Tag Archives: Stanley Ann

Donofrio team pries previously known information out of Hawaii

by Dr. Conspiracy on 02. Oct, 2009 in Birth Location, Leo Donofrio

Leo. C. Donofrio

Leo. C. Donofrio

I don’t want to make too much fun of Donofrio and his article DoH Reverses Course – Releases Index Data For President Obama, Stanley Ann and Barack, Sr; No Records For Maya Exist. While the fake dramatic aura written into his article is silly, at least it presents some facts.

It has been clear to me since last year that this, and another approach to obtaining records from Hawaii, if pressed, would result in disclosure of this  already-public information. The other approach is the Verification in Lieu of a Certificate. But the information pried out of the Department of Health, is the same information the DOH sent to the Hawaii news service and was subsequently printed in two Honolulu newspapers 47 years ago. I suppose it’s nice that Donofrio has another voice from the same source saying the same thing, but there is no surprise here. This really is “old news”.

Leo also “learned” that Obama’s sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng does not have a Hawaiian birth certificate which–while still claimed otherwise by birthers as recently as by a filing in Hollister v. Soetoro a week ago–is impossible under Hawaiian law. So TechDude (who claimed he could see that the COLB was constructed from a base copy of Maya’s birth certificate) is exposed as a fraud (wait, TechDude was already exposed as a fraud).

It remains to be seen if Leo Donofrio will be believed or demonized by the birthers. The odds are on the latter.

Read full story • Comments { 9 }

Obama Birth Announcement False (UPDATED!) (Updated Again!!)

by Dr. Conspiracy on 15. Apr, 2009 in Birth Location

…says Mississippi PI in a signed, but not notarized “affidavit.”

Mississippi investigator Jorge L. Baro says that he swore (although the notary’s signature is blank) that some unnamed people he hired told him that they had talked to Beatrice Arakaki in Hawaii and that she told them that 47 years ago in 1961 there was no black baby living next door to her at the address in the Sunday Advertiser announcement of Obama’s birth.

6085 <em>circa</em> 1961 - Honolulu Advertiser

#6085 Kalanianaole circa 1961 - Honolulu Advertiser

According to the Honolulu Advertiser, it was practice to get birth announcements from the Health Department via a news service, not from private submissions, as evidenced by that fact that two independent newspapers had the same announcement with the same announcements for other infants before and after. The announcement had to come from the Health Department, via the birth registration. So what gives?  Did they live there or not? It all becomes clear with careful reading and examination of the evidence.

Option A

Let’s assume for a moment that everything that Baro says about the interview is true (but not perhaps complete). (more…)

Read full story • Comments { 427 }

When is a Certificate not a Certificate?

by Dr. Conspiracy on 08. Feb, 2009 in Birth Certificate, Birth Location, Evidence, Featured Articles, Tutorial

In my article What You Don’t Know I asked what was the difference between a “Certificate” and a “Certification”. I meant to ask what was the difference in the meaning of the words. Someone pointed out to me that two very distinct birth documents come out of Hawaii. Folks call one a “Certificate” and the other a “Certification”, but that’s not right. So when is a “Certificate” not a “Certificate”? (more…)

Read full story • Comments { 249 }

Petition for Redress of Grievances – Examined

by Guest Contributor on 09. Jan, 2009 in Guest Essays

Revised Draft Redress Petition
PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
REGARDING THE FAILURE TO CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS THE PRESIDENT ELECT, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

INTRODUCTION
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides, in part, that “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of…or the right of the people…to petition the government for a redress of grievances”;

(more…)

Read full story • Comments { 41 }