Main Menu

Taitz headed back to DC for protest

Orly Taitz carrying anti-Obama protest signAfter her last dismal showing in DC (two supporters), Orly Taitz is once again headed to the the Federal District [Link to Taitz web site] to picket the Supreme Court and lobby Congress, calling attention to her case, Noonan v. Bowen, scheduled for conference at the Supreme Court next Friday, February 15. Orly has high hopes for a much larger turnout, perhaps as many as 5 people this time (from Tennessee, Texas, Ohio, California and Nevada).

I would go and support you on Tuesday at 11, but I have to stay home and picket my nose.

, ,

51 Responses to Taitz headed back to DC for protest

  1. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG February 8, 2013 at 9:02 am #

    Taitz and Corsi have never been seen in the same place at the same time.
    Just sayin’.

  2. avatar
    Threefiddy February 8, 2013 at 9:25 am #

    When I think of birthers, my mind always goes back to a Bugs Bunny episode, I think it was called “Sahara Hare”.. At the end, Yosemite Sam tries to enter a fortress through a secret door.. He rips it open? Another door. And another.. The last door is connected to dynamite..
    Bugs is walking away wondering “I wonder if he is stubborn enough to open all those doors?”. BOOM. “Yep! He’s stubborn enough!”

  3. avatar
    Bob February 8, 2013 at 9:36 am #

    Oh good. It will give us time to finish reading her sign.

  4. avatar
    JPotter February 8, 2013 at 9:45 am #

    Bob:
    Oh good.It will give us time to finish reading her sign.

    She did save the last one, right? It was a classic!

    I haven’t seen it on eBay.

  5. avatar
    scott e February 8, 2013 at 9:51 am #

    i might go.

  6. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 8, 2013 at 10:00 am #

    Take some photos for us.

    scott e:
    i might go.

  7. avatar
    justlw February 8, 2013 at 10:25 am #

    scott e:
    i might go.

    Sounds familiar, somehow.

  8. avatar
    justlw February 8, 2013 at 10:26 am #

    Bob:
    Oh good.It will give us time to finish reading her sign.

    SPOILER: the last line is “…let me feenish!”

  9. avatar
    JPotter February 8, 2013 at 10:30 am #

    justlw: SPOILER: the last line is “…let me feenish!”

    Even her own sign cut her off. :|

  10. avatar
    scott e February 8, 2013 at 10:54 am #

    in the end, i think you all are going to wish you’d been nicer to her.

  11. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG February 8, 2013 at 11:12 am #

    scott e:
    i might go.

    Bring water balloons!

  12. avatar
    US Citizen February 8, 2013 at 1:11 pm #

    Andrew Vrba, PmG: Bring water balloons!

    While I’m sure you meant that in jest, hitting someone with a water balloon could be considered assault.
    I’d prefer to see about 20 people with huge Obama posters encircle her while wearing traditional Kenyan clothing.
    You know, just to irk her by playing off her own fears.

  13. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG February 8, 2013 at 1:24 pm #

    US Citizen: While I’m sure you meant that in jest, hitting someone with a water balloon could be considered assault.
    I’d prefer to see about 20 people with huge Obama posters encircle her while wearing traditional Kenyan clothing.
    You know, just to irk her by playing off her own fears.

    Aw hell yeah!

  14. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 8, 2013 at 2:01 pm #

    If you are talking about the great assizes at the end of time, the Day of the Lord and the final judgment, then I daresay that I will wish that I had been nicer to a lot of people. If, on the other hand, you are suggesting that Orly Taitz will ever be recognized as right in her opinions about Barack Obama, and that her and her tribe will every be in a position of authority over anyone, then I would say no.

    scott e: in the end, i think you all are going to wish you’d been nicer to her.

  15. avatar
    JoZeppy February 8, 2013 at 3:53 pm #

    Depending on my schedule, I may show up with my camera….

  16. avatar
    misha marinsky February 8, 2013 at 4:00 pm #

    scott e: i might go.

