“Inspector” Lucas Smith claimed in comments on YouTube to have examined all newspaper birth announcements from August through December of 1961, not finding the birth announcement of the Nordyke twins (born at the same hospital as President Obama, one day later). Whether not finding was through oversight or fraud, the birth announcement is there in the newspaper on August 16 (Obama’s announcement was on August 13).
Birthers have attempted to discredit the Obama birth announcement claiming, against testimony of the newspaper and the Hawaii Department of Health that such announcements came from the department, that anyone could place such an “ad”. The very newspaper heading does not say “Birth Announcements” but rather “Health Bureau Statistics” if anyone needed further confirmation of what the announcements are. If a contemporary birth were omitted, then one would ask how, if the Health Department submitted the announcements, could one be omitted. It turns out that the objection is a fake, because the announcement is there just as it should be according to official policy. This announcement, just as the original Obama announcement, was found and published by an industrious blogger.
The Nordyke announcement is at the bottom of the column.
It’s a Photoshop job. (IA)
the conspiracy continues to grow …
And a damned good one!
But seriously, finding something that should exist according to all evidence, is not extraordinary, and one is not too remiss taking such on face value. The important thing is that the announcement is now easily verified, since we know where to look.
Wow doctor a give you A+++!
Another “surprise” for Lucas Smith. He told me the Nordyke announcement was not in the papers! Of course I didn’t believe him, but I couldn’t prove it.
If this announcement is result of automated process, they it would certianly give more credibility to following media clip.
OBama – How he got his birth announcement in the paper
This theory has yet to be proven or disproven because neither the State of Hawaii nor Obama will release the derivative of Obama’s COLB.
john,john, stop with the BS! the least credible news source on the net is WND!
LMAO! The “retired military commander” has PTSD. He basically made things up as he went along with no factual basis. His entire contention about method of birth registration was pure fabrication. WMD indeed.
But WND sells great miracle seeds that will grow a vegetable garden in only 3 sq ft!! Act now before Obama confiscates your property.
What Charles presents, we have no idea on whether it’s true or not. Not until, we see Obama’s derivative of his COLB, that is his long-form birth certificate. I guess Obots and Birthers can advance as many theories as they want but without the long-form birth certificate we really have no idea of which theory is the truth.
Except for dumb birthers there are no theories, Obama has been president for a year now, time for john to find other BS to cling to, this birther thing is over!
This is a little off topic, but I am wondering how many on this board supported the parents of Terri Schiavo in 2005. I strongly supported the parent’s position in that case and believe the court were dead wrong. I have seen that many birthers seem to be constistent in their conservative positions as the Terri Schiavo of 2005 was a deep conservative and liberal issue in 2005 and that many birthers supported the parents of Terri Schiavo. However, I am willing to bet that many if not all on this board probably supported the husband and courts in the Terri Schiavo case of 2005. This would be constitent with liberal supportive views regarding Obama’s eligiblity problem.
“… with liberal supportive views regarding Obama’s eligiblity problem.”
john there is no need to prove you are an A___hole, we all already know that!
by the way what did you think of the Schiavo autopsy? The one showing her brain was mulch that meant her life was over fo a long time. Her brain was dead!
I guess Obama would rather to perpetuate the Birther movement then think about ways of putting people back to work:
$10,000, no $15,000 for proof of Obama’s birth hospital
WND founder offers donation to facility on presidential records
I think $15,000 dollars could really help out the hospital.
$15,000 could be substanial help for the hsopital in setting a nice Obama memorial wing or section to honor Obama’s birth. Obama would be proud. The only reason for the refusal is that Obama was not born there:
15,000 is nothing to a hospital.
Kapiolani Hosptital only maintains records for 30 years as prescribed by Hawaiian law, Birth records are State Documents (not maintained by the hospital). Obama’s BC is the same type as my daughter who was born at Kapiolani in 1965. Her souvenir Hospital BC was rejected by US Passport people, she had to get the “short” form that State of Hawaii currently issues. Go back to WND where you can feel safe and delusional and don’t forget WND’s best columnist Chuck Norris believes the Earth is only 6,000 years old which is really strange considering Papyrus was used for writing way before that! Next you will tell us dinosaurs walked with man (as Norris did)
It certainly does not give it any more credibility. I suppose it doesn’t give it any less credibility (than it already had)–that is, there’s nothing in this information that actually contradicts this guy’s theory. But “not contradicting” is a far cry from “supporting.” It’s still nothing but pure speculation.
It’s pretty obvious at this point (if it wasn’t already) that what you guys have done is start with the conclusion that Obama must not be eligible, and then twisting anything you can find into support for the conclusion. It’s not convincing to anyone but yourselves.
Side comment: I consider the fact that I immediately knew who the Nordyke twins were, and what was the significance of their birth announcement, to be a sign that I’ve been lurking here waaaaay too much. How many people in the world would have known that?
“Chuck Norris believes the Earth is only 6,000 years old which is really strange considering Papyrus was used for writing way before that! Next you will tell us dinosaurs walked with man”
Palin believes it too. This just in: the earth is flat, and Palin’s church has protected her against witches.
When I was getting ready to drive back to Philly, one minister in Palin’s church wanted to baptize me, “if you’re killed on the way back, you’ll spend eternity in the torments of Hell.” I replied nothing will happen. Chevrolet protected me. Or was it the Buddhist amulet hanging from my rear view mirror?
I had a Buddhist prayer for a traveler hanging from the mirror, which my wife gave me. When that minister saw it, he went ballistic.
For some reason I actually feel like answering this question–I suppose the whole thing can go into that off-topic comment dump.
I’m a political Independent, and I wasn’t paying very close attention to politics in 2004. I feel a bit guilty about that, and feel that I really should have been paying attention, but there it is.
I was aware of the Schiavo case, and that there was a controversy about it. I thought it was a damn shame that anyone ever has to make a heart-wrenching decision like that, and a further damn shame that it can cause so many bad feelings within families. Beyond that, it was none of my business or anyone else’s. I assumed the courts would work it out, since that after all is their job.
The congressional action caught me totally by surprise. My first, and lasting, reaction was “What the hell is Congress doing getting involved with something like that?” I know that just goes to show how out of touch I really was, but I think that reaction wasn’t that uncommon.
That was one of the events (not the only one) that convinced me that the Republican party had gone out of its collective mind, and led to my vote for Obama.
I’ve never considered myself much of a liberal, but by your lights I suppose I must be. Your position seems to be that anyone who thinks Obama is the legitimate president must be a liberal.
Prove your own point. Why don’t you post your own BC?
The courts were correct: it was a matter between her and her spouse. This is not a theocracy, which Palin and her crowd want it to be.
“In his second term as a Congressman, Anderson introduced a constitutional amendment that would “recognize the law and authority of Jesus Christ” over the United States.”
Doc you need a new class of Birther Troll. This John isn’t even trying. Reinsert him in the Matrix. Fake Kenyan BC indeed.
Of course we know which is the truth. It is an irrefutable fact that Obama was born in Hawaii. The governor of Hawaii and the director of the Department of Health in Hawaii both confirmed that fact. The Nordyke twins’ birth announcement is just one more nail in the coffin of nirtherism.
John,John, John. Why the snark? The announcement is there. It comes not from Grandma or Grandpa but from the folks who collect Vital Statistics from the hospitals. Get over this John. It is done. He was born in Hawaii.
I thought her mother was treated badly. While I believed and now know the medical conclusions about her condition was correct, I also know as a mom that not one person could convince me of what I believed not to be true about one of my children. The husband should have shown grace and mercy to her mom. I never liked him even though I thought he was right about the facts.
John it is over.
“Palin believes it too. This just in: the earth is flat, and Palin’s church has protected her against witches.”
They actually hanged witches in the colonies; Birthers would love to go back there. They also jailed and beat Baptists and Catholics. Those were the good old days when religion was the foundation of government. Great place for whip and chain sellers!
Any true conservative would not have gotten involved in the case, as the issue was a private matter between the husband, the parents and the courts. That any Republican politician, let alone the president, got involved in this case by passing legislation specifically targeting it is proof that they have no interest in advocating small government unless it benefits them politically or financially.
Well, I wouldn’t go so far as to say the evidence is irrefutable that Obama was born in Hawaii, but the evidence is so strong that it would take something really powerful and direct to cast doubt on it. Something like a BOAC passenger manifest from Aug. 1961 showing “Mr. & Mrs. Barack Obama & infant” departing Nairobi. Or a Customs & Immigration document showing baby Obama entering the U.S. But the birfers have little desire to tear themselves from their computer screens and do actual research; whenever they have, it has been detrimental to the birfer cause, as are the Nordyke birth listings.
