Main Menu

Court considers reconsidering and decides not to

Yes, the latest motion to reconsider from Orly Taitz in Grinols v. Electoral College has been denied by Judge England. Taitz tried to have the President declared in default for not appearing in the case, but she bungled the service and so he’s not (yet) a party, and so has no duty to respond. Judge England explained to her in great detail how she went wrong when he denied her motion, and taking this to heart, Taitz ignored it, and asked for reconsideration.

No dice, says the Judge. Read the order:

EDCA ECF 103 2013-03-26 = Grinols v Electoral College – ORDER Denying Motion for Reconsideration by Jack Ryan

,

29 Responses to Court considers reconsidering and decides not to

  1. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG March 30, 2013 at 8:41 pm #

    A court-ordered pimp slap, from a real honest-to-God pimp would do that woman some good.

  2. avatar
    Serpico March 30, 2013 at 8:48 pm #

    The judge said ‘Unfortunately, this so-called evidence is not new’. What evidence did Taitz submit that she thought was new?

  3. avatar
    misha marinsky March 30, 2013 at 9:00 pm #

    Serpico: The judge said ‘Unfortunately, this so-called evidence is not new’. What evidence did Taitz submit that she thought was new?

    ‘This is the most important case in the whole universe, and you should do what I demand. We don’t have time. So there.’

  4. avatar
    DaveH March 30, 2013 at 9:37 pm #

    The new “evidence” she presented to the court was an affidavit from the process server stating that he tried to serve the President at the White House and that the Secret Service told him to serve the President through the US Attorney’s office.

    Perhaps, if Orly in all of her wisdom and supreme intellect, had just followed the court’s detailed explanation on how she needed to serve the President in his personal capacity, she wouldn’t have needed to include the worthless affidavit from the process server that didn’t provide any details of when he or she tried to serve the president or for what case he or she had tried to serve him for.

    Orly is and always will remain the worst attorney in the history of the world.

    Serpico:
    The judge said ‘Unfortunately, this so-called evidence is not new’. What evidence did Taitz submit that she thought was new?

  5. avatar
    aarrgghh March 30, 2013 at 10:06 pm #

    DaveH: Orly is and always will remain the worst attorney in the history of the world.

    via freeperville:

    Last of the Mohicans: I’m convinced that Orly is using the bar number of another lawyer because there is no way a real lawyer can be so inept.

    [chuckle]

  6. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG March 30, 2013 at 10:19 pm #

    aarrgghh: via freeperville:

    [chuckle]

    I guess you could say that she is to lawyering, what an Imperial Storm Trooper is to marksmanship.

  7. avatar
    alg March 31, 2013 at 10:37 am #

    Hmmmmm….it looks like Orly is now soon to give up lawyering and will instead go directly to the “people” by prevailing upon them to “recall of officials who refuse to take action and are complicit in the cover up of Obama’s forged IDs and a stolen SSN.” She suggests they “start with a low ranking official, where we need less signatures for recall.”

    I feel sorry for the dogcatchers in Rancho Santa Margarita who may find themselves at the wrong end of a recall campaign, but with their complicity in this dog gone cover up do they deserve any less?

  8. avatar
    Bob March 31, 2013 at 11:19 am #

    Orly’s post threatening recalls will be the pinnacle of her entire recall effort.

  9. avatar
    Andrew Morris March 31, 2013 at 11:26 am #

    I assume that it’s a disbarrment offence for an attorney to initiate a recall against a judge who ruled against her.

  10. avatar
    Paul Pieniezny March 31, 2013 at 12:35 pm #

    Andrew Morris:
    I assume that it’s a disbarrment offence for an attorney to initiate a recall against a judge who ruled against her.

    Yes, right. And THAT also means the California Bar is not going to do anything about it.

  11. avatar
    Rickey March 31, 2013 at 9:01 pm #

    Bob:
    Orly’s post threatening recalls will be the pinnacle of her entire recall effort.

