Archive | Editorial

The ultimate insult

I don’t dabble in collecting coins and I totally missed the release of the Chester A. Arthur $1 coin last January 5. There has to be a wonderful irony to our first post-founding-generation US President born to a British subject being commemorated on US coinage the same year that our second US President born to a British subject father is running for re-election. You can see the story below and click the image to go to the US Mint web site (where you can learn about other coins in the Presidential $1 Series).

image

 

The only reason I found this was that I was researching what forms the second part of the one-two punch from the government, this time what has to be  the ultimate insult to the birthers. The story flashed by in one of those below screen scrolling things on CNN (that I have running in a window on the computer monitor) and I turned up the volume in time to catch the story. It appears that there has been a leak of information from the Treasury about a coin that wasn’t supposed to be announced until Summer.

Image of $2 coin showing Australian aboriginee and USACNN reports that the US Mint has already been minting and stockpiling the new $2 coin that features the White House on the front and the face of a “generic” African-featured male on the back. The design is by Randall E. Pershall, who has designed several other US coins as well as coins for Australia and New Zealand.  A Congressional task force that began work in 2005 recommended the coin as the best way to commemorate the contribution of Africans slave labor in the construction of the federal city. According to the Associated Press:

Slaves were the largest labor pool when Congress in 1790 decided to create a new national capital along the Potomac surrounded by the two slave-owning states of Maryland and Virginia.

Over the next decade, local farmers rented out their slaves for an average of $55 a year to help build the Capitol, the White House, the Treasury Department and the streets laid out by city planner Pierre L’Enfant.

CNN says the Treasury will issue an NPRM for a new regulation to require mandatory acceptance of the $2 in all vending machines by June 30, 2016, so I guess this is not a one-time souvenir. A press conference is scheduled for Monday morning at 10 AM at the Treasury.

I flipped over to Fox news and they were almost apoplectic in their denunciation of what they called a “transparent pandering to shore up weakening African-American  and other minority support in the 2012 election.”  Remind me to keep all the radios off when Limbaugh comes on Monday.

Personally, I’m all for this. When I traveled to Peru they had coins that were worth enough to actually buy something. You could go down to the convenience store and get a bottle of water and a sandwich and not have to dig out your wallet. The guys down there all have leather coin purses on their belts. I was a big fan of the US $1 coin, but merchants kept looking at me funny when I tried to use them.

The birthers are going to hate it. Now every time they get change, they will be reminded of the country’s first African-American President.

I’m starting a contest for the best “nickname” for the new coin.

Learn more:

The Georgia Birther ballot challenge

As I start this editorial, I’m not quite sure what I’m going to say. The story of the Georgia ballot challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility is a fascinating, rich and multi-layered story with twists and turns and surprising connections. However, so much of that story was received in confidence that I don’t think I can write it, at least not now. What I will do is hold up the mirror and talk about how I feel and observe what I see not happening.

I’ve spent a lot of editorial energy on this site criticizing birthers and particularly their methods. I decry smears. I decry lies. I decry legal incompetence and frivolous lawsuits. But for once the Birthers have done the right thing.

The people of the State of Georgia in their wisdom have enacted legislation that allows Georgia voters to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on ballots in Georgia. The administrative lawsuit, Farrar v Obama, to be heard this month in Atlanta is an exercise by Georgia citizens of their legal rights to challenge what the Georgia Secretary of State did in approving Barack Obama for the 2012 primary ballot. Judge Malihi agreed when rejecting a motion to dismiss by Obama’s attorney Michael Jablonski.

Don’t misunderstand. I think Birther claims are the worst kind of nonsense. There are no legitimate grounds under which Barack Obama can be excluded from the presidential ballot, but that is beside the point. Birthers believe otherwise, and in Georgia they have the legal right to have those claims examined in court. So I applaud the birthers for following the law and seeking to have their grievances examined in an appropriate venue. What I fail to see is any respected anti-birther raising an objection to the Georgia process. Both sides have come together to agree on the rules of the contest.

That’s for now. There are a number of factors that will certainly upset the idyllic scene. The first factor is Orly Taitz, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys. Keep in mind that the success the Birthers have had in Georgia is not due to Orly Taitz. She didn’t guide them through the process, and she didn’t write the motion that prevailed and prevented dismissal. We can expect Orly to engage in the same deplorable legal demeanor that we’ve seen before. The second factor is that there will be a winner and there will be a loser, and this has to happen advance of the March 6 Georgia Primary. The birthers, specifically, will lose. Once that happens, they will crucify Judge Malihi and deny the validity of the process that they themselves selected. It’s their nature.

Birther poll revisited

I first wrote about this WorldNetDaily poll two years ago. WND asked its readers to respond to the following question:

Under what circumstances will the truth about Obama’s birth finally be revealed?

It turns out that only 1% (22 out of 3382) anticipated this eventual outcome: “He finally steps up to the plate, and releases his long-form, hospital birth certificate.” President Obama did indeed release his long-form, hospital birth certificate in April of last year. Only 1% gave a second correct answer: “Get over it. He’s already disclosed the truth that he was born in Hawaii.”

