Main Menu

Tag Archives | Ebola

First US Ebola case; Doc leaves country

A semicolon does not imply causality, and actually I left the US before the Ebola case was confirmed. All I’ll say is that I haven’t met Lucas Smith, and I haven’t found any new birth certificates for Barack Obama.

Normal blog operations will resume when I return in a few days.

4

Taitz files a bunch more motions in immigration suit

imageOrly Taitz is seeking to expand the scope of her recent lawsuit (Taitz v. Johnson) to not just  quarantine or deport undocumented children from Central America; she’s injecting (no pun intended) Ebola! She filed 4 motions titled, “Motion to Expedite Due to Exigent Circumstances of Deadly Ebola Epidemic.” She wants to stop all arrivals in the US from places with Ebola, and quarantine anyone who has entered the US from one of those countries in the past 21 days. She moves to:

  • Expedite
  • Stop entry
  • Quarantine anyone who has visited a country where there is an Ebola epidemic
  • Retain jurisdiction and assure compliance
  • Certify a class
  • Admit Taitz Pro Hac Vice

Read more:

Negativity merchants

I just saw this in our Twitter feed:

 

This comes on the heels of a hilarious August 7 segment on Colbert Nation on the Ebola panic that makes the serious point that an Ebola outbreak is something we’re being told to be afraid of, even though no one has come down with Ebola in the United States yet.

 

All of this gives some context for a new university study published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences that says that conservatives tend to be more responsive to negative news than liberals. Salon.com refers to the study in their July 29 article, “Secrets of the right-wing brain: New study proves it—conservatives see a different, hostile world.

The more nuanced journal article (which unlike Salon doesn’t mention birthers) says:

…A rapidly growing body of empirical evidence documents a multitude of ways in which liberals and conservatives differ from each other in purviews of life with little direct connection to politics, from tastes in art to desire for closure and from disgust sensitivity to the tendency to pursue new information, but the central theme of the differences is a matter of debate. In this article, we argue that one organizing element of the many differences between liberals and conservatives is the nature of their physiological and psychological responses to features of the environment that are negative. Compared with liberals, conservatives tend to register greater physiological responses to such stimuli and also to devote more psychological resources to them.