Main Menu

Fox News owes Orly Taitz equal time

Political pundit Bill O’Reilly dissed California Jill of all trades Orly Taitz on his show (see video below). O’Reilly has had nothing good to say about the birthers, stretching back to videos from November of 2008.

In response, Orly Taitz should demand the opportunity to appear on Bill’s show, The O’Reilly Factor to answer his charges.

I wholeheartedly agree that Fox News Network owes this equal time opportunity to Orly Taitz. I’d watch it if it were on Pay Per View!

56 Responses to Fox News owes Orly Taitz equal time

  1. avatar
    Jack October 28, 2009 at 10:24 pm #

    Do you realize that if Orly Taitz’ points had an open and fair airing on Fox — for say a 60 minute (maybe 30 minute) program — in all likelihood Obama would be gone or “essentially” gone from the Whitehouse within 48 hours!?!

  2. avatar
    Black Lion October 28, 2009 at 10:37 pm #

    Are you delusional? What makes you think that if Orly was on TV for that long a time anything other than her and this ridiculous movement would be laughed at and vilified. What part of legally admissible evidence don’t you understand? If Orly got on FOX then President Obama would be guaranteed a second term.

  3. avatar
    Texlaw October 28, 2009 at 10:50 pm #

    Why are you birfers always setting time limits on your own ineptitude? Taitz waved her papers at the kooknut rally on 9/12 and said she’d have The President out of office in 30 days. It’s October 28 and he’s still signing legislation. In the White House.

    If she’s too crazy for O’Reilly and Faux News, well that sums it up.

  4. avatar
    misha October 28, 2009 at 10:57 pm #

    Give Taitz all the airtime she wants – please. It’s great, free, entertainment. Kind of like watching a train wreck in slow motion.

  5. avatar
    aarrgghh October 28, 2009 at 11:20 pm #

    equal time? is there anything more un-american? geez, doc, i guess you’ll use anybody to sneak in a revival of that marxist moonbat fairness doctrine.

  6. avatar
    Benji Franklin October 29, 2009 at 12:33 am #

    Dear Jack,

    Orly Taitz is the curse of the Birfer lack-of-movement. She poisons her own wells and fouls her own nests. She combines the social skills of an inadvertently inhaled hornet with the reassuring shrillness of a plummeting 500 pound bomb.

    There is seemingly no limit to the damage she can do to her own causes:

    (Orly approaching St. Peter at the Golden Gate): “Sir, do you know there is criminal activity going on here in Heaven?”

    St. Peter speaking close-lipped into his phone (after speed-dialing): “Yeah, God? Peter here, say – we’ve got another birther nut bag banging on the Gate here, and we’re frankly not equipped to handle more than Berg, Dono, and Mario. Who knew we’d need this many straight-jackets?”

    Orly screaming: “How could any MAN’S wallet hold over a hundred Social Security Cards? I demand an investigation by F.B. eye and I’ll sue anybody I hear use the word, “litigious.”
    Also I need charcoal sketches of anybody with big ears committing a crime under low light conditions. Finally, I need a legal opinion before I argue with God as my witness,- what does this word mean, – “Evidence?”

    Benji Franklin

  7. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 1:14 am #

    “She poisons her own wells and fouls her own nests. She combines the social skills of an inadvertently inhaled hornet with the reassuring shrillness of a plummeting 500 pound bomb.

    There is seemingly no limit to the damage she can do to her own causes”


  8. avatar
    wendy October 29, 2009 at 1:21 am #

    So, the question now seems to be, WHO is nuttier? Taitz?
    Or those in this country who have SO LITTLE GRASP of the legal system, as to arrive at this kind of conclusion?
    It is becoming a toss up.

  9. avatar
    Lupin October 29, 2009 at 2:44 am #

    Maybe Bill can ask her the question that is surely on many minds after reading Lucas Smith’s declaration:

    Does she do anal?

  10. avatar
    Lupin October 29, 2009 at 2:47 am #

    In fact they should give her her own show.

    It’d be like Anna Nicole Smith meets Daffy Duck.

    I’d watch it.

  11. avatar
    nbc October 29, 2009 at 2:52 am #

    Orly could not present a coherent argument in this amount of time.
    Orly’s presence on the TV would be at best amusement to a few.
    But mostly a non-event.

  12. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 3:38 am #


    I never thought I would read right wing porn. Usually the radical left writes that stuff, especially in the ’50s.

    I’m trying to figure out what’s next. BTW, she appealed that sanction – so we’ll have plenty more to watch.

