Main Menu

Noonan doubts judge’s GOP credentials

This was published at The American Resistance Party web site, attributed to birther plaintiff Edward Noonan:

As one of the litigants in Attorney Orly Taitz’s upcoming Barry Soetoro (aka BHO) eligibility case (Jan 3, 2013), I have doubts that Judge Morrison C. England, Jr can be objective about removing the Usurper-in-Chief from office. England will be incapable of being fair and honest in this “Soetoro eligibility” matter. I will admit that England was nominated by George W. Bush (on March 21, 2002) for the seat on the Federal bench but I can hardly believe that England is a stalwart GOPer.

I have been unhappy with England in the past. He was the “conservative turncoat” who decided anyone that contributed money to Prop 8 could be “outed” in newspaper articles. The same leftist garbage is currently being pulled back East where names of private GUN OWNERS are being highlighted in the local newspapers. This so-called Judge (England) ruled that it is okay to ridicule and give out names and addresses of those that contribute to anti-gay causes and campaigns.

See: http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/Judge-won-t-limit-disclosure-of-Prop-8-donor-list-2326456.php

Judge England disregarded Supreme Court rulings that allowed the NAACP and the Socialist Workers Party to conceal their membership or contribution lists after encountering public hostility. But the anti-gay patriots were not allowed the same status. Thus, I do not feel kindly towards Mr. England.

Every judge has politics, but they are expected to follow the law, and if they don’t their decisions get overturned.

The non-sequitur in Noonan’s complaint here is that in the NAACP/SWP case, the organization was allowed to keep its records private. That’s different from the disclosure of public records. If the NAACP members and SWP members had made political contributions, or registered something with the State, their records would be public also.

,

24 Responses to Noonan doubts judge’s GOP credentials

  1. avatar
    bgansel9 December 31, 2012 at 11:41 pm #

    It’s amazing how their position always change depending on the circumstances. There is no cut and dried formula (or what I would call a consistent ethic) to measure independent of the circumstances. (Reminds me of Michelle Malkin and the countertops inspections after a certain little boy said something nice about liberals.) More information here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/10/10/396219/-Michelle-Malkin-SCHIP-attack-on-12y-o-exposed-as-lies# (Malkin thought the countertops were too expensive.)

  2. avatar
    Thinker January 1, 2013 at 12:13 am #

    Last spring, Ed Noonan (allegedly) submitted a hilarious complaint to the State of California Commission on Judicial Conduct against the judge in his CA birfer case. The essence of his complaint was that the defendants–CA SoS and Obama for America–had submitted responses to his lawsuit saying that the case was just another frivolous BS birfer case (I’m paraphrasing) and that the judge should be punished for de facto endorsing this position–and libeling the plaintiffs–by allowing it to be filed in his court. To show how horribly this judge had breached his judicial ethics, Noonan’s complaint to the Commission included lots of posts from the Fogbow in which people made fun of the plaintiffs and their lawsuit (although the comments he included were all made based on the content of the original lawsuit before the judge committed the ethical breach of allowing the defendants to defend themselves in his court). The complaint is available here http://www.scribd.com/doc/93096971/2012-05-10-CA-NOONAN-Complaint-Against-Judge-Micheal-P-Kenny. It’s a fun read.

  3. avatar
    Daniel January 1, 2013 at 12:27 am #

    Sounds like he’s figured out he’s going to lose, and he’s preparing his excuse ahead of the post failure rush

  4. avatar
    bgansel9 January 1, 2013 at 12:30 am #

    I didn’t realize a judge was supposed to have GOP credentials.

  5. avatar
    JPotter January 1, 2013 at 1:51 am #

    bgansel9: It’s amazing how their position always change depending on the circumstances.

    It’s like a Twister / Kama Sutra mashup.

  6. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 1, 2013 at 2:33 am #

    So, Khan Noonan Singh doubts the Judge’s credentials does he?