I supported neither Schaivo’s parents nor her husband (though the autopsy proved the husband was correct), but I thought the idea of Congress sticking its nose into the affairs of a single family in a tragedy was obscene beyond belief. Not to mention the cost to taxpayers of Bush flying back to Washington to sign the legislation (ever heard of FedEx?) And Bill Frist diagnosing a patient he had never examined (something you learn in the first week of Med School) was nothing but a joke.
Nevertheless, your digression points out an indisputable truth about the birthers. Every single one is 100% opposed to evry single position Obama favors. If the birthers were really motivated, as they claim, by the eligibility issue, there would be at least a reasonable sub-group who could say with a straight face, “I support Obama on most of the issues, I just wish there weren’t questions regarding his birth.” But in fact, you can’t show me a single pro-Obama-on-the-issues birthers. The fact that they seriously try to argue (despite the crystal clear language in the Constitution) that there is any possible successor if Obama were removed other than Biden is a dead giveaway. John, if you are honest, you will admit that the birthers started from, “I hate Obama,” and went looking for “facts” (i.e., making things up) in the hope (hopeless) of overturning a free and fair election.
I’m not sure that would cover the HIPPA violation and state privacy law litigation they’d trigger, or the employee’s salary once he/she was fired for releasing it. It’s easy for WND to make those empty gestures since they know no one will risk a career and come forth.
It used to be Rupublicans valued personal privacy (even if they didn’t find it in the Constitution). All that went out the political window.
$15,000 doesn’t even get you on the brass plaque in the lobby. The wing will set you back millions.
It wouldn’t come close to covering the HIPAA violation:
Covered entities and specified individuals, as explained below, whom “knowingly” obtain or disclose individually identifiable health information in violation of the Administrative Simplification Regulations face a fine of up to $50,000, as well as imprisonment up to one year. Offenses committed under false pretenses allow penalties to be increased to a $100,000 fine, with up to five years in prison. Finally, offenses committed with the intent to sell, transfer, or use individually identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm permit fines of $250,000, and imprisonment for up to ten years.
So, John, do you have $250,000 and 10 years of your life to give up for the cause?
C’mon John. Post YOUR BC. What are you hiding? I know – you were born on the Vermont/Ontario border.
You can’t fool me.
“BOAC passenger manifest”
Bring Over American Cash (bada-bing)
“So, John, do you have $250,000 and 10 years of your life to give up for the cause?”
Of course he does not. They are all just a motley crew of armchair warriors.
Here’s one for John: have you personally patrolled a kibbutz perimeter, all night long, with an Uzi? I’m waiting.
“$15,000 doesn’t even get you on the brass plaque in the lobby.”
That plaque starts at $1M. $15K gets you a handshake.
When my mother died, I went through her house. I found the hospital bill from my birth, $15, and…
(look the other way)
my mother’s diaphram (!)
Jews are a wild bunch – especially the NY crowd.
Last time I checked, there was some question as to whether HIPAA covered information collected before the Privacy Rule went into effect. I think generally health care facilities and workers assume that it does apply just to be safe. I cannot see how a physician who retired before the Privacy Rule went to into effect could be considered a covered entity under HIPAA, but professional ethics would prevent disclosure.
I’ve personally had to make that decision in the case of my mother. It was clear that she was not going to recover, and her own wishes were also clear. She lived maybe a half an hour after they turned off the ventilator. I held her hand, trying to keep it warm. I sang a hymn for her. You know, I have never understood the conservative Christian view of keeping people breathing who are in effect already dead. They seem to be devoid of the hope that is at the core of their religion.
I assumed anyone hanging out here is hard core enough to know who Nordyke was. But speaking about some of the trivia I carry with me, I find myself saying, “I know things that people really shouldn’t know.” I mean, how many lawyers, even, have heard of Lynch v. Clarke much less that it was 1844?
And you were probably right. I hope you didn’t take that as an implied criticism, because it certainly wasn’t meant to be. It just struck me as kind of funny–why do I even know that?
I’ve learned all kinds of stuff here. Obscure bits of Hawaiian state law, birth certificate procedures, who Vattel is, old court cases that even my lawyer brother has probably never heard of, you name it. It’s been an interesting ride.
No, it definitely covers information collected prior to its effective date. It has had a significant impact on retrospective chart reviews, a key type of clinical research.
The hospital would be at risk if it allowed the information to become public. If it actively participated in its becoming public, they could face criminal charges. If they were simply negligent in allowing the information, they could face civil fines, starting at $100, and going up to $500,000 depending on the severity of the breach.
if a child would have been born at home would the vital stats people collect this info also ? or would grandpa and grandma then provide this info
I agree about the government intervention in this family matter. I was with a younger brother, who died of melanoma at 32. Decisions are difficult for everyone. My mom wanted to continue treatment even when it meant continuing with no hope and, of course, suffering. She just wanted her child to survive and never, despite facts, ever believed that there was no hope. She read about this person and that who lived because of this treatment or that. I know how we treated my mom in this situation. I will always feel that the husband could have and should have shown mercy and grace to his wife’s mother.
chufho chews over, deeply:
what if spartacus had a piper cub?
try to answer
Soetoro/Obama was registered in a public school as an Indonesian citizen by the name of Barry Soetoro and his father was listed as Lolo Soetoro, M.A. Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s, and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education) – ** it does not say all children are entitled to an education, it specifies “all citizens” **. The Indonesian school record, indicates that Soetoro/Obama’s name is “Barry Soetoro;” his nationality is “Indonesia” and his father “Lolo Soetoro, M.A. There was no way for Soetoro/Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia was under tight rule and was a Police State. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Law No. 62 of 1958. These facts indicate that Obama/Soetoro is an Indonesian citizen, and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States.
prima facie evidence
Adaption papers not inference prove adaption. Let me give you other facts. 1.Under Islam adapted children do not receive the name of their adapted parent. The prophet Mohammed, spoke against that WESTERN custom, and instead wanted the child to be part of their birth family. People do adapt but it is more of a foster child relationship. I believe the late King of Jordan adapted a child and she always retained her family name and her identity as a member of her birth family. 2. Adults cannot by their action deprive an American child of their citizenship. 3. I see no statement in the laws you cite that expressly forbids forein students from attending school. 4. I personally know folks who as children used the name of a step-parent who never legally adapted them. You must produce formal evidence of an adaption. You have not. What Soetero was saying was that President Obama was his natural child which he was not.
Oh, recently a story appeared of a young man who had survived the gas bombing of a Kurdish village during Sadam Hussein’s regime. The young man( then an infant) was found alive and taken to live with an Iranian family. Since they could not identify his family he used their name but they NEVER stopped looking for his family-the family they regarded as truly his. Everyone was overjoyed when he was identified through genetic evidence as belonging to a particular family. That family, newly found, was now HIS family and THEIR name his. Different cultures view adaption and its effects differently. That may be why adults cannot make decisions for American children that would rob them of their citizenship.
skirting the issue is simple finding the facts seems to have you all scared to death
Myth busted. Again.
The uppity negro is still your President.
130 million votes
62 court victories (and growing)
the 44th President of the United States
It seems to me that we’re not the ones afraid of the facts.
Why would I be scared when the evidence consistently shows you to be wrong and deluded? You are not dealing with Western culture here or its and your understanding of adaption and what it means. Again, produce a court record of adaption. If you do not have that you have nothing. Scared, no. Amused and sad that you insist on going on with this fantasy. Yes, I plead guilty to being amused and sad for you. But aside from that it is important to answer with an something other than a remark about someones state of mind. Where is the certificate or court record of an adaption? Produce it for us. Let’s see it.
“try to answer”
Actually, I think he had a Cessna 152.
This does NOT mean that non-citizens are prohibited from getting an education.
Though obviously elementary logic escapes you. I’ll bet you are not so good at math, either, since you apparently believe that if 2+2=4, then the answer to 1+3 must be something else entirely.
What we have here is a perfect example of the pathology of a belief system.
Belief has been entirely separated from the question of truth, verifiability, etc. Indeed, the pathology is reinforced the more truth you throw at it, because it is like a paranoid delusion. It’s strengthened by resistance to contradictory evidence.
The birther delusion achieves greater degree of success than some other types because it serves as wish-fulfillment for those people.
See “Indonesian Policies toward the Chinese Minority under the New Order” by Leo Suryadinata, Asian Survey, Vol. 16, No. 8 (Aug., 1976), pp. 770-787
The decision to let the Chinese establish SNPCs was based on various political considerations. After the closing of Chinese-medium schools [in 1965], some alien Chinese were eager to send their children to Indonesian schools. However places in these schools were limited andpriority was given to Indonesian citizens.
