I prefer to talk about the presidential eligibility conspiracy theories on this web site, but I suppose that to live up the name, I should cover this too.

You may have heard rumblings about  how all the true patriots are going to be rounded up and interned in FEMA camps. Mr. Unruh was alarmed by a job notice found on a U. S. Army web site (GoArmy.com):

“Internment/Resettlement (I/R) Specialists in the Army are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility. I/R Specialists provide rehabilitative, health, welfare, and security to U.S. military prisoners within a confinement or correctional facility; conduct inspections; prepare written reports; and coordinate activities of prisoners/internees and staff personnel.

Of course, instead of associating this with the WARs that we’re conducting, it was naturally taken as evidence that right-wing extremists are about to be rounded up. Oh, and who are those Unruh reports will be the first against the wall? It’s those who:

• Oppose abortion
• Oppose same-sex marriage
• Oppose restrictions on firearms
• Oppose lax immigration laws
• Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs
• Oppose continuation of free trade agreements
• Are suspect of foreign regimes
• Fear Communist regimes
• Oppose a “one world” government
• Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world
• Are upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India, and more

Orly Taitz

Orly Taitz notified Obama Conspiracy Theories this afternoon of this press release, sent to 26,000 news outlets, the US Congress, Senate, state legislatures, state attorney generals, US district attorneys and state governors. I’m getting tired just typing the list.

Dr. Taitz continues in her attempts to undermine popular support for American institutions, destabilize American society, and bring about political disruption and crisis with this fanciful tale woven as an alternative explanation for why all the “M” “A” (application) type entries on the Supreme Court docket public access system were unavailable for a couple of days. Clearly her suggestion that the Supreme Court’s deliberation process is “illegal” is not designed to further her cases at the Supreme Court, but rather to attack the Constitution itself.

Regarding Illegal activity in the Supreme Court of the United States, demand for immediate criminal investigation of suspected forgery of court records, tempering with court records, cyber crime, erasing of court records from the docket, fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud and other related crimes.

Dear Mr. Holder, Mr. Mueller and Mr. Sullivan

As I have reported previously my Case Lightfoot v Bowen was erased from the exterior docket of the Supreme Court on January 21st, one day after Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro’s (Obama/Soetoro’s) inauguration and only two days before the case was supposed to be heard in the full conference of all 9 Justices. After phone calls of hundreds of outraged citizens the case was reentered on the docket in the evening of January 22, right before it was supposed to be heard in the morning of January 23. In my case I stated that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro is ineligible for presidency due to the fact that the President and Commander in chief has to be a Natural born citizen: born to two US citizen parents on US soil. Obama’s father was here on a student visa, never a US citizen and for that reason alone he didn’t qualify, aside from that there is no evidence of any birthing  file in any hospital in Hawaii, Obama sealed all his vital records and his school registration in Indonesia show him as a citizen of Indonesia.

On March the 9th I saw Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Antonin Scalia at the book signing ceremony and while he was signing two books that I purchased, I asked him, why my case wasn’t forwarded to the next step: oral argument on the merits. Justice Scalia had absolutely no knowledge of this case. I proceeded asking him about other similar cases, all claiming the same thing, that Obama is not eligible for presidency: Wrotnowski, Donofrio, Berg. In presence of several attorneys, law students and secret service agents justice Scalia kept saying that he didn’t know anything about those cases, even though all of the plaintiffs have received notification that all of these cases were reviewed by all 9 Justices in the conferenced and all of their petitions were denied.

This is particularly troubling due to the fact that according to the docket, Justice Scalia was the one that received Wrotnowski and Berg cases initially (Berg’s case was reviewed twice Certiorari and Injunction), he was the one that supposedly read those cases and forwarded them to the conference of all 9 Justices.

Additionally all 9 Justices received a World Net Daily news paper petition signed by around 350,000 American Citizens, 60,000  form letters sent by World Net Daily and estimated 100,000 individual letters, all urging the Justices to review all these cases dealing with Obama’s lack of legitimacy for presidency. How could the justices get half a million letters from citizens, read 5 lengthy briefs, sit through 5 conferences where each of 9 justices provides his opinion and vote and not know anything about the cases?

