Main Menu

Sibley/Vogt revive old crock about Fuddy taking a bribe

Birther memes are immortal

imageButterdezillion, the fervent viewer of Hawaii state documents, went off on a tizzy last Spring over Loretta Fuddy’s state ethics financial disclosure forms, questioning a $50,000 amount of money that mysteriously appeared (according to her). Actually, the money just moved from one place on the balance sheet into another. There was a thread at the Free Republic, and I had a wonderfully alliterative article: “Fault found with Fuddy’s financial facts–fraud?” debunking the whole nonsense (thanks to the expert analysis of Butterfly Bilderberg).

An article of the Birther Creed is the immortality of the meme, and that well-debunked misreading of financial statements has come back under the auspices of Sibley/Vogt and their formerly sealed affidavit in the Washington State case, In re: Douglas Vogt (aka Vogt v. Obama) now before the Supreme Court (for a few more days). Sibley is reported to have disclosed to talk radio host Erik Rush, and that up and coming smear merchant Nathan Bickel gives us the transcript of what Sibley said.

Sibley gives further evidence that “forensic” does not mean what birthers think it does, saying:

additionally there’s some forensic accounting investigation of Loretta Fuddy’s personal finances which resulted in a disclosure that she received a substantial – I believe she received a $50,000.00 dollars in cash shortly after she verified the Obama’s birth certificate as being legitimate.

Birther forensic accounting is no better than their forensic document analysis, i.e., abysmally inept.

Print Friendly

, , , , , ,

11 Responses to Sibley/Vogt revive old crock about Fuddy taking a bribe

  1. avatar
    Northland10 May 8, 2014 at 10:50 pm #

    Birther memes are immortal

    After choir rehearsal, organ and piano practice, and the rest of the long day, I keep reading the opening as “Birther memes are immoral”. Either way makes perfect sense.

    Birthers will realize that forensic anything requires certification and experience, any… day… now.

  2. avatar
    Benji Franklin May 8, 2014 at 11:19 pm #

    Northland10: Birthers will realize that forensic anything requires certification and experience

    Except, experience demonstrates that forensic Birthering requires only a willingness to make up and/or repeat unsubstantiated lies.

  3. avatar
    alg May 9, 2014 at 12:22 am #

    It doesn’t matter how many times a birther turd is flushed away, it will always reappear once againin the toilet bowl.

  4. avatar
    Benji Franklin May 9, 2014 at 1:39 am #

    alg: It doesn’t matter how many times a birther turd is flushed away, it will always reappear once againin the toilet bowl.

    So if one is a Birther turd, one CAN go home again? More likely, each expungement carries the legend, “Return To Cinder”

  5. avatar
    Lupin May 9, 2014 at 1:49 am #

    Can you libel a dead person (in the US)?

    Under French Law, if someone wrote something like that about my late father being corrupt, I would take a dim view of it and I’m sure our Courts would too.

  6. avatar
    The Magic M May 9, 2014 at 5:22 am #

    alg: It doesn’t matter how many times a birther turd is flushed away, it will always reappear once againin the toilet bowl.

    That’s because it’s a closed circuit (aka the Circular Crap Process, CCP).

    Lupin: Can you libel a dead person (in the US)?

    My guess would be no, because birthers seem to be very careful about whom they accuse of what (which is why they never mention any names when claiming “a member of Congress told me…” – they don’t want to be sued).

    Lupin: Under French Law, if someone wrote something like that about my late father being corrupt, I would take a dim view of it and I’m sure our Courts would too.

    §189 of the German Criminal Code would make that punishable by up to 2 years in prison, too.

  7. avatar
    RanTalbott May 9, 2014 at 2:53 pm #

    “My guess would be no, because birthers seem to be very careful about whom they accuse of what”
    I think the German government must be filtering violations of §189 from your feed, because here in the U.S. we see daily accusations of “treason”, “forgery”, “complicity in fraud (and/or usurpation)”, and “murder” against pretty much everyone holding elective or appointed office in D.C. Plus the entire federal judiciary and the whole State of Hawaii.

  8. avatar
    Georgetown JD May 9, 2014 at 7:10 pm #

    “Forensic accounting”, huh? Well I’d certainly like to read the “report” that the forensic accountant wrote. As Wikipedia notes, “forensic” means “suitable for use in a court of law” and, as a lawyer whose specialty is financial and tax accounting issues, that’s how I get my giggles. I love, love, love to read forensic accounting reports.

    No doubt they engaged an accountant certified in financial forensics by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Someone with access to information about ALL of the assets, debt, income and losses of the late Dr. Fuddy. Someone who is experienced in income reconstruction through bank records and transfer transactions.

    Oh wait. It’s filed under seal with Doug’s character-smearing affidavit. Too bad.

    Happy Mother’s Day to all the moms and grandmoms out there!

  9. avatar
    Hermitian May 10, 2014 at 9:27 am #

    Mr. C

    “Birther forensic accounting is no better than their forensic document analysis, i.e., abysmally inept.”

    The Obots are forever deriding the skill levels of all
    Birther forensic examiners. Oddly, the Obots never get around to providing the credentials of any Obot forensic examiner.

    [Yes, we did. Doc.]

  10. avatar
    Rickey May 10, 2014 at 11:17 pm #

    Benji Franklin: Except, experience demonstrates that forensic Birthering requires only a willingness to make up and/or repeat unsubstantiated lies.

    If Loretta Fuddy had to be bribed, it stands to reason that Alvina Onaka had to be bribed as well, since he is the person who certified the LFBC. Why is Onaka still alive? The birthers talk as if Fuddy was the only official of Hawaii who was involved in releasing the LFBC.

  11. avatar
    RanTalbott May 10, 2014 at 11:29 pm #

    Rickey: Why is Onaka still alive?

    Obviously because Onaka hadn’t been overheard by the NSA when he secretly told Corporal Zullo that he was willing to testify at the Universe-Shattering Presser.

    Just ask him whether he did: when he denies that he did any such thing, it will be Irrefutable Proof™ that the story is true.

    At least, it will be in Birtherstan…

333333 44444
5555555
6666666