<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama birth poll shows striking regional divide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/</link>
	<description>Fishing for gold coins in a bucket of mud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/#comment-22637</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=4162#comment-22637</guid>
		<description>TRUTH do you have something to say or are you focused on a popularity poll?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRUTH do you have something to say or are you focused on a popularity poll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH</title>
		<link>http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/#comment-22635</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=4162#comment-22635</guid>
		<description>Something sad about this idiots comment and lots of those that read it, since &quot;it&quot; appears to be making fun of birthers, you side with him and DO NOT click Dislike the comment, even though he said the &quot;N&quot; word.  That&#039;s real classy of you all.   It is a dumbass comment no matter WHO says it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something sad about this idiots comment and lots of those that read it, since &#8220;it&#8221; appears to be making fun of birthers, you side with him and DO NOT click Dislike the comment, even though he said the &#8220;N&#8221; word.  That&#8217;s real classy of you all.   It is a dumbass comment no matter WHO says it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/#comment-16706</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=4162#comment-16706</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s father was a citizen of the UK and Colonies (not Kenya) when the President was born, and that does not make him ineligible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s father was a citizen of the UK and Colonies (not Kenya) when the President was born, and that does not make him ineligible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dunstvangeet</title>
		<link>http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/#comment-16690</link>
		<dc:creator>dunstvangeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=4162#comment-16690</guid>
		<description>No, it asks if they believe he is eligible to be President of the United States, poll.

And show me where in the constitution it says that you have to have both Parents be U.S. Citizens to be a &quot;Natural Born&quot; Citizen?

Furthermore, would you say that to Americans, English Common Law would be more known than a Swiss Philosopher?  If so, then why would the framers, basing their writing on a swiss philosopher and knowing that English Common Law would be much more widely known, not define what they meant by Natural-Born Citizen?  Furthermore, if they weren&#039;t using English Common Law, then why did they insert it other places in the constitution, such as Haebus Corpus, which comes from English Common Law?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it asks if they believe he is eligible to be President of the United States, poll.</p>
<p>And show me where in the constitution it says that you have to have both Parents be U.S. Citizens to be a &#8220;Natural Born&#8221; Citizen?</p>
<p>Furthermore, would you say that to Americans, English Common Law would be more known than a Swiss Philosopher?  If so, then why would the framers, basing their writing on a swiss philosopher and knowing that English Common Law would be much more widely known, not define what they meant by Natural-Born Citizen?  Furthermore, if they weren&#8217;t using English Common Law, then why did they insert it other places in the constitution, such as Haebus Corpus, which comes from English Common Law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poll</title>
		<link>http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/07/obama-birth-poll-shows-striking-regional-divide/#comment-16686</link>
		<dc:creator>poll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/?p=4162#comment-16686</guid>
		<description>The poll is skewed slightly.  It doesn&#039;t ask if he was &quot;natural born&quot; (i.e., both parents U.S. citizens), only if he was born in the U.S.

There is reason to believe that Obama&#039;s father  was a Kenyan citizen when Obama was born, making him ineligible to be President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll is skewed slightly.  It doesn&#8217;t ask if he was &#8220;natural born&#8221; (i.e., both parents U.S. citizens), only if he was born in the U.S.</p>
<p>There is reason to believe that Obama&#8217;s father  was a Kenyan citizen when Obama was born, making him ineligible to be President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