Foreign students were allowed at Indonesian schools, priority was given to citizens!
The citations here do not prove either that foreigners were excluded from public schools or that the name or citizenship status were checked with the government.
You don’t have a right to drive a car. It’s a privilege. Does that mean you cannot drive a car? Aliens did not have a right to attend school in Indonesia. That does not mean they couldn’t attend school in Indonesia.
The Constitution in Indonesia still says that citizens have a right to attend school, yet birthers never argue that foreigners cannot now attend public schools in Indonesia.
The Indonesian school record, indicates that Soetoro/Obama’s name is “Barry Soetoro;” his nationality is “Indonesia” and his father “Lolo Soetoro, M.A.
Asian Law Digest, Indonesian Law section 4.02:
Regional identity cards, family identity cards, birth certificates or official reports regarding taking of oath of allegiance to Indonesia are sufficient evidence to prove Indonesian citizenship.
Notice anything missing there? Something that isnotlisted as sufficient evidence to prove Indonesian citizenship?
Yeah. That’s right. If Barry Soetoro took his school application to the Indonesian passport office they wouldn’t issue him a passport. He couldn’t sign up to be in the Indonesian little league! He couldn’t get into the Indonesian military.
The school application is not sufficient evidence to prove Indonesian citizenship – according to the laws of Indonesia
Is there anything in the Constitution that says that someone cannot also be the citizen of another country?
Here’s a clue. When we’re talking about a US President and whether he’s eligible under the US Constitution, you should first look at US law!
US law says that even if Obama became an Indonesian citizen at age 6, he did not lose his US citizenship.
Perkins v. Elg – Citizenship cannot be taken away based upon an act committed by another person. Your theory states that because of Obama’s parent’s actions, Obama’s citizenship was taken away. This goes directly against this.
Afroyim v. Rusk – Citizenship cannot be taken away without the consent of the person. Again, confirming Perkins v. Elg. Your theory is that a 6-year-old can form the legal consent neccessary to satify Afroyim.
Vance v. Terrazas – The act must be committed with explicitly the intent of taking away citizenship. The evidence of this must be seperate from the fact that he just committed the act. You have no evidence that Barack Obama ever intended to give up his citizenship. Your theory has the potential act itself as the evidence, which it is not.
Indonesian law may, or may not have considered Obama a citizen, but the United States doesn’t care. He was still a natural born citizen.
The photograph of Barry’s 2nd grade school record at a private school was taken in 2007 before his records could be sealed. If you’ve ever transferred a child to a different school, the first thing the new school will want is a copy of the complete record from the prior school.
How is it the private school, using the application from the father and records from Barry’s 1st grade, was able to correctly identify Barry’s place of birth and incorrectly list his nationality? And if their record keeping was so sloppy, why did they keep the record for 40 years?
And if you got a problem with xenophobia, why doesn’t Barry open up his complete passport record to inspection. An extensive history file will be kept on a minor traveling and living outside the U.S.
Don’t you think that Hillary, a lawyer, and McCain exhausted all the resources to beat Obama?.. or maybe it was a cover up involving, the “REPUBLICAN” gov. of Hawaii, Lingle, Congress, SCOTUS, all the federal agencies, also Obama’s family knew he was going to be president someday.. yeah must be that.
Birthers IQ = doorknob
I debunked this theory back in February of 2009 in my article:
While it has no bearing on our case, since President Obama was born in a hospital, the primary responsibility for reporting a home birth falls on the attendant at the birth (if that person were a medical professional–MD, nurse midwife), and secondly on the parents otherwise. A registration by a grandparent would have been highly unusual, and I believe would have raised questions: in 1961, there were only 14 home births in all of the city of Honolulu (0.17%), Official statistics for 1961 show zero unattended births; however, that may be the result of a failure to collect the information.
“Birthers IQ = doorknob”
Are you sure? It may actually be a tomato.
Passerby: I hope you didn’t take that as an implied criticism
No, I identified with your remark.
Good morning. I am confirming now that, yes, the Nordkye birth annoucement is listed in the August, 16th 1961 edition of The Honolulu Advertiser. This was confirmed on 01.07.2009 at the California State Library in Sacramento where microfilm going as far back as the 1920s for the said newspaper are on file. I will upload a video presentation soon which documents this finding.
My earlier statement made on youtube, under video comments of the birth certificate video, was in error. I am an objective person and believe that the facts, no matter what direction they lean towards, need to be published and made record of.
My earlier statement was never posted on my main forum page, which is my youtube profile page. The statement was posted on the video comments of the birth certificate video which runs rampant with misinformation and disinformation comments posted 24-7 by Obama supporters (Obots). In no case would I consider the video comments page (now over 9600 comments in length) as a place that should be locked upon as a Lucas Smith blog. I rarely post there and the comments there are supplied mostly (more than 50%) by Obama supporters which entail fabricated evidence, half truths and more outright lies than can be found anywhere else on the Internet regarding the Obama birth certificate factor.
I consider my profile page on Youtube.com/inspectorsmith to be the only true Lucas Daniel Smith blog, or forum, anywhere on the Internet. I caution everyone to please not confuse my profile forum with the video comments page.
Thank you to all.
Lucas Daniel Smith.
I say potato.
How is the kidney for sale business going Lucas?
I wish there was a ventilator I could have had turned off for my mother (cancer victim). Her damn Taurus heart would just not stop even when she didn’t know who she was let alone me.
I’m having some significant surgery at the end of this month (knee replacement). I rest easy, I already have a advanced directive on file with the hospital and my sister has a medical POA and is fully aware of my wishes if the operation would go south for some reason.
Down clicked your post only for the “mulch” comment. Her brain activity had stopped correct though.
Thank you for confirming you are a pathological liar.
I rarely post there and the comments there are supplied mostly (more than 50%) by Obama supporters which entail fabricated evidence
One can only assume that describing yourself as an “objective person” is your way of saying you are a “convicted felon”.
What? Are you saying WND is just to fricking cheap to get the info they want?~ that was snark~
I think the medical and vital records professionals in Hawaii are pretty faithful to its medical privacy and vital records laws. We all saw the letter Obama wrote to Kapiolani Medical Center before they took it off their website. He called it “the place of my birth”. He’s been President for 356 days. If there was any proof he was anyone other than who the preponderance of the evidence says he is, someone would have been able to show it by now.
(Hope you’re recovered Misha!)
And of course you are quite familiar with fabricated evidence, aren’t you Lucas!
Give me a break, it was Indonesia in 1967. On the day little Barry was set to begin school, Lolo walked into the school office and they wrote down what he told them. They simply believed what Lolo told them. Your first clue should be that it is handwritten. Give me a break about transfering and checking the records of a first grader from Hawaii to Indonesia in 1967. You people all creamed yourselves when you saw “Barry Soetoro” on that scrap of paper and you haven’t been able to think straight since.
“An extensive history file”
This one gets another “oh please” from me. Anybody’s passport records consist of application data, and the record of when they exited and entered the United States. It probably doesn’t contain a history of where you were in between because even in the days when every country stamped your passport when you entered and exited, that’s only interesting to Customs and Immigration when you re-enter the country. The Customs agent takes your passport and asks where you’ve been, where you’re coming from and thumbs the passport looking at stamps. He doesn’t necessarily record this information. Even when you need to get a visa to enter a particular country, you get that visa from the issuing country. US State isn’t advised you’ve gotten a visa. I don’t know why you people aren’t asking for Obama’s Interpol records instead. That’s what you need if you want to see what countries he visited when he was outside the US.
Hope it goes well and all progress is nothing but North! Do your therapy diligently! I had two neighbors who had knee replacements in August. One did her rehab religiously, the other not so much. By September, the one was out walking a mile each day. Even today, the other one who filched on her rehab is still using a cane.
[“the one” and “the other one” not to be confused with “The One” and “That one”!]
I remember in particular when they revealed that the autopsy reports showed she was completely blind and would have had no reaction to anyone in the room, it was all reflexes. It reminded me how sometimes we want so badly to believe our loved one might be the miracle we’ll see what we want to see. I felt quite badly for the husband who the parents and their supporters smeared so effectively. When the husband spoke, it was clear he loved Terry and sincerely thought he was trying to do what she wanted. These issues are painful enough when families disagree, it is horrible when they are dragged out into the public square.
Those felony and misdemeanor convictions are the result of a liberal conspiracy.
Just like Agnew. When the story first broke, he said it was a conspiracy to destroy him, by the media and liberals. Yeah, right.
Lucas: who is Orly schtupping this week?
In my travels, the immigraton guy asks for my passport, stamps & intials it then says “next” to get to the next person in line. How can this be translated into “extensive travel records”. Only in the deluded brain of a birther. Or maybe that guy has a fantastic memory and records your travel info later, Sure dipsh_t!
