Main Menu

Phil Berg wishes the President a happy birthday

Philip Berg

In a letter to supporters and press release, anti-Obama attorney Phil Berg wishes the President a happy 49th birthday.

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 08/04/10) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States says that “Obama Should Do As He Said Regarding Congressman Charlie Rangel, D–N.Y. and End Your Career With Dignity.”

Obama’s comments were directed to Congressman Rangel who is under investigation for violating Congressional Ethics Rules with 13 violations and Obama said he hopes the 80-year-old lawmaker can end his career with dignity now.

Obama, speaking on the issue for the first time, praised Rangel for serving his New York constituents over the years, but said he found the ethics charges “very troubling.”
Obama continued, “He’s somebody who’s at the end of his career. I’m sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity. And my hope is that it happens,” Obama said in an interview that aired last Friday on “CBS Evening News with Katie Couric.”

Berg said, “The charges against Obama are much more serious than Rangel’s as Obama’s actions rise to the level of treason as Obama is an Imposter; Obama is a Phony and has committed Fraud as this is the largest ‘Hoax’ against the United States in the history of our country, over 230 years !”

Berg also wishes Barry Soetoro [Barack Hussein Obama] a Happy and Hopefully Truthful 49th Birthday.

Berg has been demanding that Obama resign because he has failed to produce his long form [vault] Birth Certificate to show he is “Constitutionally eligible” being “natural born” to be President and citizenship documentation that he is even “naturalized” after being adopted/acknowledged in Indonesia with his name being changed to “Barry Soetoro” and his return to the United States at age ten [10] and evidence that he has legally changed his name back to Barack Hussein Obama.

I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ Forefathers and for the 3.2 million men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution with our ‘Peaceful Revolution’ to prove that Obama is not Constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President.”

Berg continued, “I still have a case pending in the Federal Courts. Go to obamacrimes.com to see the status of the case.”

After a cursory visit to ObamaCrimes, it was not apparent what the pending case is.

37 Responses to Phil Berg wishes the President a happy birthday

  1. avatar
    SvenMagnussen August 5, 2010 at 8:20 am #

    More and more are accepting the fact Obama was born in Hawaii on Aug 4, 1961 and his ineligibility problem begins after he arrives in Indonesia.

    WND has the story.

    “In a passport amendment submitted Aug. 13, 1968, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, identified her son with an Indonesian surname and asked the State Department to drop him from her U.S. passport.

    The transaction could have been part of an effort by Dunham to obtain Indonesian citizenship for her son. It took place before the State Department began requiring all citizens traveling abroad, regardless of age, to obtain their own passport.

    Several court cases challenging Obama’s presidential eligiblity have argued he gave up his U.S. citizenship in Indonesia …”
    – Jerome R. Corsi

  2. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 8:41 am #

    Citing Whirled Nut Daily is a sign of mental illness.

    WorldNetDaily’s Obama Birth Certificate Lies:
    http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2009/wndbirthlies.html

  3. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater (Bob Ross) August 5, 2010 at 8:52 am #

    SvenMagnussen: More and more are accepting the fact Obama was born in Hawaii on Aug 4, 1961 and his ineligibility problem begins after he arrives in Indonesia.WND has the story.“In a passport amendment submitted Aug. 13, 1968, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, identified her son with an Indonesian surname and asked the State Department to drop him from her U.S. passport.The transaction could have been part of an effort by Dunham to obtain Indonesian citizenship for her son. It took place before the State Department began requiring all citizens traveling abroad, regardless of age, to obtain their own passport.Several court cases challenging Obama’s presidential eligiblity have argued he gave up his U.S. citizenship in Indonesia …”- Jerome R. Corsi

    Considering how small of a readership WND has I find the phrase “more and more people” echo chamber speak

  4. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 9:19 am #

    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater (Bob Ross):
    Considering how small of a readership WND has I find the phrase “more and more people” echo chamber speak

    Sven is including past, present and future sock puppets. So many voices, so few brain cells.

  5. avatar
    Jules August 5, 2010 at 9:34 am #

    It’s funny how the birthers are happy to accept that Obama was born on 4 August 1961. After all, the evidence that confirms Obama’s date of birth happens to be the same evidence that confirms his birth in Hawaii.

  6. avatar
    AnotherBird August 5, 2010 at 9:41 am #

    When will Philip Berg and his ilk fade away.