    Take the Red Line. It will let you off near the Mall. Take pictures, and share them with us.

  17. avatar
    misha marinsky February 8, 2013 at 4:04 pm #

    scott e: in the end, i think you all are going to wish you’d been nicer to her.

    You’re right. We should humor that meshuggener. Sorry, I’m not polite to shondes.

  18. avatar
    Darkwing February 8, 2013 at 4:14 pm #

    My office is about 3 blocks from Capitol Hill. I am going to try and show up as well.

  19. avatar
    Darkwing February 8, 2013 at 4:17 pm #

    misha marinsky: Take the Red Line. It will let you off near the Mall. Take pictures, and share them with us.

    Red Line to Union Station is about 4-5 blocks from Supreme Court building.

  20. avatar
    richCares February 8, 2013 at 4:52 pm #

    Orly is a foul mouthed witch, her nasty attacks on our President are getting old, she has to be sanctioned heavily to stop her stupidity.

  21. avatar
    scott e February 8, 2013 at 5:31 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    If you are talking about the great assizes at the end of time, the Day of the Lord and the final judgment, then I daresay that I will wish that I had been nicer to a lot of people. If, on the other hand, you are suggesting that Orly Taitz will ever be recognized as right in her opinions about Barack Obama, and that her and her tribe will every be in a position of authority over anyone, then I would say no.

    then maybe you wish you would have been nicer to a lot of people…. know what i’m saying ??

  22. avatar
    US Citizen February 8, 2013 at 5:45 pm #

    richCares:
    Orly is a foul mouthed witch, her nasty attacks on our President are getting old, she has to be sanctioned heavily to stop her stupidity.

    It’s funny that Obama has all this power to threaten or bribe judges, but can’t seem to get a foothold on the CA BAR association. ;-)

  23. avatar
    misha marinsky February 8, 2013 at 5:57 pm #

    Darkwing: Red Line to Union Station is about 4-5 blocks from Supreme Court building.

    Oops. I used to work near Farragut North, on K Street. Wrong end of the Mall.

  24. avatar
    Thomas Brown February 8, 2013 at 6:18 pm #

    US Citizen: It’s funny that Obama has all this power to threaten or bribe judges, but can’t seem to get a foothold on the CA BAR association.

    Only because he can’t locate them. If they exist.

  25. avatar
    misha marinsky February 8, 2013 at 6:35 pm #

    US Citizen: It’s funny that Obama has all this power to threaten or bribe judges, but can’t seem to get a foothold on the CA BAR association.

    California is the most liberal state. Liberals are Democrats. Democrats are communists. Obama is a communist.

    See?

  26. avatar
    US Citizen February 8, 2013 at 7:06 pm #

    misha marinsky: California is the most liberal state. Liberals are Democrats. Democrats are communists. Obama is a communist.

    See?

    Well that does explain why, me being in CA, my cat says “Mao!”

  27. avatar
    Keith February 8, 2013 at 7:23 pm #

    Threefiddy:
    When I think of birthers, my mind always goes back to a Bugs Bunny episode, I think it was called “Sahara Hare”..At the end, Yosemite Sam tries to enter a fortress through a secret door.. He rips it open?Another door.And another.. The last door is connected to dynamite..
    Bugs is walking away wondering “I wonder if he is stubborn enough to open all those doors?”. BOOM. “Yep!He’s stubborn enough!”

    See for your self.

    Bugs Bunny and Yosemite Sam in Sahara Hare

    Your scene begins at about the 6 minute mark.

  28. avatar
    scott e February 8, 2013 at 7:30 pm #

    Andrew Vrba, PmG: Bring water balloons!

    i like waterballoons

  29. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 8, 2013 at 7:38 pm #

    If you mean the Obamas, they are inactive at the Illinois Bar, but could resume practicing if they chose to (and paid the dues…).

    scott e: they both surrendered their illinois licenses

  30. avatar
    misha marinsky February 8, 2013 at 8:18 pm #

    scott e: they both surrendered their illinois licenses

    No, they put their licenses on ‘inactive,’ as I did with my NYS Optician license. I just have to pay the current fee, and start practicing again.