One gets the impression that most birthers have never traveled outside the United States. The idea that the State Department has an extensive file on the foreign travel of Americans is exaggerated. When I flew into Rome in 1999, I didn’t even have to stop at customs or immigration. All passengers went to baggage claim and then we were waved through to the airport exit. On another trip to Europe I flew into Germany, spent some time in Switzerland and flew home from Paris. There is no record of me entering or leaving Switzerland. At the Zurich border the Swiss glanced at my passport but didn’t scan it or stamp it; I didn’t even have to stop at the French border because it was open.
And as you pointed out, the stamping of passports is very inconsistent. I was in Barcelona in 2000, but you’d never know it from looking at my passport.
Yep. Exactly as you say, they don’t seem to have first hand experience with entering or leaving this country or any other. They don’t realize once you’re in the EU, they only glance at your passport.No stamping. That when you re-enter this country no one records where you were. I suspect most of them don’t have passports anyway. They don’t seem to know what documentation is acceptable for getting one. What we need are Obama’s interpol records 😉
Thanks for dropping by. I’m always glad to hear from the folks who make the news in our little corner of the Internet.
In other words, Mr. Smith sometimes posts careless lies in the comments section on his page. In the profile section, on the other hand, he only posts well-crafted lies.
No doubt Interpol was keeping a close eye on the six-year-old’s movements!
You are lying. You are confirming now that you saw the ad in a California library trying to appear like an “innocent person” who just found out. You told ME you looked from Aug to Dec 1961 and the Nordyke birth announcement were not in the newspaper.
You are confirming nothing because it was ME who found out the evidence here and I posted it on your video. It was ME who posted yesterday that you were lying or needed glasses because you didn’t found the Nordyke birth announcements. I even posted the address for you to look at the copy of the Honolulu Advertizer with the Nordyke birth announcement.
“I rarely post there and the comments there are supplied mostly (more than 50%) by Obama supporters which entail fabricated evidence, half truths and more outright lies than can be found anywhere else on the Internet regarding the Obama birth certificate factor.”
“Entail fabricated evidence” “half truth”
Hypocrite! What about your “fabricated” Kenyan bc that you were trying to sell on Ebay? Your stupid fake “Kenyan video” with light skin people? ( from the Caribbean or S. America)Do you think people are stupid? Why don’t you post a copy of your round trip to Kenya, as evidence you went there?
You fell in your own trap birther!
lucas knows his customers are.
Sarina, the birthers actually do think people are stupid…You have to be in order to believe in their ridiculous theories…
Whether or not you view the comments section as a “Lucas Smith blog”, you did personally claim that you had looked through every single newspaper from August through December of 1961 and there was nothing there. It was you that typed that, not another YouTube user nor an “Obot” posing as you. You personally posted what was basically a blatant lie, regardless of whether it was posted on your “official blog” or not.
What part of “the citizenship of a minor child cannot be affected by the parents action” don’t you, and the faithful to Orly, understand?
Obama’s mother could have moved to Moscow and accepted Russian citizenship for her and her children without effecting Obama’s “natural born citizen” status.
The part that has to do with ending welfare by pay pal. The old saying “There’s a sucker born every minute” applies here.
Exactly. Did you know Nixon was born with a 5 o’clock shadow?
Mario wrote: “The Weimar Republic and the Soviet Union both had perfectly good Constitutioons and they were no barrier to totalitarianism.
The question is what happened in those constitutional societies to allow totalitarianism to take control? What institutions in those societies did not do their job to allow that to happen?”
It won’t happen here because we never had a president named Schiklgruber, nor named Dzhugashvili.
Actually it’s aboout the same as a box of rocks.
dont you have to fill out a form before you land in a foreign country with all your vitals such as why where and when
I understand Dr., I myself was in the same situation with my father.It was not in anyway easy. But a better place waits us all.
“why doesn’t Barry open up his complete passport record ”
There isn’t such a thing as passport record! The only place you can see where he has been is to look at his passport & see the visa stamps. There is no other record. My guess is that Whitman never traveled and has no passport just dumb sh_t talking points.
I want to see Barry’s certified copy of his passport record.
“My face is my passport”- Vladimir Horowitz
“I want to see Barry’s certified copy of his passport record.”
why? a non citizen can’t get a passport!
Do you have his notarized consent? A death certificate? Proof of guardianship? A court order?
If not, you’re out of luck!
I admit- I am stumped. What on earth does the Terry Schiavo case have to do with President Obama?
Of course I had an opinion but what does it have to do with presidential eligibility?
“his father “Lolo Soetoro, M.A.”
Do you think that Lolo Soetoro was his actual father? That is the glaring thing to me- that Soetoro was declared his father, which seems like it was done purely for expediency.
Anyway, seems like just another stretch in the multiple theories of why President Obama should not have been eligible to be president. Wish you folks would be honest enough to say that you are just looking for a theory- any theory- that will discredity the President. A person with one whacko theory they truly believed in, I might be able to believe their sincerity- advocating half a dozen theories hoping one of them might be true is just promoting your anti-Obama agenda.
Sven, if you can tell us what other President’s passport records you have seen, we would then see where your request makes sense. Or if you could show us how the President’s passport records matter in regards to the only requirements for President spelled out in the Constutution. I remember it requiring that a President be over 35, live in the US for 14 years,and be a NBC. I don’t remember it stating that the President had to have a passport and it should be inspected by the public. What are you hoping to find? That he does not have one? That he visited Kenya sometime before he stated that he did in his book? That he traveled before he moved to Indonesia? Or that he secretly visited Afganistan in the 1980’s and was a member of Al Queida and was friends with Osama?
Even as a pathological delusion, I don’t get that one.
If Obama has a US passports (which he does), then he is a US citizen.
What does it matter which country he visited? Are we back to Clinton being a KGB mole?
“Are we back to Clinton being a KGB mole?”
Worse. We’re heading back to John Birch stuff with the birthers. They’re still around, in an Appleton, Wisconsin basement.
Hmmmmm? Only citizens have U.S. passports? Are you sure?
blah, blah, blah … bunch o’stuff from the State Department and then …
If a person believes he or she is eligible under the law as a non-citizen national of the United States and the person complies with the provisions of 8 USC 1452(b)(1) and (2), he/she may apply for a passport at any Passport Agency in the United States.
It’s all explained here:
which states that “very few persons fall within this category” and none of the categories described apply to Obama.
It could apply to Obama. See if you can follow this theory …
Lolo and Stanley Ann marry in Hawaii. Lolo adopts BO II. As with the divorce between Stanley Ann and BO Sr., BO Sr. does not respond to a Family Court summons.
During the adoption process, BO II has his name legally changed to Barry Soetoro with a new BC created. BO II’s BC is sealed. Stanley Ann Soetoro and Barry Soetoro apply for US Passports under their new names.
Lolo leaves for Indonesia without Stanley Ann and Barry because Indonesia will not allow entry for people with a passport less than 6 months old. Lolo uses the marriage license and adoption papers to begin the process of naturalizing Stanley Ann and Barry to Indonesian citizenship.
After a few years, the marriage begins to fail. A family friend takes Barry to the US Embassy in Jakarta and tells embassy personnel Barry has been abandoned or orphaned with a US citizen grandmother in Hawaii. After confirming his grandmother is a US citizen and that she’ll agree to take responsibility for Barry, the US State Department expedites travel documents for Barry as an Indonesian Refugee and escorts him back to Hawaii.
Between parties at his 10 year class Reunion, BO Sr attends a Family Court hearing to contest Barry’s adoption. The court agrees to void Barry’s adoption and changes his name back to BO II.
Barry’s Indonesian citizenship is voided, as well. BO II is stateless. He is a US National without citizenship who is capable of obtaining a US Passport.
what an imagination you have to dream up such an impossible situation. An Idonesion adoption follows muslim guidelines, the child’s name remains as birth fathers name (Obama) so now show us proof of adoption. Just vote against him in 2012 no need to make up crap!
Which, according to Perkins v. Elg and Afroyim v. Rusk, does nothing to change Obama’s United States citizenship.
In order to get to court, you have to plead a case. And you have to show facts that plausibly suggest what you’re alleging. It’s not enough that the facts are consistent with the story.
You’ve got a tiny set of facts which are consistent with an infinite set of explanations. Wake me up when you’ve got a fact that suggests your conspiracy.
What if a person travelled in space at speeds approaching the speed of light? According to Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, time slows down realtive to time on a slower moving body such as Earth. That person could pass 10 Earth years in a single year. Then, what if, at the Earth age of 35 they were elected President? From the frame of reference of their space travel, they are only 26. Are they eligible?