As I wrote back in 2010, the most bizarre aspect of the poll is the by far most popular (43%)  answer: “The truth is already out there, that he is hiding information precluding him from being eligible for the presidency.” What they are saying is that they are convinced by evidence that they don’t have. I am reminded of a quote from the Bible: “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”1 By that definition, the birther movement is a faith based system.

Another popular response (15%) says that the new Congress will take over and issue a conclusion. So far there is no indication that the new Congress elected in 2010 will address the issue.

Another minority response (5%) said “A civil lawsuit will finally see success.”  I think it likely that one or more civil suits will reach a decision on the merits this year. Whether WND readers will call them “successes” remains to be seen.

Read more:


1Hebrews 11:1

Monkeys with typewriters

It’s been said that if you get enough monkeys randomly typing for a long enough time, they will produce the works of William Shakespeare

That thought came to mind as I was reading a web link provided in an email from Deep Birther. The link was to an article by Martha Trowbridge at The Terrible Truth blog. Trowbridge has made a name for herself in birther circles with her alternate biographical stories about Barack Obama including him being fathered by Malcolm X.

I looked at the particular article in question briefly, and decided it was really too crazy to delve into. Whenever I decide not to look into something I feel a little defensive. I can imagine an argument being thrown at me: “just because Trowbridge has been proven wrong before [e.g. in the case of saying Obama went to Indonesia at age 2 to live with President Suharto] that doesn’t mean she’s wrong now.” That’s true. However, it is also true that just because a dozen monkeys have not come up with the works of William Shakespeare yet that they won’t do it today.

If I want to read Shakespeare, I go to the library and not the zoo.

New Hampshire update

In this writer’s humble opinion, nothing is happening on the Birther front in New Hampshire despite headlines on Birther web sites such as the Post & Email. Rather than the “Shot Heard Around the World,” I think a better analogy for the Birther challenge to Obama’s inclusion on the NH primary ballot as “the fart heard around the room” – unpleasant, smelly, but of no lasting consequence.

The fundamental difference between New Hampshire and Georgia is that the law in New Hampshire says that the Elections Commission decision is final and cannot be reviewed by a court, hence, the NH Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge from a handful of Birther legislators. In Georgia, the law says any voter can challenge the eligibility of a candidate. It’s all so very simple.

Part of the Legislators’ grievance is over an irrelevant technicality. According to them, a naturalized citizen was barred from the ballot in New Hampshire in 2007. They believe that the Elections Commission should have made eligibility discrimination in the case of Obama also. I believe that the Commission was ready to do that, but when they asked for something more than rumors to show Obama wasn’t eligible, the Legislators said they had nothing. It was a poignant moment.

Despite those simple facts, publicity is served by fanning the fumes, and that’s what the concerned NH Legislators did by recounting to the NH Attorney General their rebuff by the NH Secretary of State. Nothing really happened.

The Birther’s day in court

This article introduces a new Editorial category here at Obama Conspiracy Theories, Editorial.

Be careful what you wish for.

I think that applies very much to the Birthers and their desire to have have their claims about President Obama examined by a court. It looks like they have gotten their wish in Georgia in the case of Farrar v Obama.

Up until now Birther lawsuits had two major problems getting a case heard on the merits: no case and no merits. In almost all of the suits the Birthers had no case, i.e. no case that the federal courts had jurisdiction to hear. In one state suit, Ankeny v Daniels, some of the merits of the suit were addressed by the court, but Birthers mostly ignore it or say it was decided wrong.

This time around, in Farrar, the plaintiffs have a perfect right to challenge Obama’s eligibility to appear on the Georgia presidential preference ballot because Georgia law says so. They have formally valid suit. The problem, as they will no doubt be told in the course of things, they have no merit. That’s because the Birther claims consist solely of  unfounded allegations, impossible rumors and crank legal theories. However, unlike Ankeny, there will be a great deal of attention focused on Georgia and it will be difficult for the Birthers to shrug off the result.

One of the Plaintiff’s attorneys in the case is Orly Taitz. She wrote on her blog [link to Taitz blog]

This is particularly sweet, as it is happening in GA, where judge Clay D. Land maligned me so badly and attacked me with $20,000 of sanctions  in order to silence me, to stop me from challenging Obama. Judge Land was sending a message to other attorneys and intimidating them, de facto telling them, “you dare to go after Obama, raise the issue of his forged birth certificate and invalid Social Secrity [sic] number, establishment will attack you and sanction you, just like attorney Taitz”

Now judge Malihi is sending a message: “nobody is above the law.”

Conspiracy theorists like to find “messages” in public statements. Personally I think Judge Land was sending Orly Taitz a message: “break the rules and get punished.” Judge Malihi is sending Orly Taitz a message: “bring a valid suit before the court and it will get heard.” Just remember, Orly, just because you get another 15 minutes of fame doesn’t mean that you’re above the law either.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes