Main Menu

Epilog

The Obama Conspiracy Theories blog started in December of 2008 and continued during the 8 years President Obama was in office. It began with the purpose in mind of collecting and critically examining some of the stories about Obama circulating on the Internet. It was never anticipated that the so-called Birther Movement would be alive eight years later in tabloids, blogs, 226 lawsuits, commentary, YouTube video channels, and even in the 2016 presidential campaign.

This blog drew an eclectic online community, and at its height had over 30,000 users per month who left over a quarter million comments. A few initial articles about Obama’s birth certificate grew in number to 4,223, both about conspiracy theories and a legal theory that denied eligibility to Obama because of his non-US-citizen father.

The blog closed to new articles at noon on January 20, 2017, as President Obama left office, but it remains a comprehensive resource on the Birther Movement. For an index to some of the debunking done on this blog, see: “The Debunker’s Guide to Obama Conspiracy Theories.” Here are some favorite articles.

Dr. Conspiracy continues to blog as “Kevin” at Blog or Die!

Note: Unfortunately some web content is ephemeral. While this site contains extensive hyperlinks to original sources, some of those sources have not stayed the course, particularly court resources and some local newspaper coverage. Replacement of dead hyperlinks is an ongoing project.

387 Responses to Epilog

  1. avatar
    Reality Check January 12, 2017 at 11:22 am #

    Uuum, I think we missed a year. Can we please have a do over?

  2. avatar
    Arthur B. January 12, 2017 at 11:26 am #

    “The blog closed to new articles at noon on January 20, 2016, as President Obama left office…”
    __

    FAKE NEWS! Crooked media!

  3. avatar
    The Magic M (not logged in) January 12, 2017 at 11:53 am #

    Obama left office in 2016 already? So ORLY WON?! 😀

  4. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 12, 2017 at 1:24 pm #

    Sigh.

  5. avatar
    Rickey January 12, 2017 at 4:07 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Sigh.

    We all do it, of course.

    I’m wondering if you have (or can compile) a list of users who have been participating for all eight years? I wasn’t here at the very beginning, but I believe that I first commented in late December of 2008 on January of 2009. My first engagement with birthers was on a blog run by Warren Throckmorton, a college psychology professor in Pennsylvania. The blog was overrun by birthers and I had trouble keeping up with them. Rambo Ike was one of them. None of them understood the legal principle of standing.

  6. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 12, 2017 at 4:18 pm #

    Here’s the list of all commenters, but it doesn’t show dates.

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/OctCommenter.txt

    Rickey: I’m wondering if you have (or can compile) a list of users who have been participating for all eight years?

  7. avatar
    roadburner January 12, 2017 at 8:08 pm #

    well, as not a prolific poster here, I must say thanks doc and the other folks here for the info over the years.

    since i´ve been dropping in here I have learned one hell of a lot, and above all it´s been fun!

  8. avatar
    Reality Check January 12, 2017 at 9:14 pm #

    Whatever happened to “G”? NBC is number 3. I would have never guessed that. He has disappeared too. I really miss his blog posts. NBC was really the guy on the Xerox work. I only added some confirmation to what he had done.

    As far as bloggers go I would rate Doc, Patrick McKinion, and NBC as the best. .

  9. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 12, 2017 at 9:25 pm #

    I still find typos in articles from 5 years ago.

  10. avatar
    bob January 12, 2017 at 9:38 pm #

    roadburner: well, as not a prolific poster here

    I think the counter is off. E.g., ex-con Judy, under his various monikers, barely cracks 100 posts. That cannot be accurate.

  11. avatar
    alg January 12, 2017 at 9:54 pm #

    Two words: Thank you

  12. avatar
    Northland10 January 12, 2017 at 10:53 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Here’s the list of all commenters, but it doesn’t show dates.

    I have it on good authority that NorthlandA is the same person as Northland10. So I guess I can add the three from NorthlandA’s early posts to my total.

    Since NorthlandA came first, does that mean Northland10 is a sock puppet?

  13. avatar
    Northland10 January 12, 2017 at 10:54 pm #

    Reality Check:
    Whatever happened to “G”? NBC is number 3. I would have never guessed that. He has disappeared too. I really miss his blog posts. NBC was really the guy on the Xerox work. I only added some confirmation to what he had done.

    As far as bloggers go I would rate Doc, Patrick McKinion, and NBC as the best. .

    Don’t forget John Woodman’s blogging.

  14. avatar
    Rickey January 12, 2017 at 11:06 pm #

    Misha should be in second place. He has 7503 posts as “Misha” and 2355 as “Misha Marinsky.”

  15. avatar
    Roadscholar January 12, 2017 at 11:10 pm #

    John Woodman may be my favorite conservative ever. A true and honest gentleman.

  16. avatar
    Rickey January 12, 2017 at 11:12 pm #

    bob: I think the counter is off.E.g., ex-con Judy, under his various monikers, barely cracks 100 posts.That cannot be accurate.

    My first thought was that perhaps it just seems like he posted more, the way that being stuck in an airport for 24 hours seems like a month.

    But actually he is credited with 504 posts as “CRJ.”

  17. avatar
    bob January 13, 2017 at 12:13 am #

    Rickey: But actually he is credited with 504 posts as “CRJ.”

    Ahhh; I did not search for that one; thanks.

    Still, only 600-ish? It feels like he has made everyone else suffer through so much more.

  18. avatar
    Voice of Reason January 13, 2017 at 1:44 am #

    Doc, thank you for your unwavering honesty, rationality and patience in a realm of ideas where dishonesty, stupidity, and partisanship was so rampant and relentless.

    I’m going to miss lurking here.

  19. avatar
    misha January 13, 2017 at 2:10 am #

    Rickey: Misha should be in second place. He has 7503 posts as “Misha” and 2355 as “Misha Marinsky.”

    I’ve spent that much time here?!

  20. avatar
    Reality Check January 13, 2017 at 3:25 am #

    Yes, I should have certainly included John.

    Northland10: Don’t forget John Woodman’s blogging.

  21. avatar
    The Magic M (not logged in) January 13, 2017 at 4:01 am #

    I’m surprised 3/4’s of my postings are “logged in” because I’m usually too lazy to.

  22. avatar
    Keith January 13, 2017 at 7:11 am #

    Northland10: I have it on good authority that NorthlandA is the same person as Northland10.So I guess I can add the three from NorthlandA’s early posts to my total.

    Since NorthlandA came first, does that mean Northland10 is a sock puppet?

    Nah, it just means that you are multi-basic.

    I can’t believe I’m in the top 10 (and there’s even a few ‘sockpuppets’ from when I was away from home and not logged in properly ). Since my posts are almost always content free that represents a heck of a lot of wasted bits. Sorry to put you through all that torture.

    But wasted input or not, I enjoyed every minute and every keystroke. Maybe well meet up again on Fogbow or someplace.

    Thanks Doc for all your hard work keeping us all honest.

    By the way, when is Mr. Soros going to send out the end of term bonus checks?

  23. avatar
    misha January 13, 2017 at 8:14 am #

    Keith: when is Mr. Soros going to send out the end of term bonus checks?

    He won’t be: George Soros lost nearly $1 billion as a result of the stock-market rally spurred by Donald Trump’s surprise presidential election, the Wall Street Journal reported.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-12/soros-lost-nearly-1-billion-after-trump-election-wsj-reports

  24. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater January 13, 2017 at 9:31 am #

    As of that count with the multiple iterations of my name I’m at 6119 this will be 6120

  25. avatar
    The Magic M (not logged in) January 13, 2017 at 10:32 am #

    misha: He won’t be: George Soros lost nearly $1 billion

    Good thing I asked for an advance payment when I signed up.

  26. avatar
    gimmeabreak41 January 13, 2017 at 11:40 am #

    Thanks for everything, Doc! I haven’t been around much or commented in years, but I have always checked in when I saw you tweets.

  27. avatar
    Rickey January 13, 2017 at 11:47 am #

    bob: Ahhh; I did not search for that one; thanks.

    Still, only 600-ish?It feels like he has made everyone else suffer through so much more.

    When you consider his penchant for long, rambling, and mostly incoherent posts, his count would be much higher if the list were based upon keystrokes.

  28. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 13, 2017 at 3:20 pm #

    Here’s another report, showing the comment output in bytes by each commenter:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/OctCommenterOutput.txt

  29. avatar
    CarlOrcas January 13, 2017 at 10:23 pm #

    Nice job, Doc. You can be proud of what you did here.

  30. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 14, 2017 at 5:46 am #

    😆 I’m at ’69’

    Be honest now. Who else here counted?

  31. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 14, 2017 at 10:28 am #

    Oh, Ok. So this is what I get paid when you publish your book?! $662236

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Here’s another report, showing the comment output in bytes by each commenter:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/OctCommenterOutput.txt

  32. avatar
    Greenfinches January 14, 2017 at 11:14 am #

    I have done little but lurk – and be stimulated! All very interesting, and all on a blog which believes in decency…..Thank you, Dr Conspiracy, and may your retirement continue fulfilling!

    I am now hoping to be able to largely ignore the US from noon on Friday for about four years…………..

  33. avatar
    Sam the Centipede January 14, 2017 at 2:41 pm #

    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger:
    I’m at ’69’

    We do NOT need a running commentary on your sex life, thank you! 🙂

  34. avatar
    Sam the Centipede January 14, 2017 at 2:42 pm #

    And I’ll add my thanks too, Doc. Lots of good blog articles, fun commentary, and I really liked the way your eternal politeness gave you special access to bait the birthers in their own cesspit sites.

  35. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 14, 2017 at 4:37 pm #

    Sex life? What are you talking about? I’m at ’69’ on the list. Count it and see for yourself. 😆

    Sam the Centipede: We do NOT need a running commentary on your sex life, thank you!

  36. avatar
    Sam the Centipede January 15, 2017 at 9:22 am #

    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger:
    Sex life? What are you talking about? I’m at ’69’ on the list. Count it and see for yourself.

    🙁 some fell by the road, some fell on the rocky ground, some fell among the thorns … 🙁

  37. avatar
    Lupin January 15, 2017 at 11:55 am #

    Thank you Doc!

    Next week I plan to watch the series finale of The United States. It’s been good so far.

  38. avatar
    J.D. Sue January 15, 2017 at 12:50 pm #

    Lupin: Next week I plan to watch the series finale of The United States. It’s been good so far.

    —–

    Hope you watch the next series, described by a Scottish TV guide as follows:

    https://twitter.com/scottreid1980/status/820663728031014915/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    And good luck to you and the people of France, Lupin. I have so enjoyed your comments.

    Susan

  39. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 15, 2017 at 1:12 pm #

    Lupin: Next week I plan to watch the series finale of The United States.

    Its probably a good thing they’re ending it when they are. Another season would have brought budget cutbacks of Clutch Cargo proportions.

  40. avatar
    Yoda January 15, 2017 at 7:29 pm #

    Kevin, you have my deepest respect and admiration. I told you once that I admire you being so up front about who you are.

    I think you have done a great service. Your blog was so much more than just a collection of articles about a non existent issue. You brought together some top notch minds from different fields who have educated each other and provided different pieces of an elaborate puzzle. We have entertained each other, laughed together and scratched our heads together, a lot.

    I regret with all my heart the need for this blog, but if there had to be one, I am glad that I found the people here and on the fogbow and RC’s show.

    Kudos to you sir, well done.

  41. avatar
    Lupin January 16, 2017 at 2:39 am #

    J.D. Sue: —–

    Hope you watch the next series, described by a Scottish TV guide as follows:

    https://twitter.com/scottreid1980/status/820663728031014915/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    And good luck to you and the people of France, Lupin.I have so enjoyed your comments.

    Susan

    The Scottish article is brilliant. I’m going to forward it to friends!

    Thank you for the kind words. We’ll need them, what with Marine Le Pen seen hovering in Trump Tower, presumably waiting to join The Legion Of Doom.

    I already watch THE MAN IN THE HIGH CASTLE; I’m not sure I need to watch the new show, although it looks like it’s going to be a lot funnier.

    As an SNL writer put it, every decision taken by Trump makes sense if you precede it with the words: “You know what would be funny?”

  42. avatar
    Lupin January 16, 2017 at 2:40 am #

    Andrew Vrba, PmG: Its probably a good thing they’re ending it when they are. Another season would have brought budget cutbacks of Clutch Cargo proportions.

    Well even GUNSMOKE didn’t run forever.

    The new spin-off doesn’t show a lot of promise, IMHO.

  43. avatar
    Craig HS January 16, 2017 at 9:22 am #

    I’ve lurked for a few years. i want to say since 2012, but can’t remember as I rarely posted. I found you by following Loren Collins, who I’ve known since before his brilliant Barackryphal blog. Your blog was a calm lake in the middle of chaos Doc, thank you very much, especially after Barackryphal closed (mission accomplished).

  44. avatar
    Rickey January 17, 2017 at 1:56 am #

    Doc, I was browsing through the December, 2008 archives and I saw where you mentioned a book called “None Dare Call it Conspiracy.” I read some of the book online and came across this interesting and a bit chilling excerpt:

    Everyone knows that Adolph Hitler existed. No one disputes that. The terror and destruction that this madman inflicted upon the world are universally recognized. Hitler came from a poor family which had absolutely no social position. He was a high school drop-out and nobody ever accused him of being cultured. Yet this man tried to conquer the world. During his early career he sat in a cold garret and poured onto paper his ambitions to rule the world. We know that.

    Similarly, we know that a man named Vladimir Ilich Lenin also existed. Like Hitler, Lenin did not spring from a family of social lions. The son of a petty bureaucrat, Lenin, who spent most of his adult life in poverty, has been responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of your fellow human beings and the enslavement of nearly a billion more. Like Hitler, Lenin sat up nights in a dank garret scheming how he could conquer the world. We know that too.

    Is it not theoretically possible that a billionaire could be sitting, not in a garret, but in a penthouse, in Manhattan, London or Paris and dream the same dream as Lenin and Hitler? You will have to admit it is theoretically possible. Julius Caesar, a wealthy aristocrat, did. And such a man might form an alliance or association with other like-minded men, might he not? Caesar did. These men would be superbly educated, command immense social prestige and be able to pool astonishing amounts of money to carry out their purposes.

  45. avatar
    brygenon January 17, 2017 at 7:59 am #

    Rickey: But actually he is credited with 504 posts as “CRJ.”

    Much as I respect the top several, we here see the folly in “credit” for mere quantity. To all those who thought out — perhaps even typed — a comment, but then self-rejected based on a personal quality standard, thanks! If you put in more time and effort to rework it into a real contribution, thanks again.

    I join in regard for our host. Over the years I was occasionally lambasted on Birther sites as one of those traitorous obamaconspiracy comrades. I was, first, honored to be associated. Second, Dr. C’s work has been so careful, accurate, modest and measured, that when I played behind enemy lines attacks on Dr. Conspiracy invariably gave me ammo. For example, losing attorney Mario Apuzzo read http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2015/06/supreme-court-justice-weighs-in-on-cruz-eligibility-sort-of-2/ and claimed:

    “Dr. Conspiracy seizes upon this statement as proof that a child born out of the United States to U.S. citizen parents is a natural born citizen and therefore eligible to be elected President.”

    No. Dr. Conspiracy actually wrote:

    “Of course this is not the majority opinion and sets no precedent, but it does give us a hint as to how Justice Thomas would vote, should a Cruz eligibility case come before the court.”

    My boyhood hero was Harry Houdini. Today I’m a huge fan of James Randi, and Penn and Teller. Truly great debunkers. If they have a weakness, it’s that they can come off as too strident. That’s partly deliberate, as they make their livings at it and need to draw attention. Dr. Conspiracy, as a first-time, non-professional debunker, did an outstanding job on both accuracy and presentation.

    Among comments, while I like giving everyone’s voice a fair hearing, I particularly valued those by legitimate experts. I’m a legal layman studying a conspiracy theory about law. Loren Collins is deservedly commended above, and I’ll add “Tes” (Ibria?) and Georgetown Butterfly J. D. Builderburg. Maybe not the most prolific commentors here, but they taught me a lot and reminded me not to take Birther attorneys as legitimate representatives of their profession.

    I’d like to thanks others, but I’ve waxed too long already. There are three more days, but I know, as I tried to tell Birthers eight years ago: It ain’t over till it’s over but it’s over.

  46. avatar
    Northland10 January 17, 2017 at 9:12 am #

    brygenon: Much as I respect the top several, we here see the folly in “credit” for mere quantity. To all those who thought out — perhaps even typed — a comment, but then self-rejected based on a personal quality standard, thanks! If you put in more time and effort to rework it into a real contribution, thanks again.

    I suspect the count of comments I abandoned is high. I’ve even deleted longer comments when I looked at them and decided that it didn’t work.

    Thank you Doc for doing this. I will miss it, but maybe I’ll use the extra time to practice.

  47. avatar
    Rickey January 17, 2017 at 10:56 am #

    brygenon: Much as I respect the top several, we here see the folly in “credit” for mere quantity. To all those who thought out — perhaps even typed — a comment, but then self-rejected based on a personal quality standard, thanks! If you put in more time and effort to rework it into a real contribution, thanks again.

    I agree that quantity doesn’t equal quality, although I should point out that of the top 35 commenters only one (Charo) is a birther. “John” is no. 38 and “Hermitian” is no. 40.

    The birthers are mostly hit and run commenters. After they are schooled they run away and lick their wounds for a while before coming back for more.

  48. avatar
    Cody Judy January 18, 2017 at 12:08 pm #

    Rickey: The birthers are mostly hit and run commenters. After they are schooled they run away and lick their wounds for a while before coming back for more.

    Rickey: None of them understood the legal principle of standing.

    Tweet😂😆😄

    My Ballotpedia Page #Democrats #DemDebate #CRJ2016 Primary yet? No invite Debate? Democrat caught Elitist sounds bad

    https://t.co/pk3Sr9rMcN

    https://t.co/67ZJxCiYgE

    As some might gather 14-9396 Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed due to an improper or unjust denial of forma pauperis.

    It remains the nemesis to Anti-Birthers Claim they did not vote for President Elect Donald J. Trump. It would be hard , very hard press, maybe Fake News, is a better word under the Fake News of the Third Kind, reference ( http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/understanding-fake-news-phenomenon.html?m=1 )
    to suppose the onslaught of Birther Banter could not dislodge Trump from the Election2016 Electoral College win.

    Anti Birthers must face they had no weight to helping Obama stay because no case with Standing was heard in Trial, and a lot of weight electing Trump with the negative noise they made and their Claims he was the Birther Leader up to 7 weeks before the Election when he joined them as Anti-Birthers. ( http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57dbed6ee4b0071a6e068090 )

    As we must assume, they voted for Trump after he joined them and won or Obama’s time in the Oval Office was not resultant or predicated upon Anti-Birther logic as there was no threat whatsoever Constitutionally anyway?

    Well.. we all had good social. 😉

    Thanks Doc, I’ll always remember you. Hat Tip to yr work. It was an excellent backboard for me to practise on.

  49. avatar
    Sam the Centipede January 18, 2017 at 12:27 pm #

    I guess one unexpectedly nice side-effect of Doc. C. closing his blog is that we won’t be subject to felon Cody Robert Judy’s insane and egocentric ramblings. His idiocy is not attractive. I cannot comprehend why Judy thinks rational folk (the ones he calls “anti-birthers”) should vote for the Orange Shitgibbon just because he sort-of-retracted his birther slanders. Only assholes voted for Trump: I would bet many dollars that Judy is a Trump supporter.

    Doesn’t Judy comprehend that the birthers and their racist nonsense was completely insignificant? It affected almost nothing. It provided an outlet for racist idiots to rant and fantasize about how they would get that nasty black man out of the White House and drag him through the courts, it provided a vehicle for Sheriff Arpaio to raise funds for his criminal activities, it gave Zullo the Klown a way of making himself feel important, and it provided a little entertainment for those of us who like to stand outside the monkey cage laughing and chucking peanuts. That’s all. Nobody cared, nobody cares, because you’re impotent, ignorant, insignificant, insane idiots.

    As for your lawsuits: they were dismissed because they were crap and you were incompetent in producing them. Are you really so completely unaware to believe that if your IFP application (that you fouled up) had succeeded that your ridiculous case would have not been kicked out immediately?

  50. avatar
    bob January 18, 2017 at 1:25 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    It remains tt gather 14-9396 Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed due to an improper or unjust denial of forma pauperis.

    The only one so “gathering” is … ex-con Judy, who still refuses to accept responsibility for (among other things) not being able to complete a simple form correctly.

    Anti Birthers must facethey had no weight to helping Obama stay

    Of course: President Obama needed no help, as the law, the facts, and reality were on his side.

    Obama’s time in the Oval Office was not resultant or predicated upon Anti-Birther logic as there was no threat whatsoever Constitutionally anyway?

    President Obama is the duly elected president because he (twice) obtained a majority of the electoral votes (as well as winning the most popular votes); duh.

    It was an excellent backboard for me to practise on.

    Ex-con Judy, as is his wont, interrupts a conversation about the wisdom of deleting half-baked comments with his signature completed unbaked nuttery,

  51. avatar
    Arthur January 18, 2017 at 3:04 pm #

    Sam the Centipede: I guess one unexpectedly nice side-effect of Doc. C. closing his blog is that we won’t be subject to felon Cody Robert Judy’s insane and egocentric ramblings.

    I was thinking the same thing. Unfortunately, there will soon be someone in Washington whose ramblings equal Judy’s insanity and eccentricity– and he will be inescapable. I’d rather have Cody’s comments than Donald’s tweets.

  52. avatar
    bob January 18, 2017 at 3:43 pm #

    Sam the Centipede: Are you really so completely unaware to believe that if your IFP application (that you fouled up) had succeeded that your ridiculous case would have not been kicked out immediately?

    Must … not … answer … rhetorical question ….

  53. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 18, 2017 at 4:10 pm #

    Wow. Cody is gonna be hopelessly stupid right up until the very end.

  54. avatar
    Joey January 18, 2017 at 5:38 pm #

    https://t.co/67ZJxCiYgE
    Anti Birthers must facethey had no weight to helping Obama stay because no case with Standing was heard in Trial,and a lot of weight electing Trump with the negative noise they made and their Claims he was the Birther Leader up to 7 weeks before the Election when he joined them as Anti-Birthers.( http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57dbed6ee4b0071a6e068090 )
    As we must assume, they voted for Trump after he joined them and won or Obama’s time in the Oval Office was not resultant or predicated upon Anti-Birther logic as there was no threat whatsoever Constitutionally anyway?
    Well.. we all had good social.
    Thanks Doc, I’ll always remember you. Hat Tip to yr work. It was an excellent backboard for me to practise on.

    As an anti-birther I take pride in helping Barack Obama to get elected in 2008 and reelected in 2012.
    Since he was not a candidate in 2016, I fail to see what that election has to do with Barack Obama’s eligibility.

    There were Obama eligibility trials on the merits held in Georgia: (Farrar, Powell, Swennson & Weldon, et al v Obama) and in New Jersey (Purpura v Obama). There were also state Election Board rulings in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, New York, and New Hampshire.

    Here’s a partial listing of rulngs that explicitedly found Barack Obama to be a natural born citizen:
    1) Allen v. Obama et al, No. C20121317 (Ariz. Pima County Super. Ct. Mar. 7, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot; finding that Obama is a ”natural born citizen” under Wong Kim Ark; and expressly rejecting argument that Minor v. Happersett holds otherwise), appeal filed (Ariz. App. Ct. 2d Div. Mar. 8, 2012);

    (2) Ankeny v. Daniels, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (“based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents”) transfer denied 929 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. 2010);

    (3)Fair v. Obama, No. 06C12060692 (Md. Carroll Cty. Cir. Ct., Aug. 27, 2012 (relying on Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark to hold that Obama is a “natural born citizen” eligible to serve as President);

    (4) Farrar v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE- 1215136-60-MALlHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen”), decision adopted by Ga. Sec’y of State (Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, Farrar et al v. Obama et al., No. 2012CV211398 (Ga. Fulton County Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2012), recons. denied (Mar. 14, 2012), appeal denied, No. S12D1180 (Ga. Apr. 11, 2012);
    5)Freeman v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 103 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (overruling objection to Obama’s placement on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Obama’s long form birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012); Freeman v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 112 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (recommending rejection of objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision (12 SOEB GP 103) which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States);

    (6) Galasso v Obama, No. STE 04588-12 (N.J. Adm. Apr. 10, 2012) (initial decision rejecting challenge to Obama’s 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a “natural born citizen” eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), decision adopted as final (N.J. Sec’y of State Apr. 12, 2012).

    (7) Jordan v. Secretary of State Sam Reed, No. 12-2-01763-5, 2012 WL 4739216 (Wash. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2012) (dismissing as frivolous plaintiff’s complaint seeking to prevent state from including Obama on 2012 ballot, noting that many similar birther claims had been filed and, in some cases, such as Ankeny Governor of State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678 (2009), courts addressed the merits of the birther claims; concluding: “just as all the so-called evidence offered by plaintiff has been in the blogosphere for years, in one form or another, so too has all the law rejecting plaintiff’s allegations. I can conceive of no reason why this lawsuit wasbrought, except to join the chorus of noise in that blogosphere. The case is dismissed.”);

    (8) Judd et al v. Obama et al, No. 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2012) (dismissing lawsuit purportedly removed by plaintiffs from state court case to federal court); Judd et al v. Obama et al, No. 8:12-cv- 01888-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2012) (dismissing lawsuit stating election fraud, RICO, and various other claims seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 general election ballot (among other things);

    (9) Kesler v. Obama, No. 2012-162 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”);

    (10) Paige v. Obama, No. 611-8-12 WNCV (Vt. Superior Ct., Sept. 21, 2012) (denying motion for temporary restraining order to prevent placement of Obama on the 2012 general election ballot and holding that “[t]he common law of England, the American colonies, and later the United States, all support one interpretation only: “that persons born within the borders of the United States are ‘natural born Citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents”), citing Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678, 688 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010);

  55. avatar
    Joey January 18, 2017 at 6:22 pm #

    Most Americans have to get by with a single court ruling, in our favor or against us when cases or controversies arise under the Constitution and maybe one appeal.

    Barack Obama had 226 original jursdiction Article II, Section 1-related rulings, 120 state or federal appellate court rulings and 35 cert petitions or applications for stays or injunctions at the Supreme Court of the United States. That’s 381 judicial rulings without a single finding of ineligibility.

  56. avatar
    Joey January 18, 2017 at 6:34 pm #

    Anti Birthers must facethey had no weight to helping Obama stay because no case with Standing was heard in Trial,and a lot of weight electing Trump with the negative noise they made and their Claims he was the Birther Leader up to 7 weeks before the Election when he joined them as Anti-Birthers.( http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57dbed6ee4b0071a6e068090 )

    As we must assume, they voted for Trump after he joined them and won or Obama’s time in the Oval Office was not resultant or predicated upon Anti-Birther logic as there was no threat whatsoever Constitutionally anyway?

    As an anti-birther I also take a wee bit of pride in possibly having influenced Donald Trump’s classic poltical flip-flop on birtherism: “President Obama was born in the United States, period. Hillary Clinton started the birther movement, I finished it.”–September 15, 2016, Donald J. Trump

  57. avatar
    Rickey January 18, 2017 at 6:35 pm #

    Judy actually believed that if SCOTUS had granted cert it would have sent Obama packing to flee the country.

    He is so ignorant and incompetent that he didn’t realize that even if SCOTUS granted his cert petition, it would not have ruled on the “merits” of his case. The best that he could have hoped for was that SCOTUS to send the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

    But even that was never a consideration. Judy failed to properly serve the defendants, who waived their right to respond to his cert petition. Not a single justice called for a response before the case was sent to conference, which means that not even Judge Thomas was interested in hearing Judy’s rambling, largely incoherent petition, a petition which didn’t even address the legal reasons why his lawsuit was tossed.

    Cody Robert Judy is a loser in court and in life Sad!

  58. avatar
    Cody Judy January 18, 2017 at 8:27 pm #

    Rickey: Judy actually believed that if SCOTUS had granted cert it would have sent Obama packing to flee the country.

    Perhaps sadly on your part, there is just no Evidense to support your claim or theory.
    You might wish or hope all you want, but the Facts speak for themselves.

    There 100% more evidence that I have filed multiple Motions for forma pauperis in multiple states for State and Federal Courts correctly than incorrectly. 0% of evidence exist that a Motion was filed incorrect.

    You all know the Court denied the Motion but gave me time to File the Money for consideration This does not bode for an incorrect filing of a Motion. It rather bodes the Court considered the Motion which it would not do unless filed correctly.

    You also all were prevy to Both Bank Accounts past or prior 30 day Balances of which you poked fun at me for McDonald’s and Redbox entries. 😂

    If prior 30 Days had no 5K in which to Pay Printing and Court Filing, how could that be in an interest of Judgement for the future they bet on my paying?

    The slam to the Poor is obvious and it’s disgraceful for anyone to say otherwise in the face of denying Justice!

    I call on each one of you to say here and now you support such malicious treatment of the poor in our Justice System. If you can do that, your no better than the Justices who did do it.

    Disgusting! A freaking horror show! Murder of Justice! Talk about a Circus and Carnival Barkers?

    Not a good Day for Justice for All here in America under the Obama Administration.

    Rickey: Cody Robert Judy is a loser in court and in life Sad!

    Interestingly enough I feel like a loser, but again Evidence suggest otherwise. If the Court granted forma pauperis rather then use it unjustly you would have a just claim. . But they did not.

  59. avatar
    bob January 18, 2017 at 8:36 pm #

    Cody Judy: You might wish or hope all you want, but the Facts speak for themselves.

    They do: SCOTUS explained to ex-con Judy the deficiencies in his IFP application, and ex-con Judy responded with a temper tantrum

    0% of evidence exist that a Motion was filed incorrect.

    Ex-con Judy lies yet again, as SCOTUS sent him a letter explaining his incorrectness. And ex-con Judy continues to blame everyone else for his failings.

    The slam to the Poor is obvious and it’s disgraceful for anyone to say otherwise in the face of denying Justice!

    The poor weren’t slammed or maliciously treated; ex-con Judy, the incompetent wannabe litigator and all-around attention seeker, was rightly shown the door because he couldn’t follow simple directions.

    If the Court granted forma pauperis rather then use it unjustly you would have a just claim.

    Ex-con Judy has lost every case he has filed, lost every election he was in, but he doesn’t think he’s a loser even though he can’t fill out an IFP application.

  60. avatar
    Cody Judy January 18, 2017 at 8:43 pm #

    bob: The poor weren’t slammed or maliciously treated; ex-con Judy, the incompetent wannabe litigator and all-around attention seeker, was rightly shown the door.

    bob: Ex-con Judy lies yet again, as SCOTUS sent him a letter explaining his incorrectness.

    bob: They do: SCOTUS explained to ex-con Judy the deficiencies in his IFP application, and ex-con Judy responded with a temper tantrum

    Sponge Bob square pants is running away without his square and is obviously out of his field of specific expertise. Stick with cheese Sponge Bob😂

    In appreciation to Doc’s Post I included it on my Blog Post today
    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/in-god-we-trust-on-birthers-we-ride.html?m=1

  61. avatar
    Joey January 18, 2017 at 9:03 pm #

    It doesn’t appear that Mr. Judy understands that in forma pauperis petitions have absolutely nothing to do with whether the Supreme Court will grant a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari.
    We have a track record for such Cert petitions and applications at the Supreme Court in Obama/Natural Born Citizen-related appeals:
    1) Anderson v. Obama (Cert Denied)
    2) Barnett, et. al. v. Obama, et. al. (Cert Denied)
    3) Barnett v Padilla (Cert Denied)
    4) Berg v. Obama, et. al. (Stay Denied & Cert Denied)
    5) Beverly v. Federal Elections Commission (Cert Denied)
    6) Craig v. United States (Cert Denied)
    7) Donofrio v. Wells (Application for Stay Denied)
    8) Dummett, et. al. v Padilla (Cert Denied)
    9) Fair v. Walker (Cert Denied)
    10) Farrar v. Obama & Kemp (App. For Stay & Cert Denied)
    11) Herbert v. United States, et. al. (Cert Denied)
    12)) Hollister v. Soetoro (Cert Denied)
    13) Judy v. Obama, et. al. (Case Closed)
    14) Kerchner, et. al. v. Obama, et. al. (Cert Denied)
    15) Keyes v. CA. Secretary of State Bowen (Cert Denied)
    16) Lightfoot v. CA. Secretary of State Bowen (Stay Denied)
    17) Noonan v. CA. Secretary of State Bowen (Stay Denied)
    18) Paige v. Vermont (Cert Denied)
    19) Purpura v. Sibelius (Cert Denied)
    20) Rhodes v. Mac Donald (Injunction & Cert Denied)
    21) Schneller v. Cortes (Emergency relief & Cert Denied)
    22) ex. rel. Sibley v. Obama (Cert Denied)
    23) Sibley v. DC Board of Elections (Cert Denied )
    24) In re: Voeltz (Cert. Denied, Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, Denied)
    25) Vogt v. Obama/In re: Vogt (Cert Denied)
    26) Welden v. Obama (Cert Denied)
    27) Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Application for Stay Denied)

  62. avatar
    bob January 18, 2017 at 9:04 pm #

    Rather than show that he correctly filed out the IFP application, childish ex-con Judy predictably returns to childlike insults. Which is especially sad since ex-con Judy is actually 50 years old.