  7. avatar
    Black Lion August 5, 2010 at 9:45 am #

    I think that Sven is channeling the pompus gasbag Rush Limbaugh….

    http://newsone.com/nation/newsonestaff5/rush-limbaugh-theres-no-proof-of-obamas-birthdate-video/?omcamp=EMC-CVNL

    “In his latest rant, Rush Limbaugh has questioned President Obama’s birthdate which is tomorrow (August 4, 1961).
    With his latest unsubstantiated claim, Rush has given life to the birther controversy which seemed to be dying down. Earlier this year, this rumor gained steam from the lips of former CNN commentator Lou Dobbs. Those claims and his anti-immigrant/immigration comments forced CNN to can the right-leaning pundit.
    Below is Limbaugh’s rant from earlier today:”

  8. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 9:48 am #

    Jules: It’s funny how the birthers are happy to accept that Obama was born on 4 August 1961. After all, the evidence that confirms Obama’s date of birth happens to be the same evidence that confirms his birth in Hawaii.

    Only if the “evidence” comes from a birther friendly, FUD site and not the U.S. or a state government. It hurts their little heads to read facts from reliable sources.

  9. avatar
    Dave August 5, 2010 at 9:50 am #

    About the “case pending in the Federal Courts,” maybe Berg is referring to Liberi v. Taitz?

  10. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 9:51 am #

    AnotherBird: When will Philip Berg and his ilk fade away.

    Not soon enough. What a pathetic POS. His fifteen minutes were up a long time ago. He’s desperately trying to seem relevant but actually comes across as a lonely lunatic tilting at windmills. Ask Phil how his great march on Washington is coming along.

  11. avatar
    AnotherBird August 5, 2010 at 9:54 am #

    Jules: It’s funny how the birthers are happy to accept that Obama was born on 4 August 1961. After all, the evidence that confirms Obama’s date of birth happens to be the same evidence that confirms his birth in Hawaii.

    Jules, it people who think they are being sarcastic. Bithers have always accepted facts when it is convenient for them. In this instance Berg is using August 4 as a chance to keep his supporters interested in him.

  12. avatar
    kimba August 5, 2010 at 10:32 am #

    ““In a passport amendment submitted Aug. 13, 1968, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, identified her son with an Indonesian surname and asked the State Department to drop him from her U.S. passport.”

    Of course Sven, you’re showing you didn’t actually read the documents. If you had, you’d know that’s untrue. The documents are publicly available and easily read and understood by someone with a high school education and a little bit of patience. Why don’t you think and read for yourself instead of waiting for birther leadership to tell you what to think and what the documents mean?

  13. avatar
    katahdin August 5, 2010 at 10:33 am #

    So this Berg clown want President Obama to resign because of a fake controversy ginned up by a bunch of right-wing nuts? Did he he think that Bush should have resigned after it became obvious that his administration lied about the need to invade Iraq?

  14. avatar
    Rickey August 5, 2010 at 10:35 am #

    Dave: About the “case pending in the Federal Courts,” maybe Berg is referring to Liberi v. Taitz?

    Reading the pleadings in Liberi v. Taitz is like listening to two pre-adolescents call each other names. Berg and Orly are pathetic, and they are embarrassments to the legal profession.

  15. avatar
    misha August 5, 2010 at 10:46 am #

    katahdin: Did he he think that Bush should have resigned after it became obvious that his administration lied about the need to invade Iraq?

    No, Shrub is a Republican.

    Rickey: Berg and Orly are pathetic, and they are embarrassments to the legal profession.

    They are shondes, and are embarrassments to us, like Roy Cohn and Andrew Breitbart.

  16. avatar
    richCares August 5, 2010 at 11:02 am #

    ““In a passport amendment submitted Aug. 13, 1968, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, identified her son with an Indonesian surname and asked the State Department to drop him from her U.S. passport.”
    .
    as the documents are readily available, where did sven get this phony story. He strikes me as not being intellectually capable to make this up, so where did it come from. This krap seems to flood the internet so quickly.
    .
    birthers are so gullible
    .

  17. avatar
    Reality Check August 5, 2010 at 11:06 am #

    katahdin: Did he he think that Bush should have resigned after it became obvious that his administration lied about the need to invade Iraq?

    IIRC Berg wanted Bush and Cheney tried for treason and executed. He is an equal opportunity kook.

  18. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 11:09 am #

    katahdin: Did he he think that Bush should have resigned after it became obvious that his administration lied about the need to invade Iraq?

    Actually, Berg the clown is also a truther and wanted more than a resignation from Cheney and Bush.