  7. avatar
    WOT! January 1, 2013 at 10:33 am #

    Of course the BC is at issue isn’t it ? What is not at issue is the Kenyan father who sired a corrupt and immoral critter of some kind that has entered America’s sacred house, it’s the white one wouldn’t ya know? AND! of course… the elections individual “Tim Adams” has an affidavit that says the long form BC is nowhere to be found nor did it ever exist, so who can beleive anyone about anything that’s involved in validating the “critter” in the White House.

    An evidence trial is needed to ferret the truth out from all sides on the “critters” issue. Let’s not forget that it’s said that the “critter” expended apx. 2.5 million dollars to hide his “crimes”

  8. avatar
    Birther Weary January 1, 2013 at 11:40 am #

    bgansel9:
    I didn’t realize a judge was supposed to have GOP credentials.

    Why not? Birthers have already created their own grand juries. It’s only logical that they’d expect judges to be partisan hacks too.

  9. avatar
    WOT! January 1, 2013 at 3:42 pm #

    Whose credibility is in question on this blog? Is it the blog owner who NEVER provides argument and counter argument to the issues concerning the “evil” one?

    What kind of tomfoolery is occurring on this blog, is it “deny”, “deny” , blindly “deny” the existing facts on both sides of the “evil” one’s history?

    The blog readers get to see evidence that is without a doubt controversial in that all kinds of distortions are presented on this blog to lure individuals away from ‘demanding’ that the White House “evil” one prove who he really is.

    Using forged documents on this blog, to wantonly prove a point, is not what a Missourian would accept as valid proof of the ‘evil’ one’s eligibility. YEP! one might conclude that ‘I’m from Missouri’ , so show me the originals of everything in question, so that this 2+ million dollar CYA effort concocted by the “evil” one can be accepted by rational thinkers.

    Why isn’t the Tim Adams , former Hawaii elections supervisor’s affidavit that says there isn’t a long form BC addressed in this corrupt blog report that has “forged” document images listed as proof of something or other?
    The facts of the eligibility matter are that ‘no person’ can resolve this, “evil” one in the White House, issue without a court hearing on the ‘merits’. Let’s find out why the “evil” one in the White House has expended 2.5 million to defend what many Americans believe are forged documents.
    In conclusion, all the images above are created from delusional people who think that a fraud can be perpetrated against ‘rational’ and True Americans who believe in the rule of law.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=372773

  10. avatar
    Scientist January 1, 2013 at 3:49 pm #

    Dear Mr. WOT! The election is over. You lost. Good bye.

  11. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 1, 2013 at 4:10 pm #

    Mr. Wot it citing both Youtube and Orly as sources…
    If that wasn’t so sad, I might be inclined to laugh.

  12. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 1, 2013 at 4:20 pm #

    You must be confusing me with someone else. Have you read all 2,700 articles on the site to check on the evidence?

    You certainly missed all of my articles on Tim Adams. The issue with Adams is that neither he, nor anyone in his office, had access to birth certificates; Adams was never willing to explain how he knew what he claimed to know, except by saying it came from somebody else at his office.

    WOT!: Is it the blog owner who NEVER provides argument and counter argument to the issues concerning the “evil” one?

    …Why isn’t the Tim Adams , former Hawaii elections supervisor’s affidavit that says there isn’t a long form BC addressed in this corrupt blog report that has “forged” document images listed as proof of something or other?

  13. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 1, 2013 at 4:33 pm #

    You could read my articles on that topic if you really wanted to know.

    WOT!: Let’s find out why the “evil” one in the White House has expended 2.5 million to defend what many Americans believe are forged documents.

  14. avatar
    HKL (Keith away from home) January 1, 2013 at 4:50 pm #

    WOT!: Using forged documents on this blog, to wantonly prove a point, is not what a Missourian would accept as valid proof of the ‘evil’ one’s eligibility. YEP! one might conclude that ‘I’m from Missouri’ , so show me the originals of everything in question, so that this 2+ million dollar CYA effort concocted by the “evil” one can be accepted by rational thinkers.

