Judd v. Obama Appellant brief filed

Something actually happened to break the birther doldrums. Orly Taitz has filed the Appellant’s Opening Brief in the case of Judd et al. v. Obama et al. Lots of familiar names in the et al. part, including Alvin Onaka, and Debra Bowen1. Orly Taitz is not only the attorney but also an appellant.

This is the crazy case that Orly Taitz tried to remove from state to federal court, even though plaintiffs can’t do that. It was a real mess and judge David Carter threw it out. The Appellants want the case reinstated and they want a different judge.

Taitz sums up her objections by saying:

The status of the U.S. Judiciary today is reminiscent of the judiciary in the Communist Soviet Union or NAZI Germany. Germany in 1932-1945 had a Constitution, parliament, codes, thousands of highly educated judges, however not one single judge in Germany found actions of Adolf Hitler to be in any way illegal or unconstitutional. In years of Communist dictatorship in the Soviet Union and Communist China not one single judge found actions of Stalin or Mao to be illegal or unconstitutional. Actions of the U.S. Judiciary during the Obama regime are very similar: judges have in front of them all the evidence of the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal who does not have one single valid ID, using crude forgeries and the judges are simply using one bogus excuse after another to cover up flagrant elections fraud and forgery. Actions by judges are so egregious that they amount to criminal complicity and possibly treason.

Treason? 🙄

Taitz, always trendy, threw in the NSA surveillance/Prism story. Taitz speculates that judges won’t touch Obama because he’s blackmailing them with information gained in the NSA data gathering.

In days gone by, I would have spent more time on this filing, but I really don’t care any more. Read it if you want; it’s crap.


1For a complete list of the defendants in the original case, see the note at the end of my article: “Orly’s California case moving.”

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Lawsuits, Orly Taitz and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

41 Responses to Judd v. Obama Appellant brief filed

  1. nbc says:

    Orly made another hilarious mistake

    It starts off with a reference to 28 USC 1295 Jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Remember, she is filing with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Let me explain, the US Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit

    […] is a United States court of appeals headquartered in Washington, D.C.. The court was created by Congress with passage of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, which merged the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals and the appellate division of the United States Court of Claims, making the judges of the former courts into circuit judges.[1][2]

    The correct reference is of course 28 USC  1291 Final decisions of district courts. How could a lawyer make such a fundamental error?… Well, remember, this is Orly..

  2. Mike Dunford says:

    1291 is a better choice than the one Orly picked, but I think it’s possible that there’s no 1291 jurisdiction in this case.

  3. Lupin says:

    Why are so many lunatics so prompt to use the word “treason”? It seems to indicate a deeply paranoid mind set.

  4. The Magic M says:

    Lupin: Why are so many lunatics so prompt to use the word “treason”?

    Because treason is one of the few crimes that can be punished by death, and killing everyone who dares disagree with them is one of their favourite fantasies.

  5. Lani says:

    They lurves themselves some treason. They fantasize about it on their preferred sites, going into details about President Obama dying during the lynching. But they are NOT racists! So they declare…. as Orly and others welcome their posts.

  6. Lupin says:

    But doesn’t “treason” implies helping an “enemy”? Who is Obama helping? China? If so the entire board of Apple should be shipped to Gitmo, no?

  7. The Plaintiffs said what they wanted. What I want is for Orly Taitz to be declared a vexatious litigant.

  8. John Reilly says:

    Dr. Taitz believes that accussing people of treason will persade them to support her to avoid being held criminally responsible. She makes the treason allegation in virtually every paper. Even though there is no evidence that anyone ever responded to her threats and joined her cause.

    Was it Dr. Freud who said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?

  9. Andrew Morris says:

    But she couldn’t find any cases on Westlaw of cases being dismissed for defective filing. So she doesn’t know what Westlaw is or what it does. With the online law degree, you can easily get someone else to sit the exams. But who did she **** to pass the CA Bar?

  10. Majority Will says:

    John Reilly:
    Dr. Taitz believes that accussing people of treason will persade them to support her to avoid being held criminally responsible.She makes the treason allegation in virtually every paper.Even though there is no evidence that anyone ever responded to her threats and joined her cause.

    Was it Dr. Freud who said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?

    “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
    – widely credited to Albert Einstein

  11. alg says:

    “In days gone by, I would have spent more time on this filing, but I really don’t care any more.”

    Yes, it has become tedious, hasn’t it?

  12. Yoda says:

    I have reached my Taitz saturation point. I can’t read her stuff beyond the first few lines.

  13. Bob says:

    On the Color Coded Crazy Alert Chart Orly has reached LameCherry red.

  14. Butterfly Bilderberg says:

    The appellate brief is supposed to argue why the District Court’s dismissal was erroneous as a matter of law. That requires the appellant(s) to argue, well, law.

    Not one word in this brief addresses the rationale behind Judge Carter’s dismissal nor why it was improper to dismiss a case over which he had no jurisdiction. The appellees can waive response and they will nevertheless prevail.

    A waste of paper.

  15. Yoda says:

    Butterfly Bilderberg:
    The appellate brief is supposed to argue why the District Court’s dismissal was erroneous as a matter of law.That requires the appellant(s) to argue, well, law.

    Not one word in this brief addresses the rationale behind Judge Carter’s dismissal nor why it was improper to dismiss a case over which he had no jurisdiction.The appellees can waive response and they will nevertheless prevail.

    A waste of paper.

    I would love to see that and her lose without a response being filed. Now that would be funny. I can just imagine her screeches now.

  16. Andrew Morris says:

    However, we mustn’t forget that she’s now a “Civil Rights Attorney”, battling away like Thurgood Marshall to ensure that there won’t be a black President in the White House. And that like NAZI GERMANY, it’s the death penalty for officials who disagree with her. The longer this goes on, the more disgusting she becomes. Interesting that now she can’t even get 150 signatures on her latest petition. I suspect her birther traffic has dwindled to zero, and most of the visitors to her site are there for it’s train wreck appeal.

  17. Yoda says:

    Andrew Morris:
    However, we mustn’t forget that she’s now a “Civil Rights Attorney”, battling away like Thurgood Marshall to ensure that there won’t be a black President in the White House. And that like NAZI GERMANY, it’s the death penalty for officials who disagree with her. The longer this goes on, the more disgusting she becomes. Interesting that now she can’t even get 150 signatures on her latest petition. I suspect her birther traffic has dwindled to zero, and most of the visitors to her site are there for it’s train wreck appeal.

    And a political decedent.

  18. The Magic M says:

    Andrew Morris: Interesting that now she can’t even get 150 signatures on her latest petition. I suspect her birther traffic has dwindled to zero,

    Her previous petition was on a site that did not require registration. This one is on the WH site and requires registration.
    So you can imagine how her flying monkeys scrambled to create the 20,000 signatures she got on her previous petition. It’s not so easy on this one.

  19. PaulG says:

    You know with her, it’s never et al. so much as inter alia

  20. nbc says:

    Mike Dunford: 1291 is a better choice than the one Orly picked, but I think it’s possible that there’s no 1291 jurisdiction in this case.

    Is that your ‘final decision’ 🙂

  21. Crustacean says:

    Apparently HGTV is in some hot water for their suggestion to use the ol’ Stars & Stripes as a table cloth for Independence Day parties.

    TREASON!! (right, Orly?)

  22. nbc says:

    Crustacean: Apparently HGTV is in some hot water for their suggestion to use the ol’ Stars & Stripes as a table cloth for Independence Day parties.

    Well, the advice is

    “The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning”

    There you go…

  23. Joey says:

    Is the plaintiff in this lawsuit Naomi Judd, Wynonna Judd, or Ashley Judd? Enquiring minds want to know

  24. perspicacity says:

    Quote of the Day

    The closest thing I can come up with for such irrational optimism is gambling, only in the case of the lottery, somebody wins. The birthers will never win.