  63. avatar
    Joey January 18, 2017 at 9:25 pm #

    Not only did birthers fail to have Barack Obama declared ineligible to run for president, fail to have Barack Obama “frog-marched out of the People’s House,” fail to stop Barack Obama’s reelection, and fail to have Barack Obama impeached, tried and convicted, Barack Obama is leaving office with a job approval rating that is TWENTY-FIVE points higher than that of his predecessor, George W. Bush.

    From the conservative leaning pollsters, Rasmussen Reports:
    Wednesday, January 18, 2017

    The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 62% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama’s job performance. Thirty-eight percent (38%) disapprove.

    The latest figures include 41% of who Strongly Approve of the way Obama is performing as president and 29% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of +12.
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_jan18

  64. avatar
    Jay Drondopolos January 18, 2017 at 10:34 pm #

    Thank you for your precision, moderate tone, and dedication.

  65. avatar
    Orlylicious January 18, 2017 at 11:25 pm #

    Doc, Thanks for eight years of debunking, smackdowns and laughs, this blog is amazing.

    Birthers wasted eight years of their lives over complete garbage. I never would have believed they could be so stupid to keep it up; thought surely after 2012 they’d find another hobby. It’s a testament to their racism and stupidity that they kept it up.

    I’m glad many of the birthers finally woke up, like Brian Reilly and all the people that stopped posting. On the other hand, delusional idiots like Orly Taitz, Mike Zullo, Carl Gallups, Miki Booth, that strange John guy and their pals have proven without a doubt that hate enfeebles the mind to the point it can’t function properly.

    I can tell you with certainty that many in the Obama administration, and on the HRC campaign, tuned in here to follow birther antics and have a laugh at their expense. You provided a great public service and many are thankful.

    I hope you’ll be invited to the opening of the Obama Presidential Center and among the first to visit the under-glass Birth Certificate exhibit! You deserve it.

    Thanks for the memories!

  66. avatar
    Steve January 19, 2017 at 12:22 am #

    Doc, always enjoyed your work. Thank you for this blog.

    Thank you to everyone here for putting up with me. I’ve learned a lot from all of you.

  67. avatar
    Rickey January 19, 2017 at 1:11 am #

    Cody Judy:

    Not a good Day for Justice for All here in America under the Obama Administration.

    The Obama Administration had nothing to do with your case being dismissed or with the Supreme Court refusing to consider your petition. Only two of the justices on the Supreme Court were appointed by Obama. The Supreme Court does not take orders from the President or the Justice Department.

    Interestingly enough I feel like a loser, but again Evidence suggest otherwise. If the Court granted forma pauperis rather then use it unjustly you would have a just claim. . But they did not.

    The evidence suggests otherwise? You lost to an empty chair. None of the defendants in your case argued against you in the District Court, on in the Court of Appeals, or in the Supreme Court. All they did was file a waiver of their right to respond to your cert petition.

  68. avatar
    Keith January 19, 2017 at 1:13 am #

    Northland10: I suspect the count of comments I abandoned is high.I’ve even deleted longer comments when I looked at them and decided that it didn’t work.

    Thank you Doc for doing this.I will miss it, but maybe I’ll use the extra time to practice.

    I know that I didn’t abandon nearly enough.

  69. avatar
    Slartibartfast January 19, 2017 at 1:37 am #

    RC,

    G showed up here once in the last year or two. I tried to connect with him again (I had an old email that was no longer valid), but he never followed up.

    Even after not commenting very much in the last couple of years I’m still in the top ten by volume and just outside of it by quantity. Hmm…

    Mr. Judy,

    While I’m not sure that you will ever come to understand how hypocritical and bigoted your frivolous quest was (not to mention idiotic), at least the others here will be spared your Quixotic nonsense. I hope you’ll someday consider the possibility that you are wrong and people with actual expertise on a subject are right. I hope to never have to think of you again.

    Thanks for everything Doc!

    Reality Check:
    Whatever happened to “G”? NBC is number 3. I would have never guessed that. He has disappeared too. I really miss his blog posts. NBC was really the guy on the Xerox work. I only added some confirmation to what he had done.

    As far as bloggers go I would rate Doc, Patrick McKinion, and NBC as the best. .

  70. avatar
    Reality Check January 19, 2017 at 7:09 am #

    Thanks Slartibartfast. I tried to contact NBC but haven’t received any response. His blog is dormant. I think his last article was when Judy’s lawsuit crashed and burned in Utah.

    Slartibartfast: G showed up here once in the last year or two. I tried to connect with him again (I had an old email that was no longer valid), but he never followed up.

  71. avatar
    JD Reed January 19, 2017 at 10:22 am #

    Steve:
    Doc, always enjoyed your work. Thank you for this blog.

    Thank you to everyone here for putting up with me. I’ve learned a lot from all of you.

    My thoughts exactly! I certainly learned a great deal from the well-educated and highly intelligent posters here, Doc certainly included. It gives me hope for confronting the difficulties that surely lie ahead in the next four years. (Please, God, not eight!)
    I feel I’m a much better educated man than I was in 2008.

  72. avatar
    Rickey January 19, 2017 at 3:32 pm #

    Here is my story.

    My name is Rich Gallagher. I am in fact a private investigator, working mostly on personal injury lawsuits. As a hobby I also write Blu-ray reviews for hometheaterforum.com. Some of my friends call me “Rickey” so that is the screen name that I chose. I was in the U.S. Navy for four years (1967-1970) and I have a B.A in History from Western Connecticut State University.

    I became interested in the birther issue in 2008 when I began hearing allegations that Obama was not born in the U.S. I was astonished to hear people claim that his COLB was not a real birth certificate, in part because it actually contains more information than my New York birth certificate. I have an excellent memory (at least as good as Trump’s!) and I know for certain that Leo Donofrio’s “two-citizen parent” rule was never taught in any school that I attended.

    Once I found Obama Conspiracy Theories I was hooked. I have learned a great deal about birth certificates, citizenship, standing in Federal Court, how the Supreme Court operates, confirmation bias, and much more. I have had the pleasure of exchanging ideas with a most impressive, intelligent and insightful group of people, and I feel that I know you even though we have never met.

    I take some satisfaction in having played a small part in debunking some of the birther theories which had gained traction among those deluded souls. I am not the person who discovered that “Harrison Bounel” or “Harry Bounel” was actually Harry Boymel, but I did confirm that he never had or used Obama’s Social Security Number (Harry’s SSN was 080-18-6078 and was issued in 1941). Some birthers believe that “Bari Shabazz” was actually Obama and that his father was Malcolm X, in part because of the coincidence that Shabazz had been involved in an auto accident in Honolulu. I obtained his service records and confirmed that Shabazz was in Hawaii because he was a Marine who was stationed there. I also verified that Shabazz was several inches shorter than Obama. And then there was the theory that the founder of Subud, Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo, was Obama’s real father. I found Subuh’s travel and speaking engagement records which confirmed that he was on the other side of the world when Obama’s mother became pregnant.

    On the other hand, I made valiant but ultimately unsuccessful attempts to get Cody Robert Judy and Nancy Ruth Owens to come to grips with reality. Both, in their own way, suffer from delusions and refuse to accept facts which are plain as day to an unbiased observer. I don’t regard them as trolls because they apparently really believe what they say, but both are desperately in need of a reality check.

    As for Kevin, he deserves a medal for the yeoman’s work that he has done in running this blog for the past eight years. I have no idea if the president knows about Obama Conspiracy Theories, but if he does he can take comfort in the fact that there are still people in the world who care about facts and the truth.

  73. avatar
    brygenon January 19, 2017 at 3:50 pm #

    Joey: We have a track record for such Cert petitions and applications at the Supreme Court in Obama/Natural Born Citizen-related appeals:

    [List snipped]

    The Court has been tolerant. They went Rule 38(8) on Joey’s number 21, Schneller v. Cortes, but that was because James D. Schneller *repeatedly* abused the Court’s process. Before birtherism, Schneller had submitted four spiteful SCOTUS petition on unrelated matters, without paying the filing fee.

    A single instance of filing a frivolous or malicious petition, and falsely pretending to be a pauper, generally does *not* get one whacked with Rule 38(8). I do not advocate doing so. Not a winning strategy. I’m noting that, much as I despise Birthers, I love living in nation where being a kook is not a crime.

    Rare as is such Rule 38(8) whacking, it’s not so bad. It just means the Court will not spend yet more time considering yet more such petitions, on civil matters, without the nominal filing fee. If you sue other people too much, frivolously or maliciously, we have to stop letting you do it for free.

    The great tradition of accepting claims put forth IFP, in the manner/form of a pauper, is at attempt to make our legal process work for everyone. No one should be denied fair hearing for being too poor to come up with a filing fee. Of course it can be abused, as we’ve seen many times from birthers, and in this thread right here: “I have filed multiple Motions for forma pauperis in multiple states for State and Federal Courts”. Yeah, well, actual pauper with legitimate legal claims don’t go off on it like that.

  74. avatar
    ScottRS January 19, 2017 at 3:56 pm #

    Thanks, Doc, and everyone else, for all you’ve done.

    I have always been interested in conspiracy theories, and it never ceases to amaze me how many are based on risible, ridiculous, and incomprehensible garbage.

    I guess I’ll have to go back to snickering at sov. cits. and tax protesters…

  75. avatar
    Cody Judy January 19, 2017 at 8:46 pm #

    One last Tweet to The U.S. Supreme Court before Trump is sworn in. https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/822253983418830848

    @SCOTUSblog REOPEN RECONSIDER pauperis MOTION #Birther https://t.co/w1LnaYrwA2 #SCOTUS 1,715 commute #incomeinequality @HillaryClinton #Dems

    https://t.co/W5ox7F7eCE

    While many here have said many ill things of me, it is not my glutton-for-punishment that has kept me going.

    The Age of Principle Closed. The Age of the MONEYWHEEL Opens #Democrats #Republicans #Election2016 #ElectionFraud #CRJ2016

    I am afraid that Money will now forever be the Decider of Elections in the USA and that Constitutional Principle has been upstaged by the filthy lucre.

    All Republicans have to do now is make sure the Money Wheel stays greased and they may abandoned every Constitutional Principle for it no longer has weight in the Halls of Justice.

    Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the U.S. Supreme Court #SCOTUS

    Just think one year ago as this came up on my FB Time Line if Trump’s Birther Claim had been neutered by the Court Hearing Judy v. Obama 14-9396 .

    Principle would have been seen in the shining Hallmark not just money.
    I wrote…
    “LONG OVERDUE” NYTimes calls #SCOTUS Defining NBCtzn while Mr. Cruz or the next White House contender whose “natural born” credentials are questioned might not appreciate the attention, the plight could serve a purpose by finally delivering a legal answer that is long overdue. They don’t mention Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which names Cruz half-a-dozen times.

    Link
    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/us/politics/it-may-be-time-to-resolve-the-meaning-of-natural-born.html?_r=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.birtherreport.com%2F2016%2F01%2Fpile-ny-times-says-it-may-be-time-to.html%3Fm%3D1

    Excerpt
    [For generations, confusion and uncertainty have surrounded this murky presidential qualification. It is a question that dogged President Obama, and even his challenger in 2008, Senator John McCain. With “birtherism” now seemingly a regular feature of American politics, demand is mounting for a definitive answer to the modern meaning of “natural born,” a term that was crafted in an era when ocean crossings took months and people rarely ventured more than a few miles beyond where they were born.]

    [“We need to resolve this issue,” said Representative Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat who was born in Karachi, Pakistan, in 1959 when his father was an American diplomat. “Obviously there are still some outstanding legal questions.”]

    People might have looked at a man , poor as I, and said, ” Look at that! Principle matters in America. It’s not all just about money.”

    We cannot say that now can we? Trump takes office tomorrow on the Birther Horse unheard by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices and denied over 5K .

    Even if I lost the Case People would have said Trump is just wondering. He never filed anything. He is a Constitutional Coward not a Defender.

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/in-god-we-trust-on-birthers-we-ride.html?m=1

    Democrats will never again win the Presidency on moral Civil rights high ground. They traded in 8 years for a Life Time.

    I just can’t believe no one here can understand this.

    It’s not me who’s hurt the worst it’s the Cause. The Cause of Principle where bribery and money have no value.

  76. avatar
    Joey January 19, 2017 at 9:41 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    One last Tweet to The U.S. Supreme Court before Trump is sworn in. https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/822253983418830848

    @SCOTUSblog REOPEN RECONSIDER pauperis MOTION #Birther https://t.co/w1LnaYrwA2 #SCOTUS 1,715 commute #incomeinequality @HillaryClinton #Dems

    https://t.co/W5ox7F7eCE

    While many here have said many ill things of me, it is not my glutton-for-punishment that has kept me going.

    The Age of Principle Closed. The Age of the MONEYWHEEL Opens #Democrats #Republicans #Election2016 #ElectionFraud #CRJ2016

    I am afraid that Money will now forever be the Decider of Elections in the USA and that Constitutional Principle has been upstaged by the filthy lucre.

    All Republicans have to do now is make sure the Money Wheel stays greased and they may abandoned every Constitutional Principle for it no longer has weight in the Halls of Justice.

    Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the U.S. Supreme Court #SCOTUS

    Just think one year ago as this came up on my FB Time Line if Trump’s Birther Claim had been neutered by the Court Hearing Judy v. Obama 14-9396 .

    Principle would have been seen in the shining Hallmark not just money.
    I wrote…
    “LONG OVERDUE” NYTimes calls #SCOTUS Defining NBCtznwhile Mr. Cruz or the next White House contender whose “natural born” credentials are questioned might not appreciate the attention, the plight could serve a purpose by finally delivering a legal answer that is long overdue. They don’t mention Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which names Cruz half-a-dozen times.

    Link
    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/us/politics/it-may-be-time-to-resolve-the-meaning-of-natural-born.html?_r=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.birtherreport.com%2F2016%2F01%2Fpile-ny-times-says-it-may-be-time-to.html%3Fm%3D1

    Excerpt
    [For generations, confusion and uncertainty have surrounded this murky presidential qualification. It is a question that dogged President Obama, and even his challenger in 2008, Senator John McCain. With “birtherism” now seemingly a regular feature of American politics, demand is mounting for a definitive answer to the modern meaning of “natural born,” a term that was crafted in an era when ocean crossings took months and people rarely ventured more than a few miles beyond where they were born.]

    [“We need to resolve this issue,” said Representative Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat who was born in Karachi, Pakistan, in 1959 when his father was an American diplomat. “Obviously there are still some outstanding legal questions.”]

    People might have looked at a man , poor as I, and said, ” Look at that! Principle matters in America. It’s not all just about money.”

    We cannot say that now can we? Trump takes office tomorrow on the Birther Horse unheard by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices and denied over 5K .

    Even if I lost the Case People would have said Trump is just wondering. He never filed anything.He is a Constitutional Coward not a Defender.

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/in-god-we-trust-on-birthers-we-ride.html?m=1

    Democrats will never again win the Presidency on moral Civil rights high ground. They traded in 8 years for a Life Time.

    I just can’t believe no one here can understand this.

    It’s not me who’s hurt the worst it’s the Cause. The Cause of Principle where bribery and money have no value.

    Wow, Cody Judy predicts the future!
    Back here in the real world, no one knows what will happen with politics in the future and no one can predict which issues will be the most important. If I was Cody Judy, I’d take that crystal ball back to Walmart and ask for a refund.

  77. avatar
    bob January 19, 2017 at 9:43 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    One last Tweet to The U.S. Supreme Court before Trump is sworn in.

    Only an idiot like ex-con Judy would think SCOTUS would acknowledge a tweet, let alone one about his dead case.

    While many here have said many ill things of me, it is not my glutton-for-punishment that has kept me going.

    Of course not: It is ex-con Judy’s narcissistic ego.

    if Trump’s Birther Claim had been neutered by the Court Hearing Judy v. Obama 14-9396

    Ex-con Judy must not be paying attention, as Trump neutered his own birther claim by stating that President Obama was born in Hawaii.

    With “birtherism” now seemingly a regular feature of American politics, demand is mounting for a definitive answer to the modern meaning of “natural born,”

    Ex-con Judy ignores the consensus of judges, professors, and other experts who have repeatedly stated that birth in the United States is sufficient for natural-born citizenship.

    I just can’t believe no one here can understand this.

    That’s because the only one living in ex-con Judy’s fantasy world is … ex-con Judy.

  78. avatar
    Joey January 19, 2017 at 10:21 pm #

    Cody Judy exclaims: “With “birtherism” now seemingly a regular feature of American politics, demand is mounting for a definitive answer to the modern meaning of “natural born,”

    One of tne few good things to come out of tne birther movement is that natural born citizen has been definitively defined. Anyone who qualifies as a “Citizen of the United States at Birth” under the 14th Amendment is a “Natural Born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1.
    19 court rulings explicitly declaring Barack Obama to be a natural horn citizen accomplished that.
    We now have a body of case law and precedent on who is and who is not a natural born citizen going back to 1898 and the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S. v Wong Kim Ark.

    Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”– Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.

    H. Brook Paige v. James Condos, Secretary of State of Vermont and President Barack Obama: Robert R. Bent, Presiding Judge
    “While the court has no doubt at this point that Emmerich de Vattel’s treatise The Law of Nations was a work of significant value to the founding fathers, the court does not conclude that his phrase–“The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”–has constitutional significance or that his use of “parents” in the plural has particular significance. Thus far, no judicial decision has adopted such logic in connection with this or any related issues. In fact, the most comprehensive decision on the topic, Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana, examines the historical basis of the use of the phrase, including the English common law in effect at the time of independence, and concludes that the expression “natural born Citizen” is not dependent on the nationality of the parents but reflects the status of a person born into citizenship instead of having citizenship subsequently bestowed. The distinction is eminently logical.”–Vermont Superior Court, November 14, 2012

  79. avatar
    brygenon January 19, 2017 at 11:23 pm #

    To me, the birther thing was about ostensibly normal and functioning people choosing to go off into lala-land. I study crank nonsense, not mental illness. My ideal specimen is Apuzzo, not Judy.

    I *like* that CRJ survived his big day. I miss and want back the spirit of such a time.

  80. avatar
    Loren January 19, 2017 at 11:38 pm #

    Doc,

    For the past eight years your blog has been a daily online destination for me, as you have chronicled and debunked Birtherism and its associated conspiratorial claims. The work you’ve done here has been nothing less than a public service. You were an inspiration to me from the beginning, and I’m grateful to have gotten to know you and I am proud and honored to consider you a friend.

    – Loren

  81. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 19, 2017 at 11:52 pm #

    Doc, your humanity and incisiveness have been a joy!

    Your site provided a home for me in the middle of the insanity I could not avoid in my personal life.

    It is so strange that birtherism now has elected a president, in that it was the starting seed for all of the circus and deceptions to come, and in my experience at least, among those I know, the hard core supporters of the new president are all intransigent birthers, among other things. At best, one or two, without changing their beliefs, have demurred to talk about it anymore. But, I was amazed all over again when someone in my family started talking about that recent Arpaio dump, talking about how they are all “actual experts.”

    In many ways, participating here on your site prepared me for the similar insanity of this election. Having been shocked by and aghast at the birthers in my family and acquaintances, I was not caught off guard by this election. Small blessings, I suppose.

    Thank you.

  82. avatar
    CarlOrcas January 20, 2017 at 12:02 am #

    And this just in in time for you to button up the blog: The new Sheriff of Maricopa County has disbanded the Cold Case Posse:

    http://www.cbs5az.com/story/34295988/sheriff-penzone-outlines-his-100-day-plan-for-mcso

  83. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 20, 2017 at 12:03 am #

    Thank you, as well, to all my fellow commenters.

    I have been privileged to study the insanity with you, and even to put that insanity to use as as a stepping stone into historical nooks and crannies and detailed workings of constitutional theory and practice.

    May we all persevere and share kind, strong light in the days to come.

  84. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 20, 2017 at 12:14 am #

    CarlOrcas:
    And this just in in time for you to button up the blog: The new Sheriff of Maricopa County has disbanded the Cold Case Posse:

    http://www.cbs5az.com/story/34295988/sheriff-penzone-outlines-his-100-day-plan-for-mcso

    Hahaha! The birthers never stop losing, do they? I guess you could say they were…grabbed by the posse? /horatio

  85. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 12:26 am #

    Cody Judy:
    One last Tweet to The U.S. Supreme Court before Trump is sworn in.

    To quote the Supreme Court: “Oct 8 2015 – Case considered closed.”

    To quote Supreme Court Rule 44: “Any petition for the rehearing of any judgment or decision of the Court on the merits shall be filed within 25 days after entry of the judgment or decision, unless the Court or a Justice shortens or extends the time…The time for filing a petition for the rehearing of an order denying a petition for a writ of certiorari or extraordinary writ will not be extended…The Clerk will not file consecutive petitions and petitions that are out of time under this Rule.”

    NYTimes calls #SCOTUS Defining NBCtznwhile Mr. Cruz or the next White House contender whose “natural born” credentials are questioned might not appreciate the attention, the plight could serve a purpose by finally delivering a legal answer that is long overdue. They don’t mention Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which names Cruz half-a-dozen times.

    You named Cruz a half dozen times, but you failed to name him as a defendant. The New York Times isn’t in the habit of citing frivolous lawsuits filed by incompetent pro-se litigants.

    Even if I lost the Case People would have said Trump is just wondering.

    You lost at the District Court, at the Court of Appeals, and at the Supreme Court. And you lost to an empty chair.

  86. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 12:29 am #

    CarlOrcas:
    And this just in in time for you to button up the blog: The new Sheriff of Maricopa County has disbanded the Cold Case Posse:

    http://www.cbs5az.com/story/34295988/sheriff-penzone-outlines-his-100-day-plan-for-mcso

    A fitting end to that circus.

  87. avatar
    John Reilly January 20, 2017 at 1:58 am #

    Doc:

    Thank you.

  88. avatar
    Keith January 20, 2017 at 2:30 am #

    Hasta la vista, Baby.

  89. avatar
    roadburner January 20, 2017 at 2:36 am #

    take care folks, and again thanks 🙂

  90. avatar
    Dave B. January 20, 2017 at 3:11 am #

    Man, am I going to hate to see this thing go. I shudder to think what else might have to come along to make us sad tomorrow.

  91. avatar
    Rambo Ike January 20, 2017 at 5:15 am #

    Twas the night before Inauguration, and up in the tower, The Donald reflected on his newfound power. The “deplorable” masses had come out in force, And delivered a victory that would chart a new course.

    The snowflakes were shell-shocked with tears in their eyes, The media lied to them . . . What a surprise. They had been promised a Hillary win, But the criminal Clinton took one on the chin.

    And though from all corners celebrities flew, They made no impression, for they hadn’t a clue. They talked about climate, racism, and such, And they made up good stories . . . But didn’t know much.

    The fake news and ignorance came at a cost, And they can’t understand all the reasons they lost. They blame it on Comey and Bernie and Vlad, But fail to acknowledge the one that was bad.

    Yes, Hillary Clinton, in many ways flawed, Was her own biggest hurdle toward getting the nod. The campaign exposed her corruptness and greed, And her speeches were punch-less as ten dollar weed.

    So out in the streets there arose such a clatter, It was Soros-paid protestors and Black Lives Matter. With cities to pillage and windows to smash, They knew not the issues, but needed the cash.

    Eight years of Obama had given them cause, To expect a replacement of their Santa Claus. But soon the protestors will feel the pain, When the wheels fall off of the old gravy train.

    And now all the snowflakes are riddled with fear, Upset and offended by things that they’ll hear. The cocoa and crayons will help for a while, But fact-based opinions will soon cramp their style.

    I originally supported anyone but Cruz, In the end I would vote for whoever they choose. He may not have been my first choice, but soon I would cede, The one they call TRUMP is the one that we NEED!

    I saw him on TV in front of a crowd, He spoke about veterans, it made me feel proud. He spoke about energy, safety, and jobs, Taking this country back from the Washington snobs.

    He was dressed in Armani, all tailored and neat, And the Brunos he wore made the outfit complete. For a man of his vintage, he seemed rather fit, And he looked presidential, I have to admit.

    His eyes glowed like embers, his smile was the best, And his hair was the color of my old hunting vest. His love for this country was on full display, And his actions spoke louder than his words could say.

    He thanked all his voters, and before he was gone, Saved thousands of jobs while Obama looked on. The fate of this country left nothing to chance, So, he filled out his cabinet weeks in advance.

    The men he had chosen were of the same mind, Let’s set the bar high, and not lead from behind. He picked up his phone as he rose from his seat, With a flick of his finger, he sent out this tweet;

    “Now Mattis! Now Kelly! Now Sessions and Pruitt! On Perry! On Flynn, You’re the ones who can do it. Start lifting restrictions and building the wall, Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!!”

    The roar of his audience rose from the stands, He kissed all their babies and shook all their hands. He answered their questions and calmed all their fears, They knew it would be a fantastic four years.

    Then he jumped in his limo, and off to his jet, A fellow that Liberals won’t soon forget.

    He sent one more tweet as the evening expired; “Happy Inauguration to all, AND OBAMA – YOU’RE FIRED!”

    ~Grin~

  92. avatar
    Cody Judy January 20, 2017 at 6:32 am #

    Joey: One of tne few good things to come out of tne birther movement is that natural born citizen has been definitively defined. Anyone who qualifies as a “Citizen of the United States at Birth” under the 14th Amendment is a “Natural Born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1.
    19 court rulings explicitly declaring Barack Obama to be a natural horn citizen accomplished that.

    The U.S. Supreme Court functions on setting Precedant not following lower court rulings

    [I don’t care what the Lower Courts said, the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear this Case because they knew they could not rule in Obama’s personal favor. It would have just been impossible for them if I was up arguing it.

    1- There is no way you can have a people who are Citizens of the U.S. Constitution before it was ratified. That ratification created a new LEGAL JURISDICTION of LAW with which to be born under:

    2- That’s the REASON that ART. II., Section 1, C-5 included two different Qualifications for President in Time: a- [CITIZEN] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution b. [NATURAL BORN CITIZEN] for those thereafter ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents

    3- Congress cannot make [natural born Citizens] with [naturalization (or in other words Adoption Law)]. The two terms are polar opposites as clearly as Adoption is from a literal Blood Birth] Congress has [naturalization powers]

    4- It is well said that the Constitution does not in fact say what a [natural born Citizen] is because there is no doubt that [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] clearly negates any Act or Determination by Adoption. There is no Judge in the United States who is going to say that anyone who is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is not a [natural born Citizen]. Get that? Zero!

    5- Clearly the Qualification for Representatives and Senators is [Citizen] and not [natural born Citizen] It’s a Constitutional Right that America can propagate her own [natural born Citizens] and a violation of our Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution to adhere otherwise.

    6- The 14th Amendment when ever it was used in argument was and always has been a [naturalization] argument not a [natural born Citizen] argument. (for those who argue Wong Kim Ark changed anything)

    7- Minor v. Happersett clear states there was never a doubt that those born of the Country to it’s Citizens are themselves the [natural born Citizens] and to the others there have been doubts. That’s U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

    8- Congress men and women 8 times since 2003 tried to change the definition but those attempts failed in Congressional Votes. Ask yourself why? Why attempt to change anything on the [natural born Citizen] requirement for President if it always meant [Citizen] as the requirement for Representatives and Senators has been? And why was [Citizen] actually mentioned in the Constitution for those who were present at the time of the Adoption if they could have been [natural born Citizens] in the first place?]

    bob: Of course not: It is ex-con Judy’s narcissistic ego.

    The narcisstic Ego involved here is Obama’s who says his Legacy is what needs protection not the Constitution’s
    https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=K4nhyiOhuTE

    https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=GCXxse2gmmQ

    https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=uF21qnPHXt8

    Obama has presided over 8 years of unbroken War dropped over 50 thousand Bombs the last two years, took 50 months to release his long form birth certificate since declaring his candidacy , and presided over the worst Legislative Record in modern day history.

    8 years of Unbroken War Record handed to Trump
    http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/01/18/510447582/after-8-years-of-unbroken-war-obama-hands-over-conflicts-to-trump

    50+ thousand Bombs dropped https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy

    Everyone’s got an Ego to deal with but let’s not fool ourselves about the Big O Ego that has drowned the Constitution’s in his own rush w populism

  93. avatar
    Krosis January 20, 2017 at 6:37 am #

    Well, the birthers were good fun in their kookery. I liked this blog’s style of dealing with them.

  94. avatar
    CarlOrcas January 20, 2017 at 6:42 am #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    I’m not seeing this in the story.

    Fourth graf: “Penzone also said he would disband the “cold case posse,” which for years spent tax dollars to investigate Obama’s birth certificate.”

  95. avatar
    Cody Judy January 20, 2017 at 6:52 am #

    Joey: Cody Judy:
    One last Tweet to The U.S. Supreme Court before Trump is sworn in. https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/822253983418830848

    @SCOTUSblog REOPEN RECONSIDER pauperis MOTION #Birther https://t.co/w1LnaYrwA2 #SCOTUS 1,715 commute #incomeinequality @HillaryClinton #Dems

    https://t.co/W5ox7F7eCE

    bob: Only an idiot like ex-con Judy would think SCOTUS would acknowledge a tweet, let alone one about his dead case.

    😂 Hey, if a Judge cited Twitter as a reference to Obama’s Eligibility being settled and Obama commuted some 350 sentences as an ineligible person in the Office of President the last day, and a Court recognized a recent Plaintiff served the defendant on Twitter , then if the Justices really wanted to count Time of submission they could grant a Motion anyway it’s served to them.

    Now it’s Recorded here on the Internet too before Obama departure

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/822412310253694976

    #SCOTUS receives Motion on Obama’s Ineligibility asHe commutes350 sentences lastDay #Birther @SCOTUSblog #Democrats
    https://t.co/wyuiujGwvI

  96. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 20, 2017 at 7:19 am #

    Thanks. For some reason I couldn’t find it. I did find it in the video, starting at 12:15. Great going-away present.

    CarlOrcas: Fourth graf:

  97. avatar
    YOU ARE FINISHED.. DONE FOR ... GONE January 20, 2017 at 8:37 am #

    Trump Just Shut Down Obama’s Post-Presidency Hustle – Barry Is Furious!

    We’ve all heard that Obama and his family are planning on staying in Washington DC after their illegal stint as First Family is over so they can continue meddling in governmental affairs. Donald Trump changed all that.
    In a move that reportedly sent Obama storming away from the Oval Office where he was on the phone with the President-Elect, Trump informed him that he was
    taking steps to remove Obama’s influence from post-Obama government.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2017/01/trump-just-shut-down-obamas-post-presidency-hustle-barry-is-furious-3238241.html

    A Trump aide in the room who asked to remain anonymous, said that Obama began screaming when Trump told him, “I’m sorry, but I made a promise and I intend to keep it.” The promise was to keep people from former administrations from lobbying or interfering with government for a period of five years after their term is up. Obama apparently flipped out when Trump told him:

    “That will include you, Mr. President. I will be adding POTUS, V-POTUS and the entire First Family to the language. You’re welcome to stay in DC, but if you try to impede the work the American people elected me to do you’ll go to jail.”

    Shortly after the phone call the Obamas announced they would be buying a house in California. Buh-bye, Barry. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

  98. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 20, 2017 at 8:40 am #

    Looks like Fake News.

    YOU ARE FINISHED.. DONE FOR ... GONE: Trump Just Shut Down Obama’s Post-Presidency Hustle – Barry Is Furious!

  99. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 20, 2017 at 9:51 am #

    I remind readers of the “Featured Articles” category pointing to some of the better items here. I haven’t added anything to it recently, but I’ll make some updates:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/category/featured/

  100. avatar
    alg January 20, 2017 at 9:55 am #

    All I can say is thank you! It’s been a good run, Kevin. I wish you and all of my obot friends here and at fogbow the very best.

    Cheers!
    mighty dawg aka “alg”

  101. avatar
    J.D. Sue January 20, 2017 at 10:06 am #

    Rambo Ike: Twas the night before Inauguration . . .

    I thought the poem sounded better in the original Russian.

  102. avatar
    realist January 20, 2017 at 10:15 am #

    Thanks for all your efforts, Doc. This blog will undoubtedly remain a great repository of birther madness for the future.

    Well done.

  103. avatar
    Reality Check January 20, 2017 at 10:22 am #

    Doc

    I could write pages on what a fabulous friend you have been. You were gracious enough to be one of the very first guests on my show (I think you were actually the first). It was such a pleasure to meet you and Mrs. Davidson at the Fogbow meetup. Folks here would be very impressed with her.

    The best of luck to you and Mrs. D and thanks for all you have done.

  104. avatar
    Reality Check January 20, 2017 at 10:36 am #

    Like!

    Rambo, an idiot to the end.

    J.D. Sue: —

    I thought the poem sounded better in the original Russian.

  105. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 10:38 am #

    So Cody Robert Judy believes that SCOTUS is going to respond to his Tweet? He leaves us not with a bang but with a whimper, having learned nothing.

  106. avatar
    CarlOrcas January 20, 2017 at 10:52 am #

    Dr. Conspiracy: Great going-away present.

    Again….thanks for your years of hard work.

  107. avatar
    CarlOrcas January 20, 2017 at 11:03 am #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Looks like Fake News.

    It is.

    But it does demonstrate why your effort was so important and why, I fear, we will need something like it going forward with the new administration.

  108. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 20, 2017 at 11:10 am #

    You’re not a very good investigator. Whoever is paying your salary needs to get their money back. I wouldn’t hire you.

    Rickey:
    Here is my story.