  13. avatar
    Adrianinflorida October 29, 2009 at 4:12 am #

    Way to parrot Orly’s talking points, word-for-word

    Jack: Do you realize that if Orly Taitz’ points had an open and fair airing on Fox — for say a 60 minute (maybe 30 minute) program — in all likelihood Obama would be gone or “essentially” gone from the Whitehouse within 48 hours!?!

  14. avatar
    Lupin October 29, 2009 at 5:40 am #

    To paraphrase Joey from FRIENDS: I’m French. I’m disgusting. We can’t help it. 🙂

  15. avatar
    Lupin October 29, 2009 at 5:43 am #

    Something like this:

    (Bless teh internets)

  16. avatar
    kimba October 29, 2009 at 7:55 am #

    HAHAHA!!! I nominate Jack’s post for the next batshirt award!!!

  17. avatar
    MsDaisy October 29, 2009 at 7:58 am #

    If they did give Orly 60 minutes, 45 of them would be used up with her saying; “Okay, Okay, Okay, I know, Okay, Let me finish, Okay, there is, I mean, Okay I’m telling you, Okay, Okay this is the evidence, (as she flashes her notebook at the cameras with yellow highlighted sections and asks) can you close in on dis? See here, this is vat I’m talking about, Okay, Okay, you don’t listen, Listen to me Okay”. No, probably that would take up more like 55 of the 60 minutes; the other 5 minutes would be her eyeballs rolling around.

  18. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy October 29, 2009 at 8:23 am #

    Just to be clear, what I am advocating here is a one on one between Taitz and O’Reilly, not Taitz having an open spot to spout.

  19. avatar
    TRUTH October 29, 2009 at 10:34 am #

    WOW!! What a bunch of craziness going on in THIS post. MOST everyone agrees Orly is a nutcase, left and right people. Sure, there are many birthers, but she is ONE person the left likes to laugh at, and in their own mind imagine she represents the right, which of course she does not. …anyways.. now you have Fox News, that the left ReALLY dislikes, because it’s the ONLY network that has the balls most the time just to Speak the Truth about anyone, including your beloved President. SO, lefties now put a spin on Fox News as being a bad network, In Their Opinion.

    YET! here we have, and I respect you Doc, but we have the Dr. and some of the Orly Booing crowd WANTING to see their favorite Nutcase ON FOX NEWS!! And WHY?? Is it because Fox asks the REAL Questions?? Bill O’Reilly won’t pull punches. I believe an underlying idea is so you can one Laugh at the Nutcase AND two further accuse Fox News of being a Bad because THEY let the Nutcase on their network.

    It is just hilarious to to point it is almost hypocritical. You HATE this woman, but want her to have time on TV. And you make excuses like “it would be entertaining”. Orly is a nut not because of her bottom line goal, but because of a few dozen idiotic things she has said and done and because she doesn’t know when to stop, when you can’t beat the government.

    Some people need to focus, because there is a few screwed up ideas going on in here.

  20. avatar
    Paul Pieniezny October 29, 2009 at 11:03 am #

    Jack has posted this on Orly’s site as well:

    (page 5 at this moment, text from 28/10/2009, perhaps you will have to go back a bit more later on, October is not yet finished)

    Re-reading it, Jack could actually be fooling all of us. Sarcasm, it is called.

  21. avatar
    aarrgghh October 29, 2009 at 11:38 am #

    no one watches fox for “news”. and like everything else on that network, the only reason to watch billo take on orly is for the giddy aliens-vs-predator slash-n-gnash entertainment.

  22. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 11:50 am #

    Actually having Orly on FOX would show how much she and everyone else associated with this movement are delusional. For instance posters to her site write things like the following:

    Submitted on 2009/10/28 at 2:31pm
    Like Bill O’Reilly, many shallow-minded Americans are so intimidated by black power that they would prefer to trash the Constitution rather than to displease Oprah. They fear that black anger would result in violence if Obuma were to be forced from office, so to keep the peace they counsel silence about Obuma’s ineligibility and consequent unlawful tenure. Incredibly, they think such cowardice is in the nation’s best interest.

    But would American blacks really want to riot for a half-white, British-born fraud who is not even an African-American as advertised? Obuma’s father was pure Kenyan and was never an American citizen. Obuma himself was born a British subject/citizen and may still owe allegiance to Queen Elizabeth. Moreover, Obuma shares nothing of the African-American heritage; not one drop of African-American blood runs in his veins.