Other than that the US laws and precedent indicate that you are wrong and other than that there is NO supporting evidence, you do have a good point.
Well, not really…
where do birthers come up with this stuff? They’re not even trying to keep one foot in reality any more.
Hey, Scientist, have we calculated what age Obama is using Einstein’s theory of special relativity? We know that Obama has taken lots of plane trips – for example, his trip to Afghanistan. Relativistic effects are felt even at relatively (forgive the pun) low speeds – albeit in extremely small amounts. Assuming most of Obama’s travel was in the Boeing 767, which has a cruising speed of 461 knots, how many flights would it take to make Obama ineligible – relativistically?
Roughly speaking, about 10 trillion flights. Nevertheless, I’d rate the odds of him being ineligible on those grounds about equal to those of Sven’s theories (or any other birther theories) being true.
Possible? Of course its possible.
It was also possible that GW Bush was actually born in Norway and smuggled into the United States by George Senior’s gardner and then George Senior bribed the hospital into reporting that the birth took place there and slipped Barbara something to make her forget that she never gave birth to George Jr. and then they just covered everything else up. I mean it is possible. It is possible that Ronald Reagan was a Soviet sleeper agent. It is possible. It is possible that Ann Coulter is an alien life form.
Almost any whacky theory that you spin in your head is possible Sven. Just because you it is possible doesn’t mean anyone is obligated to notice it, or take any time disproving it.
Provide some proof or just admit this is all just fiction intended to harm the President and the United States.
“From the frame of reference of their space travel, they are only 26. Are they eligible?”
What is that in dog years?
“Roughly speaking, about 10 trillion flights.”
Well, according to the scenarios spun by the denialists, it is entirely plausible.
Hercules is the son of Zeus and a human woman. Why not Obama?
They come up with it because they will not have this man as their President, period. As each theory is shot down they move to another. As they continue on their theories become more and more fanciful. It won’t stop. They are pathological about this. They cannot and will not stop themselves. Poor babies.
Nice job, Dick. Keep up the good work!
I’m unimpressed with the theory BO Sr. shows up in Barry’s life after 10 years of ignoring him emotionally and financially and Madelyn welcomes BO Sr. when he can work it into his social schedule.
Unless, Madelyn needed something from Senior. A complaint from Senior stating he did not consent to the Soetoro adoption would hit the reset button for Barry.
Unfortunately, as you thoughtfully pointed out, it leaves BHO stateless and unqualified to be POTUS.
Sven, Dick, do you want to rewrite the Constitution? Maybe you should go found your own country. In this country, under this Constitution, a 6-10 year-old cannot have his citizenship stripped away from him by the actions of a third person. This is true if we’re talking about adoption, acknowledgement, or whatever. This is true whether we’re talking about Indonesian citizenship, or Kenyan, or British or the Galactic Empire.
There’s a word for people who like to strip children. It’s not patriot!
sven, fluffing his own sockpuppet:
and birfers call obama narcissistic!
in the end, all they have is projection.
Sven/Dick, I guess you have decided to bring back a variation of your infamous “Indonesian refugee status” theory….It didn’t make sense then and it doesn’t now…Mainly because you neglect to take into consideration the Perkins v Elg ruling…
Nice job, Dick. Keep up the good work!”
Good night – Sven is sending notes to himself. That’s really out there.
You’ll be reading about his breakdown soon.
I see the light now! Obama is his own father as per Robert Heinlein’s ALL YOU ZOMBIES.
Thank you, Sven. Your comment is appreciated.
Hey, Sven, did you know anyone, and I mean anyone, can renounce their US citizenship?
Yes, even a 6-year-old can renounce his citizenship.
What’s that? You’re concerned a 6-year-old would be under duress or incapable of understanding what renouncing their US citizenship entails. Is that your concern, Sven?
Well, Sven, the State Department Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) has a special set of procedures devised to ensure a minor is not being exploited or manipulated when they renounce their US citizenship. There are numerous protections available only to a minor who renounces his citizenship.
Do you understand, Sven? Anyone can renounce their US citizenship under the right circumstances. If anyone ever tells you a minor cannot renounce their citizenship, then they have an agenda separate from you and are trying to manipulate you.
Remember, Sven, any US citizen can renounce their US citizenship. Even a 6-year-old.
As you pointed out- technically, legally its possible for a 6 year old to denounce his U.S. Citizenship.
Can you post one example of a 6 year old successfully doing so?
I am no Consulor officer, but having been the proud parent of a 6 year old at one time, and having spent large amounts of time at our elementary school, I can honestly say I have never talked with a 6 year old who understands the concept of citizenship.
Again Sven- anything is possible- you may be an agent provocatuer from Romania but its not probable.
If you just go around making up lists of things that are possible, you will need a team of monkeys to start typing for you.
Hey- another possibility? The night of the election, every voting mechanism in the United States hiccuped and miscounted the vote.
I am really surprised we haven’t heard that yet.
Well Dick, since you brought up the Foreign Affairs Manual, I thought you might find this intersting:
7 FAM 1111 INTRODUCTION
a. U.S. citizenship may be acquired either at birth or through naturalization subsequent to birth. U.S. laws governing the acquisition of citizenship at birth embody two legal principles:
(1) Jus soli (the law of the soil) – a rule of common law under which the place of a person’s birth determines citizenship. In addition to common law, this principle is embodied in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the various U.S. citizenship and nationality statutes.
(2) Jus sanguinis (the law of the bloodline) – a concept of Roman or civil law under which a person’s citizenship is determined by the citizenship of one or both parents. This rule, frequently called
“citizenship by descent” or “derivative citizenship”, is not embodied in the U.S. Constitution, but such citizenship is granted through statute. As U.S. laws have changed, the requirements for conferring and retaining derivative citizenship have also changed.
Oh…and just to prove you wrong yet again (you may want to pay special attention to subsection e, g, i(2) particularly that last sentance about children under the age of 16):
7 FAM 1111 INTRODUCTION
a. U.S. citizenship may be acquired either at birth or through naturalization
subsequent to birth. U.S. laws governing the acquisition of citizenship at
birth embody two legal principles:
(1) Jus soli (the law of the soil) – a rule of common law under which
the place of a person’s birth determines citizenship. In addition to
common law, this principle is embodied in the 14th Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution and the various U.S. citizenship and
(2) Jus sanguinis (the law of the bloodline) – a concept of Roman or
civil law under which a person’s citizenship is determined by the citizenship of one or both parents. This rule, frequently called
“citizenship by descent” or “derivative citizenship”, is not embodied in the U.S. Constitution, but such citizenship is granted through statute. As U.S. laws have changed, the requirements for conferring and retaining derivative citizenship have also changed.
e. Parents or guardians cannot renounce or relinquish the U.S. citizenship of a child who acquired U.S. citizenship at birth.
g. Age limitations in the INA: INA 349(a)(1), INA 349(a)(2) and INA 349(a)(4) contain specific provisions limiting their applicability to a person “having attained the age of eighteen years.” No finding of loss of nationality may be made for these acts committed by a person under the
age of eighteen.
i. Renunciation of U.S. citizenship and minors:
(1) Consult CA/OCS/ACS: Whenever you receive a request to renounce from a minor you immediately must contact CA/OCS/ACS. CA/OCS/ACS will not approve a Certificate of Loss of U.S. Nationality (CLN) for a minor without the concurrence of CA/OCS/PRI, and appropriate consultation with L/CA;
(2) Voluntariness and intent: Minors who seek to renounce citizenship often do so at the behest of or under pressure from one or more parent. If such pressure is so overwhelming as to negate the free will of the minor, it cannot be said that the statutory act of expatriation was committed voluntarily. The younger the minor is at the time of renunciation, the more influence the parent is assumed to have. Even in the absence of any evidence of parental
inducements or pressure, you and CA must make a judgment whether the individual minor manifested the requisite maturity to
appreciate the irrevocable nature of expatriation. Absent that maturity, it cannot be said that the individual acted voluntarily. Moreover, it must be determined if the minor lacked intent, because he or she did fully understand what he or she was doing. Children under 16 are presumed not to have the requisite maturity and knowing intent;
The question is whether this presumption is rebuttable or not.
In criminal law, the common law is that under age 7, there is an irrebuttable presumption that the child cannot form intent. Ages 7-14, there is a rebuttable presumption that the child cannot form intent.
I’m sure, Dick/Sven, that you can cite case law telling us which it is.
Also, are we all agreed that absent some specific, voluntary, intentional act on the part of young Barack Obama, he cannot lose his citizenship?