    My name is Rich Gallagher. I am in fact a private investigator, working mostly on personal injury lawsuits. As a hobby I also write Blu-ray reviews for hometheaterforum.com. Some of my friends call me “Rickey” so that is the screen name that I chose. I was in the U.S. Navy for four years (1967-1970) and I have a B.A in History from Western Connecticut State University.

    I became interested in the birther issue in 2008 when I began hearing allegations that Obama was not born in the U.S. I was astonished to hear people claim that his COLB was not a real birth certificate, in part because it actually contains more information than my New York birth certificate. I have an excellent memory (at least as good as Trump’s!) and I know for certain that Leo Donofrio’s “two-citizen parent” rule was never taught in any school that I attended.

    Once I found Obama Conspiracy Theories I was hooked. I have learned a great deal about birth certificates, citizenship, standing in Federal Court, how the Supreme Court operates, confirmation bias, and much more. I have had the pleasure of exchanging ideas with a most impressive, intelligent and insightful group of people, and I feel that I know you even though we have never met.

    I take some satisfaction in having played a small part in debunking some of the birther theories which had gained traction among those deluded souls. I am not the person who discovered that “Harrison Bounel” or “Harry Bounel” was actually Harry Boymel, but I did confirm that he never had or used Obama’s Social Security Number (Harry’s SSN was 080-18-6078 and was issued in 1941). Some birthers believe that “Bari Shabazz” was actually Obama and that his father was Malcolm X, in part because of the coincidence that Shabazz had been involved in an auto accident in Honolulu. I obtained his service records and confirmed that Shabazz was in Hawaii because he was a Marine who was stationed there. I also verified that Shabazz was several inches shorter than Obama. And then there was the theory that the founder of Subud, Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo, was Obama’s real father. I found Subuh’s travel and speaking engagement records which confirmed that he was on the other side of the world when Obama’s mother became pregnant.

    On the other hand, I made valiant but ultimately unsuccessful attempts to get Cody Robert Judy and Nancy Ruth Owens to come to grips with reality. Both, in their own way, suffer from delusions and refuse to accept facts which are plain as day to an unbiased observer. I don’t regard them as trolls because they apparently really believe what they say, but both are desperately in need of a reality check.

    As for Kevin, he deserves a medal for the yeoman’s work that he has done in running this blog for the past eight years. I have no idea if the president knows about Obama Conspiracy Theories, but if he does he can take comfort in the fact that there are still people in the world who care about facts and the truth.

  109. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 20, 2017 at 11:15 am #

    Rambo Ike: AND OBAMA – YOU’RE FIRED!”

    How is he fired? He completed his job. I’d say try again, but birthers are all out of tries and time. We “Obots”, as you call us, won. There was no impeachment, no arrest, and now even the cold cream posse is finished. Don’t count on Trump to help you. He cast birthers by the wayside back in September. He declared Obama legit. Now Obama is gonna live on Easy Street…On your time. *grin*

  110. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 11:16 am #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Looks like Fake News.

    It is, and of course Obama has a First Amendment right to say whatever he wants about issues. “Before It’s News” even publishes Nancy Ruth Owens’ rants. They would be hard-pressed to set a lower journalistic bar.

  111. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 20, 2017 at 11:24 am #

    They publish my truthful comments. But, they don’t publish BirtherReport and several other false news sites. Figure it out.

    Rickey: It is, and of course Obama has a First Amendment right to say whatever he wants about issues. “Before It’s News” even publishes Nancy Ruth Owens’ rants. They would be hard-pressed to set a lower journalistic bar.

  112. avatar
    JD Reed January 20, 2017 at 11:44 am #

    YOU ARE FINISHED.. DONE FOR ... GONE:
    Trump Just Shut Down Obama’s Post-Presidency Hustle – Barry Is Furious!

    We’ve all heard that Obama and his family are planning on staying in Washington DC after their illegal stint as First Family is over so they can continue meddling in governmental affairs. Donald Trump changed all that.
    In a move that reportedly sent Obama storming away from the Oval Office where he was on the phone with the President-Elect, Trump informed him that he was
    taking steps to remove Obama’s influence from post-Obama government.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2017/01/trump-just-shut-down-obamas-post-presidency-hustle-barry-is-furious-3238241.html

    A Trump aide in the room who asked to remain anonymous, said that Obama began screaming when Trump told him, “I’m sorry, but I made a promise and I intend to keep it.” The promise was to keep people from former administrations from lobbying or interfering with government for a period of five years after their term is up. Obama apparently flipped out when Trump told him:

    “That will include you, Mr. President. I will be adding POTUS, V-POTUS and the entire First Family to the language. You’re welcome to stay in DC, but if you try to impede the work the American people elected me to do you’ll go to jail

    — Exactly what law are you citing? No law that I know of gives the incoming president the right to muzzle the free speech rights of his predecessor, nor to keep him from contacting elected representatives. These are constitutionally-guaranteed rights that no mere statute or executive order can override.
    Mr. Obama won’t be a professional lobbyist, obviously, so he would not be violating any law as a private citizen by speaking out or contacting members of Congress.
    And why would moving to California make a difference? Ever heard of telephone, snail mail, email, texting, Twiter, air travel? Physical distance would make no difference if Mr. Obama was of a mind to do what Mr. Trump purportedly is forbidding him to do.

    Of course, the message you cite is phony as a $3.59 bill, which means that if you believe it and are not merely trolling, you are gullible to the end!

  113. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 20, 2017 at 11:44 am #

    I guess this may be a good place to revisit Donofrio. If I contributed one thing to the site, it was researching/detailing Donofrio’s two-parent birtherism, specifically the moment when he adopted Vattel as a supposed authority supporting that view.

    Here is the link to my main comment posting those details, following out the question raised by Doc in his article there, namely, what were Donofrio’s views before December 2008?

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2015/01/donofrios-early-views-on-natural-born-citizen/#comment-347159

    That is the main comment, but that entire thread follows and fleshes out this topic.

    A key aspect was the influence that commenters on his blog had on Donforio. There are indeed interesting/telling threads to follow with some of those commenters back to their own sites or elsewhere, with Charles Kirchner seemingly being a supportive commenter offering advice to Donofrio at that time (at least according to my analysis of the names and posts used on Donofrio’s site and Kirchner’s own site at the time). It also is fascinating to see other commenters develop their views across a few different sites. One such seemingly minor but critically timed commenter, a sparse commenter who pops up in a few places on the web at that time, would be one “John Boy.”

    The key moment where Donofrio takes up Vattel in (inaccurate) support of his two-parent birther theory is when John Boy suggested Donofrio take a look a Scalia’s reference to Vattel in District of Columbia v. Heller on June 26, 2008.

    Donforio’s development at that time makes a fascinating “archeological” dig or launching place into the birth of birtherism.

    No discussion of or reference to Vattel, though, is complete without a shout-out to Lupin, someone all the regulars here know well, as he, above all others, has been a great source on all things Vattel. Indeed, our whole journey here with Doc’s site could be called a series of “voyages in the microcosm”—a Vattelian reference that Lupin, and others here, surely understand, and which I leave as an “easter egg” for anyone else inclined to pull threads and see where they lead.

  114. avatar
    misha January 20, 2017 at 11:47 am #

    YOU ARE FINISHED.. DONE FOR ... GONE: Trump Just Shut Down Obama’s Post-Presidency Hustle – Barry Is Furious!

    It’s called lithium. Look into it.

  115. avatar
    bob January 20, 2017 at 11:59 am #

    Cody Judy: The U.S. Supreme Court functions on setting Precedant not following lower court rulings

    Ex-con Judy still fails to understand that when all the lower courts that have ruled are in agreement, precedent has already been effectively set.

    I don’t care what the Lower Courts said

    Ex-con Judy continues to show his contempt for the United States, as most the law is actually decided in the lower courts. And various lower courts have repeatedly ruled against ex-con Judy.

    the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear this Case because they knew they could not rule in Obama’s personal favor.

    A typical ex-con Judy fantasy that exists only in his head.

    That’s the REASON that ART. II., Section 1, C-5 included two different Qualifications for President in Time: a- [CITIZEN] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution b. [NATURAL BORN CITIZEN] for those thereafter

    Ex-con Judy still doesn’t grasp the concept that those born before the United States was formed by definition were not born in the United States. Hence the grandfather clause.

    Congress cannot make [natural born Citizens] with [naturalization (or in other words Adoption Law)]. The two terms are polar opposites as clearly as Adoption is from a literal Blood Birth] Congress has [naturalization powers]

    Good thing no one thinks naturalized citizens will ever become natural-born citizens.

    It is well said that the Constitution does not in fact say what a [natural born Citizen] is because there is no doubt that [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]

    After wasting eight years of his life over this nonsense, ex-con Judy still doesn’t understand the difference between necessary and sufficient conditions.

    Clearly the Qualification for Representatives and Senators is [Citizen] and not [natural born Citizen]It’s a Constitutional Right

    The difference that is clear to everyone except ex-con Judy is that naturalized citizens can servce in Congress, but not be president.

    The 14th Amendment when ever it was used in argument was and always has been a [naturalization] argument not a [natural born Citizen] argument. (for those who argue Wong Kim Ark changed anything)

    Ex-con Judy cannot read, as SCOTUS in Wong Kim Ark plainly said the 14th Amendment was a restatement of common law, i.e., those born in the United States are natural-born citizens.

    Minor v. Happersett clear states there was never a doubt that those born of the Country to it’s Citizens are themselves the [natural born Citizens] and to the others there have been doubts. That’s U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

    Ex-con Judy still fails to understand that any doubts were later resolved.

    Why attempt to change anything on the [natural born Citizen] requirement for President if it always meant [Citizen] as the requirement for Representatives and Senators has been?

    To allow natualized citizens become president; duh. But it is academic since all attempts to so amend the U.S. Constitution failed.

    The narcisstic Ego involved here is Obama’s who says his Legacy is what needs protection not the Constitution’s

    Ex-con Judy continues his parade of hateful lies, as President Obama never said such a thing.

    Obama … took 50 months to release his long form birth certificate

    President Obama was the first president to volunatarily release his long form certificate; there is nothing substantial about the timing.

    Everyone’s got an Ego to deal with

    With ex-con Judy’s being dangerously out of step with his “accomplishments.” It was ex-con Judy’s ego that led him to commit an act of domestic terrorism.

    but let’s not fool ourselves about the Big O Ego that has drowned the Constitution’s in his own rush w populism

    The only people who think President Obama “drowned the Constitution” are birthers like ex-con Judy, who wasted eight years believing in lies.

    Hey, if a Judge cited Twitter as a reference to Obama’s Eligibility being settled

    A judge did no such thing; a judge only acknowledged the public debate

    Court recognized a recent Plaintiff served the defendant on Twitter

    As permitted by the court rules.

    then if the Justices really wanted to count Time of submission they could grant a Motion anyway it’s served to them.

    The court’s rules specify how file motions, but ex-con Judy doesn’t believe he needs to follow rules. No wonder he fails in life.

  116. avatar
    roadburner January 20, 2017 at 12:03 pm #

    are we there yet? 😉

  117. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 20, 2017 at 12:05 pm #

    In a few moments, birtherism’s failure will be utterly complete, as Andrew Vrba noted on the open thread, even as we inaugurate a birther president.

  118. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 12:22 pm #

    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger:
    I wouldn’t hire you.

    You won’t have to worry about that, because I don’t accept cases from people who live in Fantasyland.

  119. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 20, 2017 at 12:36 pm #

    So, are you calling Trump a liar?

    Phoenix (aka Paper):
    In a few moments, birtherism’s failure will be utterly complete, as Andrew Vrba noted on the open thread, even as we inaugurate a birther president.

  120. avatar
    Dave B. January 20, 2017 at 12:47 pm #

    That’s resume material there.

    Rickey: Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger:
    I wouldn’t hire you.

  121. avatar
    truxton spangler January 20, 2017 at 12:52 pm #

    I’m really going to miss this blog, I read it regularly, though only commented occasionally.

    It’s sad, but I’m also going to miss the birthers.

    Thanks Doc, and everyone else for such an interesting examination of all things birther.

  122. avatar
    bob January 20, 2017 at 12:53 pm #

    Phoenix (aka Paper):
    In a few moments, birtherism’s failure will be utterly complete

    Au contraire, the birthers are finally right: Obama is now ineligible to serve as president. 😉

  123. avatar
    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger January 20, 2017 at 12:54 pm #

    Yeah, especially now when you seem to be getting more comments than ever. 😆

    truxton spangler:
    I’m really going to miss this blog, I read it regularly, though only commented occasionally.

    It’s sad, but I’m also going to miss the birthers.

    Thanks Doc, and everyone else for such an interesting examination of all things birther.

  124. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 20, 2017 at 12:58 pm #

    The new President who now has been inaugurated is proven to lie and deceive and misdirect, more egregiously and repeatedly than anyone else in this cycle (see Politifact), including most definitely on the topic of birtherism.

    We will see how he stacks up against history in the final tally, but he already has quite a running start, if not a distinctive lead, when it comes to the arts of deception.

    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger:
    So, are you calling Trump a liar?

  125. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 20, 2017 at 1:00 pm #

    I logged on to note that President Obama’s helicopter has left the Capitol. Salute.

  126. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 1:07 pm #

    Dave B.:
    That’s resume material there.

    Ha!

  127. avatar
    Joey January 20, 2017 at 1:40 pm #

    Cody Judy says: “The U.S. Supreme Court functions on setting Precedant not following lower court rulings

    [I don’t care what the Lower Courts said, the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear this Case because they knew they could not rule in Obama’s personal favor. It would have just been impossible for them if I was up arguing it.”
    ——–
    There is a historical case law reason why the Supreme Court of the United States has refused to hear any of the 35 Obama eligibility appeals and requests for stays and injunctions related to Barack Obama’s eligibility. Its called “stare decisis.” In English that means: “stand by what has been decided.”

    In 1898 the U.S. government asked the Supreme Court to rule on the following question: “Are Chinese children born in this country to share with the descendants of the patriots of the American Revolution the exalted qualification of being eligible to the Presidency of the nation, conferred by the Constitution in recognition of the importance and dignity of citizenship by birth?”
    “To hold that Wong Kim Ark is a natural-born citizen within the ruling now quoted, is to ignore the fact that at his birth he became a subject of China by reason of the allegiance of his parents to the Chinese Emperor. That fact is not open to controversy, for the law of China demonstrates its existence. He was therefore born subject to a foreign power; and although born subject to the laws of the United States, in the sense of being entitled to and receiving protection while within the territorial limits of the nation—a right of all aliens—yet he was not born subject to the ‘political jurisdiction’ thereof, and for that reason is not a citizen. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, and the respondent remanded to the custody of the collector.”
    The Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6 to 2 that: [An alien parent’s] “allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case, ’strong enough to make a natural subject, for, if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject’

    “Subject’ and ‘citizen’ are, in a degree, convertible terms as applied to natives; and though the term ‘citizen’ seems to be appropriate to republican freemen, yet we are, equally with the inhabitants of all other countries, ’subjects,’ for we are equally bound by allegiance and subjection to the government and law of the land.’

    “…every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
    The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”

    And on the basis of the Supreme Court precedent established above, the Republican Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels defended Barack Obama’s right to receive Indiana’s electoral votes in 2008 and the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled: “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”–Indiana Court of Appeals, November 12, 2009
    Previously established U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 118 years ago remained “stare decisis” in 2008 through 2016. The contemporary Supreme Court has seen no reason to overturn U.S. v Wong Kim Ark.

  128. avatar
    Rickey January 20, 2017 at 2:53 pm #

    Joey:

    There is a historical case law reason why the Supreme Court of the United States has refused to hear any of the 35 Obama eligibility appeals and requests for stays and injunctions related to Barack Obama’s eligibility. Its called “stare decisis.” In English that means: “stand by what has been decided.”

    Judy once again demonstrates that he has at best a tenuous grasp on how the Supreme Court operates.

  129. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 20, 2017 at 3:10 pm #

    Is he? He’s ineligible to be elected president, but to serve? Gerald Ford was never elected president or vice president, but he served.

    bob: Au contraire, the birthers are finally right: Obama is now ineligible to serve as president.

  130. avatar
    J.D. Reed January 20, 2017 at 3:15 pm #

    Nancy Owens, The Obama Forger:
    So, are you calling Trump a liar?

    Anybody with intellectual integrity knows that at Mr. Trump is a mass murderer of the truth, so to call him a liar is to just state common knowledge.

  131. avatar
    Pete January 20, 2017 at 3:59 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Is he? He’s ineligible to be elected president, but to serve? Gerald Ford was never elected president or vice president, but he served.

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

  132. avatar
    Pete January 20, 2017 at 6:37 pm #

    I note that President Obama’s long form birth certificate PDF has now moved to:

    https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

    What a strange journey this has been.

  133. avatar
    Cody Judy January 20, 2017 at 6:56 pm #

    Reality Check: The best of luck to you and Mrs. D and thanks for all you have done.

    Reality Check – Always enjoyed you and Doc on the Radio together.

    Nice comment.

    I hope in the aggravation of some for me, I did not create enemies of my fellows here. When I was on the Show with Doc and Reality Check I thought it was proof positive a civil discussion with different perspectives could take place.

    For any hurt feelings I may have caused, or to those who may have received me offensively when that was not my intention, I sincerely apologize for any such hurt feelings.

    I am a Democrat unlike many here who are not. I hope to have represented the American values within of our Sovereign Nation.

    We are part of the World but we are also separate, unique, independent, and we are not the World. The Office of President holds in my opinion those distinctions.

    Of General Witness , It seems a Testimony of Truth that this Blog is shutting down after Obama leaves/left office as no one expects President Trump to be sued for Ineligibility as he, there is no doubt we all agree hopefully, was born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    Obama failed that Test which sparked the Birther Movement from which this Blog was born.

    We all agree inherited citizenship from a Parent counts as a type. Most here have sided with Sen. Cruz inherited U.S. citizenship from his mother

    We all agree jurisdiction of soil is important in a type of Citizen as many argued for Rubio and Obama.

    We all agree there is no foreign citizenship inherited by someone like Trump who is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    And we all agree I was a Candidate for U.S President in the Democratic Party registered with the Federal Election Commission.

    We all agree standing most noticeably was the Civil Rights of Candidates for the same Office.

    We also agree that I, Cody Robert Judy, was the only Presidential Candidate in the entire Nation who has a Federal Court Record with the key Qualification of [ natural born Citizen ] as a Presidential Candidate against both McCain and Obama representing Republicans and Democrats.

    We also acknowledge and agree that the culmination of those came to the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court in two Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396, which that Court did not face in Hearing accept to Deny Cert in 12-5276 and Deny Motion for forma pauperis in 14-9396 when all Report witnessed here showed not enough money existed to pay printing and filing fees.

    That is a lot to agree on!😋

    I sincerely Thank you my Friends for all that we have Agreed upon.

  134. avatar
    bob January 20, 2017 at 7:19 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    When I was on the Show with Doc and Reality Check I thought it was proof positive a civil discussion with different perspectives could take place.

    Ex-con Judy is half correct: It did demonstrate Doc’s and RC’s graciousness. A courtesy no birther has extended to someone who disagrees with them.

    For any hurt feelings I may have caused, or to those who may have received me offensively when that was not my intention, I sincerely apologize for any such hurt feelings.

    When will ex-con Judy “sincerely” apologize to his actual victims — the thousands he terrorized with his threat of an explosive device?

    I hope to have represented the American values within of our Sovereign Nation.

    Considering the nation elected a lying, delusional narcissist, ex-con Judy perhaps represents American values more than we would like to acknowledge.

    there is no doubt we all agree hopefully, was born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    It would be very easy to go full birther and note there is no evidence that Trump’s mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth.

    Obama failed that Test which sparked the Birther Movement from which this Blog was born.

    The only “test” that Obama failed was a small cadre of sore losers couldn’t accept that he was twice duly elected to the presidency.

    We all agree there is no foreign citizenship inherited by someone like Trump who is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    Whether Trump inherited UK citizenship from his Scotland-born mother was a topic (“curiously”) that did not interest birthers.

    And we all agree I was a Candidate for U.S President in the Democratic Party registered with the Federal Election Commission.

    Ex-con Judy filed a singular form with the FEC. That makes him neither a candidate nor a Democrat.

    We all agree standing most noticeably was the Civil Rights of Candidates for the same Office.

    Ex-con Judy still does not understand that standing is only relevant in federal court.

    We also agree that I, Cody Robert Judy, was the only Presidential Candidate in the entire Nation who has a Federal Court Record with the key Qualification of [ natural born Citizen ] as a Presidential Candidate against both McCain and Obama representing Republicans and Democrats.

    Ex-con Judy attempted to sue McCain but he messed it up so badly that it was almost immediately dismissed. Ex-con Judy attempted to revive that suit only after McCain had already lost.

    We also acknowledge and agree that the culmination of those came to the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court in two Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396, which that Court did not face in Hearing accept to Deny Cert in 12-5276 and Deny Motion for forma pauperis in 14-9396 when all Report witnessed here showed not enough money existed to pay printing and filing fees.

    Sadly, ex-con Judy’s crowning achievement is losing frivolous lawsuits, yes.

  135. avatar
    Cody Judy January 20, 2017 at 7:51 pm #

    bob: Sadly, ex-con Judy’s crowning achievement is losing frivolous lawsuits, yes.

    Tis only 8 years – hardly a drop of my 51 and a crowning Political achievement or Stand that not even the now President of the United States took for a Political Record or may say he stood.

    And what would we say to Bob for the sacrifices made in battle to the losers at Pearl Harbor?

    I shall not fear anyone on Earth.
    – I shall fear only God.
    – I shall not bear ill will toward anyone.
    – I shall not submit to injustice from anyone.
    – I shall conquer untruth by truth. And in resisting untruth, I shall put up with all suffering

    Truth never damages a cause that is just.

    Mahatma Gandhi

    Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.

    Benjamin Franklin

    Now, you have Trump SpongeBobSquarePants

  136. avatar
    Dave B. January 20, 2017 at 7:57 pm #

    So I’m keeping my eyes peeled for that presidential records executive order.

  137. avatar
    bob January 20, 2017 at 8:09 pm #

    Ex-con Judy’s ego compels him to compare his fruitless, pointless waste of judicial resources to the very real and significant sacrifices of Gandhi, Franklin, and those who served at Pearl Harbor.

    Ex-con Judy yet again displays his vile, disgusting nature.

  138. avatar
    Joey January 21, 2017 at 12:50 am #

    Just because somebody files a lawsuit doesn’t mean that the defendant failed any test. The courts ruled: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”–Tisdale v Obama

    How in the world can Cody Judy say that Barack Obama failed any elgibility test when he won 381 eligibility legal challenges, received 67 and then 62 percent of Electoral votes and leaves office after 8 years with a 62% positive job approval rating?

    I guess it is true, you can’t please all of the people all of the time.

  139. avatar
    Keith January 21, 2017 at 2:35 am #

    Cody Judy:

    I shall not fear anyone on Earth.

    Bad advice. Human biology includes a ‘fight or flight’ instinct for a reason. Threats exist. Learn to understand them.

    – I shall fear only God.

    Bad advice. God is Love. There is nothing to fear from Love. Embrace it, be one with it, Love it back.

    – I shall not bear ill will toward anyone.

    Good advice. Love they neighbor as you would be loved by them.

    – I shall not submit to injustice from anyone.

    Good advice. God, grant me the serenity
    to accept the things I cannot change;
    the courage to change the things I can;
    and the wisdom to know the difference.

    – I shall conquer untruth by truth. And in resisting untruth, I shall put up with all suffering

    Good Advice. Now if you could just do a little work on recognizing the difference between truth and un-truth, you might be on your way to becoming a human being.

  140. avatar
    Rickey January 21, 2017 at 2:49 am #

    bob:
    Ex-con Judy’s ego compels him to compare his fruitless, pointless waste of judicial resources to the very real and significant sacrifices of Gandhi, Franklin, and those who served at Pearl Harbor.

    Ex-con Judy yet again displays his vile, disgusting nature.

    He also fancies himself a candidate for president because he invested a stamp to send a document to the Federal Election Commission. Of course he had no staff, no endorsements, insufficient campaign contributions to require him to make a financial report, appeared on no ballots, and received no votes.

    Using Judy’s standards, I am declaring myself a professional baseball player because I own a genuine Spalding Roger Maris autograph model baseball glove. I am not hiring an agent and i will not appear for any tryouts, but I will patiently wait for the contract offers to roll in. I throw right but bat left.

  141. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 21, 2017 at 5:35 am #

    Keith: Bad advice. Human biology includes a ‘fight or flight’ instinct for a reason. Threats exist. Learn to understand them.

    Shhh. In this particular instance. Darwin’s gain is also our gain. Let the idiot play with fire. It’ll be awesome!

  142. avatar
    Curious George January 21, 2017 at 10:48 am #

    Doc, you’ve done a tremendous service exposing the truth. I’ve enjoyed my daily treks to your site. I’ve enjoyed reading the comments that were posted by many on this site. Thanks for the great time, the education, and the wonderful experience in sanity.

  143. avatar
    Jemcanada January 21, 2017 at 12:09 pm #

    Thank you, Doc! I’ve loved this blog for years. I’ll miss it.

  144. avatar
    ZixiOfIx January 22, 2017 at 12:15 am #

    I will miss this, and you all.
    Thank you, Doc, for everything.
    The truth is important, and you always pursued the truth.

  145. avatar
    misha January 22, 2017 at 2:52 pm #

    Inspired by Dr. C, I wrote this:

    http://newyorkleftist.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-born-in-kenya-no.html

    Because Glenn Beck was a birther, and sought to delegitimize Obama, I wrote this:

    http://didglennbeckrapeandmurderagirl.blogspot.com/

  146. avatar
    misha January 22, 2017 at 3:25 pm #

    Republicans Continually Tried to Delegitimize President Obama – John Lewis Was Right

    http://newyorkleftist.blogspot.com/2017/01/republicans-continually-tried-to.html

  147. avatar
    misha January 22, 2017 at 3:42 pm #

    George Soros: President Donald Trump Is ‘A Would-be Dictator’ Who Is ‘Going to Fail’

    http://www.haaretz.com/us-news/1.766615

  148. avatar
    Rickey January 22, 2017 at 10:16 pm #

    ZixiOfIx:

    The truth is important, and you always pursued the truth.

    Trump wasn’t in office for 24 hours before his administration got caught in a “Pants on Fire” lie…err, “alternative facts.”

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jan/21/sean-spicer/trump-had-biggest-inaugural-crowd-ever-metrics-don/

  149. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 24, 2017 at 10:00 am #

    And he’s still claiming to have won the popular vote.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-illegals-popular-vote_us_5886ab0fe4b070d8cad516ad

    http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/donald-trump-lies-about-losing-the-popular-vote-861244483577

    THe alternativefacts.com web domain is already taken.

    Rickey: Trump wasn’t in office for 24 hours before his administration got caught in a “Pants on Fire” lie…err, “alternative facts.”

  150. avatar
    GOOD RIDDANCE January 24, 2017 at 12:08 pm #

    Your demise from the USA will be enjoyed forever by TRUE AMERICANS!

  151. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 24, 2017 at 12:16 pm #

    I’m not dead yet.

    GOOD RIDDANCE: demise

  152. avatar
    CarlOrcas January 24, 2017 at 1:09 pm #

    GOOD RIDDANCE:
    Your demise from the USA will be enjoyed forever by TRUE AMERICANS!

    Actually “TRUE AMERICANS” believe in the free and open exchange of ideas….even those they disagree with.

  153. avatar
    Rickey January 24, 2017 at 1:21 pm #

    GOOD RIDDANCE: Your demise from the USA will be enjoyed forever by RACIST, IGNORANT AMERICANS!

    FIFY.

  154. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 24, 2017 at 2:09 pm #

    GOOD RIDDANCE:
    Your demise from the USA will be enjoyed forever by TRUE AMERICANS!

    Bye Felicia.

  155. avatar
    Cody Judy January 24, 2017 at 6:10 pm #

    Rickey: He also fancies himself a candidate for president because he invested a stamp to send a document to the Federal Election Commission

    355 Youtube Videos 200,000 Views more than half of which are Political Commercials internet Videos
    725 Blog Post – 405,000 Views
    15 Cases through out the U.S.
    2 U.S. Supreme Court Cases
    Eight Year Standing Web Site- 80 pages on most every subject of Politica.
    Staff volunteer
    Over 1,000 Radio Commercials
    Published Book with Platform – Taking A Stand
    Social Media Representation Facebook, Twitter, Scripd, Web Interviews, Other Reports filled out by Candidates for dozens of organizations.

    if you think it is so easy to be a Candidate for President with Standing or a responsibility to represent those who do not have standing, I encourage you to go for it.

    Your representation of the Federal Election Commission as a body Congress has organized to keep track of where the money goes and comes is as nauseating as your dis-respect for Baseball and the Work it takes.

    It let’s us all know where you are coming from.

    https://ballotpedia.org/Cody_Robert_Judy

    http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/?compare=Judy

    http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommitteeDetail.do?candidateCommitteeId=P20003372&tabIndex=3

  156. avatar
    bob January 24, 2017 at 6:26 pm #

    Ex-con Judy still does not understand the basic concept that if your name appears on no ballots, then you aren’t a candidate.

    Self-aggrandizing, ego-feeding vanity projects (like posting incomprehensible videos or repeatedly filing frivolous lawsuits) notwithstanding.

    http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/?compare=Judy

    Oh my:

    Judy is a former Mormon, but has been officially excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church) for apostasy. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the LDS church, addressed an assembled crowd. Official accounts (including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy pleaded guilty to Aggravated Burglary, saying he had committed the crime because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. . . . Records disagree with [Judy’s] account, but he contends that the official contradiction of his story was unfairly entered against him by a Mormon judge and perpetuated by Mormon newspapers, all seeking to discredit him. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder, but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his guilty plea.

    Ex-con Judy has yet to apologize to — or even acknowledge — these victims.

  157. avatar
    Cody Judy January 24, 2017 at 9:16 pm #

    You can now sign up for the Intriguing Speaking Engagement

    [One of the best things about booking a Cody Robert Judy’s speaking Experience is knowing the range of topics. 24 years ago Cody spent a little over 8 years in Prison – half of it was spent in Maximum Security Prison based upon the judgement of what he looked like. Cody fought a Civil Rights fight even in Prison with Native Americans for the Civil Right of equality in the grooming Code and with his fight was able to release many of an unjust penalty simply due to what they looked like. This remarkable experience is recorded in Cody’s Book Taking A Stand.]

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/3x-us-presidential-candidate-cody.html?m=1

    SpongeBobSquarePants obviously refuses to read the Book or he wouldn’t spout garbage like a grouch. I call him SpongeBobSquarePants because of the square meme on his picture here and his handle Bob. 😂

  158. avatar
    Orlylicious January 24, 2017 at 9:40 pm #

    New from Bill Moyers:

    LEST WE FORGET The Big Lie Behind the Rise of Trump
    from BillMoyers.com

    In this web exclusive, Bill Moyers and four historians dissect the big lie Trump rode to power: the Birther lie. Nell Painter, historian and Edwards Professor of American History, Emerita, at Princeton University; Khalil Gibran Mohammad, Director of the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture; Christopher Lebron, assistant professor of African-American studies and philosophy at Yale University; and Philip Klinkner, James S. Sherman Professor of Government, Hamilton College discuss the fertile ground on which the birther lie was sown: our nation’s history of white supremacy.

    Vimeo at https://vimeo.com/200426901

  159. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater January 24, 2017 at 9:40 pm #

    Cody Judy: 355 Youtube Videos 200,000 Views more than half of which are Political Commercials internet Videos

    So how long do you sit on youtube hitting the refresh button on your keyboard? Seriously GFY.

  160. avatar
    bob January 24, 2017 at 9:58 pm #

    Cody Judy: SpongeBobSquarePants obviously refuses to read the Book

    Why would anyone waste their time on the incomprehisible lies of an attention-seeking, unrepentant domestic terrorist such as ex-con Judy?

    Heck, ex-con Judy couldn’t even sustain the thin vaneer of his “sincere apology” that he proffered here for more than an hour.

    Ex-con Judy could will never, ever apologize for (or even acknowledge) the harm he caused to thousands.

  161. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 24, 2017 at 10:05 pm #

    Just eat a gun already, Judy. I can’t even be bothered to pretend to think of you as a human being anymore. You’re irredeemably stupid and I don’t care of this gets me banned, but I honestly have grown to hate you. Like actual hate.

  162. avatar
    misha January 24, 2017 at 10:21 pm #

    Cody Judy: You can now sign up for the Intriguing Speaking Engagement

    [One of the best things about booking a Cody Robert Judy’s speaking Experience is knowing the range of topics…This remarkable experience is recorded in Cody’s Book Taking A Stand.]

    It’s called Thorazine. Look into it.

  163. avatar
    Joey January 24, 2017 at 11:11 pm #

    The Stock Market under Obama
    President Obama’s First Day in Office, 1/21/09
    Dow: 7,921
    NASDAQ: 1,440
    S & P: 805

    President Obama’s Last Day in Office, 1/20/17
    Dow: 19,732
    NASDAQ: 5,540
    S & P: 2,271

  164. avatar
    Rickey January 25, 2017 at 12:00 am #

    Judy fails to mention that his self-published book, which is barely comprehensible and is riddled with misspellings and grammatical errors, is currently ranked #12,370,545 in sales on Amazon and has not garnered a single review in eight years.

