…dismissive, intimidating, belittling and assumed the role of the defense attorney…
…fully prepared, unfailingly polite and infinitely patient…
The former is the allegation of birther investigator Susan Daniels, speaking of judge David L. Fuhry in Ohio. She further alleges that the transcript of the hearing has been altered at the direction of the judge to hide his misconduct. The Obot version comes from Mary, a commenter at The Fogbow, who attended the hearing.
Normally if the judge rules against you, you’re wrong. In this case, according to Daniels, it means “the judge should be removed from the bench” and that is what Daniels is demanding in a filing before the Supreme Court of Ohio Disciplinary Council.
Daniels is raising a ruckus about the alleged doctored transcript, however the specific errors she claims hardly reflect negatively on the judge. I couldn’t find the actual transcript online.