There are only 3 possibilities that I would like investigated:

1. I believe that the most likely reason is that there was tempering with documents and records by employees of the Supreme Court and the Justices never saw those briefs.

I demand immediate investigation of what has happened with the docket. Did somebody from outside brake and enter into the computer system of the Supreme Court or was it done by one of the overzealous employees who wanted to keep Obama in the white House no matter what. Each employee is supposed to have an ID for log in and there is supposed to be a record of log ins. I demand to see a record of log ins in relation to my case Lightfoot v Bowen. When a Justice reads a petition, and decides to forwarded to the conference of the full Supreme court, there has to be a decision, signed by a specific judge, stating that he read the petition, finds merit in it and distributes it to the conference of the Supreme Court. There has to be an immediate forensic analysis of these decisions, to see who signed them, was the signature forged on these decisions/referrals issued 5 times.

When the Justices hear the case in the conference, there has to be a decision signed by all 9 justices. There has to be a forensic analysis of signatures of the Justices in all of the above mentioned cases. I demand to see the decision relating to my case Lightfoot v Bowen and have an opportunity to come to the Supreme Court and analyze the original document with signatures by my forensic document experts.

I demand to see the printout of entries of both internal docket seen by justices and the external docket seen by the public, to verify if those were identical at all times, particularly between January 20th and January 23rd.

2. If the signatures were not forged and the docket was not forged, and the justices have actually signed those decisions, then there is a possibility, that the Justices have not actually read the cases but rubber stamp signed the decisions made by their clerks, which would be a dereliction of duties by the Justices of the Supreme Court and illegal as well.

3. Last option is that the justices signed the documents and read the cases. There are a few problems with this scenario as well.

a. The cases have mentioned that not only Obama, but also Roger Calero, admitted citizen of Nicaragua, currently in US on a green card was allowed as a candidate on the ballot in at least five states. Not providing decision on this issue would be a dereliction of duties by the justices and violation of their oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

b. The cases mentioned above have provided ample evidence, showing that Obama/ Soetoro is not eligible for presidency and the refusal to hear the case on the merits is a dereliction of duties and violation of oath by the Justices of the Supreme Court, which is illegal as well.

I have related all this information to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts on March13th during a question and answer session after his lecture at the university of Moscow, Idaho, which was recorded on the audio tape and video tape. Justice Roberts has agreed to read the material and I have given the pleadings, the 3200 pages of WorldNetDaily petition and 164 page dossier of suspected criminal activity to the Secret service agent, who identified himself as agent Gilbert Shaw assigned to Justice Roberts.

Due to the above and great urgency of the matter in relation to the National security of the United States, on behalf of my clients in Lightfoot v Bowen and Easterling et al v Obama et al I demand immediate investigation of this matter. I also urge you to expedite your review of my dossier #1 and 2 that describes numerous social security numbers located for Mr. Obama, fraud, perjury, suspected instances of corruption, bribery, treason and criminal activity of the supporters of Obama, such as cyber crime, intimidation, harassment, forgery, fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud,voter fraud,  impersonation of US army officer, impersonation of an attorney, identity theft and other related crimes. I demand the subpoenas to be issued immediately to obtain all of vital records for Obama/Soetoro  to ascertain his legitimacy for Presidency and the position of commander in Chief. All of 305 million American citizens need these vital records, need to know whether a foreign national is usurping the position of the President and the Commander in chief.

Sincerely

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq

Orly Taitz

Just moments ago, Mission Viejo dentist and part-time lawyer Orly Taitz notified Obama Conspiracy Theories that she had petitioned Attorney General Eric Holder to test President Obama’s eligibility quo warranto. Following is the complete statement Dr. Taitz provided to Obama Conspiracy Theories:

Attorney General, Eric H. Holder Jr.
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001 USA

March _1__ 2009

Honorable Attorney General Holder
Re: Request a Special Assistant for the United States to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II to Test His Title to President before the Supreme Court