    Keith Obermen?
    Valerie Plane?

    Self-publishing a book that nobody buys does not make one an author, just as declaring to run for office but failing to get on a single ballot or getting a single vote does not make one a candidate.

  165. avatar
    Pete January 25, 2017 at 3:21 pm #

    CarlOrcas: Actually “TRUE AMERICANS” believe in the free and open exchange of ideas….even those they disagree with.

    Sort of like the way the OP was allowed to speak his stupid nonsense here, when anyone who didn’t follow the party line was completely muzzled at literally every birther web site in existence.

    I myself was unceremoniously banned simply for speaking the plain and obvious truth.

    One of these ways of doing things is American, free and patriotic. The other is how things are done by Nazis, Communists, and third world banana republic dictators.

  166. avatar
    Lupin January 26, 2017 at 5:25 am #

    With a few notable exceptions (well known to all of us) all of you here are extremely good people, Doc most of all, and I am very grateful for the interactions I’ve had with all of you which have enriched my life. Your hearts are in the right place and you will always be welcome for a meal or two if you ever visit my region.

    However your country has now unfortunately become a neo-fascist “democrature” and hostile to the good of humanity in general; elements supported by your current regime are, as we speak, actively interfering with our forthcoming elections, or engaging into what I’d deem to be hostile behavior.

    Steps are actively taken here to variously block or fight back American interference, and generally oppose your country in any way we can. I cannot comment on things I heard from well-placed friends, but you should know that the western alliance is now in tatters, if it can be said to still exist at all.

    I’m not being overly dramatic; there are things that are not being reported in the media. I wish it were not so, but it is.

    I can still be contacted through DailyKos where I’m still registered and occasionally post news as Lupin, but I will very likely no longer post or engage into discussions on US-based blogs and forums.

    Good-bye to all and thank you for all the fish.

  167. avatar
    Reality Check January 26, 2017 at 7:42 am #

    Lupin

    It has been a pleasure to get to know you here and through our discussions on RC Radio. I enjoyed in particular how you showed up Rambo Ike to be the blubbering idiot that he is.

    We need more like you in this country and fewer like Rambo Ike. Good luck resisting the Fascists. They have taken over our country and the UK. They are after your country as well. .

  168. avatar
    J.D. Sue January 26, 2017 at 9:40 am #

    Lupin: Good-bye to all and thank you for all the fish.

    —–

    Vive la résistance!

  169. avatar
    J.D. Sue January 26, 2017 at 10:17 am #

    Trump Supporters Online are Pretending to be French to Manipulate France’s Election

    https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/inside-the-private-chat-rooms-trump-supporters-are-using-to?utm_term=.mt5r4ner7Y#.didAPVBAz2

  170. avatar
    Sam the Centipede January 26, 2017 at 10:24 am #

    Thanks Lupin!

    And today, even in the twilight of this blog, I learn something! I didn’t know the word “democrature” but I think we need it in English:

    Lupin:
    However your country has now unfortunately become a neo-fascist “democrature” and hostile to the good of humanity in general; elements supported by your current regime are, as we speak, actively interfering with our forthcoming elections, or engaging into what I’d deem to be hostile behavior.

    I found a reference to “democrature” at https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/les-idees-claires/la-democrature-une-democratie-d-apparence

    In translation:

    … We were wrong, explains Renée Fregosi in a newly published book. “The New Authoritarians. Justicialists, Censors and Autocrats”. The type of regime that has the wind at its stern is not democracy, it is “democrature”. It sounds better in Spanish: “democradura”. It refers to a hybrid system that we see spreading from Russia to Venezuela, through Turkey and Central Asia. Democratures mix elements of democracy, such as holding elections, with other issues that Fregosi, a political scientist specializing in Latin America, calls “justicialism”. …

    I don’t know what “avoir le vent en poupe” – “to have the wind on the stern” means. I guess it’s something to do with being blown along?

    Bon chance, mon ami! …
    … et merci pour tous les poissons!

  171. avatar
    Cody Judy January 26, 2017 at 10:28 am #

    Rickey: Self-publishing a book that nobody buys does not make one an author, just as declaring to run for office but failing to get on a single ballot or getting a single vote does not make one a candidate.

    However,
    1- People have purchased my Book at Barnes & Noble and Amazon

    2-The Federal District Court , Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court, and the FEC as well as Public and Social Media outlets have recognized my Candidacy for U.S. Presidency 2008, 2012, and 2016

    3- I have received Votes in every Election I’ve run in, the least of which was my own.

    Not counting Votes does not make a Vote invalid
    Not representing the holes in your argument does not make you brilliant or Stand in honor of your education and ability to spell correctly. One liner comments might be spelled correctly but they sure don’t run Health Care.

    Discrediting the Write-In simply slams and marginalizes the independent rights of everyone and shows your Bully character perhaps akin to Trump more than you care to admit Publically.

    Don’t close the Blog yet Doc, you have one BIG SURPRISE PARTY coming yet !

    HINT it involves Hillary Clinton.

  172. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater January 26, 2017 at 10:34 am #

    Cody Judy: 3- I have received Votes in every Election I’ve run in, the least of which was my own.

    Your own mother didn’t even vote for you. Limberbutt McCubbins the feline presidential candidate received more votes than you. You were not a real candidate.

  173. avatar
    Cody Judy January 26, 2017 at 10:38 am #

    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater: You were not a real candidate.

    I am very real.. if anyone isn’t real it’s the majority of commenters here who refuse their own Real Identity on the basis of responsibility to their comments and thusly validity to their arguments.

    Perhaps you hacked the Voting Booth to know my mother’s vote? My mother is a hero. She served on Obama the District Court Law suit ending up in SCOTUS 14-9396. Her action speaks much louder than your words, and her courage as a 3X Cancer Survivor more than your insult.

  174. avatar
    J.D. Sue January 26, 2017 at 11:06 am #

    Sam the Centipede: Thanks Lupin!

    And today, even in the twilight of this blog, I learn something! I didn’t know the word “democrature” but I think we need it in English:

    —-

    Me too. And I found this at https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/d%25C3%25A9mocrature&prev=search :

    Etymology
    ( 1992 ) Compact word composed by the Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano from democracy and dictatorship . Name of a book by Max Liniger-Goumaz: Democrature, camouflaged dictatorship, rigged democracy (1992)

    ( Neologism ) ( Politics ) Dictatorship camouflaged under the guise of democracy.
    Its extreme character, staged on social networks, becomes a weapon in its own right. It is displayed and claimed by terrorist groups but also by the democrats who use it to magnify the strength of the autocrats who direct them and underline the ineffectiveness of democracies , – (Nicolas Baverez – Syria: the war without limits – Journal Le Point, page 18, n ° 2301, 13 October 2016)

  175. avatar
    Rickey January 26, 2017 at 11:08 am #

    Cody Judy:

    Not counting Votes does not make a Vote invalid.

    It is axiomatic that if a vote isn’t counted, it doesn’t count. You didn’t even bother to register as a write-in candidate in your own state.

    Don’t close the Blog yet Doc, you have one BIG SURPRISE PARTY coming yet !

    HINT it involves Hillary Clinton.

    Sure, any day now.

    And you seem to forget that this blog is not about Hillary Clinton.

  176. avatar
    Majority Will January 26, 2017 at 11:25 am #

    Thank you, Dr. C. I appreciate your efforts over the years tremendously.
    Take care.

  177. avatar
    Joey January 26, 2017 at 1:43 pm #

    Cody Judy: I am very real.. if anyone isn’t real it’s the majority of commenters here who refuse their own Real Identity on the basis of responsibility to their comments and thusly validity to their arguments.

    Perhaps you hacked the Voting Booth to know my mother’s vote? My mother is a hero. She served on Obama the District Court Law suit ending up in SCOTUS 14-9396. Her action speaks much louder than your words, and her courage as a 3X Cancer Survivor more than your insult.

    The name “Cody Judy” did not appear on the general election ballots in my state in 2008, 2012 or 2016.
    Can you share with us the states in which your name did appear on ballots?

  178. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 26, 2017 at 4:07 pm #

    Cody Judy: My mother is a hero.

    You’re mother is an idiot, for birthing you.

  179. avatar
    bob January 26, 2017 at 4:10 pm #

    Cody Judy: The Federal District Court , Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court, and the FEC as well as Public and Social Media outlets have recognized my Candidacy for U.S. Presidency 2008, 2012, and 2016

    Let’s count ex-con Judy’s lies: (1) No court has recognized ex-con Judy’s candidacy; (2) the FEC only acknowledged that ex-con Judy filed a singular statement; and (3) “the public” is ridiculously vague, and “social media” is a tool, not a person or entity.

    I have received Votes in every Election I’ve run in, the least of which was my own.

    There is no evidence that anyone voted for ex-con Judy in 2016 — including him voting for himself.

    Not counting Votes does not make a Vote invalid

    By definition, an invalid vote is not counted. Ex-con Judy cannot accept the fact that in 2016 he received no valid votes.

    Discrediting the Write-In

    No one is discrediting write-in votes; the reality is that several states have simple steps necessary to be recognized as a certified write-in candidate, and in 2016 ex-con Judy made no effort to become certified in those states. And in the states that do not require any certification, there is no evidence that anyone voted for ex-con Judy. Because he was not a candidate.

    HINT it involves Hillary Clinton.

    HINT: It involves ex-con Judy’s ego compelling him to yet again hijack Doc’s blog.

    Cody Judy: the majority of commenters here who refuse their own Real Identity

    I have a rule about securing my personal identifying information from unrepentant domestic terrorists like ex-con Judy.

    Perhaps you hacked the Voting Booth to know my mother’s vote?

    There is no evidence that anyone, including ex-con Judy’s mother, voted for ex-con Judy in 2016.

    She served on Obama the District Court Law suit ending up in SCOTUS 14-9396.

    Setting aside whether her attempts were even valid, her efforts were not only fruitless (as ex-con Judy’s suit was quickly dismissed as frivolous) but harmful, as she should be focusing ex-con Judy’s energy on to more productive tasks, like providing support for his children.

    her courage as a 3X Cancer Survivor more than your insult.

    It is ex-con Judy who insults his own mother by hiding his shortcomings behind her illness.

  180. avatar
    Reality Check January 26, 2017 at 5:05 pm #

    Judy

    Take it to Sharon Rondeau. I hear if you spice things up with a few anti-Semitic remarks you are guaranteed to be printed. Don’t you dare correct her lies on President Obama though.

  181. avatar
    Northland10 January 26, 2017 at 7:50 pm #

    Cody Judy: 2-The Federal District Court , Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court, and the FEC as well as Public and Social Media outlets have recognized my Candidacy for U.S. Presidency 2008, 2012, and 2016

    Regarding the court’s “recognizing” your candidacy, prove it (and the court restating your claim does not make it recognizing your candidacy).

    Regarding the FEC:
    http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/candidate_registration_brochure.pdf

    Individual Becomes a Candidate
    An individual becomes a candidate for federal office (and thus triggers registration and reporting obligations under the Act) when his or her campaign exceeds $5,000 in either contributions or expenditures. The threshold is reached when any one of the circumstances described below occurs.

    Receives Contributions or Makes Expenditures
    The individual receives contributions or makes expenditures, either of which aggregate over $5,000. 11 CFR 100.3(a)(1). Funds raised and spent to test the waters apply to this $5,000 threshold once the individual decides to run for office.

    Authorizes Campaign Activity
    The individual authorizes another person to accept contributions or make expenditures on his or her behalf, and the authorized person receives contributions or makes expenditures which exceed $5,000. 11 CFR 100.3(a)(2).

    Fails to Disavow Campaign Activity
    The individual fails to write the Commission a letter disavowing unauthorized campaign efforts on his or her behalf within 30 days after being notified by the FEC that another person has received contributions or made expenditures of more than $5,000 on the individual’s behalf. 11 CFR 100.3(a)(3).

    Reaches Aggregate Threshold
    The individual and other persons (described above), in any combination, together receive contributions or make expenditures in excess of $5,000 on the individual’s behalf.
    11 CFR 100.3(a)(4).

    1. You have not filed ay report of contributions or expenditures so, your campaign apparently did not exceed the trigger of $5,000.
    2. Your committee, which has never filed a report on contributions or expenditures, was administratively terminated in 2015.

    In other words, you thought that filing a form made you a candidate. Sorry, it does not.

    As for social media, making a claim on Facebook or Twitter does not make anybody a candidate.

    As far as I know, I may have received a write-in vote somewhere, but that does not make me a candidate. You failed to register as a write-in candidate, in your own state even, so you are not a candidate, even if you received uncountable votes.

  182. avatar
    Rickey January 27, 2017 at 12:45 am #

    Cody Judy:

    2-The Federal District Court , Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court, and the FEC as well as Public and Social Media outlets have recognized my Candidacy for U.S. Presidency 2008, 2012, and 2016

    Wrong. None of those courts “recognized” your candidacy.

    As I explained to you before, standing never was raised as an issue in your Federal Court case, so your “candidacy” was irrelevant.

    Judy filed his lawsuit against Obama, the DNC and Obama’s campaign on July 10, 2014.

    On July 16 he filed what purported to be proof of service, but he failed to attach any documents to show what he claimed to have served.

    On August 11 he filed a Motion for Default Judgment, but he still had not filed any valid proof of service on any of the defendants.

    On August 26 Judge Stewart denied Judy’s motion as follows: “Plaintiff has applied to the Court for a default judgment. However, Plaintiff has not yet received a default certificate as required by Rule 55(a). Until Plaintiff receives a default certificate from the Clerk of Court, the Court cannot reach the merits of Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Order of Judgment. For this reason, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s Motion without prejudice. In so doing, the Court does not reach the merits of Plaintiff’s claim of proper service or entitlement to a default certificate. Rather, it will leave that determination to the Clerk of Court in the first instance.”

    So Judy failed to follow the rules of the Court.

    On September 2 Judy filed a Motion for Entry of Default.

    On September 8 the Clerk of Court denied Judy’s Motion. “Plaintiff has filed a motion for entry of default in the above entitled matter. The only proof of service filed with the court is a partial return of summons which does not include a copy
    of the summons or any indication of exactly what documents were served, i.e the complaint. Without the inclusion of the summons page, the clerk cannot determine that proper notice was given to the defendants.”

    So between July 16 and September 8 Judy utterly failed to correct the deficiencies of the supposed “proof of service” which he filed on July 16.

    On September 12 Judy filed an objection to the Clerk’s decision and a Notice for Decision.

    On September 16 Judge Stewart denied Judy’s Notice for Decision, saying that he agreed with the Clerk’s decision.

    On September 18 Judy, apparently realizing that he had failed to effect proper service upon any of the defendants, filed a Motion for Service of Process, asking the Court to appoint the U.S. Marshal to serve the defendants. This Motion prompted Judge Stewart to actually take a look at Judy’s complaint.

    The judge then dismissed Judy’s lawsuit on October 7 with the following comments: “After carefully reviewing Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s suit is frivolous. Plaintiff’s claims lack an arguable basis in law or fact and Plaintiff’s factual
    allegations border on the irrational and wholly incredible. Moreover, the suit could not survive a motion to dismiss because Plaintiff’s claims rest on conclusory statements rather than factual allegations that plausibly state a claim for relief. Finally, most of the relief sought by Plaintiff is money damages. Many of the defendants in this case would almost certainly be immune from such relief. And it is not clear that the remaining defendants would not also enjoy the same immunity. Based on the foregoing, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s claims.”

    So, as has been pointed out to Judy multiple times, his “candidacy” was never mentioned by the District Court, much less recognized. The defendants never filed an Answer, and it would have been up to the defendants to raise the issue of standing. Because standing was not raised at the District Court, it was not considered by either the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

    Because standing was never an issue, the issue of whether Judy was a real candidate was never considered by the District Court, the Court of Appeals, or the Supreme Court.

    Finally, because Judy’s lawsuit was found to be frivolous, Judge Stewart says that he never should have been granted in forma pauperis status in the first place. “Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), a court must screen cases filed in forma pauperis and must ‘dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.’”

    And that, my friends, is the story behind Judy’s claim to fame.

  183. avatar
    Rickey January 27, 2017 at 1:05 am #

    Lupin:

    Good-bye to all and thank you for all the fish.

    Lupin,

    It has been a pleasure to read your intelligent and knowledgeable posts. Your insight into Vattel vindicated our understanding that no Constitutional scholar has ever credited him with having any significant influence on that document.

    I will keep an eye out for you at the Daily Kos.

    Bonne chance!

  184. avatar
    Pete January 27, 2017 at 10:58 am #

    Bonne chance, Lupin.

  185. avatar
    Pete January 27, 2017 at 10:59 am #

    When is Obama going to stage a Rike-stag fire, declare marshall law, refuse to leave the White House, and put us all in FEMA camps or line us all up and shoot us with a million rounds of ammunition?

    It’s pretty late. I’m getting worried.

  186. avatar
    Cody Judy January 27, 2017 at 2:44 pm #

    Rickey: Wrong. None of those courts “recognized” your candidacy.

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/825064008629641216
    So it was the Clerk against Witnesses of Service and without a Hearing the Judge agreed with and not the Clerk agreeing with the Judge. 😂
    https://t.co/KYJlDLB9lA

    Glad we got that straight because we wouldn’t want a hearing and Witnesses testifying against the Clerk that the Judge was using?

    Clerical Error comes in handy at the most convenient times.

    It’s never any fun having the Truth come forward is it?

    The Judge notices Cody Robert Judy as a U.S. Presidential Candidate in the District Court Ruling but questions the immunity of Criminal Conduct by those in authority or office.

    Yeah., that’s more of the difference of Laws you are subject to and less that they are? Ahhhh who cares if the guy your voting for has a falsified identification, as long as he’s on the Ballot put there under false pretenses we don’t care?

    I do.

    We’ll give that Court one more try, because that Judge retired into senior status and may have had some difficulty that we could not see?

    It’s worth a try😉

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/obamas-ineligibiltiy-last-presser.html?m=1

  187. avatar
    Andrew Vrba, PmG January 27, 2017 at 3:55 pm #

    Pete:
    When is Obama going to stage a Rike-stag fire, declare marshall law, refuse to leave the White House, and put us all in FEMA camps or line us all up and shoot us with a million rounds of ammunition?

    It’s pretty late. I’m getting worried.

    Lets convince him Judy is the ringleader, so we can watch him get perforated first!

  188. avatar
    Reality Check January 27, 2017 at 4:18 pm #

    When I go to your twitter bull hockey I get:

    You are blocked from following @CodyRobertJudy and viewing @CodyRobertJudy’s Tweets. Learn more

    Cody Judy: https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/825064008629641216

  189. avatar
    Reality Check January 27, 2017 at 5:05 pm #

    Judy, do you ever write anything that’s coherent? Your comments are just 3rd grade level gibberish.

  190. avatar
    Rickey January 27, 2017 at 5:23 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    So it was the Clerk against Witnesses of Service and without a Hearing the Judge agreed with and not the Clerk agreeing with the Judge.

    Rule 55(a) requires that you get a default certificate from the Clerk before you can file a Default Motion. You didn’t get a default certificate because you failed to file proper proof of service. You were defeated by your own incompetence.

    Glad we got that straight because we wouldn’t want a hearing and Witnesses testifying against the Clerk that the Judge was using?

    Witnesses? What witnesses? All you had to do was provide proper proof of service, assuming that the defendants were properly served.

    Clerical Error comes in handy at the most convenient times.

    The only errors were made by you.

    It’s never any fun having the Truth come forward is it?

    Your relationship with the truth is tenuous, at best.

    The Judge notices Cody Robert Judy as a U.S. Presidential Candidate in the District Court Ruling but questions the immunity of Criminal Conduct by those in authority or office.

    No, he didn’t “notice” anything about your supposed candidacy. All he did was notice your allegation that you were a candidate.

    “Plaintiff’s suit centers on Plaintiff’s allegation that President Obama is not a natural-born citizen eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Based on this allegation, Plaintiff asserts that the DNC and President Obama’s campaign conspired to defraud donors and voters which in turn injured Plaintiff’s 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns by forcing Plaintiff to compete unfairly against a candidate who allegedly fails to meet the qualifications of the office.”

    We’ll give that Court one more try, because that Judge retired into senior status and may have had some difficulty that we could not see?

    Once again you put your ignorance on display.

    There will be no second chance. Your frivolous lawsuit is dead and buried, never to be resurrected.

    Judge Stewart achieved senior status in November, 2014 because he was at least 65 years old and had been a Federal judge for 15 years. He became a Federal judge in October, 1999 so he wasn’t eligible for senior status prior to 2014. The only difficulty he had was in trying to decipher your largely incomprehensible complaint.

    Judge Stewart, incidentally, is a Republican and a friend of Orrin Hatch.

  191. avatar
    Rickey January 27, 2017 at 5:40 pm #

    Reality Check:
    When I go to your twitter bull hockey I get:

    You are blocked from following @CodyRobertJudy and viewing @CodyRobertJudy’s Tweets. Learn more

    I can see his tweets, although I’m not proud of it.

    More than two years after the fact, Judy finally has realized that it was the Clerk who denied his Motion for Entry of Default. Judge Stewart then agreed with the Clerk’s decision. Judy seems to believe that there is something improper about this, but that is because he has never bothered to learn the rules. He also apparently never bothered to read the decision, because it is right there in black and white that it was the Clerk’s decision.

    Judy’s motion was denied without prejudice, which meant that all he had to do to have his motion reconsidered was to file proof of service that complied with the rules. But Judy doesn’t believe that the rules apply to him.

  192. avatar
    Reality Check January 27, 2017 at 5:58 pm #

    Judy banned me a while back. Unlike Doc who lets Judy post his crap here Judy cannot tolerate criticism on things he controls. In other words he is a hypocrite in addition to being an idiot.

    Rickey: I can see his tweets, although I’m not proud of it.

  193. avatar
    Northland10 January 27, 2017 at 6:24 pm #

    Cody Judy
    2-The Federal District Court , Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court, and the FEC as well as Public and Social Media outlets have recognized my Candidacy for U.S. Presidency 2008, 2012, and 2016

    The opening of the 10 Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Cody Robert Judy considered himself a candidate for President in both the 2008 and 2012 United States Presidential races.

    No, they did not recognize you as a candidate. They also explained why the District Court dismissed your case sua sponte.

    http://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/14-4136/14-4136-2015-02-03.pdf?ts=1422982873

  194. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 27, 2017 at 11:04 pm #

    I appreciate always your viewpoint, which comes from a different culture and region. I hope to get to France (for more than changing airplanes) someday.

    Lupin: Your hearts are in the right place and you will always be welcome for a meal or two if you ever visit my region.

  195. avatar
    Cody Judy January 28, 2017 at 12:53 pm #

    Rickey: You were defeated by your own incompetence.

    While I appreciate your ability to read a Docket, the argument within the Motions and Applications is something respectfully you are missing.

    The [Court Stamped Summons and Complaint] were taken [from the Clerk] and Served by the Server of Process upon the Defendants.

    The Court Received the [Witnesses] of the Server ( because there were more than 1 Witnesses of the Service of Process although only one is needed for Record, Defendants were Served.

    The Witnesses of the Service of Process testified to the Court under oath, that the Defendants were Served the Court Stamped Summons and Court Stamped Complaint , that the Clerk acknowledged Stamping for the Service of Process.

    The only thing you don’t seem to get is that multiple witnesses testified to the Court Service was completed upon the Defendants. That the Court Clerk admitted she stamped the Summons and Complaint and hand received the Witness of Service.

    The Judge refused a Hearing on that matter. The Judge refused to hear the Witnesses of Service.

    Why?

    Why would you deny the Servers Witness and others who witnessed the Service compared to the Clerks who was not there?

    You talk about not making sense? Delusion?

    Let’s say it a different way in an allegory of circumstances to be very clear.

    The Judge refused the two witnesses testimony who saw the clerk murder the victim based on the Clerks testimony she did not do it.

    Does that make Judicial sense? It might on the limb of corruption if the Judge’s clerk is his niece and he’s trying to protect her job.

    And what do we get out of that?

    A 5 page Answer from the Judge. . Hummmm that seems quite a statement. The Appeals Court no less intriguing.

    Continuing to Refuse what happens behind closed doors of Government will not bring you closer to the Truth.

  196. avatar
    Cody Judy January 28, 2017 at 1:20 pm #

    Reality Check: Judy banned me a while back. Unlike Doc who lets Judy post his crap here Judy cannot tolerate criticism on things he controls. In other words he is a hypocrite in addition to being an idiot.

    I never ban intelligent communication. . . But I’m not big on pajorative labels on my own forums. In one comment your Intel labels

    Doc a enabler of crap for not controlling Judy
    Judy intolerant of criticism
    Judy a hypocrit
    Judy an idiot

    The controlling one seems to be controlled – that is what he sowed- that is what he harvested.

    Explaining a position, and arguing for it does not take labeling your apponent nuts especially without credentials. If someone is nuts it is a label of sympathy not one of mass hysterical outrage from not converting your subject to your Religion.

    I’ve always tried to refrain from employing the pajoratives. If I have not refrained I’ve never been happy with myself and my apologies are extended.

  197. avatar
    Cody Judy January 28, 2017 at 2:05 pm #

    Rickey: Judge Stewart, incidentally, is a Republican and a friend of Orrin Hatch.

    For the Record, I’ve never implied Republicans were not involved and heavily invested in Obama’s Qualifications as many have records themselves that require cover up to keep them in Office.

    Sen. Hatch I’ve run against in my first write-in Candidacy for Senate that was broadcast on FOX News in 2000 along with my hearing granting parole. Although I did fill out the paperwork and it was notarized I was not favorited.

    In 2004 Sen. Hatch was advocating for foreign born eligibility in the Office of President and in Utah a much greater leniency on Illegal Aliens is advocated politically with over 50% of the Utah Based WorldWide LDS Church now being outside the United States in contradiction to President Trump’s positions.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2004/oct/06/local/me-arnold6

    https://www.lds.org/ensign/1996/03/news-of-the-church/more-members-now-outside-us-than-in-us?lang=eng

    Sen. Hatch has written me letters advocating for Obama’s Eligibility based on reports given to him by CRS. . that recommend rather meshing [ Citizen] for Reps’ and Sens’ and Pres ( at the Time of the Adoption of COTUS) with [natural born Citizen] rather then distinguishing it as [ Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents ] or non naturalization criteria.

    http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_033.htm

    In short, Sen. Hatch was one of Obama’s greatest assets for Bullying the Qualification for President when 8 Legislative Attempts failed to pass.

    Northland10: The opening of the 10 Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Cody Robert Judy considered himself a candidate for President in both the 2008 and 2012 United States Presidential races.

    Thank you , that is indeed a Recognition on official Record.

  198. avatar
    Northland10 January 28, 2017 at 2:13 pm #

    Cody Judy: Thank you , that is indeed a Recognition on official Record.

    So, if a court states, “Plaintiff’s considers himself to be Jesus,” that means the court recognizes the Plaintiff is Jesus.

    Really? You leave me with no choice but to decide that you are being intentionally obtuse and basically lying or you have absolutely no grasp of reality and no ability to comprehend a thing.

    All the court recognized is that you made a claim. They also recognized that your arguments were incoherent. So can we now state their is an official record that you are incoherent?

  199. avatar
    bob January 28, 2017 at 2:21 pm #

    Cody Judy: Sen. Hatch I’ve run against in my first write-in Candidacy for Senate that was broadcast on FOX News in 2000 along with my hearing granting parole.

    Ex-con Judy yet again boasts about filling out a form as if it is a meaningful accomplishment. Unsurprisingly, there’s no evidence that anyone actually voted for Judy in 2000, just like there is no evidence that anyone voted for Judy in 2016.

    Thank you , that is indeed a Recognition on official Record.

    Ex-con Judy again shows his inability to read, as the 10th Circuit acknowledged that ex-con Judy believed himself to be a candidate. The 10th Circuit notably did not say that it believed ex-con Judy was a candidate.

    Cody Judy: I’ve always tried to refrain from employing the pajoratives.

    Ex-con Judy lies yet again, as he habitually refers to me by the name of children’s cartoon character.

    If I have not refrained I’ve never been happy with myself

    Ex-con Judy again confuses his therapist’s office with Doc’s website.

    and my apologies are extended.

    The last time ex-con Judy apologized on this site, he waited an entire hour before acting in a manner that showed his apology was worthless.

  200. avatar
    Cody Judy January 28, 2017 at 2:24 pm #

    Northland10: You leave me with no choice but to decide that you are being intentionally obtuse and basically lying or you have absolutely no grasp of reality and no ability to comprehend a thing.

    The Court is generally inured with stating Facts relaying Facts for argument rather than being a smart-ass with underlying false facsimile from which Judgements are made.

    The relativity of smirk this Blog employs in comments probably a bad example to represent as a Standard for U.S. Court’s, in my opinion.

  201. avatar
    Cody Judy January 28, 2017 at 2:38 pm #

    bob: The last time ex-con Judy apologized on this site, he waited an entire hour before acting in a manner that showed his apology was worthless.

    Oh come on Bob, you have to admit your meme picture is a Square Headed angry red-faced-looking character and you chose Bob.

    That is SpongeBobSquarePants as a funny?

    I never quite figured out how to change the meme pictures assigned on this Blog although I admit to being in a rush and hurry when I thought about it. It appears you didn’t either. We have common ground.

    I never minded my Diamond shaped meme with his tongue poking out lol feel free in calling me Ex Con Judy a few more times as I’m sure you know Ex Con Jesus Christ understands completely.

    ST. JOHN 18:30

  202. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger January 28, 2017 at 2:43 pm #

    I can’t wait to see what it is that you are hiding. 😆

    Rickey: You won’t have to worry about that, because I don’t accept cases from people who live in Fantasyland.

  203. avatar
    Reality Check January 28, 2017 at 2:45 pm #

    Judy

    The word is pejorative. It means expressing contempt or disapproval. Both apply in your case. I find you contemptible and disapprove of your ignorant beliefs about many things.

    If writing something intelligent is the criterion to tweet you should immediately delete your Twitter account. You certainly wouldn’t be allowed to comment here if that were one of Doc’s criteria.

  204. avatar
    Northland10 January 28, 2017 at 3:04 pm #

    Cody Judy: The Court is generally inured with stating Facts relaying Facts for argument rather than being a smart-ass with underlying false facsimile from which Judgements are made.

    Huh?

    I said this some time ago. When making an argument, whether to an adversary or to the court, you have to put it in language that is understood by your audience. It doesn’t matter if you think it makes sense. It is only useful if the reader understands.

    Your job is to help the reader understand and agree. It is not their job to decipher what you are saying.

  205. avatar
    Cody Judy January 28, 2017 at 3:08 pm #

    Reality Check: If writing something intelligent is the criterion to tweet you should immediately delete your Twitter account.

    (in your opinion) I would venture to say your advise or opinion would apply to President Donald Trump who has 14.4 million on POTUS and 22.5 million followers at REAL DJT?

    Repeating your opinion doesn’t make it so and if your opinion was intelligent you would think it would be so. Yes., people say a lot of dumb things I included, but your worthy of being human also. 😉

    Reality Check: You certainly wouldn’t be allowed to comment here if that were one of Doc’s criteria.

    One thing I ❤ and admire about Doc and one you don’t?

    I can’t help or change the fact so many here want to tackle my comments with theirs. Generally that happens to the guy running the Football. It’s just part of the game and it’s what the opposite side of the field is suppose to do.

    I don’t take it personally.
    I’m no Taller or Smaller for it.
    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/825023073178918912

    What is a little surprising is the attention that I as such a small fish get compared to the BIG ONES who are obvious. I don’t think I’m worthy of the hatred some have expressed here anymore than a pothole in the road that has never flattened a tire.

    One thing is sure, I’m the only or biggest U.S. Presidential Candidate this site has commenting.

  206. avatar
    Arthur B. January 28, 2017 at 5:44 pm #

    Cody Judy: One thing is sure, I’m the only or biggest U.S. Presidential Candidate this site has commenting.

    Just as Nancy is the only or biggest forger / murderer.

  207. avatar
    Rickey January 28, 2017 at 7:30 pm #

    Cody Judy: While I appreciate your ability to read a Docket, the argument within the Motions and Applications is something respectfully you are missing.

    The [Court Stamped Summons and Complaint] were taken [from the Clerk] and Served by the Server of Process upon the Defendants.

    The Court Received the [Witnesses] of the Server ( because there were more than 1 Witnessesof the Service of Process although only one is needed for Record,Defendants were Served.

    The Witnesses of the Service of Process testified to the Court under oath, that the Defendants were Served the Court Stamped Summons and Court Stamped Complaint , that the Clerk acknowledged Stamping for the Service of Process.

    The only thing you don’t seem to get is that multiple witnesses testified to the Court Service was completed upon the Defendants. That the Court Clerk admitted she stamped the Summons and Complaint and hand received the Witness of Service.

    The Judge refused a Hearing on that matter. The Judge refused to hear the Witnesses of Service.

    Why?

    You ask why? BECAUSE YOU FAILED TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE RULE OF THE COURT. That’s why.

    Filing an Affidavit of Service is not, by it itself, sufficient. You have to attach to the Affidavit of Service a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint. Did you ready the Clerk’s explanation? “The only proof of service filed with the court is a partial return of summons which does not include a copy of the summons or any indication of exactly what documents were served, i.e the complaint. Without the inclusion of the summons page, the clerk cannot determine that proper notice was given to the defendants.”

    All you had to do was re-file your Affidavits of Service with the summons and complaint attached. But, as usual, you couldn’t or wouldn’t follow the rules.

    A 5 page Answer from the Judge. . Hummmm that seems quite a statement. The Appeals Court no less intriguing.

    It’s an order, not an answer. And the dismissal of your lawsuit had nothing to do with your failure to file proper proof of service, egregious as that was. As Judge Stewart made clear, your lawsuit would have been dismissed anyway because it was frivolous and failed to state a legal claim.

  208. avatar
    Rickey January 28, 2017 at 7:55 pm #

    I took a few minutes to read Judy’s latest ridiculous filing, a “Motion for Relief” which essentially asks the District Court in Utah to reopen his 2014 lawsuit based upon “new evidence” presented by Arpaio and Zullo.

    Once again Judy demonstrates that he has learned nothing. Judge Stewart ruled that “Plaintiff’s claims lack an arguable basis in law” and Judy still does not address that part of the ruling. He fails to assert any legal basis for his claim that he is entitled to damages, even assuming that his factual claims are correct.

    His other problem, of course, is that nothing that Arpaio and Zullo said or showed in December is admissible “new evidence.”

  209. avatar
    Northland10 January 28, 2017 at 8:40 pm #

    Rickey: I took a few minutes to read Judy’s latest ridiculous filing

    My condolences.

  210. avatar
    bob January 28, 2017 at 8:48 pm #

    Cody Judy: Oh come on Bob, you have to admit your meme picture is a Square Headed angry red-faced-lookingcharacter and you chose Bob.

    The avatar, which I did not choose, has neither a sponge nor pants. Ex-con Judy lies — poorly — when he claims his insult isn’t related to a popular children’s cartoon character.

    feel free in calling me Ex Con Judy a few more times

    Not that ex-con Judy’s permission is required, I emphasize his past because he refuses to accept responsibility for it.

    as I’m sure you know Ex Con Jesus Christ understands completely.

    Ex-con Judy’s ego of course compels him to make a completely unearned and offensive comparison.

  211. avatar
    Northland10 January 28, 2017 at 9:10 pm #

    Rickey: Once again Judy demonstrates that he has learned nothing. Judge Stewart ruled that “Plaintiff’s claims lack an arguable basis in law” and Judy still does not address that part of the ruling. He fails to assert any legal basis for his claim that he is entitled to damages, even assuming that his factual claims are correct.

    It’s like he never read the order. But at least we now have this:

    This evidence is the combined effort of the investigation of law enforcement professionals within the Maricopa County Arizona Sheriff Department under Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Cold Case Posse findings which copulatively state the document Obama has distributed as his long form birth certificate is a fabrication as well as his draft registration.

    I really did not need to read about Arpaio and Zullo doing anything copulatively.

  212. avatar
    Arthur B. January 28, 2017 at 9:57 pm #

    Northland10: I really did not need to read about Arpaio and Zullo doing anything copulatively.

    Denn was wäre schon diese Revolution ohne eine allgemeine Kopulation.

  213. avatar
    Rickey January 28, 2017 at 10:42 pm #

    bob:
    Ex-con Judy’s ego of course compels him to make a completely unearned and offensive comparison.

    And Jesus never entered a guilty plea.

  214. avatar
    Northland10 January 28, 2017 at 10:52 pm #

    Rickey: And Jesus never entered a guilty plea.

    Silence is an admission of guilt, so sayeth Birther/Nutjob law.

    Here endeth the lesson.

  215. avatar
    Rickey January 28, 2017 at 11:06 pm #

    Northland10: It’s like he never read the order.

    Judy is so incompetent that he butchered the title of his case when he filed his latest waste of paper. This is how it reads (the misplaced ampersand, the misspelling of “judgment” and the stray comma are in his original:

    CODY ROBERT JUDY,
    OF JUDGEMENT
    PLAINTIFF,

    (JURY TRIAL DEMAND)&

    v.

    BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
    JUDGE: Honorable Bruce S. Jenkis
    aka BARRY SOETORO , DNC
    Ted Stewart
    ORGANIZATION FOR ACTION et al.,

    The judge’s name is Bruce S. Jenkins, not Jenkis. I’m sure that he and Judge Stewart will be surprised to see themselves listed as defendants.

    Judy can’t even be bothered to proofread his legal garbage.

  216. avatar
    Cody Judy January 29, 2017 at 12:03 am #

    Rickey: Judy can’t even be bothered to proofread his legal garbage.

    Not saying I’m anywhere near perfect, but you would think with the copy excuses you guys come up with for Barack Obama that you might figure out some also applies for me and the way Scribd accepts a doc?

    Which proves another point.. yr interest for Truth is skewed ? You can only see things against me, nothing for me. May you also find happiness in the same manner.

    I wonder why sometimes I even bother to provide for your entertainment with no cost?😂

  217. avatar
    bob January 29, 2017 at 2:59 am #

    Cody Judy: Not saying I’m anywhere near perfect, but you would think with the copy excuses you guys come up with for Barack Obama that you might figure out some also applies for me and the way Scribd accepts a doc?

    Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy yet again fails to accept responsibility for his failings.

    Which proves another point.. yr interest for Truth is skewed ? You can only see things against me, nothing for me.

    Because ex-con Judy has yet to do anything positive or worthwhile.

    I wonder why sometimes I even bother to provide for your entertainment with no cost?

    Because ex-con Judy’s ego prefers receiving negative attention over receiving no attention.

  218. avatar
    bob January 29, 2017 at 3:14 am #

    Rickey: I took a few minutes to read Judy’s latest ridiculous filing, a “Motion for Relief” which essentially asks the District Court in Utah to reopen his 2014 lawsuit based upon “new evidence” presented by Arpaio and Zullo.

    What is really hi-larious is that ex-con Judy still hasn’t figured out that Arpaio and Zullo DIDN’T PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE at the vanity press conference.

    Zullo’s wild claims about these mythical experts’ mythical reports will never see the inside of a courtroom. Because Zullo is never, ever going to cough up the actual reports.

  219. avatar
    Northland10 January 29, 2017 at 7:18 am #

    Rickey: Judy can’t even be bothered to proofread his legal garbage.

    At least he stated that the Sheriff’s office released the evidence on “Dec 13th 2016 and was recorded.”

    He was only off by 2 days.

  220. avatar
    Northland10 January 29, 2017 at 7:34 am #

    Local Rules of the court

    DUCivR 7-5 HYPERLINKS IN COURT FILINGS

    (a) Encouraged and Impermisslbe Hyperlinks.

    As a convenience for the court, practitioners are encouraged to utilize hyperlinks in a manner consistent with this rule. For purposes of this rule, a hyperlink is a reference within an electronically filed document that permits a user to click on the reference so as to be directed to other content. Standard legal citations must still be used so that those who desire to retrieve referenced material may do so without use of an electronic service.

    (2) Permissible Hyperlinks.
    A hyperlink to any other internet resource not identified in subsection (a)(l)(B) is
    permissible in any document filed with the court, provided that the attorney or party
    adding the hyperlink downloads the content thus cited and attaches it to the document
    in PDF format, or if the referenced content is a media object in a format not
    acceptable for CM/ECF filing, submits the content with Notice of Conventional Filing
    pursuant to Section Il(E)(6) of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Manual.

    and there also is.

    DUCivR 10-1 GENERAL FORMAT OF PAPERS
    (b) Font Requirements.

    The requirement font type is Times New Roman or Arial and the font size must be a minimum of 12, including footnotes, although larger font sizes are acceptable. All page limits as set forth in these rules apply, even if a party elects to use a font size larger than 12.

    DejaVu is not Times New Roman or Arial.

    Cody is helpful enough by failing to follow enough rules that, by the local rules, the clerk could send it back with instructions on what needs to be changed before it could be filed. This will save the court the trouble of actually having to deny it.

  221. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger January 29, 2017 at 8:04 am #

    They called me the “Kingmaker.” I’ll make you famous. 😆

    Arthur B.: Denn was wäre schon diese Revolution ohne eine allgemeine Kopulation.

  222. avatar
    Reality Check January 29, 2017 at 10:23 am #

    Re: Judy’s latest pile of poop

    My favorite was “Motion for Relieve of Judgement” in the summary. “:ol: Of course I did almost relieve myself laughing while reading this nonsense.

  223. avatar
    Cody Judy January 29, 2017 at 10:34 am #

    bob: Because Zullo is never, ever going to cough up the actual reports

    Wouldn’t you enjoy that being settled under oath? I’ve always said this could go either way but at least would be settled as for the Truth for both sides.

    I believe Sheriff Joe stated that in so many words also.

    Rickey: Judge Stewart, incidentally, is a Republican and a friend of Orrin Hatch.

    Today’s Drudge@drudgereport.com featuring in fact Hatch apposed to Trump
    Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, the chamber’s senior Republican, asked Trump to modify his order, noting that many of his Mormon ancestors were refugees from religious persecution.

    Democrats in Congress roundly criticized the order, as did some Republicans including Hatch, Arizona’s Jeff Flake and Ben Sasse of Nebraska

    https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-01-29/u-s-entry-ban-from-seven-muslim-countries-causing-alarm-anger

    On an interesting note, no Country with a Trump Hotels was put on the ban (Saudia Arabia)

    In another interesting note , there is no other way to protest the 2016 Election. It’s down to this Democrats. Live with it or else contribute and help out. What’s it gonna be?

  224. avatar
    Cody Judy January 29, 2017 at 10:50 am #

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/825732335907663872

    No other way to protest #Election2016 #Democrats Live with it or else contribute & help out @HillaryClinton #Birther
    https://t.co/q6WbTQbJh0

    Travel Ban includes…

    https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-01-29/u-s-entry-ban-from-seven-muslim-countries-causing-alarm-anger

    More Evidense a Vote for Trump was favored here

    Reality Check: Re: Judy’s latest pile of poop

    My favorite was “Motion for Relieve of Judgement” in the summary. “:ol: Of course I did almost relieve myself laughing while reading this nonsense.

    Reality Check.. did you vote for Trump?

    I’m waiting for your Contribution and Help.

  225. avatar
    Reality Check January 29, 2017 at 11:18 am #

    Doc

    May I respectfully request that you ban Judy? He is doing nothing to contribute to the discussion. He only is posting here to get clicks on his pathetic web site and Twitter page. He blocks anyone on Twitter who dares oppose him. He attempts to make every discussion all about him and his imaginary candidacy.

    I am opposed to banning in principle but there are times that it’s the right thing to do.

  226. avatar
    Cody Judy January 29, 2017 at 11:46 am #

    Reality Check: Doc

    May I respectfully request that you ban Judy?

    Like Trump banned Citizens of 7 Countries?
    You voted for Trump didn’t you? Your request are just like his?

    It may be to late for Hillary Clinton to help. On Hillary News Trending

    Trump just issued arrest for HRC

    https://twitter.com/Hillarizer/status/825743786223480834

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/825744922665836544

    There is no other way to protest #Election2016 @HillaryClinton so is it all the Banned Countries or Obamas Qlfctn?
    https://t.co/aOltsbAovj

    @HillaryClinton Help? ExOrder barring Iran Iraq Libya Somalia Sudan Syria & Yemen Citizens or Obama? #Dems #Birther https://t.co/aOltsbAovj

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/825740729204879361

  227. avatar
    bob January 29, 2017 at 1:12 pm #

    Cody Judy: Wouldn’t you enjoy that being settled under oath?

    It would amusing if Zullo released the reports; it would be fun to tear them apart. But there is no indication the reports ever will be released.

    I believe Sheriff Joe stated that in so many words also.

    Like Zullo and ex-con Judy, Arpaio is filled with nothing but lies and worthless promises.

  228. avatar
    Joey January 29, 2017 at 2:04 pm #

    The former Maricopa County Cold Case Posse representatives stated at their December 15, 2016 press conference that they intended to turn their findings over to Congress.

    Barack Obama first announced his candidacy for president in early February of 2007. We are just days from ten years of Barack Obama being subject to the provisions of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution and not one congressional hearing has ever been held on the topic of natural born citizenship.

    Additionally, every day that the House of Representatives is in session, at the close of the day’s session there are what is known as “Special Orders.” Any member of the House can give a five minute speech on any topic that they are interested in and then other members can respond to the five minute speech for up to an hour. Special Orders alternate, one day for Republican issues and the next day for Democratic issues.
    There has never been a Special Orders speech on Barack Obama’s eligibility. That is probably because all 435 Representatives realize, as candidate Donald Trump said: “Barack Obama was born in the United States, period.”

  229. avatar
    Rickey January 29, 2017 at 3:45 pm #

    Cody Judy: Not saying I’m anywhere near perfect, but you would think with the copy excuses you guys come up with for Barack Obama that you might figure out some also applies for me and the way Scribd accepts a doc?

    You’re blaming the formatting on Scribd? It’s that way on your own website. And you couldn’t bother to make sure that you spelled the judge’s name correctly.

  230. avatar
    Joey January 29, 2017 at 3:56 pm #

    Rickey: You’re blaming the formatting on Scribd? It’s that way on your own website. And you couldn’t bother to make sure that you spelled the judge’s name correctly.

    There are judges who are like some teachers & professors, as soon as they see typos, misspellings and grammatical errors, they stop reading: you lose.

    This reminds me of Orly Taitz’s Mississippi eligibility lawsuit. She sued the “Democrat Party of Mississippi Executive Committee.” There is no organization called the “Democrat” Party and the DEMOCRATIC Party of Mississippi’s attorneys moved for dismissal on those grounds.

  231. avatar
    Rickey January 29, 2017 at 4:31 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    It may be to late for Hillary Clinton to help. On Hillary News Trending

    Trump just issued arrest for HRC

    Hilarious. Judy, who fancies himself to be qualified to be president, spreads an obviously fake story from a fake news site.

    And it’s “too late,” not “to late.”

  232. avatar
    Rickey January 29, 2017 at 6:23 pm #

    Joey: There are judges who are like some teachers & professors, as soon as they see typos, misspellings and grammatical errors, they stop reading: you lose.

    And Judy continues to argue that he served the defendants, ignoring the fact that the Court of Appeals ruled that it didn’t matter:

    Judy argues that he was entitled to default judgment because he had submitted
    evidence establishing that he properly served the Defendants in this case and that they failed to timely respond. Alternatively, Judy argues that even if the Defendants
    weren’t served, the district court erred by not compelling service of process. None of this matters. Even if the Defendants were properly served, Judy would not have been entitled to default judgment because the district court was required to dismiss his complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(i)–(ii) as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for relief.

  233. avatar
    Joey January 29, 2017 at 7:37 pm #

    Rickey: And Judy continues to argue that he served the defendants, ignoring the fact that the Court of Appeals ruled that it didn’t matter:

    Judy argues that he was entitled to default judgment because he had submitted
    evidence establishing that he properly served the Defendants in this case and that they failed to timely respond. Alternatively, Judy argues that even if the Defendants
    weren’t served, the district court erred by not compelling service of process. None of this matters. Even if the Defendants were properly served, Judy would not have been entitled to default judgment because the district court was required to dismiss his complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(i)–(ii) as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for relief.

    You mean to tell me that Cody Judy’s lawsuit was adjudicated as being “frivolous” and that Mr. Judy failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted?
    I’m SHOCKED!

  234. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 29, 2017 at 9:02 pm #

    Well? That describes our current president pretty well.

    Rickey: Hilarious. Judy, who fancies himself to be qualified to be president, spreads an obviously fake story from a fake news site.

  235. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater January 29, 2017 at 10:25 pm #

    Reality Check:
    Doc

    May I respectfully request that you ban Judy? He is doing nothing to contribute to the discussion. He only is posting here to get clicks on his pathetic web site and Twitter page. He blocks anyone on Twitter who dares oppose him. He attempts to make every discussion all about him and his imaginary candidacy.

    I am opposed to banning in principle but there are times that it’s the right thing to do.

    I’ve asked the same thing as well. Judy makes every topic about him and keeps spamming his own sites in his comments. Judy has blocked me on twitter because I made fun of his poor photoshopping skills. If he wants to comment freely here he should unblock people on his twitter.

  236. avatar
    Phoenix (aka Paper) January 29, 2017 at 11:30 pm #

    It’s like the years of birtherism have prepared us for all that is coming down the pike now–as we see many of the same behaviors, tactics and strategies manifest.

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Well? That describes our current president pretty well.

  237. avatar
    Northland10 January 30, 2017 at 7:23 am #

    Rickey: You’re blaming the formatting on Scribd? It’s that way on your own website. And you couldn’t bother to make sure that you spelled the judge’s name correctly.

    Chapter 6 of OrlyLaw. She managed to do it to her favorite judge in Brownsville.

  238. avatar
    Northland10 January 30, 2017 at 7:26 am #

    Joey: You mean to tell me that Cody Judy’s lawsuit was adjudicated as being “frivolous” and that Mr. Judy failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted?
    I’m SHOCKED!

    I went through a bunch of this other cases, including the ones not related to elections (he has sued on elections even before Obama, because, not enough pencils). There was a growing theme:

    “…failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.”

  239. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 30, 2017 at 8:00 am #

    During these 8 years I have tried to understand the birthers, and to do that I have examined various theories: bigotry, confirmation bias, the Dunning-Kruger effect and more. I’ve read books in psychology, history and political science. I think I may have finally found an explanation for why birthers are the way they are: chemtrails.

  240. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 30, 2017 at 8:05 am #

    I respectfully suggest that if you folks didn’t feed the troll he would go away. Seriously, why do you read his comments? I haven’t read them for months, and I don’t read replies to him either.

    Reality Check: May I respectfully request that you ban Judy?

  241. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger January 30, 2017 at 8:20 am #

    There are real birthers and fake birthers. The fake birthers were the loudest and have now been shut down by their own institution which is the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department. I’m sure Trump had something to do with it as well since it was nothing more than a continuous con job bleeding suckers dry with endless promises and, of course, no delivery.

    Then there are the real birthers such as me, the forger and those who know I am the forger.

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    During these 8 years I have tried to understand the birthers, and to do that I have examined various theories: bigotry, confirmation bias, the Dunning-Kruger effect and more. I’ve read books in psychology, history and political science. I think I may have finally found an explanation for why birthers are the way they are: chemtrails.

    Joey:
    The former Maricopa County Cold Case Posse representatives stated at their December 15, 2016 press conference that they intended to turn their findings over to Congress.

    Barack Obama first announced his candidacy for president in early February of 2007. We are just days from ten years of Barack Obama being subject to the provisions of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution and not one congressional hearing has ever been held on the topic of natural born citizenship.

    Additionally, every day that the House of Representatives is in session, at the close of the day’s session there are what is known as “Special Orders.” Any member of the House can give a five minute speech on any topic that they are interested in and then other members can respond to the five minute speech for up to an hour. Special Orders alternate, one day for Republican issues and the next day for Democratic issues.
    There has never been a Special Orders speech on Barack Obama’s eligibility. That is probably because all 435 Representatives realize, as candidate Donald Trump said: “Barack Obama was born in the United States, period.”

  242. avatar
    Lupin January 30, 2017 at 8:30 am #

    To Dr. Con:

    Kevin, I’d like to donate $100 to the ACLU but they don’t take paypal. I assume you must have an account. Would you be willing to be my intermediary in this matter?

    E-mail me at info at blackcoatpress dot com

    PS: Could we get the Statue of Liberty back? I don’t think you’re using it right now. 🙂

  243. avatar
    J.D. Sue January 30, 2017 at 8:38 am #

    Lupin: PS: Could we get the Statue of Liberty back? I don’t think you’re using it right now.

    —–
    No We need her more than ever!

    Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
    With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
    Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
    A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
    Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
    Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
    Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
    The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
    “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
    With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
    Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

    The New Colossus
    By Emma Lazarus

  244. avatar
    Reality Check January 30, 2017 at 11:07 am #

    I tried not responding to Judy for a long time and he didn’t go away. It’s human nature to respond to idiocy, insults and lies. After all that is pretty much what Obama Conspiracy Theories was all about isn’t it? It became clear he was not going away and I see no evidence that he would go away if people stopped responding to him.

    What changed my mind about asking for him to be blocked is when I found out he was blacking me and others on Twitter.

    Besides even if we don’t read it we still have to scroll through his bullschmidt.

    Dr. Conspiracy: I respectfully suggest that if you folks didn’t feed the troll he would go away. Seriously, why do you read his comments? I haven’t read them for months, and I don’t read replies to him either.

  245. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 30, 2017 at 11:43 am #

    While you were not feeding the troll, several others were putting out bushels of food for him every time he came around. Do I have to call names?

    Reality Check: I tried not responding to Judy for a long time and he didn’t go away.

  246. avatar
    Rickey January 30, 2017 at 12:08 pm #

    There are two ways to look at it. There is a certain troll no one has responded to recently but continues to post anyway, so I’m not sure that ignoring Judy would make him go away.

    As one who has responded to Judy, I’ll defend myself with The Fogbow’s motto, “Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.”

    That said, I’m willing to experiment. If everyone else votes to ignore him, I will as well.

  247. avatar
    Joey January 30, 2017 at 12:56 pm #

    I oppose banning anyone but ths is not my blog. I oppose labeling anyone a “troll” as I have been so labeled on birther blogs just because I respectfully disagreed with the party line.
    My view is that having opposing views adds to the dynamic of the discussion even if those in opposition are people like the Cody Judys, Trader Jacks and Nancy Ruth Owens of the world.
    If nothing else those in opposition can learn why they failed so miserably and completely, even if they don’t have the integrity to admit it publicly. Some people just can’t bring themselves to say: “I was wrong.”

  248. avatar
    Dave B. January 30, 2017 at 1:39 pm #

    Yeah, that guy’s just boring. So’s the other persistent one. And I have to have a high threshold for boredom to keep from boring myself. It’s so high I can actually listen to Mark Gillar for, oh, minutes at a time.

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    I respectfully suggest that if you folks didn’t feed the troll he would go away. Seriously, why do you read his comments? I haven’t read them for months, and I don’t read replies to him either.

  249. avatar
    Reality Check January 30, 2017 at 1:43 pm #

    There is a difference between making poorly sourced, biased, and downright dishonest arguments and merely trying call attention to oneself (even if in a completely clownish fashion). Doc tends to ban the former (like Rambo Ike and Hermitian) and let the latter like Judy and Nancy blubber on. If that’s his choice I am fine with that. It’s his blog. All I did was ask.

    Speaking of Rambo, he is over in the empty room at BR replying to comments folks have made here. It is pathetic.

  250. avatar
    Cody Judy January 31, 2017 at 11:10 am #

    Joey: There has never been a Special Orders speech on Barack Obama’s eligibility. That is probably because all 435 Representatives realize, as candidate Donald Trump said: “Barack Obama was born in the United States, period.”

    OR U.S. Sen Resolution 511 noticed every R U.S. Senator on board for McCain and it would make Republican colleagues look ‘Racist’ to object to Obama?

    OR they knew they didn’t have Standing as a Candidate for President does.

    Not stating the obvious doesn’t make your claim legit.

    Rickey: “Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.”

    What you probably meant was “Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and become President”

    But that is a line right out of Obama’s Playback that President Trump picked up on very quickly. Waiting 50 months to disclose his long form birth certificate you can expect President Trump’s taxes about two months prior the 2020 Election.

    Fight the Smears, Fact Check, all set up for .. the Truth. Forget about it in Court.

    Northland10: I went through a bunch of this other cases, including the ones not related to elections (he has sued on elections even before Obama, because, not enough pencils). There was a growing theme:

    Anyone find it odd Elections Clerks would post in the Voting Booth if someone on the Ballot had to withdraw candidacy in the order of preserving votes, but not post a Write-In who was now available and include pencils in the Voting Booth?

    You see there is logic here and how many people here were upset about the 7 Million funneled into Jill Steins camp for Recounts on an Election she had no chance of winning with the Recount 100% in her favor?

    Of course only 3M of that was used for Recounts and Lawyers.

    Dr. Conspiracy: I think I may have finally found an explanation for why birthers are the way they are: chemtrails.

    Doc is right. Ridicule, Dog Pile Tackling, and Labeling were mean. Do you see me with any back up piling on?

    GroupThink is a serious problem for Politics but not so much for a sorority party. Chem trail huffing is a serious problem for Climate Changers especially the rich ones darting back and fourth across the Nation for their next Sermon on the Mount stating they would gladly pay a Carbon Tax as long as you download their latest App and aloud them to sell your information to an unlimited amount of advertisers.

    Docs right, you guys get panty-twisted over small fish but perhaps it’s because you know you have absolutely no chance with the big fish, and you can’t conceive that I would dare even think I would.

    As if thinking made a fish grow.. 🔊😂

    As far as spelling errors Rickey, I’ve put a lot of Time in and you misspelled ” Block ” now you’ve done blown it and become everything I am to you. 😂

    Resources Gentleman, you can do more with a lot of resources and Time. I am not a Billionaire but I have a good way of building from scratches.

    You all know me now and didn’t before.

  251. avatar
    bob January 31, 2017 at 1:03 pm #

    Cody Judy: U.S. Sen Resolution 511 noticed every R U.S. Senator on board for McCain and it would make Republican colleagues look ‘Racist’ to object to Obama?

    Many Republicans didn’t object McCain yet raised “concerns” about President Obama.

    OR they knew they didn’t have Standing as a Candidate for President does.

    Only senators can vote on senate resolutions; duh. And if a senator wanted to challenge a candidate’s eligibility, there are methods other than federal court available; duh.

    What you probably meant was “Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and become President”

    Who knew ex-con Judy had such little respect for the current president?

    Waiting 50 months to disclose his long form birth certificate

    There was no “waiting,” as such disclosure was entirely voluntary.

    you can expect President Trump’s taxes about two months prior the 2020 Election.

    No one expects the current president to be as transparent as President Obama.

    Forget about it in Court.

    In all the birther lawsuits and challenges, the only ones peddling lies were … the birthers.

    Anyone find it odd Elections Clerks would post in the Voting Booth if someone on the Ballot had to withdraw candidacy in the order of preserving votes, but not post a Write-In who was now available and include pencils in the Voting Booth?

    Nope; and certainly not illegal.

    You see there is logic here

    Ex-con Judy and logic don’t have even a passing familiarity with each other.

    Do you see me with any back up piling on?

    Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy blames others for the fact that no one agrees with him.

    you can’t conceive that I would dare even think I would.

    This is unsurprising, as ex-con Judy has made it painfully obvious that his ego far exceeds his capabilities.

    You all know me now and didn’t before.

    Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy takes pride in being a useless irritant.

  252. avatar
    Joey January 31, 2017 at 1:40 pm #

    Cody Judy: OR U.S. Sen Resolution 511 noticed every R U.S. Senator on board for McCain and it would make Republican colleagues look ‘Racist’ to object to Obama?

    OR they knew they didn’t have Standing as a Candidate for President does.

    “Standing?” You don’t need standing to make a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives or in the well of the Senate, all you need is to have been elected.

    Included in House Resolution H.R. 593, passed 378-0 on July 27, 2009 (111th Congress):
    “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961;”

    Also issued on July 27, 2009:
    For Immediate Release: July 27, 2009
    STATEMENT BY HEALTH DIRECTOR CHIYOME FUKINO, M.D.
    “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”

  253. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger January 31, 2017 at 4:02 pm #

    For the record, I called Jenson, Lakin’s att. Says he’s not att anymore.

  254. avatar
    Arthur B. January 31, 2017 at 4:18 pm #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    For the record, I called Jenson, Lakin’s att. Says he’s not att anymore.

    Yes, Nancy. “Dogbite” Jensen was fired by Lakin and replaced with Neal Puckett, an attorney with considerable court-martial experience, unlike the foolish birther Jensen who assisted Lakin in carrying out his professional suicide mission.

    The substitution became official on October 13, 2010, as documented here:

    http://www.court-martial-ucmj.com/uncategorized/ltc-lakin-sitrep-15/

    Sounds like you’re a little out of touch.

  255. avatar
    jdkinpa January 31, 2017 at 4:47 pm #

    Doc, thanks for the memories!

  256. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 31, 2017 at 6:07 pm #

    I seem to recall him leaving some huge missive over here, but I deleted it because he’s banned. He was trying to start some battle with Lupin about French history.

    Reality Check: Speaking of Rambo, he is over in the empty room at BR replying to comments folks have made here. It is pathetic.

  257. avatar
    Rickey February 1, 2017 at 12:33 am #

    Arthur B.: Yes, Nancy. “Dogbite” Jensen was fired by Lakin and replaced with Neal Puckett, an attorney with considerable court-martial experience, unlike the foolish birther Jensen who assisted Lakin in carrying out his professional suicide mission.

    The substitution became official on October 13, 2010, as documented here:

    http://www.court-martial-ucmj.com/uncategorized/ltc-lakin-sitrep-15/

    Sounds like you’re a little out of touch.

    I’m not sure that Lakin ever fully grasped the fact that he was being used by Jensen and the birthers who were supporting him. Their priority was to get discovery of Obama’s records, not to exonerate Lakin. It wasn’t until Judge Lind ruled that Obama’s eligibility was irrelevant that some of Lakin’s supporters saw the handwriting on the wall and urged him to get a lawyer with military justice experience. Puckett then cut the best deal that he could get for Lakin.

  258. avatar
    The Magic M (not logged in) February 1, 2017 at 5:23 am #

    Cody Judy: you can expect President Trump’s taxes about two months prior the 2020 Election

    Unlikely, and you can expect Trump to have Obama’s presidency voided even later than his tax release. How’s that working for you? The black guy is and remains the 44th President.

  259. avatar
    Sluffy1 February 1, 2017 at 5:37 am #

    Good job Doc. Thx
    Be well and best regards.

  260. avatar
    Notorial Dissent February 1, 2017 at 5:54 am #

    The only thing funnier than Ram Boik, sorry, that;’s the way I always see that name, arguing US law or history is him trying to pontificate on French history. The man isn’t smart enough to be a fool. He embarrasses village idiots.

  261. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 1, 2017 at 6:53 am #

    This isn’t the Fogblow.

    Reality Check: blackcoatpress

  262. avatar
    Reality Check February 1, 2017 at 9:22 am #

    No, the Fogbow is a forum and this is a blog. You should post at the Fogbow. You would be placed in your own special forum there with a few fellow nutjobs.

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    This isn’t the Fogblow.

  263. avatar
    Cody Judy February 1, 2017 at 9:36 am #

    The Magic M (not logged in): How’s that working for you? The black guy is and remains the 44th President.

    If I had supported Obama as constitutionally Qualified person in that Office , I’d have noticed him as a [ natural born Citizen] as color is not part of the Qualifications mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

    Identity politics is ultimately Populism and is discriminatory.

  264. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 1, 2017 at 10:10 am #

    I posted there a few times years ago. Heavy, heavy censorship and they claim that they don’t. I wouldn’t waste my time with a site that has no respect for the first amendment.

    Reality Check:
    No, the Fogbow is a forum and this is a blog. You should post at the Fogbow. You would be placed in your own special forum there with a few fellow nutjobs.

  265. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 1, 2017 at 11:34 am #

    And, I don’t see a phone number for this lawyer anywhere. If he reads this blog, he can contact me thru my webpage: http://iforgedobamasbirthcertificates.weebly.com/

    Arthur B.: Yes, Nancy. “Dogbite” Jensen was fired by Lakin and replaced with Neal Puckett, an attorney with considerable court-martial experience, unlike the foolish birther Jensen who assisted Lakin in carrying out his professional suicide mission.

    The substitution became official on October 13, 2010, as documented here:

    http://www.court-martial-ucmj.com/uncategorized/ltc-lakin-sitrep-15/

    Sounds like you’re a little out of touch.

  266. avatar
    Cody Judy February 1, 2017 at 11:44 am #

    bob: In all the birther lawsuits and challenges, the only ones peddling lies were … the birthers.

    This provides interesting thought. Bob is not alone in the idea that a truck driver that hit a person in a passinger car in front of 10 Pedestrians from behind has no damages to pay or be responsible for even if the driver of the car states he was hit from behind and 10 witnesses saw it to a Justice Court.

    Failing to state damages upon which a Claim can be made is terrific heist by Government Officials and Court Judges. However, common sense is left out of the equasion.

    GREETINGS FROM UTOPIA OR ZION? One income for all: far-fetched, or future fact?”A universal basic income will almost certainly be part of the answer.”
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/one-income-far-fetched-future-fact-041641247.html

    As our Republic was founded upon a Moral People as well more of a Flexible U.S. Constitution than an Inflexible U.S. Constitution , I believe the way here is a trail that leads to pavement rather then the opposite.

    The complexities of capitalism were also favored on the precipice of Moral People as Constitutional Abiding Elected Leaders.

    As that morality erodes, so does pure Capitalism as the backbone of the U.S. Constitution.

    All Christians understood the Law of Consecration in The Church founded by Christ and lead after his Resurrection by Peter. The application of consecrating all and only taking what is needed.

    We are seeing a greater and greater accumulation of wealth in fewer and fewer hands who are quite naturally apposed to the restructure of their imoral unconstitutional behavior.

    I believe the Rich ones will be the last through the eye of this needle while the poor are first.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/one-income-far-fetched-future-fact-041641247.html

    ELECTION DAY “60-DAY” STOCK BUYING SPREE
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-31/trumps-latest-fan-buffett-bought-12-billion-stock-election

    [ Betting On Trump but Voting for Hillary: Buffett Bought $12 Billion In Stocks Since The Election ]
    BILLIONAIRES ROCKING THE BOAT
    When you have Billions you never have to worry about selling or buying you can do either with out personal repercussions because you have always got a Million in cash laying around, which is more than most spend in a lifetime.