Anyone else note the irony of Sven actually talking with himself…Simply amazing….So Sven is under the delusion that even though there is no evidence, that somehow a young Barack Obama was able to renounce his US citizenship, even though his mother did everything to remind him of his American heritige? I guess you have to be somewhat delusional in order to be a birther….
More Charlton nonsense…
“(Jan. 12, 2010) — The Post & Email predicts that an Orange Revolution will break out in the United States by July 2011 seeking the ousting of Barack Hussein Obama from power and sweeping his Democrat supporters in the federal government into prison.
Since his unconstitutional inauguration, more and more U.S. citizens have become aware of his ineligibility to hold the office, and outrage and anger have spread throughout the nation and all social classes at Obama’s numerous decisions which have demeaned, denigrated, and dishonored the nation on the world stage.
As part of its coverage of the Obama regime, The Post & Email has been featuring regular reports on the impending Orange Revolution. As a thematic device we are predicting a non-violent revolution in the manner of the non-violent revolutions of the Ukrainian and Georgian Republics; however, The Post & Email has no actual knowledge that such a revolution is being planned.”
aarrgghh, I guess it is better that what Sven is usually fluffing at that time of the evening…
Or this paragraph…
“Since Obama does not hold the office constitutionally and his installation in said office was a collaborative effort of the entire U.S. Congress and Supreme Court, it follows that the American people are no longer obliged in law to either show allegiance or pay taxes to the federal government, which has thereby cut all ties it had to its own legitimacy.”
Yeah…I bet quite a few of these birfoons try to use this excuse to not pay their taxes. This April 15th will be the first year taxes are due from Obama’s term. We know the Tea Party crowd contains a lot of the anti-tax folks already (as well as a mix of birther buffoons) and there definitely seems to be some overlap.
I suspect some of the anti-taxers will really only be trying to use the birther nonsense as another excuse to try to get out of their tax obligations. I also suspect some of the birthers will be gullible enought to try to avoid their filings or think that doing so will be some form of “protest” as well.
Of course, they are all just going to get their butts kicked by the IRS and penalized as per the law.
But I do say we should keep an eye out for this theme as April 15th comes and goes this year – I’m sure there will be some drama around these fools trying to exploit this issue.
Hmmm…I suspect they are just once again dredging up the old kook Russian theory about America’s impending breakup as their basis for this fantasy:
“Russian professor Igor Panarin has been predicting the eventual breakup of the United States in the year 2010 for more than a decade.”
Like many crazy predictions, those who desperately want to believe or to convince others of their “pending doom” just keep recycling the old stories and pushing out the dates for “doom” further and further as each “predicted milestone” fails to come to pass. I find it fascinating that aspects of the human condition are so susceptible to this stuff.
I also find it funny (and extremely ironic) that for a group of people who seem to be so always railing against “socialism” or “communism” and such that they keep looking to “russian sources” as their saviors or their evidence sources to back up their crazy theories – Pravda, Orly Taitz, Igor Panarin, etc.
A revolution of oranges? How entertaining.
Just as an aside, I find it appalling that with possibly 100,000 or more dead and complete devastation in a nearby country that anyone feels they have the luxury to waste even a second over an issue that was settled over 1 year ago. All Americans and all human beings should support President Obama and other world leaders in sending aid to Haiti.
then what are doing posting
Think about this, fool. You guys may attack him, but there is no other President. He’s the only game in town until 2012. You birthers cannot tell me who is actually the President if it isn’t Obama. So grow up and put the country and your fellow human beings first and stop wasting time and resources on this crap that doesn’t address a single real problem.
It’ll never live up to the Attack of the Killer Tomatos!
Thank you, SFJeff. I knew we could find common ground and be friends.
You’re quoting the FAM publised during a post-racial identity America. Quote the FAM written in 1967.
Check out the activities of Maya Angelou in the late 60’s. It would have been considered racist to prevent an African American child from renouncing his US citizenship in the late 60’s. It would have been considered especially heinous if they had moved out of the US and into a another country to begin a new life and a bureaucrat from the US government said, “No! We’ve got you. You can’t renounce your US citizenship to become an Indonesian National.”
Burden of proof, man. You made the allegation, you support it with proof.
Show us the 1967 FAM, or find us an example of a six year-old that renounced their citizenship.
Why don’t YOU quote the 1967 FAM you lazy troll.
Thank you for helping me put the pieces of the puzzle together, Sven.
It’s apparent when Barry moved to Indonesia, the US State Department was under a policy not to interfere with African Americans who wished to ex-patriot themselves from the US and become citizens of their host country.
As with Maya Angelou, Barry and his mother determined after a few years it was a mistake to ex-patriot Barry.
In a policy reversal (which happens a lot), the US State Department provided Barry with travel documents, a free plane ticket and an escort back to America. A failed policy was successfully being reversed until Barry’s grandmother decided to void his adoption, as opposed to affirmatively re-establishing Barry’s US citizenship.
Barry’s grandmother incorrectly assumed voiding the Soetoro adoption would void Barry renouncing his US citizenship. Unfortunately, it’s not true. The law is clear. Barry would have to affirmatively pledge his oath of allegiance to an authorized Federal officer of the Executive Branch to re-establish his US citizenship.
The fatal error was trying to take care of the problem through the Judicial Branch of the government. Thus, the reason the Judicial Branch doesn’t want to deal with this issue at all.
Good morning, Doctor. How are you today?
Did you know that policies are written down?
And that when bureaucrats do things, they make a record of it?
Until you provide something that even hints of this, you are just spewing your wet-dreams, Dick/Sven.
We are assured by the greatest legal minds of our time (Donofrio, Apuzzo and Taitz) that citizenship and Natural Born Citizenship are two totally different species. Therefore, even if someone renounced ordinary, everyday citizenship, they would retain Natural Born Citizenship. The State Department procedures do not even mention a renunciation of Natural Born Citizenship. It is, it seems, a burden one must carry for life, even into the White House. There is no escape.
“Thank you, SFJeff. I knew we could find common ground and be friends.”
Well I am glad we agree as to what is possible versus what is probable.
And while I doubt you and I will ever become close buddies, one of my best friends thinks highly of Sarah Palin and while I will never understand or agree, that doesn’t mean that I can’t be friends with someone I disagree with regarding a political issue.
I think Sven is writing a book:
“Obama the Ursurper’s Life Story, an Unbiased and Truthy Account as only I Could Imagine it.”
This link provides a helpful summary of citizenship renunciation cases. The bottom line is that the renunciation must be done willingly, knowingly, and with full understanding of the consequences.
Even if Sven’s fantasy turned out to be accurate, a renunciation by a ten-year old in 1971 would never stand up to judicial scrutiny per the standards set by SCOTUS in Vance v. Terrazas 444 U.S. 25 (1980).
Good evening, Sven. I am weary from traveling.
How are you, Rickey? Wouldn’t you agree presenting oneself to a FSO at a U.S. Embassy qualifies as a voluntary act? The FSO must be convinced the minor’s attempt to renounce is voluntary and without undue influence. Extensive reports are generated.
There is no way Barry can say is Loss of Citizenship is accidental or without intent.
THE TERRAZAS DECISION
Furthermore, it is State Department policy to notify a minor who has previously renounced their US Citizenship they have the right to rescind their renunciation until they are 18 years and 6 months with a filed form and an oath of allegiance before a sworn officer of the Executive Branch.
The fact of the matter is Barry chose not rescind his renunciation. He was rendered stateless when the Soetoro adoption was voided.
Dr. C please remove this maniac. Perhaps it is best to not even respond to this crap. Why does he think he NEEDS to see the PRESIDENT’S passport.
what part of “are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 USC 552(a))” do you fail to comprehend…
Actually that was the real usurper of POTUS; George W. Bush. He wasn’t elected the first time. He was “appointed” by congress and had his daddy hire a big shot lawyer to make sure he could have the honor of destroying our country and ignore the very constitution he was given (not voted) to uphold and protect. Those birfers have their presidents confused. Silly birfers. So stupid it’s almost cute.
Proof that any of this happened? Oh yeah, it’s just your wet dream.
You know, I somehow missed the documentation of the Soetoro adoption. Can you provide a link?
Of course not, there is no scintilla of evidence to support these fantasies. But it does fascinate me to see to what extent people are willing to deny President Obama his rightful place in our history.
History does seem to repeat itself, doesn’t it?
This newspaper clipping with the Nordyke twins came a few days after the Obama announcement ran, which further calls into question how Obama’s alleged certificate number can be higher than the Nordyke twins. A good private detective would contact all those families whose children are listed in the newspaper clipping and see if that certificate number really belongs to one of them. Or, better yet, the state of Hawaii could simply release the original long form, doctor-signed certificate
Yeah, we’ve been over the certificate number thing.
