30 responses

  1. avatar
    strikefighter
    August 7, 2009

    So, at this point, is there anybody, other than the birthers, who is not part of the conspiracy? The admin, the Congress, the courts, the state of Hawaii and its government, Obama’s family, the media, bloggers, various websites, numerous organizations, and apparently a substantial number of the American people.

    They just don’t comprehend how ridiculous that sounds. But hey, I need a daily laugh or three. Hell, Taitz herself takes care of that.

    • avatar
      Bob
      August 7, 2009

      Andy Martin (and others) have suggested Taitz is part of the conspiracy….

    • avatar
      misha
      August 7, 2009

      “So, at this point, is there anybody, other than the birthers, who is not part of the conspiracy?”

      My cat.

      • avatar
        dunstvangeet
        August 7, 2009

        Don’t you know anything. Your cat was the one who conjured up the fake birth certificate to embarrass Orly Taitz!

      • avatar
        misha
        August 7, 2009

        You caught us! Here is my cat’s official Kenyan birth certificate.

  2. avatar
    Bob
    August 7, 2009

    Undaunted, Taitz is going after this “Bomford” character.

    • avatar
      misha
      August 7, 2009

      Your link is broken.

    • avatar
      Welsh Dragon
      August 7, 2009

      No she’s not – she’s going after ‘Bowford’ but I suppose by Orly’s standards that’s close enough!

      • avatar
        Bob
        August 7, 2009

        Seriously, she’s gift that keeps on giving….

      • avatar
        Dr. Conspiracy
        August 7, 2009

        Maybe she throw some malaware at him. Is that anything like Melmac?

    • avatar
      Dr. Conspiracy
      August 7, 2009

      Good grief. She’s trying to get us into war with Australia!

      • avatar
        Shrieking wombat
        August 7, 2009

        Bow down to your new imperial overlords.

  3. avatar
    Greg
    August 7, 2009

    Has it been rejected yet?

    Sorry, Orly, you don’t actually have to read very much of the complaint to realize that someone attempting to challenge the “order of the military” doesn’t have particularized or concrete injury and thus, does not have standing.

    Also, if she’s swearing that a “reasonable person” would find the judge’s actions to be biased, is that perjury? Or could her inability to perceive the “reasonable person” evidence of sanctionable incompetence?

    • avatar
      Greg
      August 7, 2009

      I just answered my own question by continuing to read on the http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/ blog. All her motions were denied! That was quick!

      Filing motions that are frivolous and wholly without merit certainly sounds like a sanctionable offense.

      08/06/2009 10 ENDORSED ORDER denying 8 Motion for Recusal as frivolous and wholly without merit. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 8/6/2009. (DMB) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
      08/06/2009 11 ENDORSED ORDER denying as frivolous and wholly without merit 9 Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter Judgment and 9 Motion for Rehearing re: 6 Order on Motion for Reconsideration of 3 Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 8/6/2009. (DMB) (Entered: 08/06/2009)

      • avatar
        Bob
        August 7, 2009

        A warning, for sure. The judge is daring Taitz to take it up with the 11th Circuit.

  4. avatar
    John
    August 7, 2009

    I am not too suprised with Judge Lazzara. He is a murderer (Judicially speaking) in my opinion. Lazzara was party to the killing of Terri Schiavo in 2005. In that case, Lazzara denied Terri Schiavo her due process rights when her life was put it the hands of Judge Lazzara.

    • avatar
      Greg
      August 7, 2009

      What you mean to say is that he didn’t subvert due process and the law in order to get the result you wanted!

    • avatar
      Rickey
      August 7, 2009

      Judge Lazzara stood up for the principle of states’ rights when he ruled that the Federal Court had no jurisdiction in the Schiavo case. You right-wingers seem to have no principles whatsoever — you cast them aside in a minute if they lead to a result with which you disagree. You want the Federal Government to stay out of our lives except when you want the Federal Government to intrude in our lives.

      Besides, Terri Schiavo was effectively already dead when her feeding tube was disconnected.

      Terri Schiavo suffered severe, irreversible brain damage that left that organ discolored and scarred, shriveled to half its normal size, and damaged in nearly all its regions, including the one responsible for vision, according to an autopsy report released yesterday…Schiavo’s brain damage “was irreversible . . . no amount of treatment or rehabilitation would have reversed” it, said Jon R. Thogmartin, the pathologist in Florida’s sixth judicial district who performed the autopsy and announced his findings at a news conference in Largo, Fla.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061500512.html

    • avatar
      nbc
      August 7, 2009

      In that case, Lazzara denied Terri Schiavo her due process rights when her life was put it the hands of Judge Lazzara.

      Nice revisionism.

  5. avatar
    John
    August 7, 2009

    Judge Lazzara looks he one of these sticking obots judges like Judge James Robertson. Both Lazzara and Robertson need to be removed. Especially, Lazzara, since he was the party of the killing of Terri Schiavo in 2005. These judges are absolute slimeballs.

    • avatar
      misha
      August 7, 2009

      You are of course opposed to the death penalty, correct? And you are actively engaged in supporting relief efforts for civilian casualties in Gaza, Iraq and Afghanistan, correct?

    • avatar
      Bob
      August 7, 2009

      Both Lazzara and Robertson need to be removed.

      Will their impeachments occur before or after Obama’s?

      • avatar
        misha
        August 7, 2009

        Simultaneously.

    • avatar
      strikefighter
      August 7, 2009

      So, he’s an “Obot” (stupidest.insult.ever.) because he threw out motions written by a horrible excuse for a lawyer and someone who is clearly deranged and filled with inexplicable hatred for a person? Yeah, sounds like an “Obot” to me. Or maybe an excellent jurist who understands the laws of this nation, unlike Orly Taitz, who apparently just makes it all up as she goes along.

      • avatar
        misha
        August 7, 2009

        We need True Christians™ running the country, just like Sarah Palin’s BFF Bishop Muthee says.

      • avatar
        misha
        August 7, 2009

        ” just makes it all up as she goes along”

        Why not? That’s what they did in the USSR.

    • avatar
      nbc
      August 7, 2009

      These judges are absolute slimeballs.

      Tough when the facts are not on your side eh?

  6. avatar
    Bob
    August 7, 2009

    Report of the Liberi v. Taitz TRO hearing.

  7. avatar
    Bob
    August 12, 2009

    Taitz claims (on her site) that the judge put the “actual orders” under seal.

Back to top
mobile desktop