    Only 19 states (plus D.C.) allow recall petitions. Orly couldn’t get a dogcatcher recalled.

    http://www.ncsl.org/legislatures-elections/elections/recall-of-state-officials.aspx

  12. avatar
    justlw March 31, 2013 at 9:43 pm #

    alg: She suggests they “start with a low ranking official, where we need less signatures for recall.”

    I see. Sort of a Suzuki Method of recalls.

  13. avatar
    justlw March 31, 2013 at 9:47 pm #

    Andrew Morris:
    I assume that it’s a disbarrment offence for an attorney to initiate a recall against a judge who ruled against her.

    I think many of us remain stumped, after the last four years of Orly, as to what’s left for a disbarment offense to actually be. Perhaps if she started bringing in live skunks and throwing them at the judge.

  14. avatar
    elmo April 1, 2013 at 9:18 am #

    Andrew Morris:
    I assume that it’s a disbarrment offence for an attorney to initiate a recall against a judge who ruled against her.

    Naw, it’s just more proof of Orly’s ignorance. Federal judges aren’t subject to recall; they can be removed from office only by the impeachment process…just like you know who.

  15. avatar
    Northland10 April 1, 2013 at 11:07 am #

    justlw: I see.Sort of a Suzuki Method of recalls.

    She’ll never get past “Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star.”

  16. avatar
    J.D. Sue April 2, 2013 at 4:20 am #

    I see that Orly has filed a notice of appeal, claiming that Judge England abused his discretion in denying her motion to reconsider entering a default judgment against Obama. Her notice reminds Judge England that this makes him complicit in a cover up and treason, and requests that he stay the motions to dismiss. Of course her motion to stay pending appeal is “ex parte expedited”. http://www.scribd.com/doc/133502684/Grinols-Notice-of-Appeal-and-Ex-Parte-Expedited-Motion0001

    At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I again mention that it is axiomatic that default judgments are not favored in the law. And that little axiom pertains to cases where there has been service of process, and where there has been no subsequent filing of an amended complaint…

  17. avatar
    The Magic M April 2, 2013 at 12:22 pm #

    alg: it looks like Orly is now soon to give up lawyering and will instead go directly to the “people” by prevailing upon them to “recall of officials who refuse to take action and are complicit in the cover up of Obama’s forged IDs and a stolen SSN.” She suggests they “start with a low ranking official, where we need less signatures for recall.”

    She does this every time she loses a couple cases in a row. Nothing new, and of course nothing ever materializes since birtherism has nowhere near the required number of people to succeed with such an attempt.
    I just wonder when Orly will suggest all her followers move to the same state in the hope that at least this will generate enough local pressure. She did it before when she needed three people to contest an election.

  18. avatar
    gatsby April 2, 2013 at 12:35 pm #

    I just wonder when Orly will suggest all her followers move to the same state in the hope that at least this will generate enough local pressure. She did it before when she needed three people to contest an election.

    Whatever happened to her big plan to arrest President Obama in Connecticut? That would have resulted in nothing less than checkmate.

  19. avatar
    donna April 5, 2013 at 1:20 pm #

    taitz: Very important! Federal Judge Morrison C. England scheduled a new hearing for April 22, 10 Am, Courtroom 7. I am asking my supporters to come to the hearing. It will mean a lot to me.

  20. avatar
    Rickey April 5, 2013 at 1:37 pm #

    donna:
    taitz: Very important! Federal Judge Morrison C. England scheduled a new hearing for April 22, 10 Am, Courtroom 7. I am asking my supporters to come to the hearing. It will mean a lot to me.

    And she has been told that there will be no witnesses and no zibits She’ll have 30 minutes to speak and Judge England has made it clear that he is going to control the hearing.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/134126048/GRINOLS-ECF-117-OrDER-Continuing-M2D-Hearing-to-April-22-and-Continuing-Motio

  21. avatar
    donna April 5, 2013 at 1:51 pm #

    Rickey: And she has been told that there will be no witnesses and no zibits She’ll have 30 minutes to speak and Judge England has made it clear that he is going to control the hearing.

    thanks: caramel corn ordered in bulk

  22. avatar
    Dr Kenneth Noisewater April 5, 2013 at 2:22 pm #

    gatsby: Whatever happened to her big plan to arrest President Obama in Connecticut? That would have resulted in nothing less than checkmate.