    Are Billionaires preparing to sink Trump’s Ship with a Fire Sell Out crushing the small investor, or are they earnestly invested for the long haul? What would selling 12 Billion in the next sixty Days do to the Market Fever?
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-31/trumps-latest-fan-buffett-bought-12-billion-stock-election

    Now read this :

    Warren Buffett Indicator Predicts Stock Market Crash in 2017

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lombardiletter.com/warren-buffett-indicator-predicts-stock-market-crash-in-2017/6076/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

    Paraphrased

    Warren Buffet is sitting on 85 Billion in Cash.
    His buying spree is only indicative of what he earned just last year [12 Billion] It’s nothing really. His moto ” “be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy.” He’s actually in ‘Waiting” mode right now.

    The market-cap-to-GDP ratio is currently at 127.1% it’s only been higher rwice [The Warren Buffett Indicator has only been higher twice since 1950. In 1999, at the height of the dotcom bubble, the ratio was at 153.6%. In late 2015, it was at 129.7%. It was only at 108% before the 2008 financial crisis.

    January 19, 2017, the Case Shiller cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio
    was at 28.06. That means, for every $1.00 of earnings a company makes, investors are willing to pay $28.06.

    The ten year average is about 16. Both times it was higher 2000 and 2007 there was a crash.

    According to Nobel-winning economist Robert Shiller, the euphoria after Trump won the election has sent the markets into a frenzy of greed and irrationality that could send stocks plunging in a rerun of the 1929 stock market crash.

    Lastly, the Wilshire-5000-to-GDP is a market-cap weighted index of all stocks actively traded—U.S.(-headquartered stocks that trade on the major exchanges ) ratio is at an all-time high of around 139.1.

    $85.0 billion is a lot of money to sit on for Beffet. Buffett has said he likes to keep a safety net of at least $20.0 billion. Like I said, he knows how to keep a little stashed that he’ll never use in his lifetime anyway.

    Far from being pointless, the Birther Movement provided an excellant example of immorality of Judges and Elected Leaders whose decisions of immorality will collapse our system and perhaps even extinguish their positions.

  267. avatar
    Reality Check February 1, 2017 at 12:21 pm #

    I doubt it. The mods there rarely censor anyone. If you push Birther nonsense or in your case just nonsense you will be placed in FEMA camp which is a special portion of the forum that people can choose not to see. Brian and Justin didn’t even do that on the Politijab board.

    What name did you post under?

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    I posted there a few times years ago. Heavy, heavy censorship and they claim that they don’t. I wouldn’t waste my time with a site that has no respect for the first amendment.

  268. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 1, 2017 at 12:31 pm #

    Probably Nancy Ruth Owens. I don’t recall. I tried three times to blog and kept getting booted. I’m sure the NSA still has records given the material. I’ve blogged on every site that would allow me access. Fogbow wouldn’t.

    Reality Check:
    I doubt it. The mods there rarely censor anyone. If you push Birther nonsense or in your case just nonsense you will be placed in FEMA camp which is a special portion of the forum that people can choose not to see. Brian and Justin didn’t even do that on the Politijab board.

    What name did you post under?

  269. avatar
    Reality Check February 1, 2017 at 1:00 pm #

    The First Amendment doesn’t give you the right to say anything you want on anyone’s forum or blog. Doc has the final say here. Foggy and the other mods do at the Fogbow. I do on my blog and radio show. You have the same right at your blog although it appears there are no comments there to censor.

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: I wouldn’t waste my time with a site that has no respect for the first amendmen

  270. avatar
    misha February 1, 2017 at 1:26 pm #

    Reality Check: The First Amendment doesn’t give you the right to say anything you want on anyone’s forum or blog.

    The 1st Amendment does not give the right to shout “Fire” in a crowded theatre. Also, this blog is privately owned, and the owner has the right to moderate comments.

    Get your own blog and fire away, as I did.

  271. avatar
    Arthur B. February 1, 2017 at 1:26 pm #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: And, I don’t see a phone number for this lawyer anywhere.

    Really? How hard did you look?

    A simple google search leads to the http://www.avvo.com site, which lists his office number as (202) 340-0069.

    Be aware, though, that his own homepage (http://www.nealpuckett.com/) states:

    “The Office of the Judge Advocate General of the United States Navy has appointed Mr. Neal A. Puckett, Esq., to the full time position of: Complex and Sexual Assault Litigation Highly Qualified Expert (HQE) … Mr. Puckett will therefore be on sabbatical from the private practice of military criminal defense law. The Law Office of Neal A. Puckett, PLLC, is not accepting any new clients.”

  272. avatar
    Slartibartfast February 1, 2017 at 1:37 pm #

    Nancy,

    The first three posts of every new member of the Fogbow are moderated—you would have been quickly put in a group where you were able to say anything you wanted (even things that would not be allowed on the rest of the forum, like insulting other members) and even post new topics and where there always would have been several people willing to engage you.

    That is not in any way “censorship”. It is, in fact, just the opposite. I would also note that your comment shows that you don’t respect the First Amendment enough to know what it means as it is only applicable to government action, not private forums and blogs as you seem to think.

    Isn’t it long past time for you to take responsibility for your actions and acknowledge that your understanding of the law, the facts, and the character of political figures (on both sides of the isle) is deeply flawed? You talk about integrity all the time, but have you ever considered showing any? That can only start with admitting that you are wrong.

    Mr. Judy,

    That goes for you as well. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is madness. As is your lack of remorse for the act of domestic terrorism you were incarcerated for. On the other hand, all you have to do to start rebuilding your integrity is to own your mistakes. What do you have to lose besides a bunch of hate, fear, and ignorance?

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    I posted there a few times years ago. Heavy, heavy censorship and they claim that they don’t. I wouldn’t waste my time with a site that has no respect for the first amendment.

  273. avatar
    Slartibartfast February 1, 2017 at 1:40 pm #

    Doc,

    From one Kevin to another, thanks for the opportunity to remonstrate some birthers one last time! Good luck in whatever you move on to!

  274. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 1, 2017 at 1:49 pm #

    Thanks!

    Arthur B.: Really? How hard did you look?

    A simple google search leads to the http://www.avvo.com site, which lists his office number as (202) 340-0069.

    Be aware, though, that his own homepage (http://www.nealpuckett.com/) states:

    “The Office of the Judge Advocate General of the United States Navy has appointed Mr. Neal A. Puckett, Esq., to the full time position of: Complex and Sexual Assault Litigation Highly Qualified Expert (HQE) … Mr. Puckett will therefore be on sabbatical from the private practice of military criminal defense law.The Law Office of Neal A. Puckett, PLLC, is not accepting any new clients.”

  275. avatar
    Joey February 1, 2017 at 3:11 pm #

    Cody Judy says: “Failing to state damages upon which a Claim can be made is terrific heist by Government Officials and Court Judges. However, common sense is left out of the equasion.”

    There is no “heist”. Mr. Judy doesn’t even get the name of the defense correct. Its “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” That defense comes straight from the Federal Rules of Criminal (and civil) Procedure and the purpose is to keep the courts from meddling in affairs where it has no business. Failure to state a claim simply means that the plaintiff did not convince the court in briefs that even if everythng alleged is true, as the plaintiff stated it that the court can provide a remedy. The U.S. Constitution does not give the judicial branch the power to unseat an elected president.
    This was pointed out by a federal judge in one of the very first Obama eligibility lawsuits, Barnett v Obama: “Barnett, Keyes et. al. v Obama, et. al.
    U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, 10/29/09:
    “The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought. Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not initiated impeachment proceedings, and, in fact, the House of Representatives, in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office. See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Congress. (2009) commemorating, by a vote of 378-0 the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating “The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.”

    “There may very well be a legitimate role for the judiciary to interpret whether the natural born citizen requirement has been satisfied in the case of a presidential candidate who has not already won the election and taken office. However, on the day that President Obama took the presidential oath and was sworn in, he became President of the United States. Any removal of him from the presidency must be accomplished through the Constitution’s mechanisms for the removal of a President, either through impeachment or the succession process set forth in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.
    Plaintiffs attempt to subvert this grant of power to Congress by convincing the Court that it should disregard the constitutional procedures in place for the removal of a sitting president.
    The process for removal of a sitting president– removal for any reason–is within the province of the Congress, not the Courts.”

  276. avatar
    Reality Check February 1, 2017 at 4:00 pm #

    As mentioned in another comment the first three posts there get moderated. This is to prevent spambots from posting.

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    Probably Nancy Ruth Owens. I don’t recall. I tried three times to blog and kept getting booted. I’m sure the NSA still has records given the material. I’ve blogged on every site that would allow me access. Fogbow wouldn’t.

  277. avatar
    misha February 1, 2017 at 4:04 pm #

    I am noticing posters here arguing with Cody Judy and Nancy Owens.. I have refrained from doing so, because of what my father – עליו השלום – always used to say:

    “If you argue with a fool, make sure you’re not doing the same thing.”

    It was good advice.

  278. avatar
    Cody Judy February 1, 2017 at 4:34 pm #

    Joey: The process for removal of a sitting president– removal for any reason–is within the province of the Congress, not the Courts.”

    Precisely why taking a look at the Case now would be of such a great Value to the General Public. Obama is un-seated , but can still be held liable to the Constitutional Standard – Natural born Citizen ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    I agree, that Judges do not want to get between a big ball rolling, however , now that is not a big ball rolling, Obama is like you said, unseated.

    Only damages now would be Obama’s Honor and the honor of his Signiture.

    Think of it as if Obama got to eat his cake and be Pres, but was yanked after his 2 Terms and found ineligible. There is nothing really that is upsetting we had a Smooth transition.

  279. avatar
    bob February 1, 2017 at 5:02 pm #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    Probably Nancy Ruth Owens.

    No “Nancy Ruth Owens” is a member of Fogbow. Given Owens’ unfamiliarity with reality, I’m inclined to believe she either never posted there, or never got past the three moderated messages speed bump (used to weed out ‘bots).

  280. avatar
    bob February 1, 2017 at 5:17 pm #

    Cody Judy: Bob is not alone in the idea that a truck driver that hit a person in a passinger car in front of 10 Pedestrians from behind has no damages to pay or be responsible for even if the driver of the car states he was hit from behind and 10 witnesses saw it to a Justice Court.

    I can’t even comprehend what words ex-con Judy is trying to shove in my mouth.

    But if there is anyone who knows anything about refusing to accept responsibility, it is ex-con Judy, who still refuses to even acknowledge the thousands of victims who he terrified with his threat of an explosive device.

    Failing to state damages upon which a Claim can be made is terrific heist by Government Officials and Court Judges.

    Failing to state a claim, “counselor,” is why ex-con Judy’s case was dismissed as frivolous.

    Speaking of ex-con Judy’s frivolous case: Remember when ex-con Judy appealed the dismissal of his frivolous case, the 10th Circuit affirmed the dismissal, and then ex-con Judy filed a “petition for rehearing en blanc” (yet another ex-con Judy malapropism worthy of much snickering)? That petition was denied because no judge on the 10th Circuit thought ex-con Judy’s case was worth its time — including the current Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch.

    Far from being pointless, the Birther Movement provided an excellant example of immorality of Judges and Elected Leaders whose decisions of immorality will collapse our system and perhaps even extinguish their positions.

    The only thing birthers like ex-con Judy provided was unjust accusations of immorality. Because birthers like ex-con Judy cannot accept that neither law nor facts are on their side.

    Cody Judy: Precisely why taking a look at the Case now would be of such a great Value to the General Public. Obama is un-seated

    As President Obama is ineligible to be elected again to the presidency, such a case (if filed) would be quickly dismissed as moot. A concept with which one would think ex-con Judy would be familiar with by this time.

    to the Constitutional Standard – Natural born Citizen ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    Liar that he ever is, ex-con Judy continues to accept that no judge, professor, or other expert has ever agreed with the two-citizen-parent fantasy that birthers peddle.

  281. avatar
    Joey February 1, 2017 at 5:38 pm #

    Cody Judy: Precisely why taking a look at the Case now would be of such a great Value to the General Public. Obama is un-seated , but can still be held liable to the Constitutional Standard – Natural born Citizen ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

    I agree, that Judges do not want to get between a big ball rolling, however , now that is not a big ball rolling, Obama is like you said, unseated.

    Only damages now would be Obama’sHonor and the honor of his Signiture.

    Think of it as if Obama got to eat his cake and be Pres, but was yanked after his 2 Terms and found ineligible. There is nothing really that is upsetting we had a Smooth transition.

    Congress can hold investigative hearings if they so choose. I would have no problem with that and I have advocated such hearings as a way to definitively resolve the issue for good.
    Nineteen court rulings found that Barack Obama is a natural born citizen. No court has ever ruled that he is not a natural born citizen. I fail to see what will change now that he is out of offfice. The Constitution only requires that standard for a person who is in office. Civil suits would be dismssed as moot and being “unripe” (past time to effect a change).
    Civil lawsuits will fail because Obama’s attorneys would seek dismissals for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted and/or lack of standing. While Obama was a candidate or while he was president, he didn’t offer a defense at all in the vast majority of lawsuits.
    If anyone wants to continue to involve the courts in natural born citizen eligibility actions, the best bet is in the criminal courts using the birthers’ forgery, fraud, election fraud, identity theft, and document tampering allegations. There is no requirement for standing, and there is no failure to state a claim defense in criminal court.

    There are just so many non-judicial remedies available to deal with ineligible candidates:
    1) Political parties can refuse to nominate them.
    2) Registered voters can refuse to sign their petitions to run as Independents or write-in candidates.
    3) Each state’s Chief Elections Officer can refuse to clear them for the state’s ballot.
    4) They can be challenged before state Election Boards.
    5) Voters can reject their candidacy and not give them their votes.
    6) The Electoral College can deny them a majority.
    7) Congress can refuse to certify their electors.
    8) Any one Senator plus any one Representative can object to the certification of any state’s electors and both Houses of Congress must, by law immediately adjourn from counting and certifying the Electoral vote to consider the objection. Each state then gets one vote on the objection. If enough states upheld the objections an ineligible candidate

  282. avatar
    Joey February 1, 2017 at 5:52 pm #

    [continuation of my previous post]
    would be unable to get to 270 Electoral votes. The 20th Amendment states that a president-elect can “fail to qualify,” and that means not having the votes of a majority of the Electors.

  283. avatar
    CarlOrcas February 1, 2017 at 5:53 pm #

    misha: I am noticing posters here arguing with Cody Judy and Nancy Owens.. I have refrained from doing so, because of what my father – עליו השלום – always used to say:

    “If you argue with a fool, make sure you’re not doing the same thing.”

    Your father was a very wise man.

  284. avatar
    Cody Judy February 1, 2017 at 7:23 pm #

    Joey: If anyone wants to continue to involve the courts in natural born citizen eligibility actions, the best bet is in the criminal courts using the birthers’ forgery, fraud, election fraud, identity theft, and document tampering allegations. There is no requirement for standing, and there is no failure to state a claim defense in criminal court.

    Joey: [continuation of my previous post]

    Very well covered. I enjoyed your comment Joey. Hat Tip!😏

    As a Presidential Candidate a Fair, Well Articulated Ruling by SCOTUS or a Federal District Court via Presidential Candidate v. Presidential Candidate I think would be a Great Service to All.

    People Contributing and those who are Voting have a Right to understand and have it laid to rest. Folks may say it’s laid to rest, but it’s not thoroughly in Constitutional Scholars Opinions so how could it be ours?

  285. avatar
    Cody Judy February 1, 2017 at 7:44 pm #

    bob: Judy continues to accept that no judge, professor, or other expert has ever agreed with the two-citizen-parent fantasy that birthers peddle.

    I’m glad you didn’t say ” Senators’ because all the Republican Senators ,Sen Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and a good portion of Democratic Party Senators did exactly the two Parent Ruling on non binding Sen Resolution 511

    TEXT QUOTE
    [Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens ]

    Of course Congress only has [ naturalization powers or adoptive powers] so McCain’s the first and only naturalized natural born Citizen 😂

  286. avatar
    bob February 1, 2017 at 7:53 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    As a Presidential Candidate a Fair, Well Articulated Ruling by SCOTUS or a Federal District Court via Presidential Candidate v. Presidential Candidate I think would be a Great Service to All.

    Ex-con Judy, who was a candidate in 2016 only in his mind, still fails to understand that the U.S. Supreme Court wasn’t interested in any birther case because all the lower courts that had considered the issue were in complete agreement that President Obama was a natural-born citizen. The U.S. Supreme Court only takes cases where there is uncertainty or conflict, and not because dissatisfied litigants can’t accept “no” as answer.

    Judy implies that he’ll respect the decision of a federal court’s ruling. “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.” (Tisdale v. Obama, No. 12-00036 (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012).) “[W]e affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.” (Tisdale v. Obama, No. 12–1124 (4th Cir. June 5, 2012.)

    but it’s not thoroughly in Constitutional Scholars Opinions so how could it be ours?

    There is no constitutional scholar that thinks President Obama was ineligible — only birthers like ex-con Judy believe that.

    did exactly the two Parent Ruling on non binding Sen Resolution 511

    Only birthers like ex-con Judy lie about S.R. 511 because in no place does it say that two citizen parents is required for natural-born citizenship.

  287. avatar
    Joey February 1, 2017 at 8:14 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    Very well covered.I enjoyed your comment Joey. Hat Tip!

    As a Presidential Candidate a Fair, Well Articulated Ruling by SCOTUS or a Federal District Court via Presidential Candidate v. Presidential Candidate I think would be a Great Service to All.

    People Contributing and those who are Voting have a Right to understand and have it laid to rest. Folks may say it’s laid to rest, but it’s not thoroughly in Constitutional Scholars Opinions so how could it be ours?

    What part of nineteen state and federal courts have ruled that Barack Hussein Obama is a Natural Born Citizen don’t you understand? Just because some folks don’t accept those verdicts does not invalidate them, they stand and those that were upheld by state and federal appellate courts are either binding precedent or persuasively precedential, depending on the jurisdiction.
    The vast majority of Americans get by with just one court ruling n their favor or against them, and maybe one appeal and 1% of the time, a US Supreme Court ruling.
    Twenty-seven appeals for Cert were made to the U.S. Supreme Court and all were denied. Now its too late… not ripe and therefore moot.

    “Now its too late, baby, now its too late
    Though we really did try to make it.
    Something inside has died and I can’t hide and I just can’t fake it.”–Carole King

  288. avatar
    Pete February 1, 2017 at 9:43 pm #

    misha: “If you argue with a fool, make sure you’re not doing the same thing.”

    Are you sure that wasn’t, “If you argue with a fool, make sure he’s not doing the same thing?”

  289. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 1, 2017 at 9:46 pm #

    How could someone be “president elect” if they didn’t have the votes of the electors?

    Joey: The 20th Amendment states that a president-elect can “fail to qualify,” and that means not having the votes of a majority of the Electors.

  290. avatar
    Joey February 1, 2017 at 11:28 pm #

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    How could someone be “president elect” if they didn’t have the votes of the electors?

    Great question! From Wikipedia: “The President-elect of the United States is the apparent winner, as ascertained by the General Services Administration Administrator, following the general election on Election Day in November,[2] and the finalized winner when the votes cast in December by the Electoral College are counted by a joint session of Congress in early January.”
    The title then is used before the Electors have voted.

  291. avatar
    Joey February 2, 2017 at 12:16 am #

    Cody Judy: I’m glad you didn’t say ” Senators’ because all the Republican Senators ,Sen Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and a good portion of Democratic Party Senators did exactly the two Parent Ruling on non binding Sen Resolution 511

    TEXT QUOTE
    [Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens ]

    Of course Congress only has [ naturalization powers or adoptive powers] so McCain’s the first and only naturalized natural born Citizen

    The Senate Resolution noted John McCain’s birth situation, nowhere has either House of Congress endorsed the theory that two citizen parents are required.
    The law of the land clearly states (8 U.S.C. § 1401) that:
    The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
    (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

    If a person is born in the United States the citizenship status of their parents is only relevant if the parents have diplomatic immunity or are members of a foreign invading military on U.S. soil (NOT born subject to the jurisdiction thereof).

    Anyone who qualifies as a 14th Amendment “Citizen of the United States at Birth” is also an Article Two “Natural Born Citizen” since the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S. v Wong Kim Ark in 1898.

  292. avatar
    Rickey February 2, 2017 at 12:17 am #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    And, I don’t see a phone number for this lawyer anywhere. If he reads this blog, he can contact me thru my webpage:

    Neal Puckett isn’t in private practice any longer. He has been working for the Naval Inspector General since 2015, so I doubt that he has any interest in what you have to say.

  293. avatar
    The Magic M (not logged in) February 2, 2017 at 4:43 am #

    Cody Judy: the two Parent Ruling on non binding Sen Resolution 511

    TEXT QUOTE
    [Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens ]

    The resolution also says he was born 1936 in the Canal Zone, but you don’t go claiming that *that* is part of the NBC definition, do you? So why single out the citizen parents, of everything the resolution says about McCain?

  294. avatar
    Keith February 2, 2017 at 6:25 am #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: I wouldn’t waste my time with a site that has no respect for the first amendment.

    The First Amendment says the GOVERNMENT cannot make laws denying free speech.

    Fogbow is NOT the government, is not related to the government in any way, and the First Amendment does not apply to the FogBow.

    As the owner of the FogBow, Foggy has first, second, third, …, and last say on who can or cannot post and how those posts are treated.

    Respect for the First Amendment doesn’t come into it in anyway shape or form.

  295. avatar
    Keith February 2, 2017 at 6:44 am #

    Cody Judy: I agree, that Judges do not want to get between a big ball rolling,

    This is NOT rocket science.

    It is not a matter of ‘Judges do not want to get between a big ball rolling’. It is a matter of it not being in their job description.

    Why is this so hard for you to understand. The Constitution does not give the Judicial Branch authority to unseat a President. It just doesn’t.

    No matter what court you try to get heard by, that court CANNOT grant the relief you seek. No matter how you word your claim, even if your claim about eligibility were somehow 100% correct (if some such universe can be imagined), NO COURT HAS THE ABILITY TO REMEDY THE SITUATION.

    This is what they mean when they tell you that you fail “to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”. It is as if you are asking your motor mechanic to fix your pace maker – it just isn’t in his power to do so and your are wasting everybody’s time trying to get him to do it.

  296. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 2, 2017 at 9:07 am #

    I really don’t care. You are blowing this way out of proportion. Fogblow, right or wrong, censors the truth.

    Keith: The First Amendment says the GOVERNMENT cannot make laws denying free speech.

    Fogbow is NOT the government, is not related to the government in any way, and the First Amendment does not apply to the FogBow.

    As the owner of the FogBow, Foggy has first, second, third, …, and last say on who can or cannot post and how those posts are treated.

    Respect for the First Amendment doesn’t come into it in anyway shape or form.

  297. avatar
    Reality Check February 2, 2017 at 9:18 am #

    You are a disgusting liar Nancy. You are the one who claimed you First Amendment rights were violated. First of all you were not censored. Second Foggy would have been within his rights as owner to delete your crazy nonsense even if he had.

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger:
    I really don’t care. You are blowing this way out of proportion. Fogblow, right or wrong, censors the truth.

  298. avatar
    misha February 2, 2017 at 9:22 am #

    Reality Check: You are a disgusting liar Nancy.

    When did you discover this? I don’t engage pathological liars. See my aphorism, above.

    Pete: Are you sure that wasn’t, “If you argue with a fool, make sure he’s not doing the same thing?”

    I googled it; you are correct.

  299. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 2, 2017 at 1:32 pm #

    I’m blogging on every possible outlet. But, somehow, I bypass the Fogblow which claims to be a birther site? You’re going to have a hard time selling that BS to anyone who follows this issue. Why does it matter to you anyway? You really are blowing this way out of proportion.

    Reality Check:
    You are a disgusting liar Nancy. You are the one who claimed you First Amendment rights were violated. First of all you were not censored. Second Foggy would have been within his rights as owner to delete your crazy nonsense even if he had.

  300. avatar
    bob February 2, 2017 at 2:11 pm #

    Fogbow is about the opposite of a birther site.

    Use it, or don’t. Just don’t surprised if your about get called out.

  301. avatar
    Reality Check February 2, 2017 at 2:26 pm #

    Really, until yesterday I thought Crazy Nancy was the Oracle of Truth. You do believe me don’t you? 😆

    misha: When did you discover this? I don’t engage pathological liars. See my aphorism, above.

  302. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 2, 2017 at 5:27 pm #

    But perhaps it should be.

    Keith: Fogbow is NOT the government

  303. avatar
    Rickey February 2, 2017 at 8:36 pm #

    The Magic M (not logged in): The resolution also says he was born 1936 in the Canal Zone, but you don’t go claiming that *that* is part of the NBC definition, do you? So why single out the citizen parents, of everything the resolution says about McCain?

    Judy once again proves that he doesn’t understand the difference between “sufficient” and “necessary.”

  304. avatar
    Rickey February 2, 2017 at 8:36 pm #

    The Magic M (not logged in): The resolution also says he was born 1936 in the Canal Zone, but you don’t go claiming that *that* is part of the NBC definition, do you? So why single out the citizen parents, of everything the resolution says about McCain?

    Judy once again proves that he doesn’t understand the difference between “sufficient” and “necessary.”

  305. avatar
    Rickey February 2, 2017 at 8:44 pm #

    Cody Judy: I’m glad you didn’t say ” Senators’ because all the Republican Senators ,Sen Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and a good portion of Democratic Party Senators did exactly the two Parent Ruling on non binding Sen Resolution 511

    TEXT QUOTE
    [Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens ]

    So you believe that when Obama co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 he was in effect making the case that he was not eligible to be president. Fascinating and incredibly stupid.

    Here is a question for you. A sign at the country club swimming pool says “Children must have permission from their parents to use the pool.” Does that mean that both parents have to give their permission? And since the sign uses the plural “children,” does that mean that an only child is exempt from the requirement?

  306. avatar
    Slartibartfast February 2, 2017 at 8:47 pm #

    Jeebus knows I’d rather have Foggy as Supreme Dictator than the guy we have now. (Bannon, I think his name is…)

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    But perhaps it should be.

  307. avatar
    Slartibartfast February 2, 2017 at 11:11 pm #

    For me, what takes the stupid to epic levels is the fact that, in over eight years, no birther has understood this point that you (and many, many others) have tried to make. Not for nothing is it said that foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. Both Nancy and Cody are textbook illustrations of that aphorism.

    Misha,

    Hi! It’s good to see you here again! By the way, I took a DNA test a year or so ago and found out I was 42% Eastern European Jew.

    Shalom.

    Rickey: So you believe that when Obama co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 he was in effect making the case that he was not eligible to be president. Fascinating and incredibly stupid.

    Here is a question for you. A sign at the country club swimming pool says “Children must have permission from their parents to use the pool.” Does that mean that both parents have to give their permission? And since the sign uses the plural “children,” does that mean that an only child is exempt from the requirement?

  308. avatar
    Northland10 February 2, 2017 at 11:34 pm #

    Rickey: So you believe that when Obama co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 he was in effect making the case that he was not eligible to be president. Fascinating and incredibly stupid.

    He co-sponsored a resolution that makes him ineligible to prevent people from realizing he was ineligible. It’s all a redirection to move the conspiracy forward.

    Wheels within wheels.

    Oh, and it is the “elites” who are responsible for such a complex conspiracy because Obama was too dumb to do anything but follow orders, so sayeth the Birthers.

    Here endeth the lunacy.

  309. avatar
    Cody Judy February 3, 2017 at 10:14 am #

    Rickey: So you believe that when Obama co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 he was in effect making the case that he was not eligible to be president. Fascinating and incredibly stupid.

    Absolutely not, of course that is Stupid! No, he was getting Republicans on board to [ not ] apposed him.

    Yes, that makes sense for a Freshman Senator who was formulating plans to run for U.S. President, but knew he had a hiccup in his Constitutional Qualification.

    How indeed do you get every Republican Senator on board with his ineligibility? You endorse Republicans eventual nominee in 2008, and call truce on the Standard.

    Of course, just because the Senate subverts the U.S. Constitution doesn’t make it Law, or an Amendment.

    Yes.., I do believe that would be smart and not so stupid.

    You know speaking of stupid, the Federal District Court just has not returned that MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT yet?

    I wonder… (?)

    Of course if that is accepted whither it’s granted or not, we have a new basis for Appeal to SCOTUS.

  310. avatar
    Cody Judy February 3, 2017 at 10:35 am #

    Doc, you may have Epilog’d one Case to soon.

    Cody Judy: Reality Check: Re: Judy’s latest pile of poop

    My favorite was “Motion for Relieve of Judgement” in the summary. “:ol: Of course I did almost relieve myself laughing while reading this nonsense.

    Maybe you should give me your last or Final Post?

    This 300 comment Epilog is giving the regulators calluses on their finger from scrolling😂

    Not Regulators I meant Regulars😂 oops! I think the FEDS ate it. OOPS Again! I mean the Feds are on it!

    Sure would be interesting to see and hear the communications and discussions between 1791 and 1795 wouldn’t it?
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1795

  311. avatar
    Joey February 3, 2017 at 1:16 pm #

    Cody Judy says: “Yes, that makes sense for a Freshman Senator who was formulating plans to run for U.S. President but knew he had a hiccup in his Constitutional Qualification.”
    ——–
    There’s a chronological problem with Mr. Judy’s theory above: Barack Obama had announced that he was a candidate for president on February 10, 2007. The McCain Senate Resolution was drafted and passed in April of 2008. Barack Obama had been a candidate for more than a year before the issue of McCain’s eligibility was raised.
    Furthermore, Barack Obama had already had the number one New York Times Bestsellers list non-fiction book, Dreams From My Father in publication since 1995. That book was about his father being a British and then Kenyan national.
    There had been 12 years for anyone to press any alleged “constitutional hiccup” and there had been more than a year to challenge Obama’s eligibility BEFORE McCain’s Senate Resolution 511. Mr. Judy’s theory bites the dust.

  312. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 3, 2017 at 1:16 pm #

    Obama’s rise in power has nothing to do with the Republican’s nominees. This was planned out over thirty years ago by the Medellin Cartel who gathered KGB intel on members of the Congress and Senate. And, most especially on Bush, Reagan, and the Clintons.

    That KGB intel is being dispersed today just as planned via Julian Assange who is using the truth. But, who is lying by changing the timeline.

    Seth Rich is a prime example and I called Assange out on it via the internet. He was shut down within a day or so of my expose.

    Seth Rich is really McCarthy who was murdered in the early 1980’s. I know this because I am the one who shot and killed him.

    That’s why I have repeatedly said, “It’s the Russians.” Anyone who says otherwise is not privy to the truth.

    I am a Medellin Cartel Expert.

    Cody Judy:

    How indeed do you get every Republican Senator on board with his ineligibility? You endorse Republicans eventual nominee in 2008, and call truce on the Standard.

  313. avatar
    Rickey February 3, 2017 at 1:17 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    Yes, that makes sense for a Freshman Senator who was formulating plans to run for U.S. President, but knew he had a hiccup in his Constitutional Qualification.

    So he thought it would be a good idea to call attention to the supposed hiccup?

    You responded to my note but you didn’t answer my question. I’ll try again:

    A sign at the country club swimming pool says “Children must have permission from their parents to use the pool.” Does that mean that both parents have to give their permission? And since the sign uses the plural “children,” does that mean that an only child is exempt from the requirement?

    You know speaking of stupid, the Federal District Court just has not returned that MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT yet?

    I wonder… (?)

    The Clerk of Court has to review it first and see if it conforms with the rules. The local rules say “The required font type is Times New Roman or Arial and the font size must be a minimum of 12, including footnotes, although larger font sizes are acceptable.”

    You used a DejaVu font, proving once again that you are incapable of following rules.

    And of course the Clerk of Court has to pass it around the office so everyone can have a good laugh.

  314. avatar
    bob February 3, 2017 at 3:03 pm #

    Yes, that makes sense for a Freshman Senator who was formulating plans to run for U.S. President, but knew he had a hiccup in his Constitutional Qualification.

    Ex-con Judy continues to lie about his two-citizen-parent fantasy, as only birthers believe it is a qualification. And, notwithstanding ex-con Judy’s lies, S.R. 511 does not reference this two-citizen-parent fantasy. Ex-con Judy’s imaginations into President Obama’s thoughts are equally inaccurate as anything else that has dropped out of ex-con Judy’s mouth.

    Of course if that is accepted whither it’s granted or not, we have a new basis for Appeal to SCOTUS.

    Ex-con Judy is technically correct that the denial of his pointless, stupid, doomed, and truth-adverse motion can lead to an appeal and eventual SCOTUS petition. As ex-con Judy serves no role on this planet other than to pointlessly waste judicial resources, it will be unsurprising if he continues to be a burden on others. Maybe ex-con Judy will learn how to properly complete an IFP application this time, but learning has never been one of ex-con Judy’s strong points.

    Maybe you should give me your last or Final Post?

    Ex-con Judy must have missed Doc’s comment where he says he doesn’t read ex-con Judy’s comments. But of course ex-con Judy’s ego compels him to believe that there’s anything in value of whatever he vomits out.

  315. avatar
    Joey February 3, 2017 at 3:24 pm #

    Rickey: So he thought it would be a good idea to call attention to the supposed hiccup?

    You responded to my note but you didn’t answer my question. I’ll try again:

    A sign at the country club swimming pool says “Children must have permission from their parents to use the pool.” Does that mean that both parents have to give their permission? And since the sign uses the plural “children,” does that mean that an only child is exempt from the requirement?

