Main Menu

“Natural born citizen” dropped in new Constitution

Not eligible under new Constitution

New Constitution takes effect when President is sworn in 2013

I don’t know where the press has been on this one, but there will be a new Constitution to go into effect when the new President is sworn in 2013. The phrase “natural born citizen” is dropped in a vote October 15.

Is this the solution for President Obama’s eligibility challenges? Apparently not because President Obama would not meet the requirement that he be a citizen and resident of the country of Georgia for 5 years. Still, it’s an option for the future.

14 Responses to “Natural born citizen” dropped in new Constitution

  1. avatar
    misha October 18, 2010 at 11:25 am #

    Commies.

  2. avatar
    Granite October 18, 2010 at 5:06 pm #

    Can anyone help me find a full list of lawsuits against Obama or trying to stop the election, stop the Electoral College from voting or stop the inauguration? I have said (based on my memory) that most of the lawsuits were attempts to stop the election, stop the Electoral College, stop the Congress from confirming, Etc. But my memory is no longer good enough, and I have to reference the lawsuits. Can anyone help me?

  3. avatar
    misha October 18, 2010 at 5:15 pm #

    Granite: Can anyone help me?

    Would this Kenya BC help?

  4. avatar
    Majority Will October 18, 2010 at 5:17 pm #

    Granite: Can anyone help me find a full list of lawsuits against Obama or trying to stop the election, stop the Electoral College from voting or stop the inauguration? I have said (based on my memory) that most of the lawsuits were attempts to stop the election, stop the Electoral College, stop the Congress from confirming, Etc. But my memory is no longer good enough, and I have to reference the lawsuits. Can anyone help me?

    Last updated Sept. 13th, 2010 (pdf):

    http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHER%20CASE%20LIST.pdf

  5. avatar
    Whatever4 October 18, 2010 at 5:46 pm #

    Majority Will: Last updated Sept. 13th, 2010 (pdf):http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHER%20CASE%20LIST.pdf

    I was going to post the list also. This is the work of Tes from Politijab and Fogbow as well as her own mostly dormant site, “What’s your Evidence”. She is a lawyer who meticulously researched the cases to construct the list, and updates it when appropriate. Fogbow has extensive postings on most cases, including transcripts for the major cases, and dockets and links to documents for most of the cases.

    (She’s my friend, and I like to make sure she gets credit.)

  6. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP October 18, 2010 at 5:49 pm #

    [The following comment is in error, Doc.]

    I INTERRUPT THIS BLOG FOR A SPECIAL NEWS BULLETIN.

    BARNETT APPEAL TOSSED OUT..

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/39292211/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-APPEAL-9th-CIRCUIT-26-Submitted-ECF-Answering-brief-for-review-TransportRoom-26-0

  7. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP October 18, 2010 at 5:54 pm #

    It is submitted that counsel’s attempts to demonstrate that the District Court was prejudiced and biased against her are utterly frivolous, and completely without merit. See also Rhodes v. MacDonald, 670 F.Supp.2d 1363 (M.D. Ga 2009).

    Finally, the attempts by the Barnett Appellants to overturn the District Court’s decision on the grounds that the court was biased or intimidated are based on arguments which are false, frivolous and fanciful.

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=13099

  8. avatar
    nbc October 18, 2010 at 6:22 pm #

    FUTTHESHUCKUP: I INTERRUPT THIS BLOG FOR A SPECIAL NEWS BULLETIN.BARNETT APPEAL TOSSED OUT..http://www.scribd.com/doc/39292211/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-APPEAL-9th-CIRCUIT-26-Submitted-ECF-Answering-brief-for-review-TransportRoom-26-0

    This is the answer to the appeal brief, not the Court ruling. Oops….

  9. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP October 18, 2010 at 6:30 pm #

    I had some questions about it, nbc. I took the person’s word for it that it was the ruling but have been trying to verify it but have not gotten a good verification.

  10. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP October 18, 2010 at 6:35 pm #

    Yeah, it says “appellee’s’ answering brief” right on it. I should have looked first.

  11. avatar
    FUTTHESHUCKUP October 18, 2010 at 6:38 pm #

    Oh well, I guess we’ll have to wait another week or two for the denial

  12. avatar
    Majority Will October 18, 2010 at 7:37 pm #

    Whatever4: (She’s my friend, and I like to make sure she gets credit.)

    Absolutely. Excellent work and birther kryptonite.

  13. avatar
    nbc October 18, 2010 at 8:30 pm #

    FUTTHESHUCKUP: Oh well, I guess we’ll have to wait another week or two for the denial

    Yep.

  14. avatar
    Vince Treacy October 20, 2010 at 6:14 pm #

    The BBC asks “Who, what, why: What happens when a country loses its ‘birth certificate’?”

    “Fiji has admitted losing the legal document confirming its independence from the United Kingdom. But does that threaten its existence as a state?”

    Read about it: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11565853

    The happy ending: “In the same way that losing your birth certificate does not mean you cease to exist, the legitimacy of a state does not rest on a piece of paper, agrees Prof Roda Mushkat.”

    Whew!