    If reason prevails when Obama resigns or is disqualified or impeached, black Americans will realize that their allegiance is not to half-African blood but to their own nation’s Constitution, under which they hold equal protection and enjoy all the benefits of a free society.

    Or this post….


    Your comments are well taken but don’t underestimate Americans (Blacks) or any other group of people. People of all races are starting to understand the gravity of the current situation “we” are in due to apathy, guilt, and out and out racism. Once Obama is proven ineligible (criminal) there will be no riots because black people are starting to realize that he is just another lying politician running this great nation into the ground! Lastly, our nation has survived far worse and nefarious things, historically, we will survive the removal of the Usurper, his communist minions, and corrupt state and local politicians! Keep the faith and continue to pray that God gives Orly the strength and wisdom to see this thing through to the VICTORY!

    You have to understand that these clowns are so dumb that they think that there will be some sort of “do over” election….

    If Obama is not legitimate, neither are his appointments, including his pick of Biden. We will need to have a new election ASAP, before these diabolical psychopaths completely destroy US economy, currency and unleash some bio engineered swine flu virus as an excuse for martial law and suspension of our constitutional freedoms

    I mean can people be so dumb? We ask ourselves that and every time you think that they can’t get any dumber you see posts like that or you see Orly submitting as evidence the obvious Kenyan forged document as evidence or the Kenyan AP article. So having Orly on FOX would be great entertainment.

  23. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 11:56 am #

    I wonder how many people will actually show up? 20 or 30? But of course Orly will claim it was thousands…This is pure comedy…

    Hope to see you November 11, 12 noon, Veteran’s day

    1211 Ave of the Americas, FOX headquarters, protest Bill O’Reilly defrauding the Nation and defaming decent Americans and are caring a legal battle to unseal all of Obama’s vital records. If you can come, if you can assist in organizing, call me 949-683-5411.

    We need signs, bull horns.

    We are looking for a diner for people to meet and greet before and after the protest.

    Let me know if you can help with transportation, frequent flyer

    Keep in mind, what OReilly did, is more dangerous, more harmful then what some idiots like Rachel Maddow or Keith Obertmann did, since people believe O’Reilly to be fair and balanced.

    The best line from that was “People believe O’Reilly to be fair and balanced”? I think her followers are becoming more unhinged every day that President Obama continues to be the President and leading our great country.

  24. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy October 29, 2009 at 12:01 pm #

    TRUTH, this is not about liberals and conservatives; it’s about birthers and constitutional cranks.

    I want Orly on the O’Reilly show because he will make mincemeat out of her, and THAT advances the cause of rational thinking, and shutting the birthers up. It also helps the conservative cause insofar as the are tarred by these fringe elements. Many conservatives have failed to confront these fringe elements hoping that the smear they involve will hurt Obama or help their own agendas. However, there are conservatives with integrity, like Lindsey Graham, who have refused to play with the devil.

  25. avatar
    Con Rep October 29, 2009 at 12:02 pm #

    I think equal time is perfect, in this instance.

    As you can see, the spot lasted one minute, 39 seconds.

    That would be just enough time for Orly to let out a few loud shrieks before her mike is cut off.

  26. avatar
    ballantine October 29, 2009 at 12:08 pm #

    Great, only a few blocks away. Think I’ll go heckle them.

  27. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 12:10 pm #

    More conspiracy theories…I guess if you worked at one time for the Perkins Coie law firm you are some sort of enemy. Just like Judge Carter’s law clerk, I wonder how long it will take before they start making up stuff about this lady?

    Submitted on 2009/10/29 at 12:31am
    Wow! Here is another interesting connection that may explain why O’Reilly and Fox News in general refuse to tackle the eligibility question: Lis Wiehl, the blonde legal analyst who was so adamant about BHO having been vetted, began her career with PERKINS COIE law firm! Read the description from Fox’s web site.

    The puzzle pieces are starting to fall in place.

    Lis Wiehl

    Lis Wiehl joined FOX News Channel (FNC) as a legal analyst in October 2001. Currently an associate professor of law at the University of Washington School of Law, Wiehl also serves as a legal commentator on National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered.”

    Prior to joining FNC, Wiehl served as a legal analyst for KIRO-TV (CBS). From November 2000-February 2001, she provided legal analysis for NBC News. Before that, Wiehl held the position of principal deputy chief minority investigative counsel for the United States House of Representatives, Committee on Judiciary. Additionally, from 1990-1995, she served as an executive assistant at the United States Attorney’s office. Wiehl began her career as a litigation associate for Perkins Coie law firm.

