Main Menu

Attorney Berg Declares National “Sad Day”

Hereafter, January 20 will be known as National “Sad Day” in commemoration of the inauguration of Barack Obama as the 44th President, November 20, 2009.

01/20/09: PRESS RELEASE – Berg states that the Inauguration of Obama today will be recognized as a “Sad Day” for America when it is proven that Obama is “not qualified” pursuant to the U.S. Constitution to be President. Today begins a “Usurper” as President Obama is “ineligible” to be President as Obama is “not” “natural born.” We are headed for a “Constitutional Crisis.”

I assume this means that “Constitutional Crisis” is being used in some manner different from the usual definition. Perhaps Phil can get Oprah to convince Barack Obama to make the declaration of the new commemoration.

It was also reported on CNN that price for quotation mark futures had risen 20% immediately after Berg released his statement. This will not be a problem here at Obama Conspiracy Theories, as we grow our own here in the Victory Garden.

,

8 Responses to Attorney Berg Declares National “Sad Day”

  1. avatar
    bogus info January 20, 2009 at 7:48 pm #


    http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=820
    Linda Starr Posts New Information

  2. avatar
    George Orwell III January 20, 2009 at 9:03 pm #

    It was also reported on CNN that price for quotation mark futures had risen 20% immediately after Berg released his statement. This will not be a problem here at Obama Conspiracy Theories, as we grow our own here in the Victory Garden.

    LMAO!!!

  3. avatar
    bogus info January 20, 2009 at 10:03 pm #

    How can they FOIA passport information when that information is specifically exempted? In Department of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982), the Court adopted a broad interpretation of Exemption 6’s threshold “similar files” requirement. thereby permitting that exemption to apply potentially to any information regarding an individual.
    “The citizenship information sought by respondent satisfies the “similar files” requirement of Exemption 6, and petitioners’ denial of the request should have been sustained upon a showing by the Government that release of the information would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”
    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&invol=595&vol=456
    You can read the regulations for your self here: http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_guide07.htm

  4. avatar
    GeorgetownJD January 21, 2009 at 8:48 am #

    I’m going to take a short position on those quotation mark futures. There will be a short continued rise in price, but I’m predicting a dramatic fall as demand quickly diminishes.

  5. avatar
    awe_and_shock January 25, 2009 at 11:25 am #

    In the “Join the Blog” section of Berg’s http://www.obamacrimes.com :

    “Berg and Company were harmed by the Donofrio and Taitz suits

    written by Ron Polarik, January 21, 2009

    In order for Donofrio’s case to be made, Obama had to have been born in Hawaii as demonstrated by the bogus COLB he made a part of the public record. Otherwise, the dual citizenship argument could not be made.

    Now, what that did was to ignore the cold hard fact that Obama committed document fraud, both at the State level and the Federal level, and that Factcheck was also a co-conspirator in promulgating this hoax. So, what did we hear coming from the dual citizenship blogsphere? Demands to “stop talking about the birth certificate issue!!”

    Which is the more important feature of this COLB image? That: (a) it cannot be used to prove NBUSC,” or that (b) it represents felony fraud committed by Obama?

    The “dual citizenship” crowd chose (c) “None of the above” because they need Obama to be a US citizen!

    What are they thinking? At a bare minimum, Obama and Factcheck are at least guilty of false advertising and consumer fraud. At the level that it should be, Obama has broken several Federal laws governing the behavior of public servants. The act of forgery and fraud is clearly spelled out in them in Title 18 PI CH47 of the U.S. Code.”

    Clearly Dr. PHD is upset that all his hard work was for nothing.

  6. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 25, 2009 at 7:52 pm #

    But of course, Barrack Obama is a US Citizen. No fraud, no foul.

    They used to say of Republicans (fairly or not) prone to infighting: “they eat their young”. That might be said of conspiracy theorists who are not at all tolerant of opposing views, even if outsiders wonder whey they aren’t on the same sides. It’s nice to see the nObots wasting cycles on each other than on us good guys.