Main Menu

Innocent until proven guilty

Orly Taitz, traffic violator

Officer, I was using my cell phone to fight the usurper.

Orly Taitz has been charged with driving over 100 miles per hour! She has plead “not guilty”. Around here we presume someone is innocent until proven guilty.

Orly, however, has been proven guilty, or failed to appear in court on other driving violations. It appears she is a scofflaw, and I wonder why she still has a license. These are the charges where she has been proven guilty or is guilty by default in one or more cases of:

  • Failing to stop at limit line or crosswalk
  • Driving while using a wireless telephone
  • Failure to use a seat belt
  • Evading electronic toll charge
  • Failure to Appear
  • Unsafe speed for prevailing conditions
  • Failure to stop at a stop sign
  • Exceeding maximum speed of 65 miles per hour

12 Responses to Innocent until proven guilty

  1. avatar
    Estiveo November 26, 2009 at 11:27 pm #

    Mustang Orly better slow that pony down! One of her Facebook friends is trying to organize a show of support at her court date. We all know how well that worked in Federal Court, so why not fly the freak flag in Superior Court?

  2. avatar
    mommybrain November 26, 2009 at 11:47 pm #

    Orly is a *superstar* (think Molly Shannon). She can’t be bothered to drive like the rest of us peons and remember all the rules. Also, rules don’t apply to her. Also.

  3. avatar
    misha November 27, 2009 at 1:34 am #

    You betcha.

  4. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy November 27, 2009 at 7:24 am #

    I do note this similarity between her driving record and the court transcripts in Obama cases.

  5. avatar
    The Sheriff's A Ni- November 27, 2009 at 2:32 pm #

    Failure to Appear? You mean Dr. Taitz has no respect for our law or judicial systems? Say it ain’t so!

  6. avatar
    Black Lion November 27, 2009 at 9:50 pm #

    The birthers will never die….I was over at the RSOL and the new birther recycled argument is that the Fukino statement and the vital records mean that Obama’s birth records are amended….It is kind of hilarious if it wasn’t pathetic…

    This was a response to comments regarding the COLB by a birther double team…

    “Where is the raised seal in Factcheck’s image of Obama’s alleged COLB and how does one find it? The reason is obvious: there is no raised seal in Factcheck’s image of Obama’s alleged COLB, which means that the COLB the image purports to depict is not authentic and is a fake.

    “Does it matter that it was an amended birth certificate?” Joseph Maine

    Online images of Obama’s alleged COLB do not contain, as they should by law, the amendment(s) made to his vital records, which means that Obama’s “COLB” is a fake or the amendment(s) were never accepted by DoH. The implications would include:

    1 Obama has provided no evidence of US citizenship and Presidential eligibility.
    2 Forgery was commited in producing Obama’s online “COLB” and the newspaper announcements, fraud was committed in using them to solicit nearly a billion dollars in campaign donations and to get Obama elected.

    “…just a bunch of…unofficial papers (affidavits)…with no real backing as to their veracity.” Joseph Maine

    3 DoH rules in 1961 deemed affidavits could be sufficient to permit a birth filling to be accepted. DoH confirms it holds a filing on Obama from August 1961, confirms it holds a delayed filing for Obama, and confirms it holds documents concerning an amended birthdate. By law amendments must be specifically marked on COLBs and Obama’s is not so marked. Furthermore, under Hawaii law an amended COLB is not presumed to be true (prima facie) and its probity must be investigated when offered as evidence. The only way online images of Obama’s alleged COLB are not fake is if Obama’s birth filing was never officially accepted as registered by DoH (which is indicated by the item “DATE FILED” on Obama’s alleged COLB, when DoH rules showed “FILED” does not mean “ACCEPTED”). Consequently, there is no possibility that online images of Obama’s alleged COLB are authentic and, even assuming hypothetically they were, Obama’s COLB should have to be investigated before a court would admit it as evidence. Given substantial funds and effort have been devoted to keeping Obama’s COLB out of court, this cannot be simply to cover-up a birthday.

    “The problem would be that no one can prove otherwise.” Joseph Maine

    4 Obama cannot release his vital records because they don’t support his eligibility, otherwise online images depicting a fake wouldn’t be needed.

    5 If Obama were to release vital records which differ from the alleged COLB Obama placed online, then see point 2.

    “Does it matter because HE has to PROVE that he was born in the United States?” Joseph Maine

    6 Election law in various states permits challenges against presidential nominees and candidates on ineligibility, and standing is not an issue. If online images of Obama’s alleged COLB are not to be presumed true (see point 3), the neccessity for their existence means Obama will not risk exposure by seeking another term in 2012.

    7 Fukino’s July statement was a gift to “birthers”. Under Hawaii law (UIPA) Fukino is required, and will be compelled, to make public all the documents which informed her statement: if Obama could emerge from this without forfeit he wouldn’t have struggled so hard to avoid it. See points 1 and 2.

    “So, why hasn’t somebody filed this lawsuit?” Sue

    a I am not here as a spokesperson. b Hawaii law expedites UIPA legal actions. c It would be very surprising if UIPA lawsuits do not happen.”

  7. avatar
    Expelliarmus November 27, 2009 at 10:51 pm #

    You’ve inspired me to write another limerick:
    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/11/obama-conspiracy-limerick-contest/comment-page-6/#comment-28918

  8. avatar
    brygenon November 28, 2009 at 11:36 pm #

    Black Lion: The birthers will never die….

    Conspiracy theories are remarkable resilient, but this one has a time limit. The birthers long for the day when Barack Obama is proven Constitutionally ineligible to be President and has to leave the White House, and I think they get their wish on January 20, 2017.

  9. avatar
    Black Lion November 29, 2009 at 12:32 am #

    Bry, you are correct. At least in 2017 we can finally rid ourselves of these idiots…That is unless there is another person of color that happens to run and win the Presidency…

  10. avatar
    Loren November 29, 2009 at 1:08 am #

    Black Lion: I’ve been trying to find a way to contact you regarding the Birthers’ “unknown genealogist.” Shoot me an e-mail at lorencollins@yahoo.com

  11. avatar
    Patrick McKinnion November 29, 2009 at 2:14 am #

    Nope. They’ll argue then that Obama was never a “real” president and therefore everything he did as president should be ignored or repealed.

  12. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy November 29, 2009 at 8:40 am #

    That reminds one of the cranks that claim that various constitutional amendments were not really ratified.