Main Menu

Taitz radio

imageOrly Taitz says she will be be doing an interview for Laurie Roth’s radio show this afternoon at 5 PM Pacific time (I think that’s UTC – 7 in the Summer). I don’t know when it will be broadcast. Check Roths’ web page for listening links.

You may remember that Roth was one of the Plaintiffs in the Taitz v. Democrat Party of Mississippi lawsuit. She wrote the court asking to be excused from the case due to her injuries from a motorcycle accident (that happened in 2005 :shock: ).

Print Friendly

10 Responses to Taitz radio

  1. avatar
    Thinker June 23, 2014 at 7:33 pm #

    Since Judge Wingate has been so busy investigating the Virgil Byrd incident that didn’t happen, he has never ruled on the motions of the wingnuts who joined Taitz’s failtrain in this lawsuit. I hope that the lawyers for the Mississippi Democratic Party keep these losers in mind when they make their motions for sanctions. The other plaintiffs are not as culpable as Taitz in causing the defendants to waste time and money defending this BS, but they’re not innocent, either. Plus, it might get the other defendants to go after Taitz for dragging them into this, and I’m huge fan of the internecine birfer wars.

    ETA: Perhaps Taitz’s interview is scheduled for 5 pm PT, but I don’t think the broadcast is. According to the web site, Roth’s show runs from 10:00 pm – 1:00 am ET and 7:00 – 10:00 PM PT. I doubt Taitz’s interview is going to be aired at 5 pm PT.
    http://therothshow.com/

  2. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy June 23, 2014 at 8:01 pm #

    Thanks for mentioning that.

    Thinker: ETA: Perhaps Taitz’s interview is scheduled for 5 pm PT, but I don’t think the broadcast is. According to the web site, Roth’s show runs from 10:00 pm – 1:00 am ET and 7:00 – 10:00 PM PT. I doubt Taitz’s interview is going to be aired at 5 pm PT.

  3. avatar
    Crustacean June 23, 2014 at 8:10 pm #

    Yikes! One delusional whacko being interviewed by another.

    I wonder if Roth’s motorcycle accident can be used to excuse her from other things, like this stupidity:

    “Obama has employed many current members of the Muslim Brotherhood in his White House staff and in positions of influence. Hillary Clinton’s own assistant, Huma Abedin, is a Muslim Brotherhood member who has parents who have been high up in leadership. Can anyone say ‘national security breach?’ Apparently not.” (October, 2012)

    Remember, Abedin had to be placed under police protection due to threats made against her. Roth can go to Hell – and take Taitz with her – as far as I’m concerned.

  4. avatar
    Bonsall Obot June 23, 2014 at 8:30 pm #

    I wonder if she has there in her hand a list of 205 (State Department employees) that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party Muslim Brotherhood and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department.

    Because that’s never happened before.

  5. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy June 23, 2014 at 10:11 pm #

    While off topic for this blog, anti-Muslim bigotry seems to be on the rise, and any number of false facts about Muslims and the US Government are in circulation on the Internet.

  6. avatar
    Rickey June 24, 2014 at 2:52 am #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    While off topic for this blog, anti-Muslim bigotry seems to be on the rise, and any number of false facts about Muslims and the US Government are in circulation on the Internet.

    Jody Hice, a Republican candidate for a U.S. House seat from Georgia, does not believe that Islam is truly a religion and doesn’t think it should be protected under the First Amendment.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/georia-gop-candidate-anti-islam

  7. avatar
    The Magic M (not logged in) June 24, 2014 at 4:05 am #

    Rickey: Jody Hice, a Republican candidate for a U.S. House seat from Georgia, does not believe that Islam is truly a religion and doesn’t think it should be protected under the First Amendment.

    I hate to bring in Godwin’s Law so quickly, but that’s a bit like the Nazis deciding that Jews weren’t “citizens of the Reich” (“Reichsbürger”), only “citizens of the state” (“Staatsbürger”) and therefore had less rights than others.

    Real life Animal Farm – some are more equal than others. Next he’ll claim pro-liberalism isn’t really speech and therefore doesn’t enjoy free speech rights.

  8. avatar
    ArthurWankspittle June 24, 2014 at 4:25 am #

    Bonsall Obot:
    I wonder if she has there in her hand a list of 205 (State Department employees) that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party Muslim Brotherhood and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department.

    Because that’s never happened before.

    205? Not 57?

  9. avatar
    Bonsall Obot June 24, 2014 at 4:55 am #

    ArthurWankspittle:

    205? Not 57?

    Oddly enough, a variety of numbers were stated.

  10. avatar
    Keith June 24, 2014 at 7:58 am #

    Bonsall Obot:
    I wonder if she has there in her hand a list of 205 (State Department employees) that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party Muslim Brotherhood and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department.

    Because that’s never happened before.

    Well McCarthy IS Majority Leader in the House. Not as ‘prestigious’ as the Senate though.

333333 44444
5555555
6666666