    The Clerk of Court has to review it first and see if it conforms with the rules. The local rules say “The required font type is Times New Roman or Arial and the font size must be a minimum of 12, including footnotes, although larger font sizes are acceptable.”

    You used a DejaVu font, proving once again that you are incapable of following rules.

    And of course the Clerk of Court has to pass it around the office so everyone can have a good laugh.

    And a judge who adjudicated an Obama eligibility challenge backed up Rickey’s point:
    H. Brook Paige v. James Condos, Secretary of State of Vermont and President Barack Obama: Robert R. Bent, Presiding Judge
    “While the court has no doubt at this point that Emmerich de Vattel’s treatise The Law of Nations was a work of significant value to the founding fathers, the court does not conclude that his phrase–“The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”–has constitutional significance or that his use of “parents” in the plural has particular significance. Thus far, no judicial decision has adopted such logic in connection with this or any related issues. In fact, the most comprehensive decision on the topic, Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana, examines the historical basis of the use of the phrase, including the English common law in effect at the time of independence, and concludes that the expression “natural born Citizen” is not dependent on the nationality of the parents but reflects the status of a person born into citizenship instead of having citizenship subsequently bestowed. The distinction is eminently logical.”–Vermont Superior Court, November 14, 2012

  316. avatar
    Keith February 4, 2017 at 4:43 am #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: I really don’t care. You are blowing this way out of proportion. Fogblow, right or wrong, censors the truth.

    Your E-Z-2-C Guide to Free Speech

  317. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater February 4, 2017 at 9:00 am #

    bob: No “Nancy Ruth Owens” is a member of Fogbow.Given Owens’ unfamiliarity with reality, I’m inclined to believe she either never posted there, or never got past the three moderated messages speed bump (used to weed out ‘bots).

    She posted under Pablo’s white Rabbit

  318. avatar
    Reality Check February 4, 2017 at 9:39 am #

    Yes, and all three posts she claimed were removed are still there in the topic she started.

    http://thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6346

    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater: She posted under Pablo’s white Rabbit

  319. avatar
    Arthur B. February 4, 2017 at 11:15 am #

    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater: She posted under Pablo’s white Rabbit

    And, checking the Fogbow site, I see that she made three posts. She got ribbed rather soundly, but I see no sign of censorship — in fact, as far as I can tell, she remains a member in good standing, though confined to the FEMA camp.

    [ETA: And I see that my comment has been put into moderation! Was it something I said?]

  320. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 4, 2017 at 12:13 pm #

    You included a word that triggers moderation.

    Arthur B.: Was it something I said?

  321. avatar
    Cody Judy February 4, 2017 at 12:27 pm #

    Joey: There had been 12 years for anyone to press any alleged “constitutional hiccup” and there had been more than a year to challenge Obama’s eligibility BEFORE McCain’s Senate Resolution 511. Mr. Judy’s theory bites the dust.

    As if no evidence existed elsewhere .. hardly the case. McCain announced early also, so why was the U.S. Senate Res 511 necessary anyway?

    February 28, 2007 during a live taping of the Late Show with David Letterman, and formally launched at an event on April 25, 2007.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain_presidential_campaign,_2008

    On February 22, 2006, an associate attorney in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on the finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama wrote a paper that advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution’s “natural-born” citizen requirement, calling the requirement “stupid” and asserting it was discriminatory, outdated and undemocratic.

    Hummmm.. did Obama know their was a hiccup? Why advocate for change if he knew there was not reason?

    On November 27, 2007, US congressman Eni Faleomavaega (D – Samoa) checked into the Sheraton in Jakarta, Indonesia. In a meeting with Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Faleomavaega asked to travel to Obama’s childhood school. According to Southest Asian sources, “officials” who accompanied Faleomavaega were interested in acquiring any and all documentation or photographs of a young Barry Soetoro for America’s “national archives” and they were offering cash, lots of it. In a “show of faith,” Barack Obama’s childhood school was one of the very first beneficiaries of this outpouring receiving thousands of dollars to upgrade the school and for the purchase of computer equipment. The challenge of course was securing Indonesian government records potentially damaging to Barack Obama’s candidacy for the U. S. presidency as well as other records pertaining to a young Barry Soetoro and his family.

    Hummmm.. that is interesting timing.

    • On February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration. That bill was known as “S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act.” The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK). The bill attempted to change Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen.”

  322. avatar
    Cody Judy February 4, 2017 at 12:54 pm #

    Rickey: You used a DejaVu font, proving once again that you are incapable of following rules.

    And of course the Clerk of Court has to pass it around the office so everyone can have a good laugh.

    So you got a Copy from the Court Clerk sent to you to base your comments on right? I hate to embarrass you like that but what else can I say if your basing comments on an unsigned draft I threw up on Scribd.

    Not to mention I sometime ago indicated Scribd Copies also change the format unless your uploading a PDF. If yr uploading Microsoft Doc watch out for changes to the PDF program. I also mentioned being rushed which to normal people would indicate a rough draft.

    Now more importantly, does content count at all with you? If a victim of an assault is filing a criminal complaint and your an officer, what’s more important to you ‘The Font’ or ‘The Content’ ?

    With you it happens to be the Font. 😓 God help any women filing a Rape Report with you?

    To excuse a Crime based on the Font has nothing to do with Justice nor can it claim to be a moral highground. Would you dismiss the Bible for a misspelled word?

    Indications are that you would.

    As for “Children in the Pool”

    Joey: A sign at the country club swimming pool says “Children must have permission from their parents to use the pool.” Does that mean that both parents have to give their permission? And since the sign uses the plural “children,” does that mean that an only child is exempt from the requirement?

    The allegory doesn’t apply because of course we know from [ naturalization Cases] that each Parent provides a [ Inherited Citizenship] to a Child.

    The claims for U.S. Citizenship based upon 1 Parent are voluminous as are Cases claiming Kenyan Citizenship from one Parent, English Citizenship from one Parent, etc.

    Dual Citizenship is an International understood term by definition. , but all those foreign citizenship do not have allegiance to the USA now do they?

  323. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 4, 2017 at 1:18 pm #

    And, completely unable to log in. I sent repeated email requests for help which were ignored.

    Arthur B.: And, checking the Fogbow site, I see that she made three posts. She got ribbed rather soundly, but I see no sign of censorship — in fact, as far as I can tell, she remains a member in good standing, though confined to the FEMA camp.

    [ETA: And I see that my comment has been put into moderation! Was it something I said?]

  324. avatar
    bob February 4, 2017 at 1:41 pm #

    Cody Judy: As if no evidence existed elsewhere .. hardly the case.McCain announced early also, so why was the U.S. Senate Res 511 necessary anyway?

    Because, unlike most candidates, McCain was not born in the United States, and President Obama wanted to demonstrate leadership; duh.

    Why advocate for change if he knew there was not reason?

    Many reasonably believe that the natural-born-citizen clause unnecessarily precludes naturalized citizens from becoming the president; duh.

    On November 27, 2007, US congressman Eni Faleomavaega (D – Samoa) checked into the Sheraton in Jakarta, Indonesia.

    If ex-con Judy insists on spouting conspiracy nonsense, the least he could do is show a little professional courtesy and acknowledge his source (“The Obama File,” in this case).

    Cody Judy: on an unsigned draft I threw up on Scribd.

    We would be so lucky if ex-con Judy confined his vomiting to Scribd. But ex-con Judy will continue to be a drain on precious judicial resources, as he has no other purpose in life.

    If a victim of an assault is filing a criminal complaint

    Ex-con Judy offensively compares himself to a criminal-assault victim, while still refusing to acknowledge the thousands he terrorized with his criminal actions.

    Would you dismiss the Bible for a misspelled word?

    Also unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy offensively compares his vomiting to the Bible.

    The allegory doesn’t apply because of course we know from [ naturalization Cases] that each Parent provides a [ Inherited Citizenship] to a Child.

    Ex-con Judy still refuses to explain how he thinks “parents” can have two different meanings in the same context.

    Dual Citizenship is an International understood term by definition. , but all those foreign citizenship do not have allegiance to the USA now do they?

    Ex-con Judy, ignorant as ever, does not realize that numerous people with dual citizenship have allegiance to the United States. That dual citizenship somehow precludes natural-born citizenship is a lie spread by birthers like ex-con Judy.

  325. avatar
    Joey February 4, 2017 at 2:19 pm #

    Cody Judy: As if no evidence existed elsewhere .. hardly the case.McCain announced early also, so why was the U.S. Senate Res 511 necessary anyway?

    February 28, 2007 during a live taping of the Late Show with David Letterman, and formally launched at an event on April 25, 2007.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain_presidential_campaign,_2008

    On February 22, 2006, an associate attorney in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on the finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama wrote a paper that advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution’s “natural-born” citizen requirement, calling the requirement “stupid” and asserting it was discriminatory, outdated and undemocratic.

    Hummmm.. did Obama know their was a hiccup? Why advocate for change if he knew there was not reason?

    On November 27, 2007, US congressman Eni Faleomavaega (D – Samoa) checked into the Sheraton in Jakarta, Indonesia.In a meeting with Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Faleomavaega asked to travel to Obama’s childhood school.According to Southest Asian sources, “officials” who accompanied Faleomavaega were interested in acquiring any and all documentation or photographs of a young Barry Soetoro for America’s “national archives” and they were offering cash, lots of it.In a “show of faith,” Barack Obama’s childhood school was one of the very first beneficiaries of this outpouring receiving thousands of dollars to upgrade the school and for the purchase of computer equipment.The challenge of course was securing Indonesian government records potentially damaging to Barack Obama’s candidacy for the U. S. presidency as well as other records pertaining to a young Barry Soetoro and his family.

    Hummmm.. that is interesting timing.

    •On February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration.That bill was known as “S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act.”The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK).The bill attempted to change Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen.”

    The non-binding resolutions of either House of Congress are never “necessary,” they are either symbolic or celebratory.
    Due diligence of the campaign staff of any presidential candidate is to anticipate what other candidates of his own party for the primaries and the opposition parties for the general election might try to use against the candidate whether it has validity or not.
    With regard to Article II, Section 1 eligibility for Barack Obama, the proof is in the pudding:
    381 official legal challenges to his eligibility (226 in original jurisdiction, 120 state and federal appellate rulings and 35 U.S. Supreme Court petitions and applications) and Obama was victorious 100% of the time over eight years of attempts from state Election Boards to a local small claims court in Florida to state courts to federal district courts to SCOTUS.
    Additionally Congress showed zero interest in investigating this issue or in calling anyone to testify about the meaning of the term “natural born citizen.”
    A George W. Bush appointed federal judge in the very red state of Georgia put it very succinctly: “A spurious claim questioning the president’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”—U.S. District Court Judge Clay D. Land, United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, September 16, 2009, Rhodes v MacDonald

  326. avatar
    Reality Check February 4, 2017 at 2:19 pm #

    So you are changing your story again? First you claimed you were censored and now we find out you can’t log in? There is a resend activation link on the login page just like about every other forum I know. My money is on operator error.

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: And, completely unable to log in. I sent repeated email requests for help which were ignored.

  327. avatar
    Rickey February 4, 2017 at 4:04 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    •On February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration.That bill was known as “S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act.”The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK).The bill attempted to change Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen.”

    Wrong again. It was intended to clarify the definition of natural born citizen, not change it. And it had nothing to do with Obama’s eligibility.

  328. avatar
    Rickey February 4, 2017 at 4:48 pm #

    Cody Judy: So you got a Copy from the Court Clerk sent to you to base your comments on right? I hate to embarrass you like that but what else can I say if your basing comments on an unsigned draft I threw up on Scribd.

    Then you should have identified it as a draft.

    Now more importantly, does content count at all with you?If a victim of an assault is filing a criminal complaint and your an officer, what’s more important to you ‘The Font’ or ‘The Content’ ?

    With you it happens to be the Font.

    I don’t make the rules, but apparently it is important to the Court.

    Incidentally, I looked at your Motion on Pacer and I see that you did change the font to Arial. However, the font size appears to be 9.5, and the Court rules specify a minimum size of 11.

    And somebody crossed out the name of Judge “Jenkis.”

    As to content, your Motion will fail because once again you failed to address the legal reasons why your Complaint was dismissed. Your lawsuit was a claim for monetary damages. You can’t seem to get it through your thick skull that you have to establish that you have a legal basis for being awarded damages. If there is no legal basis for awarding damages, regardless of what the actual facts are, you have no claim. The Court of Appeals tried to explain it to you:

    First, addressing whether he adequately stated a claim for relief, Judy cites no basis in law for his claim that he is entitled to damages under § 1983, the Sherman Act, or the Clayton Act. Even taking all his allegations as true and construing them in the light most favorable to his case, we see nothing even suggesting that he would ever be entitled to any sort of relief for President Obama’s (and the other Defendants’) supposed wrongdoing. Judy cannot point to a single case that construes any of these statutes in a way supporting his claims for relief.

    In order to have your lawsuit go forward, you have to convince the court that you have a legal claim for relief which the Court has the power to award. Instead, you chose to appeal by arguing that Obama was not eligible to be president. It doesn’t matter if you have evidence that Obama was born on Mars, because you still would not be entitled to damages. That is why your Motion is doomed.

    Would you dismiss the Bible for a misspelled word?

    No, but I do dismiss things which peddle nonsense.

    As for “Children in the Pool”

    The allegory doesn’t apply

    It’s not an allegory. It’s an analogy.

    Let me simplify it for you. The sign says “Children may not use the pool after 8:00 p.m.” The word “children” is plural. Does that mean that a child who is alone may use the pool after 8:00 p.m.? It’s a simple question, calling for a yes or no answer. Let’s see if you can do it.

  329. avatar
    Pete February 4, 2017 at 6:34 pm #

    Well, it’s obvious, Rickey.

    “Children” is plural. “A child” is not “children.”

    The sign says NOTHING about “a child.” It only talks about “children.”

    So if a child comes in after 8:00 pm, of COURSE he or she may use the pool. Because he or she is not children.

    Likewise, if two children, or a group of children, come in, they can also use the pool, but ONLY if they are each acting as an individual child, and NOT as children.

    They can even come in together, as long as they do not use the pool together. That doesn’t mean they can’t use the pool at the same time, they simply can’t use it TOGETHER.

    So no talking, no swimming in close proximity, and so forth. They have to ignore each other as much as possible. Then they’re fine.

    They don’t violate the rule, “Children may not use the pool after 8:00 p.m,” because they’re not acting a children, each one is only acting as A CHILD.

    Whether one child may attempt to rescue another who starts to drown is not quite clear.

    On the surface, it appears to violate the rule that children may not use the pool after 8pm, because the drowning child and the rescuer are then together.

    I think, though, that a very good case can be made that the drowning child is no longer actually using the pool, he or she is merely drowning.

    The argument is that drowning is not using a pool. This is supported by the fact that at that point in time, the drowner is most likely trying to get OUT of the pool, not stay in it.

    I think that’s a good argument, but others might disagree. So I’m afraid we’ll need a test lawsuit to sort the whole question out.

  330. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater February 4, 2017 at 6:47 pm #

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: And, completely unable to log in. I sent repeated email requests for help which were ignored.

    Were these emails you sent to foggy or the made up foggy that you killed?

  331. avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater February 4, 2017 at 6:48 pm #

    Cody Judy: I am very real.. if anyone isn’t real it’s the majority of commenters here who refuse their own Real Identity on the basis of responsibility to their comments and thusly validity to their arguments.

    The cat I mentioned was more of a real candidate than you. You couldn’t even get your own mother to vote for you.

  332. avatar
    Northland10 February 4, 2017 at 9:24 pm #

    Rickey: Incidentally, I looked at your Motion on Pacer and I see that you did change the font to Arial. However, the font size appears to be 9.5, and the Court rules specify a minimum size of 11.

    Actually, it looks like Calibri, not Arial. This may have been the original font used on the Scribd “draft” but Scribd identified it and embedded Deju Vu (Deju Vu is mentioned in the properties). In either case, Calibri is not Arial or Times New Roman and only those two are allowed by the rules.

    As it is, there are many sufficient reasons to either deny any request or not even bother having the court respond.

  333. avatar
    Rickey February 4, 2017 at 11:12 pm #

    Northland10: Actually, it looks like Calibri, not Arial.This may have been the original font used on the Scribd “draft” but Scribd identified it and embedded Deju Vu (Deju Vu is mentioned in the properties). In either case, Calibri is not Arial or Times New Roman and only those two are allowed by the rules.

    As it is, there are many sufficient reasons to either deny any request or not even bother having the court respond.

    Could be. I copied and pasted it into Word and Word identified it as Arial, but as you say it’s really irrelevant. Judy needed to make a legal argument, but instead he based his motion on supposed “new evidence.”

    The Court doesn’t care about his “evidence.” The Court cares about whether he has stated a claim for relief, which he hasn’t.

  334. avatar
    Keith February 5, 2017 at 4:13 am #

    Pete: …Likewise, if two children, or a group of children, come in, they can also use the pool, but ONLY if they are each acting as an individual child, and NOT as children….

    Oh my gosh. Do you have a sovereign citizen website with a PayPal button?

    Because I wanna send you all my money,

  335. avatar
    Pete February 5, 2017 at 4:53 pm #

    I’m so glad you asked!

    Yes. It’s at giveyourcashtomenotthefilthyIRS.com.

  336. avatar
    Pete February 5, 2017 at 5:06 pm #

    Pete: So I’m afraid we’ll need a test lawsuit to sort the whole question out.

    When I say “test lawsuit,” of course, what I really mean is that we need to convene a Citizens’ Jury made up of a dozen random citizens, and have them decide.

    But all of them need to be Sovereign Citizens and Real Patriots.

  337. avatar
    Reality Check February 6, 2017 at 12:12 am #

    I am reminded of Mario Apuzzo and the parable of the dogs.

    Pete: Well, it’s obvious, Rickey.

    “Children” is plural. “A child” is not “children.”

  338. avatar
    Cody Judy February 6, 2017 at 12:02 pm #

    Rickey: As to content, your Motion will fail because once again you failed to address the legal reasons why your Complaint was dismissed. Your lawsuit was a claim for monetary damages. You can’t seem to get it through your thick skull that you have to establish that you have a legal basis for being awarded damages. If there is no legal basis for awarding damages, regardless of what the actual facts are, you have no claim. The Court of Appeals tried to explain it to you:

    Thick Skull – I do hope you would offer Tom Brady the same compliment.

    If there is no award the Court can give for damages or an accident which caused damages, then there is no Justice.

    If Rules of a Race can be violated with only the Winners Reward being taken away, and the losers of the race still losing, then there is no race. . No game.

    If the game like a football field has parameters and rules, just like a Presidential Contest Race, then we can apply those Rules and assess penalties.

    I’m very familiar with the Scorn of the Judicial Branch represented and associated with many of my Cases.

    Failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted , just happens to be a cool catch phrase to excuse wicked behavior as I’ve experienced. Won’t say all the time, but like any Principle it can be abused.

    The abuse of it becomes very offensive. The penalty for the abuse of it is what? (Oh your never going to become a U.S Supreme Court Justice.
    Guess what? Big Whoopi.. didn’t expect it.)

    In Lance Armstrong’s Case, he was stripped of all Official Awards from the Time he started winning Tour de France Races. .. but interestingly enough, they did not award the Titles to second place finishers. http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-presidential-race-that-was-rigged.html?m=1

    I’m reminded of a Law Suit I won in Prison suffering Maximum Security 23h/7 days a week lock down simply for refusing to cut my hair. I sued for a modest $10 per day which after 3 years added up.

    The Judge with great Scorned nearly yelled at me in admitting I was right , there was unecessary discrimination between men and womens grooming codes in the standard of hair. The Judge said, ” You won .. you got your hair!!!”

    The $10 per day Judge? That was a joke to him.

    I was relieved for my fellow native American Indians who had suffered longer then I had. Yes, a Civil Right had been established.. even in Prison. It had been infringed, and suffered for greatly. It had been lawfully established.

    The suffering was part of the establishing.

    It’s a Civil Right to a Presidential Candidate to run a Fair Race with all of the requirements established declared in the U.S. Constitution serving as parameters of the Civil Right. Only Candidates have that Civil Right as it pertains to the Race for that Office.

    Not being able to point to a single case of Presidential Candidate v. Presidential Candidate in the claim of a rule violation in the Qualification specification of [ natural born Citizen] because there hasn’t been one, is indeed my problem I said to the 10th Circuit.

    Duh! Just because no one had the crooked audacity to break that Rule , extend by Obama in some selfish scheme in an entitlement of the ego that rules did not apply to him , does not mean a Civil Rights Claim in violation was not established that can indeed be awarded in damages, it means the Judge’s had scorn and contempt, and pompous disrespect for the Constitution.

    If a red car hits a blue car and it’s never happened before, is it any less an accident covered by insurance? The Judge’s in my Case say in other words, because it’s never happened before there is no Precedent Case to guide them.

    It’s like officials under the cover or color of Law are God and can do ANYTHING. We know it is very very hard to question the logic of any person in the Office of President who can send off a drone and kill any of us now in the principle of the Bush Doctrine which also became a Precedent unheard of before.

    My Sister said to me yesterday, ” Well, what does it matter now Code? ”

    Why does Fraud, or Crime, or Cover Up of Crime matter? I guess when you suffer it all of a sudden it does matter.

    Precedent Cases are Established that others don’t have to suffer. No Person in Prison or otherwise should be penalized for their looks. Now they aren’t.

    It’s an interesting Conundrum.. Judges look for precedent Cases to establish Precedent as a credit to them, but so Few have the instinct for Precedent Cases.

    It’s all the same, they are like robots and anyone comes a long to challenge their robot ways with something new? It’s never happened before we have no guide to defer to Dismiss. . Or . . It’s all happened before nothing new can come along Dismissed.

    Well.., Trump became U.S. President, Tom Brady began a come back in the 3rd Quarter and Won a 5th unprecedentef Superbowl, while the NFL named Mat Ryan of the Atlanta Falcons League MVP just after the 1st half, but no QB in history has won 5 Superbowls!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/sport/2017/feb/04/matt-ryan-nfl-mvp-super-bowl-li-atlanta-falcons?client=ms-android-verizon

    https://www.google.com/amp/people.com/sports/gisele-bundchen-lost-her-mind-when-tom-brady-won-his-5th-super-bowl-with-the-patriots/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

    We have seen because of the Officials screwing up calls in the NFL a Mandate for Review on every Touchdown. And the ability for the other Team to challenge with the benefit of slow motion.

    It’s Nature and the God of Nature saying you can say this or that based on your tiny particle of experience, but it does not make it so you Thick Skulled Idiots throwing temper tantrums when your wrong.

    You have to Establish why your Complaint should be Opened up First. . Then , you establish the right to proceed. It was done.

  339. avatar
    Rickey February 6, 2017 at 12:23 pm #

    Cody Judy: Thick Skull – I do hope you would offer Tom Brady the same compliment.

    Blah, blah, blah.

    All you have established with your latest whine is that you still don’t understand what “failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted” means.

    You’re now comparing yourself to Tom Brady? Tom Brady has won five Super Bowls. You are 0-7 in Federal Court cases. I even made a list:

    2:95-cv-00952-JTG Judy v. Hinkley, et al (prisoner civil rights case)
    Filed on 10/19/95, dismissed on 12/11/95
    Appealed to Court of Appeals, denied

    2:95-cv-00989-DB Judy, et al v. St UT (Writ of Habeas Corpus)
    Filed on 11/13/95, dismissed on 11/7/96
    Appealed to Court of Appeals, denied

    2:00-cv-00187-TC Judy v. Balton, et al (prisoner civil rights case)
    Filed on 3/2/2000, dismissed on 9/28/01
    Case dismissed “for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” Sound familiar?

    2:00-cv-00513-DB Judy v. Carver (prisoner civil rights case)
    Filed on 7/14/2000, dismissed on 9/22/2000
    Case dismissed without prejudice for “failure to exhaust administrative remedies”

    2:04-cv-01110-DB Judy v. Bennett, et al (contesting election)
    Filed on 12/6/04, dismissed on 3/17/05
    Judy ran as an “official write-in candidate” for U.S. Senator and claimed that he was damaged to the tune of $100,000 for alleged campaign expenses because writing instruments were not readily available at all polling stations and the list of write-in candidates was not posted. The lawsuit was dismissed for lack of standing and failure to state a claim, among other things.

    2:08-cv-01162-KJD-RJJ Judy v. McCain
    Filed on 9/3/08, dismissed on 9/8/08 because mail sent to Judy was returned by the Post Office marked “Return to Sender, Box Closed, Unable to Forward”
    On 9/15/08 the dismissal notice was returned by the Post Office marked “Box Closed, Unable to Forward, Return to Sender”
    On 9/23/08 Judy filed a motion to reopen the case, but it was denied on 1/8/09 because he failed to update his address in a timely fashion and because of mootness. The defendants never filed an Answer so the issue of standing was never raised.

    1:14-cv-00093-TS Judy v. Obama et al
    We all know the details of this one.

  340. avatar
    Cody Judy February 6, 2017 at 1:35 pm #

    Rickey: “The required font type is Times New Roman or Arial and the font size must be a minimum of 12, including footnotes, although larger font sizes are acceptable.”

    You used a DejaVu font, proving once again that you are incapable of following rules.

    So what you wrote there was all proven false not to mention Pro Se litigants are construed more liberally. But really Rickey, my gosh, Fraud in the Identification documents of Obama and your concerned with Fonts and Points as reasons for it not to be Filed?

    Well it was Filed and this is probably the First Case filed with the whole last Presser Case included of Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse info with the forensics analysis included from highly reputable Investigative Agencies on two Continents. 😉

    That’s telling us all your technical compass is very good for professionals, lousy on poor untrained folks, and more importantly your moral compass is so Far Up the Black Hole we’re all surprised you find your car in the parking lot?
    Take a look at it from a Taxpayer Perspective Rickey

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/fake-president-propped-up-by-fake-news.html?m=1

    Rickey: Judy’s motion was denied without prejudice, which meant that all he had to do to have his motion reconsidered was to file proof of service that complied with the rules. But Judy doesn’t believe that the rules apply to him.

    What do you think, let’s just say Obama as an unseated person now is found never to have been Eligible in the first place, would happen considering his honor, and the honor of his Signiture?

    Do you think if Obama committed Fraud he should get away with it? Are you really advocating corruption in Elected Positions should be upheld?

    Why would you not want a Court to adjudicate this?

  341. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 6, 2017 at 2:52 pm #

    FYI: I just got a major Trojan with Mike Zullo as the google alert. Sender was Martini something or the other. I contacted Microsoft who removed it and the authorities. Also, updated security (new computer). Just giving ya’ll a heads up.

  342. avatar
    Rickey February 6, 2017 at 3:02 pm #

    Cody Judy: So what you wrote there was all proven false not to mention Pro Se litigants are construed more liberally.But really Rickey, my gosh, Fraud in the Identification documents of Obama and your concerned with Fonts and Points as reasons for it not to be Filed?

    As I explained to you before, if the copy you posted on your blog was just a draft you should have identified it as such. And as I explained to you before, I don’t make the rules of the Court. It’s up to you to follow them, even if you believe they are unimportant. And it is up the Court to decide whether to enforce the rules.

    And of course there is no fraud in Obama’s identification documents.

    Do you think if Obama committed Fraud he should get away with it? Are you really advocating corruption in Elected Positions should be upheld?

    Why would you not want a Court to adjudicate this?

    As others have pointed out to you, it already has been adjudicated in several courts, and in each instance the Court ruled that Obama was eligible. There has been no corruption involved in him being elected president.

    No Court will now hear a case involving Obama’s eligibility because the issue is moot. Even if proof were to surface that Obama was born on Mars, there is nothing that any Court can do to remedy it.

    Which brings up back to your inability to understand “failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” Making a claim for damages is not sufficient. In a civil case, you also have to identify a tort which is recognized, either by statute or in the common law. It is the tort which gives the Court jurisdiction to grant relief. Even if true, an ineligible person running for president is not a tort in civil law. Your lawsuit was doomed from the outset, and your latest motion likewise is doomed.

    And even if you could state a claim, your lawsuit would be dismissed because your damages are speculative. You would not be able to prove that even a dime of the money that Obama’s campaign raised would have gone to you if he had not been the Democratic candidate.

  343. avatar
    Reality Check February 6, 2017 at 3:28 pm #

    You got a condom with Mike Zullo?

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: FYI: I just got a major Trojan with Mike Zullo as the google alert.

  344. avatar
    bob February 6, 2017 at 4:31 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    Failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted , just happens to be a cool catch phrase

    “Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,” is not a cool catch phase: It is a bedrock principle of American law.

    I know this is too complicated for ex-con Judy to understand, but it means the courts only respond to real cases, which involve real facts and real laws.

    After all of his years of failure, ex-con Judy still does not understand that he is not in charge of determining what is real and what is a fantasy that exists only in ex-con Judy’s head.

    Fraud in the Identificationdocuments of Obama

    A perfect example of one of ex-con Judy’s many lies: there is no fraud in President Obama’s identification documents.

    Well it was Filed and this is probably the First Case filed with the whole last Presser Case included of Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse

    Like many birthers, ex-con Judy wrongly thinks it is an achievement to file something, when in reality literally anyone can file literally anything. The achievement is in winning, which no birther was able to do.

    info with the forensics analysis included from highly reputable Investigative Agencies on two Continents.

    Ex-con Judy will never, ever see this “analysis” because Zullo will only dangle it in front of idiots like ex-con Judy.

    What do you think,let’s just say Obama as an unseated person

    Only birthers like ex-con Judy refuse to acknowledge that President Obama was eligible to serve.

    And there are an infinite amount of wholly imaginary thoughts to waste energy on. Like imagining the day ex-con Judy doesn’t tell a lie. Or the day ex-con Judy apologizes to the victims of his crime.

    Why would you not want a Court to adjudicate this?

    Because the courts only adjudicate real cases, which involve real facts and real law. And not the phantoms that exist only in ex-con Judy’s head.

  345. avatar
    Pete February 6, 2017 at 5:16 pm #

    Reality Check: You got a condom with Mike Zullo?

    I do think she means a trojan, not a Trojan.

  346. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 6, 2017 at 6:10 pm #

    That nut job knows what I meant. 😆

    Pete: I do think she means a trojan, not a Trojan.

  347. avatar
    Reality Check February 6, 2017 at 6:12 pm #

    I knew what she meant but Trojan makes for a funnier word picture. I was thinking of the full body type like Leslie Nielsen wore in Naked Gun.

    Pete: I do think she means a trojan, not a Trojan.

  348. avatar
    Cody Judy February 6, 2017 at 6:45 pm #

    Rickey: “failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” Making a claim for damages is not sufficient. In a civil case, you also have to identify a tort which is recognized, either by statute or in the common law. It is the tort which gives the Court jurisdiction to grant relief. Even if true, an ineligible person running for president is not a tort in civil law. Your lawsuit was doomed from the outset, and your latest motion likewise is doomed.

    And even if you could state a claim, your lawsuit would be dismissed because your damages are speculative. You would not be able to prove that even a dime of the money that Obama’s campaign raised would have gone to you if he had not been the Democratic candidate.

    bob: Because the courts only adjudicate real cases, which involve real facts and real law. And not the phantoms that exist only in ex-con Judy’s head.

    Just to help everyone understand what is being represented here by Rickey & Bob

    Tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong[1] that unfairly causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act, called a tortfeasor. Although crimes may be torts, the cause of legal action is not necessarily a crime, as the harm may be due to negligence which does not amount to criminal negligence. The victim of the harm can recover their loss as damages in a lawsuit. In order to prevail, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, commonly referred to as the injured party, must show that the actions or lack of action was the legally recognizable cause of the harm. The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is delict.

    Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries and may include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights. Torts comprise such varied topics as auto accidents, false imprisonment, defamation, product liability, copyright infringement, and environmental pollution (toxic torts). While many torts are the result of negligence, tort law also recognizes intentional torts, where a person has intentionally acted in a way that harms another, and in a few cases (particularly for product liability in the United States) “strict liability” which allows recovery without the need to demonstrate negligence.

    Tort law is different from criminal law in that: (1) torts may result from negligent as well as intentional or criminal actions and (2) tort lawsuits have a lower burden of proof such as preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. Sometimes a plaintiff may prevail in a tort case even if the person who allegedly caused harm was acquitted in an earlier criminal trial. For example, O. J. Simpson was acquitted in criminal court of murder but later found liable for the tort of wrongful death.

    We just read Constitution and Civil Rights in the Tort Definition.

    We also read Civil Cases do not have to be beyond doubt and have a lower burden of Proof.

    We also know Congress has passed specific concerning Legislation about Cartels involved with two or more Corporations involved in illegal activity for their benefit we can construe as illegal actions and representations that harm others in the Clayton Act with specific penalties therein for infractions causing harm.

    We also know you do not have to be a A.G to bring those to the Court.

    What we do not yet know is the degree of corruption involved in protecting Obama as an unseated Defacto President in the face of Forensic evidence brought forth by someone in the Presidential Race with Standing asserting the claims with professional legal lawful authorities evidence.

    This is what Federal District Court Utah District case no. 1:2014cv00093 represents in a very Real Case with a very real Presidential Candidate, with a very real Sheriff Possee Investigation in a very real crimestate or criminal enterprise and with very real Civil damages.

