Comments on: Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Forgery – Part 2 http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/barack-obama%e2%80%99s-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery-part-2/ Fishing for gold coins in a bucket of mud Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:24:39 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Internet Banking http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/barack-obama%e2%80%99s-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery-part-2/#comment-33880 Internet Banking Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:13:59 +0000 http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=19#comment-33880 That was a different thought track. I like your finesse that you put into your writing . Please do move forward with more similar to this. That was a different thought track. I like your finesse that you put into your writing . Please do move forward with more similar to this.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Jez http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/barack-obama%e2%80%99s-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery-part-2/#comment-27429 Jez Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:19:17 +0000 http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=19#comment-27429 When you save a graphic from Photoshop for publishing on the web, the layers are not preserved. Shoots a hole in that theory, doesn't it. When you save a graphic from Photoshop for publishing on the web, the layers are not preserved.
Shoots a hole in that theory, doesn’t it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Lamarr01 http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/barack-obama%e2%80%99s-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery-part-2/#comment-27420 Lamarr01 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:11:53 +0000 http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=19#comment-27420 I played with the COLB one afternoon with a trial version of Photoshop. The basic idea of editing is there are layers. The safety check of the print stock is the background layer. The printed letters are a foreground layer. The person who edited the document typed the corrections on the background layer. It looked like she took an ink eraser and erased the old letters and typed over the top of it. This left white space in the holes in the "O" so she took the dabbing tool and tried to paint the safety check back in. At regular magnification it looks pretty good. At a higher magnification it looks like a sloppy forgery. I played with the COLB one afternoon with a trial version of Photoshop. The basic idea of editing is there are layers. The safety check of the print stock is the background layer. The printed letters are a foreground layer.

The person who edited the document typed the corrections on the background layer. It looked like she took an ink eraser and erased the old letters and typed over the top of it.

This left white space in the holes in the “O” so she took the dabbing tool and tried to paint the safety check back in. At regular magnification it looks pretty good. At a higher magnification it looks like a sloppy forgery.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3

]]>