    –Dr. Conspiracy

    Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

  25. US Citizen says:

    Joey:
    Is the plaintiff in this lawsuit Naomi Judd, Wynonna Judd, or Ashley Judd? Enquiring minds want to know

    Hey Judd, don’t make it bad.
    Take a sad song and make it better.
    Remember to let her under your skin,
    Then you’ll begin to make it
    Better better better better better better, oh.

  26. US Citizen says:

    Ok, how about something more practical?
    A birther calendar.
    Every day is circled and at top it says “Any Day Now!”

  27. nbc says:

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

    ROTFL… So a publicist uses a statement and therefore it is a fact?… Hilarious… That’s really the best they have? Oh wait… And this hearsay is relevant how? Oh the follies of the birthers never cease to amaze me.

  28. Benji Franklin says:

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

    Oh! What a magnificent victory for all Birthers everywhere! Better than winning a single court case! Better than getting rid of Obama! Better than keeping him from being reelected! How sweet this is for you Birthers!

    Or would Birthers really have gotten more satisfaction from gathering around Lady Liberty Taitz, and watching her extract any one of Zullo’s healthy teeth?

  29. Northland10 says:

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

    Congratulations. Here’s your prize.

    http://youtu.be/f4RzFiF3z78

  30. nbc says:

    Taitz, always trendy, threw in the NSA surveillance/Prism story.

    Of course, she needs fantasy to explain how she has managed so many legal failures. Of course, she must have been bugged, her mind does not allow for a more logical and reasonable explanation.

    Poor Orly, unable to take any responsibility for her countless failures.

  31. Majority Will says:

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

    That’s really stupid.

  32. The essence of birtherism: relying on someone who doesn’t know anything.

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

  33. Dave B. says:

    So how does that “birther victory” thing work, exactly?

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

  34. aarrgghh says:

    Dave B.: So how does that “birther victory” thing work, exactly?

    just like this.

  35. Northland10 says:

    Dave B.: So how does that “birther victory” thing work, exactly?

    If I were a “birther” then I can claim the Blackhawks won last night. I could claim the Cubs are dominating World Series champions. Only the kool-aid drinkers who deny this truth can deny this.

    That was fun.

    Go Hawks!!!

  36. Rickey says:

    perspicacity:

    Actually, the birthers have already won. When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

    Yet Obama is still Presidenting while Black.

  37. The Magic M says:

    perspicacity: Actually, the birthers have already won.

    And the rapture really did happen, and so did the collapse of the government announced by Glenn Beck. The only thing these three things have in common is that somehow nobody noticed and everybody just carried on as before.

    If a bowl of rice falls down in China, does the Earth’s orbit really change?

  38. Northland10 says:

    The Magic M: And the rapture really did happen, and so did the collapse of the government announced by Glenn Beck. The only thing these three things have in common is that somehow nobody noticed and everybody just carried on as before.

    And are wheels came off, just as Hemie said.

  39. Thomas Brown says:

    perspicacity: When o’s publicist package came to light, they were all vindicated, and those who called them crazy were exposed as ignorant toadies.

    That piece of non-evidence “vindicated” Birthers? Sure… the way a rapist walks away saying “I bet she really enjoyed that!”

  40. Rickey says:

    The Magic M: And the rapture really did happen, and so did the collapse of the government announced by Glenn Beck. The only thing these three things have in common is that somehow nobody noticed and everybody just carried on as before.

    The birthers who are still active seem to be intent upon discrediting the moral of the story of the boy who cried “wolf.”

  41. Plantmaster says:

    alg

    “In days gone by, I would have spent more time on this filing, but I really don’t care any more.”

    Yes, it has become tedious, hasn’t it?
    *************

    From “Much Ado About Nothing” (an apt description of Birtherism…)

    Dogberry: Were I as tedious as a king, I could find it in my heart to bestow it all on Your Worship.

    Leonato: All thy tediousness on me?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.