    If Rickey was so good, how come he can’t understand a rough draft doesn’t have Real Signiture, but needs to be told?

    What he says is gobbledygook. .

  349. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 6, 2017 at 6:57 pm #

    My new grimacing avatar doesn’t make it any better. Doc, do you think we can do something about that? Shut up Reality. 😆

    Reality Check:
    I knew what she meant but Trojan makes for a funnier word picture. I was thinking of the full body type like Leslie Nielsen wore in Naked Gun.

  350. avatar
    bob February 6, 2017 at 7:36 pm #

    What we do not yet know is the degree of corruption involved in protecting Obama as an unseated Defacto President

    Ex-con Judy still fails to understand that his fantasies are not evidence of any corruption; ex-con Judy’s fantasies are only evidence that he has an overactive imagination and an extreme willingness to spread lies.

    in the face of Forensic evidence

    Ex-con Judy still does not understand that birthers playing telephone with each other is not evidence.

    brought forth by someone in the Presidential Race with Standing

    Ex-con Judy still does not understand that filing out a form does not make one a candidate. (And that being a candidate isn’t always necessary.)

    This is what Federal District Court Utah District case no. 1:2014cv00093 represents in a very Real Case with a very real Presidential Candidate, with a very real Sheriff Possee Investigation in a very real crimestate or criminal enterprise and with very real Civil damages.

    Ex-con Judy is wrong every single point: Ex-con Judy’s case has already been dismissed as frivolous (and the district court will not re-open it); Zullo’s “investigation” is not a real investigation, nor will it ever see the light of day; there is no evidence President Obama has committed any crime; and there are no damages because there is no claim.

    What he says is gobbledygook.

    Oh, the irony.

  351. avatar
    Rickey February 6, 2017 at 8:31 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    If Rickey was so good, how come he can’t understand a rough draft doesn’t have Real Signiture, but needs to be told?

    First of all, it’s spelled “signature.”

    Second, I didn’t bother to read your word salad to the very end, so I didn’t notice that it hadn’t been signed. Even if I had noticed it, I wouldn’t have assumed that it was a draft because you didn’t identify it as a draft.

    Third, the Court of Appeals explained to you why you failed to state a claim for relief:

    Judy cannot point to a single case that construes any of these statutes in a way supporting his claims for relief. Next, because we see no scenario where he would be entitled to relief under § 1983, the Sherman Act, or the Clayton Act, we also agree with the district court that his complaint was frivolous.

    The Court did not say that you needed to cite another case which involves presidential eligibility. But you did need to cite some cases in the long history of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act which have at least tenuous relevance to your claims for damages. Instead of filing something which is responsive to the legal reasons for the dismissal of your lawsuit, you chose to try to get the Court to consider your claim that Obama was ineligible. But the Court has already told you that it doesn’t matter if your factual claims are correct. You first have to clear the legal hurdle, and in that regard you have fallen flat on your face.

  352. avatar
    Rickey February 6, 2017 at 9:30 pm #

    bob:

    Ex-con Judy is wrong every single point:Ex-con Judy’s case has already been dismissed as frivolous (and the district court will not re-open it); Zullo’s “investigation” is not a real investigation, nor will it ever see the light of day; there is no evidence President Obama has committed any crime; and there are no damages because there is no claim.

    And Judy hasn’t filed proof of service which complies with the rules of the court. The District Court provided him with a road map and he still took the wrong road.

  353. avatar
    Reality Check February 7, 2017 at 7:18 am #

    Meanwhile….

    WH Petition Scorecard:

    Pardon Terry Lakin: 984
    Explain why Trump is such a a needy little bitch: 5624

  354. avatar
    Northland10 February 7, 2017 at 7:56 am #

    Rickey: And Judy hasn’t filed proof of service which complies with the rules of the court. The District Court provided him with a road map and he still took the wrong road.

    Funny how he keeps lecturing the courts and the people here about how the law and courts work, yet still continues to fail. It’s almost as if the courts think they understand the law and how courts work better than Cody.

    A logical person, even if they were absolutely sure they were right, might still decide to jump through the court’s hoops so at least they could get as far as possible with their claim. Unfortunately, this requires listening, a willingness to learn and the ability to swallow your pride long enough to achieve your goals.

  355. avatar
    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger February 7, 2017 at 9:19 am #

    Because, he would risk being carted off to prison if he did. Some of his evidence is fabricated. Fraud Upon the Court, if I’m not mistaken. Misprison of treason or whatever that is, if he doesn’t. Lose-lose.

    bob: What is really hi-larious is that ex-con Judy still hasn’t figured out that Arpaio and Zullo DIDN’T PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE at the vanity press conference.

    Zullo’s wild claims about these mythical experts’ mythical reports will never see the inside of a courtroom.Because Zullo is never, ever going to cough up the actual reports.

  356. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 7, 2017 at 9:58 am #

    The avatars come from Gravatar.com, and are keyed to your email address. If you want a different avatar, then go to Gravatar and upload something of your own choosing.

    It’s been my intent for a while now to remove avatars from comments for a couple of reasons: 1) it increases load times and 2) the security concerns described in my Confession Part 3.

    Nancy Ruth Owens, The Obama Forger: My new grimacing avatar doesn’t make it any better. Doc, do you think we can do something about that?

  357. avatar
    Cody Judy February 7, 2017 at 12:05 pm #

    Northland10: Rickey: And Judy hasn’t filed proof of service which complies with the rules of the court. The District Court provided him with a road map and he still took the wrong road.

    Funny how he keeps lecturing the courts and the people here about how the law and courts work, yet still continues to fail. It’s almost as if the courts think they understand the law and how courts work better than Cody.

    A logical person, even if they were absolutely sure they were right, might still decide to jump through the court’s hoops so at least they could get as far as possible with their claim. Unfortunately, this requires listening, a willingness to learn and the ability to swallow your pride long enough to achieve your goals.

    Well in a nutshell I don’t disagree with you, which I suppose makes me a “logical person” ?

    You all witness the Mailing Certificate along with the Oath Requirement per Federal Statute. Of course, no one here gets that Service which without would [not] have been Docketed.

    Rickey now asserts he only reads a portion of the Motion but feels free to extol the powers of his reasoning and expert spelling and grammar skills not even a 3rd Grade Teacher would say counted as any more than an F as over 50% was not accomplished.

    Northland ( if he’d read the Motion ) would Notice as he wrote ..
    [Unfortunately, this requires listening, a willingness to learn and the ability to swallow your pride long enough to achieve your goals.]..
    that in the Summary is indeed the most humble supplication for the Court under the [Clayton Act] decorum of Congress direction, assign Prosecutorial Counsel.

    As many here probably haven’t read the Sherman Act or the Clayton Act as per requirement when the Judge receives the Complaint under such Act, he shall refer the Complaint to a Prosecutor of the Attorney General’s Office.

    When that is done, if any question of service or other technicality needing to be fulfilled is in question, said Prosecutor shall fulfill the obligation to and for the Court’s Heart content.

    Oh.. my, guess what? The Attorney General’s Office is not filled by an Obama A.G. any more? You know the one who met with Pres. Bill Clinton on the Tarmac in AZ. discussing things like grandkids, and deferring Prosecutions on some Pres. Candidate. Who said, ” What Difference does it make?” I’m trying to recall HER name?

    A.G. Loretta Lynch not there for Obama to call up and say, ” Tell that Judge through my Utah Division Fed. A.G Office, to tell that Plaintiff GFY.

    Now, I’m not saying Trump’s A.G couldn’t do the same, but I am saying it appears the Federal District Court (Utah Division) has a long 4 years ahead with Trump and political winds do shift as the Election 2016 relayed to us very dramatically.

    Republicans are running out of airport runway as they control the House, Senate, and Executive Branch. The winds will not be favorable forever if they do not Act.

    Now most Critics Arm Chair Quarter backing here, assume the continuation of protection Obama received while in the Office in light of a seated President not one already unseated and now with a Birther in the White House!

    Deferred Prosecution is of course big in the Obama Administration on defying Congressional Acts, rules, and Constitutional Directives. Will that continue?

    Did the MSM say Trump would win? No, they were totally fantastically wrong wrong wrong.

    Did any one here vote for Trump? Me thinks Rickey might be the only one. He defends Obama precariously not to blow his cover as does Bob as all here notice all most instantly line for line.

    This Action in the Federal District Court ( Utah Division) represents, as far as I know, the only INELIGIBILITY ACTION post Obama 8 yrs in the White House in the entire Nation with, I might add, a legal continuation through the 8 years.

    That’s 8 Superbowls put together with Justice as the Trophy.

    What I’m saying is the WAY is Cleared Up now. A soft transition of power has been made. I have been patient yet determined. The Law has a path that is Open now. It’s not defended by Obama’s A.G.

    It has a chance. . It has Legal Authority if Congresses Actions are respected by the Court. I can’t do it myself. and I’ve asked for help that I feel Congress says I am afforded.

    Whether that is respected by the Federal Court I cannot say. All I could do was bring it this far but it’s 99 yards of the 100 for a Touchdown. That’s a long ways.

    How many of you have filed against Trump for not being a [ natural born Citizen]?

    That should tell you something about Obama’s Ineligibility. . By your own Records that witness against you. There is no doubt for those [ Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]

    The fact this Blog is in Epilog mode is a witness that 8 years was the magic time frame and it’s whole interest was getting Obama through the 8 years.

    That is why I have thought of a new Title for you.
    [Obama Clock Watchers] or [ Obama Clock Hangers] but now Obama’s Clock is limp. It’s not erect or correct anymore. It’s over. . Yet Action continues in Federal Court and if that’s decide we go Tenth Circuit, and if that’s denied we go SCOTUS.

    The Action is not about Obama it’s about Justice and Honor and Integrity. It’s about Honoring America and her Right to qualify born in, and by Americans in the Office of President.

    It’s fundamentally a Sovereign Nation’s Right to say so and it does.

  358. avatar
    Rickey February 7, 2017 at 2:17 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    You all witness the Mailing Certificate along with the Oath Requirement per Federal Statute. Of course, no one here gets that Service which without would [not] have been Docketed.

    The rules require that your Affidavit of Service has to have a copy of the Summons and Complaint attached to it. According to the Clerk of Court, you failed to follow the rules. That’s on you.

    Rickey now asserts he only reads a portion of the Motion but feels free to extol the powers of his reasoning and expert spelling and grammar skills not even a 3rd Grade Teacher would say counted as any more than an F as over 50% was not accomplished.

    I’m not sure what that word salad is supposed to mean, but I read enough of your Motion to recognize that it utterly fails to address the reasons why your lawsuit was dismissed.

    As many here probably haven’t read the Sherman Act or the Clayton Act as per requirement when the Judge receives the Complaint under such Act, he shall refer the Complaint to a Prosecutor of the Attorney General’s Office.

    You may have read them, but you obviously don’t understand them. As the Court of Appeals pointed out to you, you have not provided any legal support for your contention that the Sherman Act and Clayton Act have any relevance to your claims. As the Supreme Court pointed out in Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan 506 U.S. 447 (1993):

    The purpose of the Act is not to protect businesses from the working of the market; it is to protect the public from the failure of the market. The law directs itself not against conduct which is competitive, even severely so, but against conduct which unfairly tends to destroy competition itself.

    Obama and the DNC did not tend to destroy competition itself. Indeed, the 2012 campaign was vigorously competed by Mitt Romey, who won 47% of the popular vote. In addition, you cannot explain how your situation would have been different if the Democrats had nominated someone other than Obama.

    Your Complaint wasn’t eligible to be referred to the Attorney General’s office because neither the Sherman Act nor the Clayton Act have any applicability to your nonsensical claims.

  359. avatar
    bob February 7, 2017 at 3:15 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    As many here probably haven’t read the Sherman Act or the Clayton Act as per requirement when the Judge receives the Complaint under such Act, he shall refer the Complaint to a Prosecutor of the Attorney General’s Office.

    Ex-con Judy still fails to understand that — years ago — the courts have already ruled that his word salad failed state a violation of the Sherman, Clayton, or any other act.

    Now most Critics Arm Chair Quarter backing here, assume the continuation of protection Obama received while in the Office in light of a seated President not one already unseated and now with a Birther in the White House!

    The current president has stated that Obama was born in Hawaii (“period”). And has shown no interest in playing birther games.

    He defends Obama precariously not to blow his cover as does Bob as all here notice all most instantly line for line.

    Ex-con Judy confuses defending Obama with defending reality: there is nothing partisan in noting the objective facts that Obama was born in Hawaii; and that every judge, professor, and other expert who has considered the issue has concluded birth in the United States is sufficient for natural-born citizenship.

    This Action in the Federal District Court ( Utah Division) represents, as far as I know, the only INELIGIBILITY ACTION post Obama 8 yrs

    Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy boasts about his inability to admit that he is wrong.

    All I could do was bring it this far but it’s 99 yards of the 100 for a Touchdown.

    Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy confuses his panhandling in the stadium’s parking lot with actually playing the game.

    How many of you have filed against Trump for not being a [ natural born Citizen]?

    As birth in the United States is sufficient for natural-born citizenship, why would any sane person file a lawsuit against someone who was born in New York?

    (Not so) ironically, ex-con Judy believes in a two-citizen-parent fantasy, yet ex-con Judy has no evidence concerning the citizenship of the president’s parents at the time of his birth.

    [Obama Clock Watchers] or [ Obama Clock Hangers]

    The only people obsessed with Obama’s natural-born citizenship are the one who always have been: the same few birthers like ex-con Judy.

    Yet Action continues in Federal Court and if that’s decide we go Tenth Circuit, and if that’s denied we go SCOTUS.

    Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy boasts about his intent to waste more judicial resources.

    The Action is not about Obama

    Ex-con Judy is correct: Ex-con Judy’s actions are about ex-con Judy’s ego; ex-con Judy’s narcissism; and ex-con Judy’s many failures in life.

  360. avatar
    Joey February 7, 2017 at 3:42 pm #

    Interviewer: “Do you question [Obama’s] faith and citizenship?”
    Governor Sarah Palin: “I don’t, and those are distractions, What we’re concerned about is the economy. And we’re concerned about the policies coming out of his administration and what he believes in terms of big government or private sector. So, no, the faith, the birth certificate, others can engage in that kind of conversation. It’s distracting. It gets annoying and let’s just stick with what really matters.”
    http://youtu.be/HMKwo_Cz8mw

    Donald J. Trump, 9/16/16: “Barack Obama was born in the United States, period. Hillary Clinton started the birther movement, I finished it.”

  361. avatar
    Cody Judy February 7, 2017 at 3:53 pm #

    bob: Unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy confuses his panhandling in the stadium’s parking lot with actually playing the game.

    This was kind of funny Bob.. Hat-Tip to you Sir.😂

    Rickey: Your Complaint wasn’t eligible to be referred to the Attorney General’s office because neither the Sherman Act nor the Clayton Act have any applicability to your nonsensical claims.

    2017/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Washington, D.C. attorney and law professor Victor Williams today issues a harsh condemnation of Judge James Robart’s suspension of President Trump’s travel ban. “Robart pulled a dangerous political stunt.” Williams states:

    “There was no legal basis for Robart’s ruling. Donald Trump is absolutely right that the travel ban will be eventually upheld. Indeed, Trump’s Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco, who is a brilliant and experienced appellate advocate, will shred the trial judge’s TRO decision.”

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/02/07/so-called-judge-james-robarts-dangerous-political-stunt-robart-opens-a-wide-window-to-allow-alien-terrorists-to-enter-america-says-d-c-law-professor/

    I look at the Decisions rendered thus far by lower courts on Obama’s Foreign Allegiance in the Office of President, (other than the SCOTUS who has never heard Obama’s Ineligibility Cases), as just as big or bigger Stunts upon our Nation’s Constitution and our National Security.

    I believe (one way or the other) this will come to be a National Agreement and those caught up in the folly will regret the day they did.

  362. avatar
    Cody Judy February 7, 2017 at 4:25 pm #

    bob: When will ex-con Judy “sincerely” apologize to his actual victims — the thousands he terrorized with his threat of an explosive device?

    24 years Ago.. Today Feb 7th, 1993
    https://www.google.com/amp/universe.byu.edu/1999/08/02/cody-judy-leaves-prison-on-parole/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

    Judy said part of his reform included apologizing to those he hurt.

    “I am thankful that I had an opportunity while President Hunter was alive to write him a personal letter. I probably lament a little bit the opportunity for he and I to have gotten together before he died to express a few words.”

    “To anybody who is scared out there I would like to tell them I’m sorry and that this won’t happen again, for sure,” Judy said.

    😊 I hope you copy this Bob and stick it down in yr pocket deep where you don’t forget it. 😎

    http://www.cc.com/video-clips/ybem0d/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-putting-the-con-back-in-congress

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/02/fight-over-forgiveness-lds-church.html?m=1

  363. avatar
    bob February 7, 2017 at 4:36 pm #

    Cody Judy:
    “To anybody who is scared out there I would like to tell them I’m sorry and that this won’t happen again, for sure,” Judy said.

    Any sincerity, if any ever existed, was completely destroyed by ex-con Judy’s repeated lies about his criminal acts ever since:

    in a continuously crafted character assassination that fabricates and embellishes not only the incident, but outright lies regarding the prosecution and circumstances, lending a devastation to not only myself but the community at large in fear of the same bias and prejudice treatment based on actual or perceived religion as it relates to our continually evolving digital data record(s) available to anyone that searches the internet.

    Ex-con Judy continues to play the victim because he cannot sincerely accept that he was the victimizer.

    I look at the Decisions rendered

    The only person who cares about ex-con Judy’s opinion is … ex-con Judy.

    Washington, D.C. attorney and law professor Victor Williams

    The person so dumb as to use Mario Apuzzo as his attorney?

  364. avatar
    Cody Judy February 7, 2017 at 4:46 pm #

    bob: Any sincerity, if any ever existed

    I can’t express a choice or tell Bob how to feel. He feels the way he feels, nor can i apologize for Facts that are not True Facts for no ” explosive device” ever existed and the LDS Religion uses B.O.M or Book of Mormon when other Faith’s do not.

    I can remind all about what Jesus Christ said on the subject.

    Matt 18:21-22
    Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?”

    Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.

  365. avatar
    Joey February 7, 2017 at 4:54 pm #

    Cody Judy: This was kind of funny Bob.. Hat-Tip to you Sir.

    2017/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Washington, D.C. attorney and law professor Victor Williams today issues a harsh condemnation of Judge James Robart’s suspension of President Trump’s travel ban.“Robart pulled a dangerous political stunt.” Williams states:

    “There was no legal basis for Robart’s ruling.Donald Trump is absolutely right that the travel ban will be eventually upheld.Indeed, Trump’s Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco, who is a brilliant and experienced appellate advocate, will shred the trial judge’s TRO decision.”

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/02/07/so-called-judge-james-robarts-dangerous-political-stunt-robart-opens-a-wide-window-to-allow-alien-terrorists-to-enter-america-says-d-c-law-professor/

    I look at the Decisions rendered thus far by lower courts on Obama’s Foreign Allegiance in the Office of President, (other than the SCOTUS who has never heard Obama’s Ineligibility Cases), as just as big or bigger Stunts upon our Nation’s Constitution and our National Security.

    I believe (one way or the other) this will come to be a National Agreement and those caught up in the folly will regret the day they did.

    For the record, there are 866 full time Article III federal judges (Supreme Court, Courts of Appeals and District Courts). Bill Clinton appointed 373 federal judges; Barack Obama appointed 329 federal judges and George W. Bush appointed 327 Article III judges.
    Some of Bill Clinton’s appointees are now on Senior Judge status and only work part time.
    What Cody Judy “believes” is legally/constitutionally irrelevant. There is no such thing as a “national agreement.” Anything and everything legal/constitutional concerning Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president is now moot in civil actions and beyond the Statute of Limitations in criminal actions. “Eligibility” is the period of time BEFORE a candidate assumes an office. Once a president or vice-president has taken office, impeachment is the only process available to determine whether high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed.
    Once a president or vice president has relinquished the office, issues of eligibility are moot and non-justiciable.

  366. avatar
    bob February 7, 2017 at 5:04 pm #

    Cody Judy: nor can i apologize for Facts that are not True Facts for no ” explosive device” ever existed

    Ex-con Judy told thousands that he had an explosive device. Which is why he later belatedly and insincerely said he was sorry.

    That ex-con Judy continues his lie that he meant something else (both on the day of criminal action and later around the time of his release from prison) only proves his continued insincerity and despicableness.

  367. avatar
    Cody Judy February 7, 2017 at 6:44 pm #

    bob: That ex-con Judy continues his lie that he meant something else

    …fits right in line with Democratic Party Leaders Nancy Pelosi stating Bush was President😂 and Rep. Maxine Waters saying Putin invaded Korea in the same Press Conference.😂

    Now for a Commercial Break

    #Democrats 76 Year Old Rep. Minority Speaker Nancy Pelosi freaks 78 Year Old Rep. Maxine Waters out when in a Press Conference she thinks President Bush is still in the Office. Rep. Pelosi was the one who signed two different forms the same day in 2008 declaring Obama Constitutionally Eligible contributing to the Democratic Party’s demise. One for Hawaii and one for the 49 other States who did not need an oath stating Obama was Eligible under the Standard of the Constitution.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x2czvd61mR0&feature=youtu.be

    In the same Press Conference 78 Year Old Maxine Waters states Putin has invaded Korea.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXPGPMTulDw&feature=youtu.be

  368. avatar
    bob February 7, 2017 at 7:06 pm #

    Rep. Pelosi was the one who signed two different forms the same day in 2008

    A distinction that had no legal bearing in the real world.

    And, unsurprisingly, ex-con Judy attempts to divert attention away from his own inability to take responsibility for his own actions and words.

    Making ex-con Judy, among other things, a coward.

  369. avatar
    Joey February 7, 2017 at 7:31 pm #

    Donald Trump’s Pre-Super Bowl Interview Ratings Dismal Compared To Obama’s.

    The Super Bowl Sunday interview is part of a now-customary tradition giving the U.S. president a platform to speak prior to the Super Bowl. Speaking to Bill O’Reilly on Fox News before the big game, Trump drew 12.2 million viewers in Nielsen’s overnight ratings, according to Variety. By comparison, Obama brought in 21.9 million viewers in his first pre-game interview in 2009. (He followed up with 18 million viewers in 2014, 16.4 million in 2015, and 14.9 million in 2016.

  370. avatar
    Rickey February 7, 2017 at 9:32 pm #

    Cody Judy:

    2017/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Washington, D.C. attorney and law professor Victor Williams today issues a harsh condemnation of Judge James Robart’s suspension of President Trump’s travel ban.“Robart pulled a dangerous political stunt.” Williams states:

    “There was no legal basis for Robart’s ruling.Donald Trump is absolutely right that the travel ban will be eventually upheld.Indeed, Trump’s Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco, who is a brilliant and experienced appellate advocate, will shred the trial judge’s TRO decision.”

    Victor Williams is far-right politically and has a bromance with Trump, so it’s hardly surprising that he supports Trump’s Muslim ban. Williams also filed a lawsuit to disqualify Ted Cruz – a lawsuit which he lost, of course, so his track record in eligibility cases is no better than yours.

    And of course the constitutionality of the Muslim ban has absolutely nothing to do with your lawsuit. Williams is just one lawyer, and he is entitled to his opinion. Your lawsuit was rejected by a Federal District Court judge and three Federal Court of Appeals judges, and it’s their opinion which counts.

  371. avatar
    Reality Check February 8, 2017 at 8:29 am #

    Meanwhile…

    Shortly after the Trump is a Needy Little Bitch WH petition topped 6000 signatures it was yanked for violating the rules. It had made it to the front page of petitions too.

    The Lakin petition plods along and is at just over 1000 signatures. It will fall far short of the goal of 100k.

  372. avatar
    Cody Judy February 8, 2017 at 11:28 am #

    Joey: Once a president or vice president has relinquished the office, issues of eligibility are moot and non-justiciable.

    I don’t think this is true, based on the Life-Time Title associated with the Office of President ,as well as the Tax-Payer Paid Retirement eligibility.

    This was included in the Motion
    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/fake-president-propped-up-by-fake-news.html?m=1

    The 2 Terms is a limit on being seated, the Honor of the Office in Title is for Life

  373. avatar
    bob February 8, 2017 at 12:11 pm #

    Cody Judy: I don’t think this is true, based on the Life-Time Title associated with the Office of President ,as well as the Tax-Payer Paid Retirement eligibility.

    Only ex-con Judy cares ex-con Judy thinks.

    And after these years, ex-con Judy still has no concept of standing, or why is magical FEC filing is wholly irrelevant to his latest saga of paper terrorism.

  374. avatar
    Northland10 February 8, 2017 at 12:58 pm #

    Cody Judy: I don’t think this is true, based on the Life-Time Title associated with the Office of President ,as well as the Tax-Payer Paid Retirement eligibility.

    Which statue or Constitutional clause backs up your claim. Be specific. Cite the law then demonstrate how it applies. Provide any court cases that may apply to the cited law.

    Remember, this is a Constitutionally specified office, not an appointed office.

  375. avatar
    Keith February 8, 2017 at 1:35 pm #

    Cody Judy: I don’t think

    That’s the phrase that is doing all the work in all of your posts.

    It sure took you a very long time to find it.

  376. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 8, 2017 at 2:05 pm #

    I guess VP Pence’s 2nd job will be to investigate how the ratings were rigged.

    Joey: y comparison, Obama brought in 21.9 million viewers

  377. avatar
    Rickey February 8, 2017 at 2:38 pm #

    Cody Judy: I don’t think this is true, based on the Life-Time Title associated with the Office of President ,as well as the Tax-Payer Paid Retirement eligibility.

    First of all, you would have no standing to challenge Obama’s entitlement to his pension, because your grievance, if true, would be shared by every other taxpayer.

    Second, can you cite any case law which says that a pension can be revoked if the retiree wasn’t eligible for the job in the first place? Let’s say that I apply for a job which requires a college degree and I put down on my application that I have a degree. I am hired and work there for 20 years, and then retire and start collecting my pension. Someone then tips off my employer that I never received a college degree. Do you believe that the employer could then revoke the pension which I earned? If you believe that an employer can revoke a pension which an employee earned, you’d better have some legal citations to back it up.

  378. avatar
    J.D. Sue February 8, 2017 at 3:06 pm #

    They say 45 is finding it’s lonely at the top. I sure hope he saw this today — 44 has been in the tropics with Sir Richard Branson.

    “We decided to set up a friendly challenge: Could Barack learn to kitesurf before I learned to foilboard? We agreed to have a final day battle to see who could stay up the longest,” Branson wrote in a post on Virgin.com.

    “We were neck and neck until the last run on the last day, when I got up on the foilboard and screamed along for over 50 metres, three feet above the water,” Branson wrote. “I was feeling very pleased with myself, only to look over and see Barack go 100 metres on his kiteboard! I had to doff my cap to him and celebrate his victory.”

    Nice pictures.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/politics/barack-obama-kitesurfing-richard-branson/

  379. avatar
    Joey February 8, 2017 at 3:33 pm #

    Let’s review just one more time, shall we?
    Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 has been the legal basis of birther lawsuits. That is an eligibility requirement. Every states’ Chief Elections Officer, usually an elected Secretary of State accepted Barack Obama as eligible in 2008 and again in 2012.
    When you count multi-judge appeals court panels plus seven and nine justice Supreme Court panels, well over 1,000 judges and other Triers of Fact such as state Election Boards have reviewed Barack Obama’s eligibility without a single finding of ineligibility. 365 Electors in 2008 and 332 Electors in 2012 selected Barack Obama as President. Joint sessions of Congress held in 2009 and 2013 certified Barack Obama’s Electoral votes unanimously, without a single objection from any member of Congress.
    There are three branches of the federal government:
    1) Executive: “Barack Obama was born in the United States, period”–Donald J. Trump
    2) Legislative: Never held a single hearing on eligibility and certified Obama’s Electors.
    3) Judicial: No federal judge, appeals court panel or SCOTUS action on ineligibility.
    Taitz v. Obama (Quo Warranto) “This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen, as is required by the Constitution. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”– Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, April 14, 2010

  380. avatar
    misha February 8, 2017 at 3:46 pm #

    J.D. Sue: Nice pictures.

    To President Obama, as we say in Yiddish, זעי געסונד (be healthy, be well; farewell!).

    SNL’s Cecily Strong and Sasheer Zamata pay tribute to President Obama, To Sir with Love:

    http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/to-sir-with-love/3457937?snl=1

  381. avatar
    Joey February 8, 2017 at 4:06 pm #

    Let’s pretend that two years from now some new evidence emerges concerning Barack Obama’s eligibility to have been president. What then?
    Well, that eventuality is already accounted for in case law:
    The De Facto Officer refers to an officer holding a colorable right or title to the office accompanied by possession. The lawful acts of an officer de facto, so far as the rights of third persons are concerned, when done within the scope and by the apparent authority of office, are valid and binding.

    The de facto officer doctrine confers validity upon acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title even though it is later discovered that the legality of that person’s appointment or election to office is deficient.

    The following is case law defining the term De Facto Officer. “An officer de facto is one whose acts, though not those of a lawful officer, the law, upon principles of policy and justice, will hold valid so far as they involve the interests of the public and third persons, where the duties of the office were exercised:
    First, without a known appointment or election, but under such circumstances of reputation or acquiescence as were calculated to induce people, without inquiry, to submit to or invoke his action, supposing him to be the officer he assumed to be;

    Second, under color of a known and valid appointment or election, but where the officer had failed to conform to some precedent requirement or condition, as to take an oath, give a bond, or the like;

    Third, under color of a known election or appointment, void because the officer was not ELIGIBLE, or because there was a want of power in the electing or appointing body, or by reason of some defect or irregularity in its exercise, such ineligibility, want of power, or defect being unknown to the public;

    Fourth, under color of an election or appointment by or pursuant to a public unconstitutional law, before the same is adjudged to be such”.

    So Barack Obama would remain the duly elected 44th President of the United States under the de facto officer doctrine even if it was later discovered that he had been ineligible for the position. Why? Because 70 million voters elected him, the Electoral College also elected him, the Chief Justice swore him in, the Congress didn’t challenge his eligibility, the Senate confirmed his appointees, both Houses sent him bills to sign into law, and the Supreme Court ruled on his policies and actions.

  382. avatar
    J.D. Sue February 8, 2017 at 4:38 pm #

    misha: To President Obama, as we say in Yiddish, זעי געסונד (be healthy, be well; farewell!).

    SNL’s Cecily Strong and Sasheer Zamata pay tribute to President Obama, To Sir with Love:

    Yes, zei gezunt! I saw that tribute live on SNL, and I was so moved and sang along. It was perfect.

  383. avatar
    Rickey February 8, 2017 at 9:40 pm #

    Joey:

    So Barack Obama would remain the duly elected 44th President of the United States under the de facto officer doctrine even if it was later discovered that he had been ineligible for the position. Why? Because 70 million voters elected him, the Electoral College also elected him, the Chief Justice swore him in, the Congress didn’t challenge his eligibility, the Senate confirmed his appointees, both Houses sent him bills to sign into law, and the Supreme Court ruled on his policies and actions.

    Judy, being ignorant of the law in general and the Constitution in particular, doesn’t understand that the Constitution makes no provision for retroactively removing a president from office. There is no magic reset button.

  384. avatar
    Pete February 8, 2017 at 10:30 pm #

    Joey: So Barack Obama would remain the duly elected 44th President of the United States under the de facto officer doctrine even if it was later discovered that he had been ineligible for the position. Why? Because 70 million voters elected him, the Electoral College also elected him, the Chief Justice swore him in, the Congress didn’t challenge his eligibility, the Senate confirmed his appointees, both Houses sent him bills to sign into law, and the Supreme Court ruled on his policies and actions.

    SURELY you don’t mean to say that even IF (ha, ha) someone were actually to produce some actual evidence, at some point in the future, that Obama was in fact ineligible, it wouldn’t change a single thing at this point, and Cody Judy and all of the other birthers are well, truly, PERMANENTLY AND IRREVERSIBLY SCR*WED???

    Say it ain’t so!!

  385. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy February 8, 2017 at 10:52 pm #

    Donald Trump said that no one wanted to see his tax returns, except the media.

    The petition for him to release his tax returns has topped half a million. I hadn’t heard about it, and found it when I visited the petitions site.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/immediately-release-donald-trumps-full-tax-returns-all-information-needed-verify-emoluments-clause-compliance

    Reality Check: Shortly after the Trump is a Needy Little Bitch WH petition topped 6000 signatures it was yanked for violating the rules. It had made it to the front page of petitions too.

  386. avatar
    Joey February 8, 2017 at 11:39 pm #

    Pete: SURELY you don’t mean to say that even IF (ha, ha) someone were actually to produce some actual evidence, at some point in the future, that Obama was in fact ineligible, it wouldn’t change a single thing at this point, and Cody Judy and all of the other birthers are well, truly, PERMANENTLY AND IRREVERSIBLY SCR*WED???

    Say it ain’t so!!

    Well, they could try to get Congress to amend the Former Presidents Act and make the elimination of pensions and benefits for allegedly ineligble presidents retroactive, but there is the little problem of what the Constitution says about ex post facto laws.
    Those darn “factos” just doom the birthers.

  387. avatar
    bob February 8, 2017 at 11:50 pm #

    I for one look forward to ex-con Judy explaining how people in 2017 voluntarily referring to Obama as “president” fraudulently induced ex-con Judy to pretend he was a candidate in 2012.