RSS Feed
May 5

LIBERI et al v. TAITZ et al

Posted on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 in Orly Taitz, Philip Berg
Hollister v. Soetoro

Liberi v. Taitz

In a move long anticipated, Philadelphia lawyer Phil Berg, anti-Obama activist and judicial candidate has filed suit against Orly Taitz on behalf of individuals who have come under attack recently by  California lawyer and anti-Obama conspiracy theories promoter Orly Taitz.

Orly Taitz frequently makes published assertions that two people who share the same name are the same person (like Barry Soetoro and Soetoro Moestabjab), and in this case Lisa Liberi, Phil Berg’s, associate may be the victim of just such a false association with a New Mexico felon having a similar name.

Also, former webmaster of Orly Taitz’s blog, Lisa Ostella, the recipient of all sorts of accusations related to the handling of former Orly blogs and the funneling of PayPal donations, is suing. We’ve reported here on the Ostella accusations before.

A complaint was filed and it looks like a request for a temporary restraining order. The full list of plaintiffs are: LISA LIBERI, PHILIP J. BERG, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG, EVELYN ADAMS ["MommaE"], LISA M. OSTELLA and GO EXCEL GLOBAL with defendants: ORLY TAITZ, DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATIONS, INC., YOSEF TAITZ, THE SANKEY FIRM, SANKEY INVESTIGATIONS, INC., NEIL SANKEY, JAMES SUNDQUIST, ROCK SALT PUBLISHING, LINDA SUE BELCHER, EDGAR HALE, CAREN HALE, PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, BAR H FARMS, KPRN AM 1610 [Plains Radio]. (more…)

Apr 21

Complaint against Orly Taitz filed with Cal Bar

Posted on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 in Orly Taitz

According to the Native and Natural Born Citizen Explored blog. An official complaint has been filed with the California Bar Association about the conduct of California Attorney, Orly Taitz. The complaint, obviously written by someone with legal training, is a scathing condemnation of her behavior compared to the California attorney standards and law. A PDF version is also available.

Table of Contents

Preface...................................................................................3
A. Respect for Courts & Judges ...........................................................5
B. Honesty Requirement; Prohibition on Deception.........................................12
C. Prohibition Against Presenting Claim Not Warranted....................................15
D. Failing to Act Competently ...........................................................20
E. No Facts Prejudicial to Honor or Reputation Unless Required By Justice ...............21
F. Encouraging Lawsuits from Corrupt Motive of Passion or Interest.......................21
G. Accounting for Monies Received .......................................................22
H. Prohibition against Advising the Violation of Law ....................................23
I. Prohibition against Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges.....25
J. Prohibition against Ex Parte Contact with Judicial Officials .........................26
K. Unauthorized Practice of Law in Another Jurisdiction .................................28
Conclusion ..............................................................................29
Case Number(s) of Suit(s)................................................................30

Generally, I agree with the complaint. The author, whose identity is unknown to me, knows about this blog as one of the case files in PDF cited is hyperlinked to the library here.