My Google alerts pointed me to an article at WorldNetDaily where Larry Klayman supposedly pulled the rug out from under Obama’s attorneys with his (now stricken) “Second Amended Complaint” in Voeltz v. Obama. Attorney Klayman somehow overlooked this slam-dunk winner in his original complaint and the amended complaint. If it’s such a winner, one wonders how paralegal Jerry Collette figured it out but attorney Klayman didn’t (perhaps Klayman finally got around to reading Collette’s case).
I’m not a lawyer, but those who are seem to think that this declaratory judgment is a non-starter. However, what stuck me, and prompted this story’s title is what I saw at WND: