Main Menu

Stanley Ann, not a commie radical after all?

Recent disclosures by Allen and Strunk’s Freedom of Information Act releases have fueled an old conspiracy theory about Barack Obama and his mother. Rather than being a commie radical, she was actually a spy for the CIA! That’s what an article titled Obama’s Pedigree at the Opinion Maker web site this past Friday. It’s been copied and reprinted on other web sites.

Wayne Madsen, writing for Opinion Maker, sees the destruction of routine passport applications in the 1980’s as part of a CIA coverup of the undercover activities of Obama’s mother — that eventually resulted in the recruitment of Barack Obama by the CIA after his graduation from Columbia University in 1983.

27 Responses to Stanley Ann, not a commie radical after all?

  1. avatar
    Sef August 10, 2010 at 11:17 pm #

    I believe the possibility that Stanley Ann was a CIA agent was mentioned on a Freeper thread some time ago and was received with much hilarity.

  2. avatar
    AnotherBird August 10, 2010 at 11:54 pm #

    Sef: I believe the possibility that Stanley Ann was a CIA agent was mentioned on a Freeper thread some time ago and was received with much hilarity.

    Well then it makes Obama definitely a natural born citizen. Conspiracy theories rot the brain.

  3. avatar
    Steve August 11, 2010 at 1:16 am #

    That’s actually pretty awesome. In a “Weasels Ripped My Flesh” sort of pulpy way.

  4. avatar
    ASK Esq August 11, 2010 at 8:31 am #

    And here I thought the latest birther idea was that she wasn’t really his mother at all. It seems that there is no concept too ridiculous for these people to believe.

  5. avatar
    Slartibartfast August 11, 2010 at 9:51 am #

    ASK Esq: And here I thought the latest birther idea was that she wasn’t really his mother at all. It seems that there is no concept too ridiculous for these people to believe.

    You shouldn’t try to reconcile different birther beliefs – you might hurt yourself. The birthers seem to have taken the phrase, ‘consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds’ waaaaay to literally…

  6. avatar
    kimba August 11, 2010 at 2:48 pm #

    “ASK Esq wrote:
    And here I thought the latest birther idea was that she wasn’t really his mother at all. ”

    Oh, that’s not a new one. Birthers go down the line starting with not born in Hawaii, to lost his citizenship when adopted by Soetoro, to renounced his citizenship, to Madelyn Dunham was his mother, Malcolm X was his father, to he had an Indonesian passport because travel to Pakistan was banned for US citizens. It’s been the same crap for two years. As each idea is proven wrong, the march through the list and when they reach the end, they start over as if none of it was ever proven wrong. It’s like cars on some crazy train derailing. When all the cars are gone, they circle back, put them all back on the tracks and start over.

  7. avatar
    Ellid August 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm #

    kimba: “ASK Esq wrote:
    And here I thought the latest birther idea was that she wasn’t really his mother at all. ”Oh, that’s not a new one. Birthers go down the line starting with not born in Hawaii, to lost his citizenship when adopted by Soetoro, to renounced his citizenship, to Madelyn Dunham was his mother, Malcolm X was his father, to he had an Indonesian passport because travel to Pakistan was banned for US citizens.It’s been the same crap for two years.As each idea is proven wrong, the march through the list and when they reach the end, they start over as if none of it was ever proven wrong.It’s like cars on some crazy train derailing.When all the cars are gone, they circle back, put them all back on the tracks and start over.

    I keep waiting for one of these morons to contact the Shabazz family to demand a DNA sample “proving” that they’re actually related to the President. THAT would be epic.

  8. avatar
    Black Lion August 11, 2010 at 3:33 pm #

    Or we note that Glenn Beck has finally become 100% mentally unhinged….On his show he actually compares the President to Lucifer…..Really…..

    http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/10/glenn_beck_compares_obama_to_lucifer.php#more

  9. avatar
    sfjeff August 11, 2010 at 3:45 pm #

    “As each idea is proven wrong, the march through the list and when they reach the end, they start over as if none of it was ever proven wrong. ”

    Oh thank you- so right and so funny.

  10. avatar
    Majority Will August 11, 2010 at 4:31 pm #

    kimba: “ASK Esq wrote:
    And here I thought the latest birther idea was that she wasn’t really his mother at all. ”Oh, that’s not a new one. Birthers go down the line starting with not born in Hawaii, to lost his citizenship when adopted by Soetoro, to renounced his citizenship, to Madelyn Dunham was his mother, Malcolm X was his father, to he had an Indonesian passport because travel to Pakistan was banned for US citizens.It’s been the same crap for two years.As each idea is proven wrong, the march through the list and when they reach the end, they start over as if none of it was ever proven wrong.It’s like cars on some crazy train derailing.When all the cars are gone, they circle back, put them all back on the tracks and start over.

    To make the insanity complete, some birthers invent sock puppets to make it seem like they’re not actually rehashing anything or starting over.

    That way it’s not true again.

    And they shall be known as re-birthers. It’s Episode II: Attack of the Clowns.

  11. avatar
    misha August 11, 2010 at 4:36 pm #

    Black Lion: On his show he actually compares the President to Lucifer…..Really…..

    Sorry, but who is Lucifer?

  12. avatar
    Black Lion August 11, 2010 at 4:48 pm #

    misha: Sorry, but who is Lucifer?

    I know you are messing with me but I’ll bite…The “Devil”….

  13. avatar
    misha August 11, 2010 at 5:18 pm #

    misha: Sorry, but who is Lucifer?

    Black Lion: I know you are messing with me but I’ll bite…The “Devil”….

    I’m Jewish, remember? When I was in NY, I worked for an optometrist whose telephone number was 212-6XX-6666.

    One day, a customer said to me “you really should change your phone number.” I asked why. She replied, “it’s bad luck.” I kept pressing her, and she finally said, “those are the numbers of the devil.” I never heard of that before.

    I told the optometrist, and he laughed. My mother never heard that, either.

    Jindal wrote about an exorcism, when he was in college. He also claimed he smelled sulfur. That woman was having a breakdown, and should have been taken to a hospital and psychiatrist, instead of Jindal and the rest mumbling claptrap.

    Whenever someone says they are possessed, they should see a Jewish psychiatrist.

  14. avatar
    Rickey August 11, 2010 at 6:56 pm #

    misha: I’m Jewish, remember? When I was in NY, I worked for an optometrist whose telephone number was 212-6XX-6666.

    914-666-6666 is the listed number for a limo service in Mount Kisco. Mount Kisco originally was Mount Kisco 6-XXXX, which of course became 666 when the phone company stopped designating the phone exchanges with letters It never occurred to me that anyone believed that 666 had any significance until I moved to Arizona and became exposed to fundamentalist Christians.

  15. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy August 11, 2010 at 7:57 pm #

    Rickey: It never occurred to me that anyone believed that 666 had any significance until I moved to Arizona and became exposed to fundamentalist Christians.

    No Social Security Number starts 666, by the way.

  16. avatar
    richCares August 11, 2010 at 8:02 pm #

    There was a lottery in Illinois where the $500.00 prize went the number 666.
    To the fundies, this is proof that Obama is the anti-Christ (or is it anti-Freeze)

  17. avatar
    justasking August 12, 2010 at 7:20 am #

    I have read, and seen evidence, that strongly implicates SAD and Obama with the CIA. (This would explain multiple properties, multiple social security numbers, conn social security number previously issued, time gaps, missing documents, sealed records before the election, the ford foundation links, ect). It seems that even the radical left has started to embrace this. Acceptance that Obamas were involved in the CIA seems to quell the possibility that Obama is truly a usurper or illegal POTUS, and that the DNC has committed election fraud on a grand scale. See comments above. Thus, from a political standpoint, this is far preferable to grasping the concept that the Constitution has been subverted, and treason was deliberately propagated on Americans by a political left whom yearned for power. Release of the Journolist comments and commenter’s would likely be revealing again here.

    However, as my name here implies, I am just asking if “Obama was CIA” really better than the above alternative? Consider that Obama would then have been, and since has not publically claimed he is no longer, would still be considered an Agent. Thus, any assistance the CIA gave Obama thus far would be considered a “domestic operation”. That would make it entirely illegal, since the CIA cannot operate covert operations on US soil by law. Remember all that money that appeared in Obama’s election coffers that cannot be traced!

    I’m trying to consider which of the two is worse, a POTUS whom is an illegal alien and a DNC and journalists whom committed treason for a political agenda, or knowing that our government CIA is completely out of control and now operating on US soil against Americans?

    Perhaps its better we just consider the possibility, based upon the preponderance of evidence, that both are true.

    Justasking

  18. avatar
    Northland10 August 12, 2010 at 8:39 am #

    Making him CIA can be helpful for birthers, as they can avoid all those pesking things like, evidence. They can just stat that it is all a CIA secret. No more need to make up their facts or even move the now super secret goal posts.

    On a side note, Justasking must have been a big Dukakis and Clinton fan given his belief that somebody from the CIA cannot be President.

  19. avatar
    Majority Will August 12, 2010 at 8:45 am #

    Justblathering nonsense. Are birthers really this deranged or just taking really good drugs?

    “I have read, and seen evidence . . .” And then his cat spoke to his mirror who confirmed everything. What a loon.

  20. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater (Bob Ross) August 12, 2010 at 9:29 am #

    Black Lion: Or we note that Glenn Beck has finally become 100% mentally unhinged….On his show he actually compares the President to Lucifer…..Really…..http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/10/glenn_beck_compares_obama_to_lucifer.php#more

    Well I’m wondering how well he knows Lucifer to make a comparison? Maybe Beck sold his soul?

  21. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater (Bob Ross) August 12, 2010 at 9:32 am #

    Majority Will: Justblathering nonsense. Are birthers really this deranged or just taking really good drugs?“I have read, and seen evidence . . .” And then his cat spoke to his mirror who confirmed everything. What a loon.

    But he’s just asking questions. Its the fox news method they don’t actually come out and say it they instead put a question mark after everything.

  22. avatar
    Bovril August 12, 2010 at 9:35 am #

    justasking: I have read, and seen evidence, that strongly implicates SAD and Obama with the CIA.

    Nooooooo, you have read some mad made up cack, probably referring that idiot Manning. There is no proof as there is no fact.

    I’m willing to bet your whining about Da Ebil CIA and Usurping doesn’t stretch to the ex Head of the CIA…..which would be Bubba’s dad, Bush 1…..does it..?

  23. avatar
    sfjeff August 12, 2010 at 12:28 pm #

    justasking:
    “I have read, and seen evidence, that strongly implicates SAD and Obama with the CIA”

    Great- why don’t you provide it to us to look at.

    “It seems that even the radical left has started to embrace this.”

    Umm who? You seem to be big on vague assertions.

    “Acceptance that Obamas were involved in the CIA seems to quell the possibility that Obama is truly a usurper or illegal POTUS, and that the DNC has committed election fraud on a grand scale”

    Actually that whole statement is full of wrong. First of all I have seen no evidence to support anything in your entire statement. Secondly, even if they were involved with the CIA, that would have no affect on eligibility.

    “I am just asking if “Obama was CIA” really better than the above alternative?”

    If i ask whether it would be better if you were a child molestor or a wife beater, without any evidence that you are either, would that be an honest question. Your question is intellectually dishonest, since there is no evidence of anything that you posit in your post.

    I doubt you will be back, but if you do, I would love to see your ‘evidence’

  24. avatar
    Origuy August 12, 2010 at 7:49 pm #

    Lucifer means “light-bearer” in Latin. The word appears in Isaiah (in the Vulgate) as a name for the king of Babylon, and in Peter to refer to the Morning Star (i.e. Venus). The use as the name of a fallen angel comes originally from Jewish writings from around the first century CE. Christians and Muslims both picked up the story.

    Speaking of 666 in telephone numbers, the exchange for the University of San Francisco, a Jesuit school, has been 666 for a long time. They’ve spread out to other exchanges in recent years. Make of that what you will.

  25. avatar
    justasking August 12, 2010 at 9:04 pm #

    “I have read, and seen evidence, that strongly implicates SAD and Obama with the CIA”
    SFjeff— Great- why don’t you provide it to us to look at.
    Can you not read my post or search the internet yourself?

    “It seems that even the radical left has started to embrace this.”
    SFJeff—Umm who? You seem to be big on vague assertions.

    Please other peoples posts above me.

    “Acceptance that Obamas were involved in the CIA seems to quell the possibility that Obama is truly a usurper or illegal POTUS, and that the DNC has committed election fraud on a grand scale”
    SFJeff—Actually that whole statement is full of wrong. First of all I have seen no evidence to support anything in your entire statement. Secondly, even if they were involved with the CIA, that would have no affect on eligibility.

    See post below on point one. On point two, I personally agree with you here, see my final comment original post.

    SFJeff—“I am just asking if “Obama was CIA” really better than the above alternative?”
    If i ask whether it would be better if you were a child molestor or a wife beater, without any evidence that you are either, would that be an honest question. Your question is intellectually dishonest, since there is no evidence of anything that you posit in your post. I doubt you will be back, but if you do, I would love to see your evidence’

    I have now provided you with the basics. If you really are seeking the truth’, whatever that may be, you can easily do searches about Obama and the information already provided. I noticed that you would like to see my evidence’ but much (not all) is available via the internet, if your willing to open your mind and look. You might try looking up the ford foundation, then cross searching with Indonesia, and microloans—which SAD was part of in the 1960’s. Try Wikipedia, ford foundation. Check to see if anyone has done any mock trials on the subject. Were there CIA people that testified, what was the result?

    Oh, just asking again, since you were aggressive in your posting style and stated I was short on facts, what facts or statements do you have that show Obama or SAD weren’t CIA? A simple denial by Obama or family with reference would be adequate, if you have time to come back.

    Justasking

  26. avatar
    Majority Will August 12, 2010 at 9:15 pm #

    “Can you not read my post or search the internet yourself?”

    Typical, cowardly birther copout. What a steaming pile of just drivel.

    “if your willing to open your mind and look”

    Grammar lessons are easy to find as well.

    Clueless troll alert with a heavy dose of lazy and a touch of unjustified hubris.

    “A simple denial by Obama or family with reference would be adequate”

    The troll has not denied nor provided evidence of not being a child molester.

    Do your own work, lazy troll.

  27. avatar
    sfjeff August 12, 2010 at 9:31 pm #

    “Can you not read my post or search the internet yourself?”

    I read your post- you provided no facts, just an assertion. I asked you to support your assertion with facts. If you can’t be bothered to support your assertions then I will just assume that you can’t back it up with any facts.

    “Please other peoples posts above me.”

    Frankly i can’t even decipher what you mean by this. You said that the radical left is embracing your theory- I asked who- as in who is the radical left that you are referring to.

    “I have now provided you with the basics.”

    No, really you haven’t provided anything but your unsupported assertions. Again.

    “If you really are seeking the truth’, whatever that may be, you can easily do searches about Obama and the information already provided”

    If you know this information, why not enlighten us and give us the specific links. Or if it isn’t on the internet, name the book, or the magazine article.

    “You might try looking up the ford foundation, then cross searching with Indonesia, and microloans—which SAD was part of in the 1960’s. Try Wikipedia, ford foundation. ”

    To what end? Again, if you know the information point it out. If you only are guessing, then admit it.

    “Check to see if anyone has done any mock trials on the subject. Were there CIA people that testified, what was the result?””

    The only ‘mock’ and I find the term ironic that i am aware of is Mannings farce. As I recall his ‘CIA’ witness never showed. If this whole thing is in support of Manning’s rantings, then fine, I know how to categorize your position.

    If you have any actual proof, get back to me.

    “Oh, just asking again, since you were aggressive in your posting style and stated I was short on facts, what facts or statements do you have that show Obama or SAD weren’t CIA?”

    Oh the horrors- Obama hasn’t stated that he wasn’t part of the CIA. Is this the pathetic best you can do? There have been a myriad of smears circulating around the internet- that Obama is sleeper agent for the KGB, that he is secretly gay, that he is a heavy drug user, that he is really Santa Claus- i really don’t expect him to refute all the smears that float around.

    I don’t have to refute that Obama worked for the CIA- matter of fact- if he had I would assume that would show that he was a patriotic American.

    FACT: I interviewed with the CIA once. It was really quite cloak and dagger, and i still don’t believe Obama worked for the CIA.