Chris Matthews, of the MSNBC Hardball show hosted a documentary titled, “The rise of the new right,” featuring Taitz to Tea Party. The program aired June 16.
“Their common cause, a raging hostility towards the American government“
View the video: (more…)
Attorney Levy
Orly Taitz, slapped with a $20,000 fine by the federal court in Columbus, Georgia, defiantly said she’s not paying; however, exhibiting a more practical side, she’s found an attorney to help her appeal the sanctions.
Jonathan Levy, a Russian-speaking attorney from the resort island of Hilton Head, South Carolina, has written an appeal that is very different from Tatiz’s brand of illiterate ranting. The essence of Levy’s argument is that Taitz was not given adequate time to respond to the sanctions, and therefore was denied due process.
While the appeal is not typical Taitz crazy, it does get a bit silly when it suggests that Attorney General Eric Holder in the middle of a week-long tour of California might have secretly jetted to Columbus, Georgia, remaining long enough to hold an ex parte conference with Judge Land and be “spotted” by someone in a coffee shop down the street from the court house. Levy wrote:
… the Court did not produce an affidavit from Mr. Holder or other responsible party instead choosing to rely upon the supposed factual impossibility of being in Georgia and California on the same day.
Levy is reported to have graduated from the same correspondence law school as Taitz. This is a departure for Levy who normally deals with conspiracy theories about the Vatican Bank and the Illuminati.
Update: Taitz lost the appeal.
Orly Taitz
In a tersely worded order dated October 4, 2009, Judge W. O. Carter denied Orly Taitz’s motion to reconsider his dismissal of the Barnett v. Obama lawsuit. Judge Carter said, in essence, that the motion to reconsider was mostly the same old stuff she presented before.
After reviewing the moving and opposing papers, the Court finds no factual, legal, or bias grounds upon which to grant the motion for reconsideration. Counsel largely repeats the same arguments made in her briefing and oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss, which is prohibited. To the extent that she does present new argument, it is without merit and does not meet the standard for reconsideration. The Court’s ruling that it lacks jurisdiction, and that Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim on their remaining causes of action, stands.
Sanction doubled in Georgia military case.
In a lengthy order, federal Judge Land ordered Orly Taitz to pay $20,000 as punishment for abusing the court system and her position as an attorney. The order states:
Adoption of counsel’s legal theory would make the judiciary the arbiter of any dispute regarding the President’s constitutional qualifications. Our founders provided opportunities for a President’s qualifications to be tested, but they do not include direct involvement by the judiciary. In addition to the obvious opportunity that exists during a presidential campaign to scrutinize a candidate’s qualifications, the framers of the Constitution provided a mechanism for removing a President who “slips through the cracks,” which is how counsel describes President Obama. Upon conviction by the Senate of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, the President can be removed through impeachment. U.S. Const. art. II, § 4; see also id. art. I, §§ 2 & 3. Thus, if the President were elected to the office by knowingly and fraudulently concealing evidence of his constitutional disqualification, then a mechanism exists for removing him from office. Except for the Chief Justice’s role in presiding over the trial in the Senate, that mechanism does not involve the judiciary. Id. art. I, § 3, cl. 6.
Warning to ORLY! A frivolous appeal to sanctions can lead to further sanctions!
Orly Taitz
In an unusual Sunday posting (perhaps due to system maintenance on the court electronic filing system), new documents have appeared in the Barnett v. Obama lawsuit today, October 11, 2009.
Attorney Orly Taitz filed a brief asking the court to take judicial notice that “Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346″, continuing her assertion that the RICO statute gives her standing. You will notice that this lawsuit has been changing colors like a chameleon, originally started as a suit under an inapplicable Bush presidential order, morphed into a hodgepodge of other things, and now she’s trying to be turned into a RICO lawsuit. As evidence Orly continues to push the false social security number allegation she and her detectives have skimmed from various questionable sources. Most recently, she has included an affidavit from her number 2 detective in Ohio, Susan Daniels.
Request for Judicial Notice – 11 Oct 2009
[UPDATE!] The second document (the Daniels affidavit) has been deleted from the Obama Conspiracy Theories library. It contains clumsily redacted Social Security Numbers of private individuals (one at least who is still living) that are easily readable.
Orly Taitz, DDS, Esq
While Orly Taitz’s blog is infected with the H1N1 Swine Malware, I’ll continue sporadic reports, using my full body respirator virtual machine browser. [Recall last April it was that Orly said not to get H1N1 vaccinations.] It looks like Orly is including email addresses of the folks whose emails she posts.
© 2010 Obama Conspiracy Theories. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Wordpress. Designed by 
Recent Comments