Main Menu

Pretty please with sugar on it

Orly Taitz entered a second request for reconsideration of the decision against her in the case, Taitz v Obama. Judge Royce Lamberth said “DENIED.” This was not a one-word denial, though, but 8 pages which you may read for yourself if interested.

Indeed, the Court did not misunderstand plaintiff’s FOIA request; rather, plaintiff misunderstands the Court.

15 Responses to Pretty please with sugar on it

  1. avatar
    BatGuano December 10, 2010 at 2:51 pm #

    “In her second motion for reconsideration, plaintiff adds nothing but further allegations of
    the President’s ineligibility for office. She offers no new factual or legal argument meriting
    reconsideration under Rule 60(b)(1). ”

    nuff said.

  2. avatar
    aarrgghh December 10, 2010 at 3:02 pm #

    i’m starting to think that birfers do nothing but mindlessly regurgitate the same old arguments that have been already debunked and rebuffed again and again and again …

  3. avatar
    Slartibartfast December 10, 2010 at 3:07 pm #

    aarrgghh: i’m starting to think that birfers do nothing but mindlessly regurgitate the same old arguments that have been already debunked and rebuffed again and again and again …

    What could possibly lead you to that conclusion? πŸ˜‰

  4. avatar
    Black Lion December 10, 2010 at 3:44 pm #

    aarrgghh: i’m starting to think that birfers do nothing but mindlessly regurgitate the same old arguments that have been already debunked and rebuffed again and again and again …

    And exploit the same ignorant followers….

    From the Post and Fail interesting editors note….

    “Editor’s Note: Thank you for your generous donations to the Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III Legal Defense Fund. We have raised about $2,300, but between collect phone calls and the $200 repair to the broken door which the sheriff’s deputies caused on October 27, there is about $1,000 left.”

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/08/walter-fitzpatrick-charged-almost-5000-in-fines-and-court-costs-for-two-misdemeanor-convictions-arising-from-tainted-grand-jury/#comments

  5. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP December 10, 2010 at 3:57 pm #

    Okay, I missed this article on the inevitable denial. Nutley shot down again

  6. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP December 10, 2010 at 4:29 pm #

    Two weeks ago Kerchner. This week Taitz. Next week Lakin. It’s going to be a bad month for the buffoons

  7. avatar
    G December 10, 2010 at 5:00 pm #

    FUTTHESHUCKUP: Two weeks ago Kerchner. This week Taitz. Next week Lakin. It’s going to be a bad month for the buffoons

    Isn’t EVERY month a bad month for the birther buffoons? πŸ˜‰

  8. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP December 10, 2010 at 5:03 pm #

    lmao. Yes it is, and so has every year since 11/4/2008, G. They’re still bitter about McCane losing, and every time they lose one in court it rubs even more salt in their wounds.

    (I spell it that way for a reason).

  9. avatar
    G December 10, 2010 at 5:04 pm #

    Black Lion:
    And exploit the same ignorant followers….From the Post and Fail interesting editors note….“Editor’s Note: Thank you for your generous donations to the Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III Legal Defense Fund.We have raised about $2,300, but between collect phone calls and the $200 repair to the broken door which the sheriff’s deputies caused on October 27, there is about $1,000 left.”http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/08/walter-fitzpatrick-charged-almost-5000-in-fines-and-court-costs-for-two-misdemeanor-convictions-arising-from-tainted-grand-jury/#comments

    Good link, BL. Yes, it was hilarious! So they’ve been blowing a good chuck of the pitiful donation amount they’ve gathered over all this time on phone calls and fixing a door…LOL!

    Actually, outside of the P&E’s usual biased nonsense, there was a lot of useful info in their article from the court itself about the actual court costs and fines in this case.

    Although there was the usual hilarious anti-government rants from the whining and ignorant peanut gallery in the comments, I was surprised to see that the latter comments moved to actual fact-based info explaining why court reporters charge for transcripts.

    It was actually well worth the read to follow the link over there for once. Thanks.

  10. avatar
    G December 10, 2010 at 5:05 pm #

    Black Lion:
    And exploit the same ignorant followers….From the Post and Fail interesting editors note….“Editor’s Note: Thank you for your generous donations to the Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III Legal Defense Fund.We have raised about $2,300, but between collect phone calls and the $200 repair to the broken door which the sheriff’s deputies caused on October 27, there is about $1,000 left.”http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/08/walter-fitzpatrick-charged-almost-5000-in-fines-and-court-costs-for-two-misdemeanor-convictions-arising-from-tainted-grand-jury/#comments

    Good link, BL. Yes, it was hilarious! So they’ve been blowing a good chuck of the pitiful donation amount they’ve gathered over all this time on phone calls and fixing a door…LOL!

    Actually, outside of the P&E’s usual biased nonsense, there was a lot of useful info in their article from the court itself about the actual court costs and fines in this case.

    Although there was the usual hilarious anti-government rants from the whining and ignorant peanut gallery in the comments, I was surprised to see that the latter comments moved to actual fact-based info explaining why court reporters charge for transcripts.

    It was actually well worth the read to follow the link over there for once. Thanks.

    FUTTHESHUCKUP: lmao. Yes it is, and so has every year since 11/4/2008, G. They’re still bitter about McCane losing, and every time they lose one in court it rubs even more salt in their wounds.

    (I spell it that way for a reason).

    πŸ˜‰

  11. avatar
    Viking (Phil Cave) December 10, 2010 at 6:12 pm #

    So, LTC Lakin can expect to see the same “response.” You’ll recollect in his interview the other day Neal Puckett was pushing the financial support for Lakin post-trial.

  12. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy December 10, 2010 at 7:57 pm #

    Viking (Phil Cave): You’ll recollect in his interview the other day Neal Puckett was pushing the financial support for Lakin post-trial.

    I’m thinking “book deal.”

  13. avatar
    Daniel December 10, 2010 at 9:58 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    I’m thinking “book deal.”

    Picture book probably…. considering the target audience

  14. avatar
    misha December 10, 2010 at 11:17 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy: I’m thinking “book deal.”

    Daniel: Picture book probably

    A pop-up book. The signing will be at Toys Я Us.

  15. avatar
    SueDB December 12, 2010 at 2:03 am #

    misha: A pop-up book. The signing will be at Toys Π― Us.

    I’ll wait until the Bernstein Bears edition is out.