    Wiehl received her undergraduate degree from Barnard College in 1983 and received her Master of Arts in Literature from the University of Queensland in 1985. In addition, she earned her Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1987. She is also the author of “The 51% Minority: How Women Still Are Not Equal and What You Can Do About It.”


    If this woman would’ve been in private practice, she would’ve been sued for malpractice. Neither she, nor anyone else on this show read one single word of pleadings and they viciously attacked me and the whole movement without having any information about the case, aside from reading one order, which was written in order to intimidate any attorney daring to bring an issue of Obama’s illegitimacy. These people are actively aiding and abetting this massive fraud and treason. All of them should be held accountable, and they will be held accountable one day.

  28. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 12:13 pm #

    Truth: when Jews lie down with conservatives, they only get fleas. The conservative movement is a haven for white nationalists, theocrats, anti-Semites, mysoginists, and assorted other kooks.

    Did you hear the latest about a Republican/family values/Christian public servant:

    Try to transubstantiate
    Get down on your knees
    Fiddle with your rosaries
    Ave Maria
    Gee it’s good to see ya
    Do the Vatican Rag
    (thank you Tom)

  29. avatar
    ballantine October 29, 2009 at 12:16 pm #

    She’s obviously not aware that Barnard College is part of Columbia Univeristy and she was there the same time as Obama. Then she went to Harward Law. The conspiracy keeps getting bigger and bigger.

  30. avatar
    Lupin October 29, 2009 at 12:20 pm #

    I think we are being consistent; Orly is a lunatic and Fox News is a lunatic asylum.

    I don’t see the problem.

    PS: And don’t assume that everyone who laughs at you is pro-Obama either.

  31. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 12:21 pm #

    We say here in the States that the French national sport is adultery.

    (Guilty, BTW)

  32. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 12:23 pm #

    Nooo…let her go off. Don’t spoil the fun. In fact, let’s have her and Glenn Beck on the same program. Could you imagine??

  33. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 12:23 pm #

    I am in Manhattan, maybe I’ll join you…It would be fun…

  34. avatar
    TRUTH October 29, 2009 at 12:24 pm #

    thanks for Proving my point even further

  35. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 12:28 pm #

    This is true….and she was none too happy with the following article from the WSJ on the President and the economy….

    “But a dark national view of how everybody in Washington is conducting the public’s business appears to be preventing Republicans from benefiting from concerns about the direction of the country or the Democrat-led government’s handling of the economy, as the minority party often does.

    In fact, disapproval of the Republican Party actually has ticked upward, along with the public’s general pessimism. Asked which political party should control Congress after next year’s midterm elections, Democrats now hold a clear edge over the GOP, 46% to 38%, a month after the Republicans were nearly as popular. In September, the Democratic edge was 43% to 40%.

    “There was a bounce-back surge for Republicans, and that’s stalled,” said Bill McInturff, a Republican pollster who conducted the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll with Democratic pollster Peter Hart.”

    I wonder if the right/GOP realize that getting in bed with the birthers as well as the disinfotainers like Rush and Beck has had a negative effect on the party. You put that with their actions of basically rooting against American (the Olympics) and most Americans are getting turned off by the fact it seems lihe the party has sold its soul to the right wing conservative nutcases.

  36. avatar
    TRUTH October 29, 2009 at 12:29 pm #

    I actually had that in my post and removed it, saying your intent has to be you want O’Reilly to take her apart, which he WOULD do. However, my point is how everyone(most) here doesn’t like FOX, yet they want to use them for their gain. How about Katey Curic, she hugs the left tight, drools over Obama like a kid in a candy store, couldn’t she Handle Orly? THEN you all wouldn’t have to reprogram your TV set to get FOX.

  37. avatar
    TRUTH October 29, 2009 at 12:31 pm #

    misha, you have issues. Call your counselor and make an appointment, I KNOW you have one and his number handy, so go ahead, go it now. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, and you call TeaParty people haters…your a sad person.

  38. avatar
    Paul October 29, 2009 at 12:33 pm #

    Not even “Fake News” Bill O’Reilly believes the crazies, how funny.

    Was the $20K fine enough? Maybe when Taitz becomes a real lawyer she will appreciate what just happened. I wonder if she is a mail order bride, just like her law degree? She is perfect reporter material for “Fake News”, where unfounded rumors and innuendo reign supreme , unlike a our US courts of law, where you need to present documented facts, not half baked lies (prepare for more failures).