    Please attempt to “put your mind in gear before you engage your keyboard”.

    Missouri is a closed record state just like Hawai’i. You cannot get to see the physical original record in Missouri either. The application form for a BC even warns you that it is a crime to apply for a copy of a vital record when you are not legally authorized, and the form must be signed and notarized.

    Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services: Obtaining Certified Copies of Vital Records

    Application and Review Procedures for Using Missouri
    Vital Records and Patient Abstract System Data

  15. avatar
    Northland10 January 1, 2013 at 5:11 pm #

    WOT!: Using forged documents on this blog, to wantonly prove a point, is not what a Missourian would accept as valid proof of the ‘evil’ one’s eligibility.

    Here is a Missourian who would disagree and also has proof (if, of course, your definition of proof is not, “what I want to hear”);

    http://www.obamabirthbook.com/

  16. avatar
    donna January 1, 2013 at 5:30 pm #

    WOT:

    i hope all Missourians are not incapable of independent research

    isn’t missouri the “show me” state?

    IF you want “valid proof”, you’ve come to the right place

    IF you want bogus assertions by witnesses who are not court qualified forensic experts, rely on the nearly 200 failed lawsuits by plaintiffs

    let me remind you of some of judge bent’s words in the DISMISSED Indiana Ballot Challenge

    (emphasis mine)

    19. NO WITNESS presented by Plaintiffs was QUALIFIED as an EXPERT in the field of document authentication.

    20. NO WITNESS presented by Plaintiffs was QUALIFIED to provide an EXPERT OPINION as to whether what was purportedly downloaded from the White House web-site is a FORGERY.

    All EVIDENCE produced on October 22, 2012 is STRICKEN.

    or how about the court in voeltz:

    in this particular decision, the judge said:

    This Court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered States of the Union addresses, and meets with Congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world. President Obama’s recent appointment of The Honorable Mark Walker, formerly a member of this Court, has been confirmed by the United States Senates. Judge Walker has been sworn in as a United States District Court Judge and currently works at the Federal Courthouse down the street. The Electoral College has recently done its work and elected Mr. Obama to be President once again. As this matter has come before the Court at this time of year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film Miracle on 34th St. “Since the United States Government declares this man to be President, this Court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.”

    or

    November 25, 2012

    The Court dismisses the lawsuit quickly and decisively:

    “As other courts have held in similar suits brought by Plaintiff, “this Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with [Taitz].” Sibley v. Obama, –F.Supp.2d–, 2012 WL 2016809 at *1 (D. D.C. June 6, 2012.) (quoting Taitz v. Obama, 707 F.Supp.2d 1, 3 (D. D.C. 2010)).”

    june, 2012

    Sibley DISMISSED

    The court [grants] defendants’ motion to dismiss with respect to each of the plaintiff’s myriad unmeritorious claims. As Chief Judge Lambert recently stated with respect to a similar suit, ‘[t]his Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills. Taitz v. Obama, 707 F. Supp. 2d 1, 3 (2011).

    Judge Marginis to Taitz: “You should know that evidence is not stuff printed from the Internet.”

  17. avatar
    Arthur January 1, 2013 at 5:46 pm #

    WOT!: In conclusion, all the images above are created from delusional people who think that a fraud can be perpetrated against ‘rational’ and True Americans who believe in the rule of law

    Well, the “rule of law” in which you say you believe has come down firmly and without equivocation, on the side of President Obama. Maybe you need to reconsider your conclusions.

  18. avatar
    misha marinsky January 1, 2013 at 6:05 pm #

    WOT!: In conclusion, all the images above are created from delusional people who think that a fraud can be perpetrated against ‘rational’ and True Americans who believe in the rule of law.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=372773

    Very important website devoted to Orly Taitz. Highly recommended:

    http://spreadingtaitz.tumblr.com/

  19. avatar
    SluggoJD January 1, 2013 at 6:46 pm #

    WOT!:
    Whose credibility is in question on this blog?Is it the blog owner who NEVER provides argument and counter argument to the issues concerning the “evil” one?