  31. avatar
    Rickey February 8, 2013 at 8:30 pm #

    scott e:
    in the end, i think you all are going to wish you’d been nicer to her.

    Orly calls the Obama Administration a “criminal enterprise” and we’re supposed to be nice to her? Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. She is either a grifter or she is the most incompetent attorney I have ever seen. Or she is both.

    Case in point: she keeps trumpeting her SCOTUS “hearing” next Friday. It isn’t a hearing, and she has ZERO chance or prevailing because the events she is asking SCOTUS to stay have already occurred. It’s so obvious, even a five-year old child could understand it.

  32. avatar
    G February 8, 2013 at 9:07 pm #

    And why is that?

    The woman is NOT nice to a lot of people. She constantly says awful things and sends her flying monkeys to harass anybody who disagrees with her or sees the world differently from her. She is an insane narcissistic shrew. I have no idea what her private life is like (don’t really care), but in her public crusade, she is a vile and vindictive A-hole.

    People who act like A-holes earn the invective and venom that ensues back at them.

    Likewise, people who rant on and pursue crazy and illogical things, unsupported by real world facts deserve to be treated as crazy and ridiculous people who are out of touch with reality.

    Likewise, an extremely incompetent and inept lawyer who can’t get a clue and can’t even file her frivolous and vexatious motions correctly deserves any mocking and ire for her bumbling buffoonery and her total lack of professional competence and integrity.

    scott e:
    in the end, i think you all are going to wish you’d been nicer to her.

  33. avatar
    dogsled February 8, 2013 at 9:18 pm #

    Did everyone (anyone) look at the comment on the Taitz site referring to an article from Canada Free Press (yeah I know one of the uglies) supposedly from a DHS insider about the secret Obama cyber task force and the plans in the works for decades to take over and ruin the US ecomony?

    Pretty wacky, but scary stuff if people really believe it.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52923

  34. avatar
    Dr Kenneth Noisewater February 8, 2013 at 9:29 pm #

    scott e: they both surrendered their illinois licenses

    No they put them into inactive status. This has been long debunked

  35. avatar
    Dr Kenneth Noisewater February 8, 2013 at 9:30 pm #

    scott e:
    in the end, i think you all are going to wish you’d been nicer to her.

    Trying your hand at comedy now Scott?

  36. avatar
    G February 8, 2013 at 11:58 pm #

    Not in terms of the Orly reference itself, as I recall.

    But otherwise, yes…the silly stupid CFP article was mentioned and discussed on another thread the other day… I just can’t recall which one at the moment.

    dogsled:
    Did everyone (anyone) look at the comment on the Taitz site referring to an article from Canada Free Press (yeah I know one of the uglies) supposedly from a DHS insider about the secret Obama cyber task force and the plans in the works for decades to take over and ruin the US ecomony?

    Pretty wacky, but scary stuff if people really believe it.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52923

  37. avatar
    misha marinsky February 9, 2013 at 12:51 am #

    G: She is an insane narcissistic harridan.

    FIFY

  38. avatar
    G February 9, 2013 at 1:36 am #

    Yep. That works better. Thanks!

    misha marinsky: G: She is an insane narcissistic harridan.

    FIFY

  39. avatar
    aesthetocyst February 9, 2013 at 2:06 am #

    US Citizen: I’d prefer to see about 20 people with huge Obama posters encircle her while wearing traditional Kenyan clothing.

    A suggestion:

    Music From Kenya Volume 1
    Various Kenyan Artists

    http://www.amazon.com/Music-From-Kenya-Volume-1/dp/B001BOYF6E/ref=sr_shvl_album_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360393500&sr=301-1

  40. avatar
    scott e February 9, 2013 at 8:56 am #

    misha marinsky: Take the Red Line. It will let you off near the Mall. Take pictures, and share them with us.

    thanks for the directions, i’ll google it if i get lost.

  41. avatar
    scott e February 9, 2013 at 9:14 am #

    Dr Kenneth Noisewater: No they put them into inactive status.This has been long debunked

    i guess it depends on who you talk to.

  42. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 9, 2013 at 10:21 am #

    If you talk to a birther, any rumor stays active forever. If you talk to the Illinois Bar it’s pretty clear:

    Michelle Obama holds a valid license to practice law in Illinois, has never been disciplined or the subject of a disciplinary proceeding in Illinois and is on voluntary inactive status as an Illinois lawyer. Voluntary inactive status is simply a lawyer registration category for lawyers who are not currently practicing law. Attorneys on voluntary inactive status may resume active status at any time as a matter of course.

    See also FactCheck.org:

    http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

    scott e: Dr Kenneth Noisewater: No they put them into inactive status.This has been long debunked

    i guess it depends on who you talk to.

  43. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 9, 2013 at 10:31 am #

    At least she passed the bar, You pathetic birthers just keep making the same mistakes over and over, and telling lies over and over, and you never get anywhere. You’re been stuck in denial for 4 years.

    So what’s your source that the Obama’s surrendered their licenses? You don’t have one. Some birther just went to the web site and found them inactive and then launched into a flight of fancy.

    Hell, you’re too stupid to read the topic of the current thread.

    scott e: he passed the bar the first time, she didn’t.
    there’s no point in using snopes or annenberg as a source as far as i go. it would be like wnd or american thinker to you guys.

  44. avatar
    Whatever4 February 9, 2013 at 10:49 am #

    scott e: i guess it depends on who you talk to.

    How about Eugene Volokh, Libertarian and no fan of the Obamas? http://www.volokh.com/2010/04/05/massive-problems-with-anti-obama-allegations-that-have-been-making-the-rounds-recently/

    A couple of people e-mailed me this story, which is apparently making the rounds in some conservative circles. I wanted to warn people away from this; it’s a mixture of error, unsupported rumor and speculation, linguistic gamesmanship, and innuendo suggesting some malfeasance in what is actually perfectly normal behavior. It’s wrong to fall for it and to recommend it to others. And it’s also counterproductive: it undermines your credibility for the actual substantive arguments that should be made against the Administration’s policies. (For me, it’s enough that it’s wrong; but I mention the counterproductiveness as an extra incentive.)…

    The fact that [Barack Obama] who doesn’t actually practice law, and is unlikely to practice law, voluntarily retires is hardly a sinister signal: It costs money to be a member of the bar, and if you’re not going to practice, it may make sense to retire. Nor does this somehow undermine claims that he’s a lawyer; a retired lawyer is still commonly called a lawyer — as an indication of what he has studied, and his general professional field — even if he is no longer a member of the bar. …

    [The] bar record says that [Michelle Obama] is “Voluntarily inactive.” This is even more common for lawyers who don’t need a bar card, such as many lawyers who don’t appear in court or counsel clients other than employer. Being an active status lawyer costs more money (see Rule 756) than being inactive, and it requires one to do Continuing Legal Education classes (Rule 790), unless one is in certain jobs for which the CLE requirements are waived). The difference in bar fees, for instance, is why I myself was inactive in 2001. Moreover, it’s pretty easy to switch back to active status should one need to do that (as I did in early 2002); again, in Illinois, see Rule 756. …

    Suffice it to say that it would behoove us — as human beings, as Americans, as conservatives, and as critics of various parts of President Obama’s agenda — to stay away from such erroneous or unfounded attacks. Criticize the Administration’s arguments all you wish. Criticize the qualifications of the Administration’s personnel, including the President, if you have sound criticisms. But make sure that your criticisms are indeed sound. And be skeptical of allegations that you read, whether online or elsewhere.

  45. avatar
    Northland10 February 9, 2013 at 11:47 am #

    Whatever4 quoting Eugene Volokh: And it’s also counterproductive: it undermines your credibility for the actual substantive arguments that should be made against the Administration’s policies.