    When flies get too close to the lights they get burned, Taitz just got burned, thing is, like a fly she will continue, no end in sight. Poor little Birthers they are haters not debaters.

    A lawyer, dentist, realtor and black belt, WOW I must say a JACK of all trades master of none.

  39. avatar
    TRUTH October 29, 2009 at 12:47 pm #

    Im not sure why you felt the need to post all that, when everyone agrees she is a nut. Kind of a waste of space to make a point already known. Yet you too make the statement “it would be great entertainment”, hoping to use Fox to exploit her. So what I’m beginning to understand here, is without realizing it, ALL of you have admitted it is FOX Network that will Grill this NUT, unlike ANY OTHER Network would do it. You KNOW Fox is more honest..”Fair n Balanced”, it just gets your goat they do it to your party, the Pres and his Cabinet almost daily.

    MAYYYBEEEE what some of you need to do is re-evaluate yourselves. You hate FOX because they ARE more Honest than your used to.

    AxleRodless says “Fox is not a NEWs network, they just give their perspective”. LOL!! What a great rep he is of the party. And for the person that said “nobody watches Fox”. ummmm…they are the #1 watched News Network…look it up.

  40. avatar
    richCares October 29, 2009 at 12:59 pm #

    Judge Carter Dismisses Orly and writes the following:

    “Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to
    disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a itting president who was popularly elected by “We the People”–over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

  41. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 1:09 pm #

    Too bad, I once lived on E72. Now I’m in Philly.

  42. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 1:16 pm #

    “your a sad person”

    It’s “you’re a sad person.” And, no I’m not. My wife loves the sarcasm. I’m Jewish from NY. What do you expect? The Spanish Inquisition? (Cue the sound effects)

  43. avatar
    misha October 29, 2009 at 1:20 pm #

    “I think we are being consistent; Orly is a lunatic and Fox News is a lunatic asylum. I don’t see the problem.”

    Exactly. They were made for each other.

  44. avatar
    AdrianInFlorida October 29, 2009 at 1:26 pm #

    8 years ago, they forsaw the Rise Of The Usurper Obama….And brought in another lackey for him, Lis Wiehl, who was born and raised specifically to give Obama legitimacy on Fox News…The pieces have been falling into place since 1961, Muwahahahaha

    “Lis Wiehl joined FOX News Channel (FNC) as a legal analyst in October 2001. Currently an associate professor of law at the University of Washington School of Law, Wiehl also serves as a legal commentator on National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered.”

  45. avatar
    Bob October 29, 2009 at 1:26 pm #

    Judge Carter dismisses Barnett v. Obama.

  46. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 2:29 pm #

    You must have missed it when she was grilled by David Shuster on MSNBC. It was hilarious. And I believe she was questioned by the fill in for Lou Dobbs on CNN. As a matter of fact the only cable network that did not question her was FOX. So you theory makes no sense. No one watches FOX for objective news. Dr. C could post many columns on how much misinformation they spread. FOX has already admitted that they are the “opposition network”. So to them it is not about the news, it is about making the Democrats look bad.

  47. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 2:33 pm #

    This is good news…I wonder how long it is going to take before we hear that Judge Carter is a traitor and a poor excuse for a Marine and that Obama/Holder got to him. It is always the same crap from these people. You would think that they would figure out that their cases don’t have a chance. But they seem to enjoy the punishment.

  48. avatar
    Paul October 29, 2009 at 2:34 pm #

    Judge Carter and Land, smack down the crazies!

    To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true, if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it. In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”. I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Stanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC).

  49. avatar
    Black Lion October 29, 2009 at 2:36 pm #

    Dr C., this poster should be in the running for the batshirt of the week award with this posting over at tROSL. He actually equated the President with Dred Scott…

    The Dred Scott Decision, the most infamous slavery case in the history of the U.S., clearly used de Vattel in its decision back in 1857 to define what a Natural Born citizen was.

    Without fear of contradiction, it does not import the condition of being private property, the subject of individual power and ownership. Upon a principle of etymology alone, the term citizen, as derived from civitas, conveys the ideas of connection or identification with the State or Government, and a participation of its functions. But beyond this, there is not, it is believed, to be found, in the theories of writers on Government, or in any actual experiment heretofore tried, an exposition of the term citizen, which has not been understood as conferring the actual possession and enjoyment, or the perfect right of acquisition and enjoyment, of an entire equality of privileges, civil and political.