Relators, Major General Carroll Childers, Ret.; Lt. Col Dr. David Earl-Graef; Navy and Police officer Mr. Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, currently serving in Iraq; Major James Cannon, US Marine Corps, Ret; New Hampshire State Representative Mr. Timothy Comerford; Tennessee State Representative Mr. Frank Niceley  State of Alabama 2008 electoral college elector Mr. Robert Cusanelli bring information for Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II, testing his title to President per attached relation. Relators include:
Robert Cusanelli, Elector for 7th District, State of Alabama, in the 2008 Electoral College;
Frank Niceley, State Representative of Tennessee in his official capacity;
Timothy Comerford, State Representative of New Hampshire in his official capacity;
Major General Carrol D. Childers, 29th Infantry Div VA retired, lifetime subject to recall; Numerous Decorations
1st Lt. Scott R. Easterling OD LG US Army on active duty in Iraq;
Clint Grimes, Sergeant Long Beach Police Officer & CDR/0-5 US Navy (Active Reserve). Numerous Decorations, including two National defense medals, two Navy commendation medals
Dr. David Earl-Graef, Lieutenant Colonel Air Force MC , Military Surgeon- Active Reserve. Numerous decorations including Air Force outstanding unit with valor
James Cannon Major US Marine Corps, Ret, lifetime subject to recall. Numerous awards, including Bronze Star with combat “V” and two Purple Hearts
Relator’s oath of office grants standing. Relators are affected by actions of Respondent Obama and the outcome of this Quo Warranto, and thus have interest above citizens.
Information on Quo Warranto against a Federal Officer is normally related to the Attorney General to raise on behalf of the United States in U.S. District court of the District of Columbia per DC Code § 16-3502. However, the Attorney General defends the office of President and is appointed by the President. For the Attorney General to bring Quo Warranto on the President raises an intrinsic conflict of interest. USAM 3-2.170 Historically, a Special Prosecutor or Independent Counsel was appointed to eliminate such conflicts of interest. E.g., Attorney General Elliot Richardson appointed Archibald Cox as the Watergate Special Prosecutor over issues touching on President Nixon.
This information on Quo Warranto includes action between the United States ex rel. and the State of Hawaii over original birth records of Barack H. Obama II being withheld per Hawaii’s privacy laws. Hawaii’s action obstructs the constitutional duties of election officers to validate or evaluate President Elect Obama qualifications to become President under U.S. CONST. art. II § 1, and amend. XX § 3.
As President Elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as President Elect, Respondent Obama failed qualify per U.S. CONST. amend. XX § 3.
Such negligence and misprision threaten to nullify these essential safeguards. Thus Relators request this Quo Warranto be related to the Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction.
Enclosed is a summary motion for leave to file Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II a/k/a Barry Soetoro, with the Supreme Court. The list of Questions Presented is attached. A full brief supporting this motion is in preparation.

1)     Relators respectfully pray that the Attorney General recuse himself over bringing this Quo Warranto for the United States on Barack H. Obama II, by reason of intrinsic conflict of interest.
2)     Relators pray the Attorney General appoint a Special Assistant (prosecutor) of Archibald Cox’s reputation and expertise, to relate this Quo Warranto to the Supreme Court per 28 USC 543.
3)     Relators request that their attorney, Orly Taitz, Esq. DDS, assist in relating this Quo Warranto, being recognized at bar before the Supreme Court.
4)     Relators further request the assistance of Patrick Fitzgerald, United States Attorney General for the Northern District of Illinois, as having familiarity with issues involving Barack H. Obama, II while Senator from Illinois and as President Elect.
5)     Relators request guidance from the Attorney General, within one week of receipt of this information, regarding his decision on whether to appoint such a Special Assistant.

With respect, in absence of such guidance, Relators will proceed to request leave from the Supreme Court to relate information for this Quo Warranto on Mr. Obama to test his title.

Yours sincerely

Orly Taitz, ESQ
Attorney for Relators
26302 La Paz
Mission Viejo CA 92691
949-683-5411

Encl. Motion to Supreme Court for leave to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II, testing his title to the Federal office of President.

Now we know what the military officers and Tennessee state legislators Orly recruited are being used for. Is this what they signed up for on their consent forms? Faustian agreements seldom come off as planned.

It’ll go nowhere, but as a publicity stunt it’s not bad.