    This is the argument that I would most like Birthers to here. Taitz, and those who may support her protest, feel they need to hate all of Obama and everything about him. For them, agreeing that he is eligible, or he did not commit fraud, or we was not disbarred means they have to agree with Obama’s policies. They miss that their own obsession undermines the arguments against his policies. For the Democratic Party, hard line Obama haters are the gift that keeps on giving.

    On the off-topic, bar membership issue, It should be noted that Mario Apuzzo was “administratively suspended” for a time because he had not paid into an attorney fund. This does not mean he was disciplined or disbarred but only, because he was not practicing at the time, he did not need to be active so did not pay into the fund. When he decided to jump back into the pre-election court challenges, he made himself current.

  46. avatar
    Dr Kenneth Noisewater February 9, 2013 at 11:59 am #

    scott e: he passed the bar the first time, she didn’t.
    there’s no point in using snopes or annenberg as a source as far as i go. it would be like wnd or american thinker to you guys.

    Umm no not even close. WND and American thinker publishes bad information all the time. Still waiting for you guys to point to instances where snopes and annenberg were wrong. How about you proving your stupid claims since we’ve shown you that the illinois bar says you’re wrong.

  47. avatar
    Dr Kenneth Noisewater February 9, 2013 at 12:01 pm #

    scott e: i guess it depends on who you talk to.

    Yes it does if you talk to a birther they’ll just pull anything out of their rectum and say its true then they’ll set up a debate that they’re too chicken to show up for. I however prefer reliable sources like the Illinois Bar which says you’re wrong. But hey it’s easier just to make up stuff like you do than tell the truth.

  48. avatar
    justlw February 9, 2013 at 12:19 pm #

    scott e: there’s no point in using snopes or annenberg

    You do know who Walter Annenberg was, right? Conservative zillionaire publisher, ambassador under NIxon and Reagan. Later decided to devote his life to philanthropy. Now, I know that’s a dirty word in some conservative circles, but if it makes you feel better, you can go back and bask in this bit of his newspaper’s journalistic excellence, from teh WP:

    During a press conference, an Inquirer reporter asked Shapp if he had ever been a patient in a mental hospital. Having never been in one, Shapp simply said “no”. The next day, a five-column front page Inquirer headline read, “Shapp Denies Mental Institution Stay.” Shapp and others have attributed his loss of the election to Annenberg’s newspaper.

    But anyhoo. As of 2005, the Annenberg Foundation has awarded over five thousand grants. Two of those 5,000+ grants are:

    • The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which Barack Obama headed from 1995-1999; and,

    • The Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, established in 1993, which has as one of its projects Factcheck.org .

    The only common link to these two organizations, then, is that they were started by grant money from a foundation started by a conservative philanthropist, chaired at the time by a woman who was once chief of protocol to Ronald Reagan.

    Let’s say you currently have a mortgage with Wells Fargo, and I once did as well but no longer do. Any logic that says Barack Obama or other scary libruls somehow have any influence over factcheck.org because of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge would come to the conclusion that I own your house.

    The actual problem you are having with the Mikkelsons and Factcheck is due to, as Stephen Colbert pointed out, reality having a well-known liberal bias.

  49. avatar
    G February 9, 2013 at 9:32 pm #

    Bingo!

    justlw: Let’s say you currently have a mortgage with Wells Fargo, and I once did as well but no longer do. Any logic that says Barack Obama or other scary libruls somehow have any influence over factcheck.org because of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge would come to the conclusion that I own your house.

    The actual problem you are having with the Mikkelsons and Factcheck is due to, as Stephen Colbert pointed out, reality having a well-known liberal bias.

  50. avatar
    US Citizen February 9, 2013 at 9:38 pm #

    scott e: in the end

    Define “end”

  51. avatar
    misha marinsky February 11, 2013 at 6:22 am #

    US Citizen: scott e: in the end

    Define “end”

    Buttocks