    I really wish she’d file a suit in CT that would be fun to see in action.

  23. avatar
    Rickey April 5, 2013 at 2:54 pm #

    donna:
    Rickey: And she has been told that there will be no witnesses and no zibits She’ll have 30 minutes to speak and Judge England has made it clear that he is going to control the hearing.

    thanks: caramel corn ordered in bulk

    If I lived anywhere near Sacramento I would take the day off to be there. I’m sure that The Fogbow will have boots on the ground, though.

  24. avatar
    donna April 5, 2013 at 2:57 pm #

    Dr Kenneth Noisewater:

    are you surprised that there was so little notice from her that she was going to be in CT at their SS office?

    3/26/2013 taitz: Today I travelled to the Social security office in Stamford, CT where the SSN fraudulently used by Obama, was issued. I recorded all the information received from them and they forwarded to Washington DC all the evidence of fraud provided by me

    why didn’t she inform the media?

    re the 4/22 hearing, england has limited arguments to 30 minutes, no exhibits or witnesses and arguments are limited to 1. mootness, 2. standing, 3. political question doctrine, 4. speech and debate clause, 5 service of process.

    that’s 6 minutes per issue including time for england to interject – i can picture taitz’s hair on fire

  25. avatar
    RetiredLawyer April 5, 2013 at 3:39 pm #

    Is this 30 minutes per side, or 30 minutes total? If it is 30 minutes total, and as the defendants as moving parties go first, Orly is going to have a whopping 15 minutes to cover all five topics. It’s going to be such fun!

    donna: re the 4/22 hearing, england has limited arguments to 30 minutes, no exhibits or witnesses and arguments are limited to 1. mootness, 2. standing, 3. political question doctrine, 4. speech and debate clause, 5 service of process.

    that’s 6 minutes per issue including time for england to interject – i can picture taitz’s hair on fire

  26. avatar
    donna April 5, 2013 at 3:47 pm #

    RetiredLawyer:

    “each side” has a maximum of 30 minutes

  27. avatar
    J.D. Sue April 5, 2013 at 4:39 pm #

    Rickey:
    donna:
    Rickey: And she has been told that there will be no witnesses and no zibits She’ll have 30 minutes to speak and Judge England has made it clear that he is going to control the hearing.
    thanks: caramel corn ordered in bulk
    If I lived anywhere near Sacramento I would take the day off to be there. I’m sure that The Fogbow will have boots on the ground, though.

    —-
    I wish I could be there to hear/see it! Well, at least the federal court will have a transcript, although we’ll miss the body language…

  28. avatar
    Dr Kenneth Noisewater April 5, 2013 at 4:57 pm #

    donna: Dr Kenneth Noisewater:are you surprised that there was so little notice from her that she was going to be in CT at their SS office? 3/26/2013 taitz: Today I travelled to the Social security office in Stamford, CT where the SSN fraudulently used by Obama, was issued. I recorded all the information received from them and they forwarded to Washington DC all the evidence of fraud provided by mewhy didn’t she inform the media?re the 4/22 hearing, england has limited arguments to 30 minutes, no exhibits or witnesses and arguments are limited to 1. mootness, 2. standing, 3. political question doctrine, 4. speech and debate clause, 5 service of process.that’s 6 minutes per issue including time for england to interject – i can picture taitz’s hair on fire

    Not at all. I learned that she was in town only after Tracy Fair posted about it on amazon. The SS office is just down the street and it would have been fun to see the screeching in action and me telling her to get lost as a civlian.

  29. avatar
    donna April 5, 2013 at 5:29 pm #

    Dr Kenneth Noisewater:

    i too live close by in weschester and would have attended and learned about her visit from her website after the fact –

    we could have told her to “get lost” together – what are the chances she wasn’t there at all? there were no media accounts in the local ct news