How about, instead of speculating on what a private investigator should do, you could: 1) hire a private investigator; or 2) do it yourself.
Anyone who questions why President Obama’s certificate number could be higher than someone born after him, obviously never worked in an office before the advent of computers. They worked with slips of paper that got stacked as they came in. Most likely, the newer ones got stacked on top of the older ones, and they were all given numbers the next week for the previous week. Since the numbers are so close together, I see no reason to doubt it’s authenticity.
Presuming I do it myself, you’ll accept the results when it’s learned the certificate number belongs to someone else??
Is this birth certificate the form you are looking for?
“Presuming I do it myself”
I would love to see you prove your allegations. Let us hear.
Because the numbers ARE so close together and out of sequence, despite being born on different days in a facility that would have averaged about 14 births per day, I find it highly unusual that the certificates of two babies born a day later, signed and filed three or four days later than Obama’s, would be lower in the sequence. Instead of assuming what might have happened, let’s demand that the state of Hawaii show us the original, doctor-signed birth certificate and see if it matches.
You haven’t answered the question. Would you accept the findings?? It’s easy to talk tough when you’re not going to be honest about the results.
It looks about as genuine as the alleged document posted at Fight the Smears, but, the answer is no.
“let’s demand that the state of Hawaii show us the original, doctor-signed birth certificate”
Honolulu Bureau of Conveyances: 808-587-0147.
Let us know. I’ll be watching this space for your answer.
Sure, but we both know you won’t check, birthers never check facts so we know you won’t! the phone number and email contact is on Hawaii gove site. easy to check, dip sh_t!
(if they did they wouldn’t be birthers)
OK, we would love for you to check but we know you won’t accept the results! Every fact or statement by Hawaiin gov has not been accepted by birthers. but go ahead and check, will you admit you are an idiot if you get the wrong answer. No you won’t infact you won’t check, Will You?
Why all the animosity?? Also, I’m a proofer, not a birther. An original, doctor-signed birth certificate should vindicate Barry Soetoro’s integrity, if he has any. Besides, I’ve contacted the spokesbabe at the HI DOH already and she used a very sophisticated technique to assert that Obama’s COLB was real … she said it looked like hers. Later, she recanted when interviewed by Poltifact. The only ‘facts,’ since that time, are that the state of Hawaii has refused to confirm the authenticity of the alleged COLB.
Why on earth would I contact the Bureau of Conveyances??? What???
You Are a birther not a proofer as you are obviously not interested in the facts.
The State of Hawaii is on the record that President Obama was born in Hawaii and natural born.
Don’t you feel stupid now?
Show your research my dear foolish friend
Well that would rule out 99.9% of the birthers.. You see it’s not really about the evidence, it’s all about the insinuations
“Later, she recanted when interviewed by Poltifact. The only facts,’ since that time, are that the state of Hawaii has refused to confirm the authenticity of the alleged COLB.”
Close but wrong Department… Of course the DOH is on the record that Obama was born on US soil and a natural born citizen.
Those nasty facts again…
We have no evidence. The director of the DOH made two undocumented statements, neither of which confirmed the authenticity of the alleged COLB. Then she made a statement that was not based on the original birth certificate, so in effect, it has no legal weight, especially her claim that Barry was a natural born American citizen. No documents maintained by her office have the capacity to make such a statement.
Yes, it is a good thing to ask for evidence that the original statement was recanted. If it was, how come it is still on the website?
“Why on earth would I contact the Bureau of Conveyances???”
What does it matter? You’ll never call.
You may demand all you like but you have no standing.
They confirm the facts on the birth certificate and since the birth certificate had the requisite seal and signature it is prima facie legal evidence.
And of course, people in her office have all the right to use logic to interpret whether or not President Obama is natural born, all it takes is birth on US soil.
Why do you take pride in hiding the most basic form of identification for citizenship for the most public figure in the world?? What could he possibly be hiding that this document can’t be released?? It has historical value too and it should vindicate. If you really believe in him and his pledge of transparency, you should want this document to be out there where everyone can see it.
So what does the COLB contain that remains contested?
Name of the Baby – Check
Date of Birth – Check
Hour of Birth – ?? but irrelevant
Name of mother – Check
Name of father – Check
City of Birth – Check
Sex – Check
Mother’s race – Check
Father’s race – Check
Signature – Check
Raised Seal – Check
Date filed – Within range of expectations
“An original, doctor-signed birth certificate ”
Do you know that this is a souvenir BC and is not accepted for a passport or any other legal reason, also the Hospital does not maintain BC records in any State, only State govs keep these records., in fact in Hawai they are only kept for 30 years (that’s all that is required by State law).
Most birther’s and Proofers’s don’t know this, do you?
The certificate Obama got is all that Hawai will supply, and it’s good enough for a passport. My daughter was born at Kapiolani in 1965, she had to request a state issued BC (short form was supplied) as her Hospital BC was not legal, it’s a souvenir only.
You don’t know any of this do you?
Don’t vote for Obama in 2012, no need to make up crap.
Why do you lie? The most basic form of identification for citizenship, the COLB has been provided.
That this has not stopped you from making silly assertions is just evidence that further releases are not going to make any difference.
You are just not interested in the truth.
The original long-form is not simply a ‘souvenir.’ Please. Up until 2001, this was THE official birth document for obtaining passports … Obama’s alleged COLB was stamped with a June 2007 date. He had to use a different form of birth documentation prior to that to get a passport. So let’s see that birth certificate. Also, state law in Hawaii requires the original forms to be preserved and copies MUST BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST. Learn the facts.
It hasn’t been authenticated by the issuing agency. And Obama’s COLB has typo that is inconsistent with database-driven, computer-generated forms. A jpg at a Web site is not acceptable evidence.
The statement of birth in Hawaii is not cited from the original birth certificate. Fukino says it’s from unspecified vital records. What records are more reliable than the original, doctor-signed birth certificate?? And again, NO DOCUMENT MAINTAINED BY THE DOH declares natural born citizenship. This is either an opinion or is based on an unofficial document. It’s a toothless statement.
It has, see the signature and raised seal. As to the so called typo, that’s a new assertion. Care to expand?
That you do not even know that according to the Federal Rules of Discovery this document is admissible in court as prima facie evidence is beyond me.
Sorry, but this is what is known as an out of court statement and it carries no legal weight without presenting the alleged vital records that were cited. It’s nice double speak, but it’s certainly not what you want to think it is.
I see you are observing the missing space between the day and the year, just like in other COLB’s released by Hawaii…
Took me 2 minutes…
Are you just lazy or unable to do research?
Presuming you do it yourself, ksdb, I’ll take Reagan’s advice, “Trust, but verify.”
Why don’t you go do it yourself, and give us some good proof, and see if we accept it.
ksdb: It hasn’t been authenticated by the issuing agency. And Obama’s COLB has typo that is inconsistent with database-driven, computer-generated forms. A jpg at a Web site is not acceptable evidence.
The document itself is authenticated in that it bears the signature of the state registrar and the seal of the state of Hawaii. It is a “certified copy” if you will. While the State of Hawaii has not commented on the computer image floating around the Internet, they have commented that Barack was born in Hawaii, which is the essential point. To say that the COLB itself hasn’t been authenticated is a distinction without a difference.
Typo? What, pray tell is this typo?
A jpg on a web site is not evidence but the document it was scanned from is. Be practical. A million Internet readers are not going to get their hands on any official document like this. We have to delegate that to others. FactCheck.org viewed the original and the State of Hawaii says Obama was born there. There really isn’t any reasonable doubt remaining.
No, the document itself is sufficient legal evidence and admissible in court. That the people at the DOH are supporting this with their official statements is just icing on the cake.
In the date filed, there is a space lacking between the day and the ,year.
However a comparison with other COLBs from Hawaii shows this to be a consistent feature. That by itself strengthens not weakens the veracity of the document.
Thanks to KSDB…
Check the back of the COLB. There is a stamped signature from the State of Hawaii, Alvin Onaka, in fact, that the COLB is a true and accurate copy or abstract of the original. So, Alvin’s swearing that it does, in fact, match.
So, you don’t need the original, just depose Alvin Onaka.
You do not know where the information came from but the fact that it was verified and found that Obama was indeed born on US soil shows that Obama is natural born.
A toothless statement with a nasty bite to those who keep denying the facts.
All we’ve seen is a jpg. No document has been presented to a bona fide reporter, document expert and last of all, not to a court of law.
The typo is on the date filed. It’s missing a space between the comma and year. Databases have this information stored as separate fields: month, day, year. Certainly all COLBs are pre-formatted and spit out information in the appropriate fields … the code would be something like mmmmm#dd,#yyyy with the # sign being a space between fields. There’s no way for that space to be missing if printed from a database. Other known COLBs don’t have the missing space. Such an error is indicative of being manually typed.
