On March 1, 2008, a message appeared at the Free Republic forum1:
I was told today that Obama swore in on a Koran for his Senate seat. I do not believe he did. Can someone clarify this for me? I am under the impression only a Congressman has so far sworn in on a Koran.
…Also that Obama’s mother gave birth to him overseas and then immediately flew into Hawaii and registered his birth as having taken place in Hawaii.Again, any clarifications on this? Defintely disqualifies him for Prez. There must be some trace of an airticket. While small babies are not charged air fare they do have a ticket issued for them.
Long time ago but there may be some residual information somewhere. Good ammo (if available and true) BEST USED AFTER he becomes PREZ (if that occurs) and it’s too late for Dems – except accept the VP.
And from that sprang tweets, emails, speeches, town meetings, web sites, citizen grand juries, media coverage, lawsuits and ballot challenges—all claiming that Barack Obama could not legally be president of the United States because of the facts of his birth. The proponents of these theories came to be called “birthers.” In the 6 years since that original forum post, the alternate biography of Barack Obama has taken many twists and turns, but there are four main ideas as to why Barack Obama cannot be president:
- The allegation that Obama was born outside the United States
- The allegation that Obama’s non-citizen father makes him ineligible
- The allegation that Obama lost his citizenship as a child
- The allegation that Barack Obama failed to register for Selective Service and therefore cannot hold any federal employment
To read more about the validity of these claims, see my collection, “The Debunker’s Guide to Obama Conspiracy Theories.”
In response to Internet rumors that his middle name was “Mohammed,” the Obama campaign released a copy of his birth certificate in June of 2008 (showing his middle name is “Hussein”).
Nevertheless, a growing number of people began to believe the rumors, particularly among Hillary Clinton supporters, and it was not until a Clinton supporter found the 1961 Honolulu newspaper notice of Obama’s birth that this group largely abandoned birther theories. However, one Clinton supporter, attorney Philip J. Berg, continued to promote these theories, and filed a lawsuit in federal court (Berg v. Obama et al.) to prevent Barack Obama from running for office.
The Berg lawsuit popularized many of the main features of “born in Africa” birtherism, including an edited audio recording, in which Obama’s step grandmother in Kenya says through a translator that she “was present when he was born.” The full version of the audio recording makes it plain that she was not saying Barack Obama was born in Kenya, but many only heard the edited version. For more on the importance of Philip Berg’s lawsuit, see my article “We all came out of Berg’s Suit.” The Berg lawsuit (and its successors) were dismissed.23
A major component of the “born in Africa” theory is an attack on Barack Obama’s birth certificate, the official state-issued computer abstract birth certificate, the “Certification of Live Birth.” A number of non-credentialed Internet researchers declared the birth certificate a phony, but no authority has agreed.
During the 2012 presidential campaign, maybe candidate Donald Trump generated significant media attention to his questions about Obama’s birth, claiming to have sent investigators to Hawaii. No results of that investigation were ever published, but the White House did respond by releasing the so-called long form birth certificate from Hawaii, containing additional details, including the name the doctor who delivered Obama and the name of the hospital where he was born.
The long-form birth certificate was released by the White House as a PDF document, and again non-credentialed Internet researchers declared it a fake, again no authority has agreed.
The second prong of objection to Obama’s legitimacy is based on the fact that his father, Barack Obama Sr., was not a US Citizen. The theory, created by New Jersey attorney Leo C. Donofrio, says that the phrase “natural born citizen” in the Article II constitutional requirements for the President, means someone who was born in the US to two US citizen parents. Those who hold this legal theory largely base it on an 18th century legal treatise titled in English, The Law of Nations, by a Swiss jurist named Emerich de Vattel. While all the courts that have looked at this question deny any parental requirement for US Presidents, Donofrio’s theory is widely held by birthers to this day.
The third objection deals with Obama’s residence in Indonesia from age 6 – 10. The theory says that Obama was adopted by his Indonesian step-father Lolo Soetoro, and that by the action of Indonesian law Obama became an Indonesian citizen and no longer an American citizen. The theory is largely based on a school registration form from an Indonesian school where Obama’s nationality is listed as “Indonesian” and his surname “Soetoro.” No other documentation suggesting an adoption has been cited, nor any Indonesian law found that would permit Obama to become an Indonesian citizen, nor US law that would permit a minor to renounce his citizenship. President Obama, and the US State