    Thus Vattel, in the preliminary chapter to his Treatise on the Law of Nations, says: Nations or States are bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage, by the joint efforts of their mutual strength. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person, who possesses an understanding and a will peculiar to herself.’ Again, in the first chapter of the first book of the Treatise just quoted, the same writer, after repeating his definition of a State, proceeds to remark, that, from the very design that induces a number of men to form a society, which has its common interests and which is to act in concert, it is necessary that there should be established a public authority, to order and direct what is to be done by each, in relation to the end of the association. This political authority is the sovereignty.’ Again this writer remarks: The authority of all over each member essentially belongs to the body politic or the State.’

    By this same writer it is also said: The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural- born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.’ Again: I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to settle and stay in the country.’ (Vattel, Book 1, cap. 19, p. 101.) From the views here expressed, and they seem to be unexceptionable, it must follow, that with the slave, with one devoid of rights or capacities, civil or political, there could be no pact; that one thus situated could be no party to, or actor in, the association of those possessing free will, power, discretion.

    Now here’s where the irony enters stage left. Scott filed suit for his freedom in a free state. I think you can guess which free state it was: Illinois.

    Even more ironic was the lack of real information about Scott’s Birth. Apparently he was born some time between 1795 and 1799. Sound familiar? It should. Historical accounts of slave trading mark the majority of slaves entering Virginia (the place of Scott’s birth) between 1600 and 1800 from the Arab/Portugese province of Zanzibar.

    You may have heard of Zanzibar. Back in 1795, the territory encapsulated none other than region of Mombasa, Kenya.

    How ironic that this crucial turning point case in slavery history will contribute to the Constitutional downfall of the first black usurping “president”.

  50. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy October 29, 2009 at 4:38 pm #

    Thank you very much for posting this important notice.

  51. avatar
    TRUTH October 29, 2009 at 6:16 pm #

    Which sad to say isn’t a real difficult task for them to take on.

    As for posting the MANY columns of their misinformation…bring it. It would be a funny column to read. CONSPIRACY NEWS Doc can title it. I wonder how we would stack that up to the MANY networks/interviews that will not/dare not challenge the group of twits in the white house now. Fox is like the deer hunter of the news networks. They take a lot of shots, and sometimes their gonna miss. At least they are in the woods hunting. MSNBC and the other sorry MSMs don’t even own a gun. Maybe a b.b. gun…”yes sir mr. president(drool drool), your absolutely right mr. president(drool drool). We apologize for asking this difficult question, but what day were you married on mr. president(drool drool, giggle giggle)”. Gee, it gives me a tingle up my leg to think how tough those MSM can be on our elected officials, the (D) ones at least. If a (R) or (I) sneezes the wrong way however it’s headline news!!!

  52. avatar
    wendy October 29, 2009 at 7:41 pm #

    another fine example of lots of important sounding words, with no meaning at all.

    there is no question concerning where and when Obama was born.
    De Vattel might have written bunches of stuff…none of which are part of US law.

    But, hey… keeps them busy. Talk about can’t see the forest for the trees.

  53. avatar
    Randall Barondess October 31, 2009 at 5:05 am #

    Obama and his administration need out. Lets not forget about the economy. He blames it on Bush, well lets not forget that Bush was being run by Obamas congress two years before Obama took the helm….The economy is Obamas problem and he can not blame it on Bush…. I hope every real American gets the trash out of congress because their representatives are selling them down the river.

  54. avatar
    Mary Brown October 31, 2009 at 11:05 am #

    Who was in charge when the medicare drug benefit was passed without proper funding? Who lied about the reason for a war and claimed the war would pay for itself because the Iraqis would pay with their oil money? Do I excuse Democrats from their responsibility in this? No. But let us not forget who was in charge. This is just the short list.

  55. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy October 31, 2009 at 11:27 am #

    Congressional elections are just a year away. Better get busy.

  56. avatar
    aarrgghh October 31, 2009 at 6:16 pm #

    now this is funny. from a new (10/29) faux news poll:

    who do you think is more responsible for the current state of the economy — president barack obama or former president george w. bush?

    ALL: obama 18%; bush 58; both 9; neither 12
    DEM: obama 7%; bush 85; both 2; neither 4
    REP: obama 35%; bush 29; both 14; neither 18
    IND: obama 11%; bush 59; both 14; neither 13

    even among republicans, only one third blame obama.

    obviously, these are not “real americans” like randy …