    What kind of tomfoolery is occurring on this blog, is it “deny”, “deny” , blindly “deny” the existing facts on both sides of the “evil” one’s history?

    The blog readers get to see evidence that is without a doubt controversial in that all kinds of distortions are presented on this blog to lure individuals away from ‘demanding’ that the White House “evil” one prove who he really is.

    Using forged documents on this blog, to wantonly prove a point, is not what a Missourian would accept as valid proof of the ‘evil’ one’s eligibility.YEP! one might conclude that ‘I’m from Missouri’ , so show me the originals of everything in question, so that this 2+ million dollar CYA effort concocted by the “evil” one can be accepted by rational thinkers.

    Why isn’t the Tim Adams , former Hawaii elections supervisor’s affidavit that says there isn’t a long form BC addressed in this corrupt blog report that has “forged” document images listed as proof of something or other?
    The facts of the eligibility matter are that ‘no person’ can resolve this, “evil” onein the White House, issue without a court hearing on the ‘merits’. Let’s find out why the “evil” one in the White House has expended 2.5 million to defend what many Americans believe are forged documents.
    In conclusion, all the images above are created from delusional people who think that a fraud can be perpetrated against ‘rational’ and True Americans who believe in the rule of law.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=372773

    Poor racist little baby WOT, has to make up a bunch of BS because the facts are not-too-kind to lying little pieces of poopoo.

    Guess what, bozo!? All the whining in the world can’t alter reality into your distorted, bigoted alternate reality.

  20. avatar
    RoadScholar January 1, 2013 at 7:41 pm #

    WOT!:

    “…‘rational’ and True Americans who believe in the rule of law.

    You are not true Americans. You are not ‘rational.’

    You are a laughingstock. You embarrass America in front of the world. You are so plainly unbalanced that you drag down support for the GOP by association. You are pathetically gullible: you disbelieve a mountain of actual, verifiable evidence that has been accepted by every court, but accept a thin smear of utter bullshit from known liars, grifters, forgers, and psychopaths.

    Literally every single thing you think you know about the President is garbage. He hasn’t spent any money hiding anything. He HAS spent money defending against trumped- up (literally) attack that are without any basis whatsoever, but the amounts pale next to the TAXPAYER MONEY and court resources that has been wasted because you simple-minded goofballs insist on denying the obvious.

    We are the rational ones. You are acting like nuts and flakes. We support the rule of law; you would happily defy the law to attack our President. We have read the Constitution and swear to uphold it; you want to insist that the Constitution says what it doesn’t and never did.

    We are the real patriots here. We are the real Americans. And you are not.

  21. avatar
    JPotter January 1, 2013 at 7:52 pm #

    donna: isn’t missouri the “show me” state?

    Yes, and, now that you mention it, that does sound like a birfer anthem …. show me this, show me that …. as they continue to ignore everything shown they prefer not to see.

  22. avatar
    JPotter January 1, 2013 at 7:54 pm #

    WOT!: Whose credibility is in question on this blog? Is it the blog owner who NEVER provides argument and counter argument to the issues concerning the “evil” one?

    Yours. Which blog owner is that … Taitz? Apuzzo? Donofrio? Rondeau? etc., etc.

    Once again, a splendidly accurate icon. Eyes wide shut, constipated look.

  23. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 1, 2013 at 9:26 pm #

    Wot, I’ve been a proud Show-me Stater since birth, and I’m waiting for you to SHOW ME the proof that Obama is this evil muslim nazi cyborg or whatever you’re claiming him to me.
    And by proof I don’t mean Youtube Poop, and Ocrazy’s blog ramblings.

  24. avatar
    Crustacean January 2, 2013 at 9:36 pm #

    Poetic typo of the day: someone posted on that ARP page that they were going to send this Earth-shattering information to “Reindeer Preibus.”

    Well, his nose WAS pretty red at the Repub Convention…