I wrote a while back about an account of Barack Obama finding his original hospital keepsake birth certificate from Kapi’olani hospital, as described by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann in their book Double Down: Game Change 2012. Since then I have been enjoying the rest of the book, a riveting story of the 2012 presidential election campaign.
Obviously, if Kapi’olani Hospital issued Obama a hospital souvenir with his little infant footprints on it, a certain other document purportedly reporting his birth on the same day at the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, also with Obama’s name and infant footprints, just can’t be real. And indeed, I and others have spent some time debunking that second document, which is sometime called the POSFKBC (President Obama’s Second Fake Kenyan Birth Certificate, or something else.) One Lucas Daniel Smith is the immediate source of the POSFKBC, claiming that he got it at the Kenyan hospital after paying a bribe.
Smith launched a web site in support of the POSFKBC and his claims about Obama, and I announced that event in a 2011 article “Unrepentant Smith doubles down on fake birth certificate.” Smith’s web site includes some rather creepy material invading my personal life and family. I get mentioned again now in a supporting role in a new article, which if not creepy, is certainly strange.
Smith’s latest embeds a draft lawsuit where Smith is the plaintiff, and Double Down authors Halperin and Heilemann (Barack Obama, Penguin Books, etc. ) are defendants. In the article Smith alleges that a distinguished law professor, Michael C. Dorf (who based on what I know so far is an innocent bystander who knows nothing about any of this), was negotiating with Smith to purchase the POSFKBC for $3,000,000. Then along came the Double Down book and nixed the deal. (My supporting role is that Dorf, who allegedly reads this web site “daily” found out about the book from my article.) Smith, of course, claims that the story of Obama’s certificate in Double Down is bogus, and that is the basis of the suit. The draft lawsuit discusses purported communications between Smith and Dorf at some length and I will not summarize those here as they are in the draft lawsuit at Scribd. Smith also chronicles his prior attempts to sell the POSFKBC on eBay.
One addition to Smith lore in the document is a “digital scan” image of the footprint on the POSFKBC. Let’s back up to the POSFKBC itself. Following is an image extracted from the POSFKBC image in the complaint PDF.
You can see that the image is monochrome and of very poor quality. However, the actual scan is at 200 dpi, not that low a quality. The scan is also not monochrome because a stamp on the POSFKBC upper left is in color. Therefore, the original paper POSFKBC has an extremely low-quality footprint on it, which is monochromatic.
And below is what Smith alleges is as a digital scan of the footprint from Obama’s original Kenyan birth certificate (a document which has not been shown to even exist). This image is at a resolution of 122 PPI, and appears to be a shrunk and rotated version of another image that’s included on page 60 of the draft complaint.
One is invited to ask why, if the second image (at 122 dpi) is as good as it it, why the original is so crummy. Since Smith claimed to have obtained his POSFKBC at the hospital where the original was kept, he can’t claim it was faxed, and what photocopy machine would make so crummy an image? Was it microfilmed? I printed out the second footprint and made a black and white copy of it looked much better than the POSFKBC version, and mine was only a copy of a copy of a copy.
Links to original images extracted from the Smith PDF with Adobe Acrobat:
- POSFKBC PDF Page 41
- Medium resolution footprint (featured in article) PDF Page 19
- High resolution footprint PDF Page 60
The larger image on page 60 of the PDF differs from the the other footprint images in that it preserves metadata from its scanning.
|Encoding Process||Baseline DCT, Huffman coding|
|Bits Per Sample||8|
|Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling||YCbCr4:4:4 (1 1)|
|Profile CMM Type||Lino|
|Profile Class||Display Device Profile|
|Color Space Data||RGB|
|Profile Connection Space||XYZ|
|Profile Date Time||1998:02:09 06:49:00|
|Profile File Signature||acsp|
|Primary Platform||Microsoft Corporation|
|CMM Flags||Not Embedded, Independent|
|Device Attributes||Reflective, Glossy, Positive, Color|
|Connection Space Illuminant||0.9642 1 0.82491|
|Profile Copyright||Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company|
|Profile Description||sRGB IEC61966-2.1|
|Media White Point||0.95045 1 1.08905|
|Media Black Point||0 0 0|
|Red Matrix Column||0.43607 0.22249 0.01392|
|Green Matrix Column||0.38515 0.71687 0.09708|
|Blue Matrix Column||0.14307 0.06061 0.7141|
|Device Mfg Desc||IEC http://www.iec.ch|
|Device Model Desc||IEC 61966-2.1 Default RGB colour space – sRGB|
|Viewing Cond Desc||Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1|
|Viewing Cond Illuminant||19.6445 20.3718 16.8089|
|Viewing Cond Surround||3.92889 4.07439 3.36179|
|Viewing Cond Illuminant Type||D50|
|Luminance||76.03647 80 87.12462|
|Measurement Observer||CIE 1931|
|Measurement Backing||0 0 0|
|Measurement Geometry||Unknown (0)|
|Technology||Cathode Ray Tube Display|
|Red Tone Reproduction Curve||(Binary data 2060 bytes)|
|Green Tone Reproduction Curve||(Binary data 2060 bytes)|
|Blue Tone Reproduction Curve||(Binary data 2060 bytes)|
|DCT Encode Version||100|
|APP14 Flags 0||Encoded with Blend=1 downsampling|
|APP14 Flags 1||(none)|