    RICO lawsuit, Rodriguez v. Bush

    In October 2004, Berg filed Rodriguez v. Bush, accusing the President of the United States and 155 other parties of complicity in the 9/11 attacks.
    This 237-page civil lawsuit[6][7] included allegations pursuant to the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) against The United States Of America, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, George Herbert Walker Bush, George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld,and numerous others, totaling 156 defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    This lawsuit made hundreds of allegations including allegations that the Twin Towers were destroyed by means of “controlled demolitions;” that members of the FDNY were ordered, on instructions of the CIA, not to talk about it; that the FDNY conspired with Larry Silverstein to deliberately destroy 7WTC; that projectiles were fired at the Twin Towers from “pods” affixed to the underside of the planes that struck them; that FEMA is working with the US government to create “American Gulag” concentration camps which FEMA will run once the federal government’s plan to impose martial law is in place; that phone calls made by some of the victims, as reported by their family members, were not actually made but were “faked” by the government using “voice morphing” technology; that a missile, not American Airlines Flight 77, struck the Pentagon; that United Airlines Flight 93 was shot down by the U.S. military; that the defendants had foreknowledge of the attacks and actively conspired to bring them about; that the defendants engaged in kidnapping, arson, murder, treason, conspiracy, trafficking in narcotics, embezzlement, securities fraud, insider trading, identity and credit card theft, blackmail, trafficking in humans, and the abduction and sale of women and children for sex.[7]
    The matter was transferred to the Southern District of New York on May 2, 2005.[8] On June 26, 2006, the court dismissed the claims against the USA, DHS, and FEMA, and gave the plaintiff until July 7, 2006 to show cause why his lawsuit should not be dismissed with respect to the other 153 defendants.[9]
    The plaintiff failed to do so, and the court dismissed all of the claims against all of the remaining 153 defendants on July 17, 2006.[10]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Berg#RICO_lawsuit.2C_Rodriguez_v._Bush

  19. avatar
    Ellid August 5, 2010 at 11:14 am #

    Sven –

    Stanley Ann Dunham did nothing of the sort. She clearly identified her son as Barack Hussein Obama. Why are you lying?

  20. avatar
    Rickey August 5, 2010 at 11:20 am #

    Ellid: Sven –
    Stanley Ann Dunham did nothing of the sort. She clearly identified her son as Barack Hussein Obama.Why are you lying?

    Because he is Sven. Making up things and distorting things is in his DNA.

  21. avatar
    AnotherBird August 5, 2010 at 11:34 am #

    Majority Will: Actually, Berg the clown is also a truther and wanted more than a resignation from Cheney and Bush.

    RICO lawsuit, Rodriguez v. Bush

    In October 2004, Berg filed Rodriguez v. Bush, accusing the President of the United States and 155 other parties of complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

    So Berg is just another conspiracy nut. I never thought that anyone could be crazier that Orly Taitz when it comes to frivolous lawsuits.

  22. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 11:43 am #

    AnotherBird:
    So Berg is just another conspiracy nut. I never thought that anyone could be crazier that Orly Taitz when it comes to frivolous lawsuits.

    In 2001, Berg demanded the disbarment of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas due to their participation in the case Bush v. Gore. He also challenged President George W. Bush on his right to conduct a war against terror and another against Saddam Hussein with only a congressional authorization. And he has sued Taitz on behalf people who believe they were targeted by the Moldovan dentist and amateur attorney:
    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/05/liberi-et-al-v-taitz-et-al/

  23. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 11:48 am #

    AnotherBird:
    So Berg is just another conspiracy nut. I never thought that anyone could be crazier that Orly Taitz when it comes to frivolous lawsuits.

    Birthers often cite Berg, a Democrat as evidence of this conspiracy originating from the left. He is a PUMA and supported Hillary Clinton. Birthers will twist that by saying he was one of her attorneys. He’s also one of the birthers who pushed the million dollars to hide the truth conspiracy. Of course, with no proof.
    And Berg is obviously pro-Democrat as long as you’re white.

  24. avatar
    AnotherBird August 5, 2010 at 12:04 pm #

    Majority Will: (Berg) he has sued Taitz on behalf people who believe they were targeted by the Moldovan dentist and amateur attorney.

    That is a dangerous comment. There should have been a warning label. I don’t know what would have happened to me if I was drinking something. Sorry, I had to laugh when I read that.

    Majority Will: Birthers often cite Berg, a Democrat as evidence of this conspiracy originating from the left.

    Why don’t they cite that he is a truther? Birthers are utter silly.

  25. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 12:15 pm #

    AnotherBird:
    That is a dangerous comment. There should have been a warning label. I don’t know what would have happened to me if I was drinking something. Sorry, I had to laugh when I read that.
    Why don’t they cite that he is a truther? Birthers are utter silly.

    It’s pretty funny and predictable. When a birther who is rabidly fright wing and ultraconservative starts citing Berg, I’ll point out it his truther stance and Democratic allegiance. Usually only silence is returned or the goalposts get moved and the topic shifts. Birthers despise the truth because it causes them too much mental anguish.

  26. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 1:51 pm #

    AnotherBird:
    I don’t know what would have happened to me if I was drinking something. Sorry, I had to laugh when I read that.

    I may owe a few people new keyboards. 😉

    Birthers are the perfect setup for a punch line sometimes.

  27. avatar
    Sean August 5, 2010 at 3:15 pm #

    Majority Will:
    I may owe a few people new keyboards.
    Birthers are the perfect setup for a punch line sometimes.

    My favorite was that Stanley Ann is not Barrack Obama’s Mother.

  28. avatar
    katahdin August 5, 2010 at 6:03 pm #

    Sean: My favorite was that Stanley Ann is not Barrack Obama’s Mother.

    Well, you have to understand that, for the birthers, it’s very painful to contemplate the reality of a black person coming out of a white person, and especially, a black person being inside a white person.

  29. avatar
    Reality Check August 5, 2010 at 6:31 pm #

    Phil Berg? Wasn’t he a birther or something?

  30. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 6:33 pm #

    Reality Check: Phil Berg? Wasn’t he a birther or something?

    And some thing.

  31. avatar
    Majority Will August 5, 2010 at 6:35 pm #

    Reality Check: Phil Berg? Wasn’t he a birther or something?

    And only one-ninth of him is above water. The rest is lurking below the surface and waiting to wreck anyone who comes near him.

  32. avatar
    AnotherBird August 5, 2010 at 8:15 pm #

    katahdin:
    Well, you have to understand that, for the birthers, it’s very painful to contemplate the reality of a black person coming out of a white person, and especially, a black person being inside a white person.

    For some it is very painful to accept that a white person and a black person can actually get along, fall in love and get married. Captain it seems that they have a problem with reality.

  33. avatar
    AnotherBird August 5, 2010 at 8:33 pm #

    Majority Will:
    And only one-ninth of him is above water. The rest is lurking below the surface and waiting to wreck anyone who comes near him.

    Like Orly Taitz. suesuesue suesuesue ….

  34. avatar
    US Citizen August 5, 2010 at 11:42 pm #

    Berg stopped pushing his WTC conspiracies as soon as that well dried up enough.
    He’s performs common ambulance chasing practices coupled with fringe lunatic beliefs that give him a niche market and audience.
    I bet more than anything, he’s pissed that Orly and the other birther sideshows are taking away his limelight and thus income.
    But like the true scum he is, he now rides Orly’s coattails via their mutual suits they’ve brought against each other.
    One thing’s for sure: the moment Obama is out of office, Berg will find yet another bizarre cause to rally behind. Replete with Paypal donation boxes ready for the gullible.
    Another bottom feeder of the legal world, but at least he’s avoided Orly’s dental chair of passion. I think Berg prefers his women colder and looser. 😉

  35. avatar
    Majority Will August 6, 2010 at 12:05 am #

    US Citizen: Berg stopped pushing his WTC conspiracies as soon as that well dried up enough.
    He’s performs common ambulance chasing practices coupled with fringe lunatic beliefs that give him a niche market and audience.
    I bet more than anything, he’s pissed that Orly and the other birther sideshows are taking away his limelight and thus income.
    But like the true scum he is, he now rides Orly’s coattails via their mutual suits they’ve brought against each other.
    One thing’s for sure: the moment Obama is out of office, Berg will find yet another bizarre cause to rally behind. Replete with Paypal donation boxes ready for the gullible.
    Another bottom feeder of the legal world, but at least he’s avoided Orly’s dental chair of passion. I think Berg prefers his women colder and looser.

    I hope Mario, Orly and Philip and the other birther lawyers (oh, Lakin, you must be clueless like so many birthers) screw up enough to get appropriate punishments as allowed by law.

  36. avatar
    Majority Will August 6, 2010 at 2:16 pm #

    NOW I remember where I’ve seen Phil Berg before!

    He was Bumble, the Abominable Snow Monster of the North!

  37. avatar
    ASK Esq August 6, 2010 at 3:52 pm #

    Berg is basically the ten year old kid who, when his parents brought home twin babies, jumped up on the sofa and started yelling “Hey! Look at me!”