If this a Polarik COLB, then it speaks for itself. We have no way of validating the legitimacy of this particular COLB … and these ‘matching’ typos didn’t show up until I pointed them out to Polarik.
ksdb, that is all true. But today is not 2001. Today the State of Hawaii issues copies of birth certificates like the one Obama published. He ordered a copy and published what he got, and what he got is official, and prima facie evidence of what it says, namely Obama was born in Hawaii.
You can cite law, and policy all you want, and you can wave forms around all you want. But in the end, Obama’s published birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii, and you cannot make that go away. And if that weren’t enough, the Department of Health web site carries a letter from its head stating that the original records for Obama say he was born in Hawaii.
Those are the facts.
Sorry, but you’re falling prey to double speak. If the original, doctor-signed birth certificate verified that Obama was born in Hawaii, there’s no need to cite so-called ‘vital records’ in the plural. Again, it’s toothless and inconclusive.
And, after 2001, this was NOT the official birth document for obtaining passports.
In 2001, Obama was a state senator. He hadn’t even formed his committee to explore the possibility of running for US Senate.
And, in 2001, the State of Hawaii decided that the short form was sufficient to serve all its needs.
Moving those goal posts. No, the Courts have rejected discovery based on lack of Constitutional standing. However, according to the Federal Rules of Evidence the documents (COLB) is admissible and prima facie evidence.
Check: Hawaii Birth Certificate
You are also misrepresenting that other COLBs do not have the missing space, I linked to one of them…
The birthers lied about the COLB. Why should they be given the opportunity to gain publicity by doing the same to the so-called long form?
ksdb: The director of the DOH made two undocumented statements
What do you mean by “undocumented”?
You also didn’t answer my question. Was that one of the COLBs posted by Polarik?? There were no other COLBs released by prior to my observation about the typo that included the same typo. Find one that doesn’t have the names covered up.
And, I’ve moved no goalposts. The Obama COLB at Fight the Smears does not have a seal and signature.
Not acceptable evidence where? In court? We’re not in court.
Do you want Obama to provide you with a personalized copy of his COLB?
To suspect that Obama put a forged COLB on the web is to enter into conspiracy-land. No one on his staff leaked the info about the forgery? Alvin Onaka didn’t check to see if the doc with his signature was real? The Republican governor and her political appointee, the head of the DOH, didn’t check? None of the many, many Republicans serving on the staffs of these Republicans checked?
The ones with “date filed” instead of “date accepted” show a missing space. Seems that during the change-over from showing the date accepted to showing the date filed, the template was messed up and a space was omitted. That this feature is available on other COLBs strengthens the veracity and authenticity of the document.
The Nordyke family wasn’t embarrassed to show their long form. What is Obama hiding??
No, she took the information she had, Obama born in Hawaii, and not a diplomat, and applied what every legal scholar of any importance in the past 200 years has said, and came to a conclusion.
Anyway, can we agree that Obama was born in Hawaii?
Why would Fukino lie about that?
Unless we see verifiable COLBs, you’re making a baseless assumption NBC.
There are various COLBs available, most of them have the info redacted. As I explained on the ones with date filed, the space is missing.
And yes, according to Dr C this was provided by Polarik.
ksdb: The statement of birth in Hawaii is not cited from the original birth certificate.
I consider your statement willful ignorance. What the hell do you think a vital record is?
You’re not a proofer; you’re a troll.
Now that is hilarious. I have shown you that there are at least two with ‘date filed’ which show the same ‘missing space’, caused likely by a formatting error.
Your assertion is the one truly baseless.
“The Obama COLB at Fight the Smears does not have a seal and signature.”
You can see the seal and signature here:
I has been established beyond a reasonable doubt Obama was born in Hawaii. You are clinically insane.
ksdb: The Obama COLB at Fight the Smears does not have a seal and signature.
It has a seal (hard to see, but present). The signature is on the back, as indicated by FactCheck.org photos.
Every legal scholar more often concludes that both parents must be citizens or permanent immigrants in order for their children to be natural born citizens. Fukino’s statement that Obama was born in Hawaii was not based on the one document that is strongest evidence of place of birth: the original, doctor-signed birth certificate. There’s no logical reason it should be withheld.
The Factcheck photos are laughable. The embedded date that the photos were taken was three months EARLIER than this amateur site claimed they were taken. The document in their photographs is not the same one scanned at Fight the Smears.
Fukino’s statements’ prove absolutely nothing. She did not stipulate whether Obama’s original certificate of live birth was a delayed registration as outlined by Statute 338. If it is a delayed registration it would mean that the information was as a result of the mother reporting the information to the Registrar of Vital Statistics. There would be no official confirmation of any of the info provided by her so she could make up whatever. But of course there would also not be a hospital named or a delivery doctor’s signature, which would contradict Obama’s claim of being born at Kapi’olani Medical Center. Obama’s mother could easily have given birth out of the country, come home with Barack, and then registered his birth. The only way to be sure that Obama was born at the Kapi’olani Medical Center is to see the orginal birth certificate with the hospital name and doctor’s signature. Period.
On the contrary. You are creating your argument by interpreting statements in odd ways. “Vital records” means “birth certificate” (since in context it couldn’t refer to one of the other vital records like a death certificate). You are being willfully ignorant of normal English usage.
“Every legal scholar more often concludes that both parents must be citizens or permanent immigrants in order for their children to be natural born citizens.”
Name the scholars, and provide links. And we just moved the goalposts.
Sorry to disappoint you, but we’re not in court!
And you won’t get past the COLB if you get into court. It is sufficient evidence, on its own. It has a state seal, it is signed, the registrar has attested that it is a true and accurate copy or abstract.
It is self-authenticating, and it is admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule.
As for the statements of DOH, they can be used to impeach the testimony of them if you ever did get into court. So, it’s not like the officials at the DOH are going to be telling lies willy-nilly.
Which is why they are so relevant. If the typos were machine generated, one would have noticed a difference between Obama’s COLB and others. I have shown that in fact these COLBs show the same missing space.
It completely undermines your argument and in fact validates the authenticity of Obama’s COLB.
For that we should be grateful. Thanks KSDB…
That’s a total lie. In fact there are few scholars who have reached this conclusion and certainly even fewer in the early days when the Courts almost consistently held that natural born only requires birth and subject to jurisdiction.
Your lies are becoming tiresome. Or should we just blame ignorance?
Again ignoring the fact that the COLB does show a seal and signature. In fact, the seal is visible even in the scanned version, but requires some enhancements.
ksdb: I’m a proofer
So where’s your proof?
You’re more like the petulant child who keeps responding “why” no matter what you say. Hugely annoying.
I’ve asked TWICE if these were COLBs scanned by the infamous Polarik. It makes a difference because no one knows where these alleged COLBs came from or how authentic they are. Polarik showed how easy it was to forge COLBs and he was trying a little too hard to prove his own theories.
Right. Uh huh. They couldn’t have checked both the birth certificate AND the index data?
It could not be a delayed one as it was filed a few days after Obama’s birth.
That is entirely the question. Where is the proof that Obama’s COLB is genuine. The state of Hawaii REFUSES to say it is. I don’t claim have the proof … just that I want to see it and not a bunch of double talk and doctored evidence.
Don’t feed those two trolls.
And thus he managed to forge another COLB to validate Obama’s COLB?
Surely you must understand how incredible you sound.
At least your claim about the missing space has been shown to be contradicted by the known facts.
The fact that these COLB’s match in an area so inconspicuous that noone had noticed until recently indicates that the Obama COLB is most like authentic.
And for that observation we have you to thank.
I will be dedicating a posting on my site to your discovery…
The DOH has admitted that the data on the COLB is accurate and thus that Obama was born on US soil.
Too bad that your arguments are so foolish that you have to ignore the logical conclusions.
As I have shown, all the data shows the certificate to be authentic, including the now discovered ‘missing space’. What a find my friend. Your birther friends surely will admire you for your hard work
And yet, that is all you have to offer…
This has not been established by credible experts nor even the amateurs at Factcheck.
Oh yeah, if you enhance it and squint, it looks almost real. Please.
Find me one citation that says a child born of ONE citizen parent = natural born citizen. And stop the childish accusations of lies.
No, not even close. Schuck and Smith wrote “Citizenship without Consent,” and they’re the only scholars who state anything close to that – they think that illegal aliens shouldn’t be able to grant birthright citizenship. Of course, even they think that the current state of the law is that anyone born here is a natural born citizen. They propose a change to the Constitution to fix that problem.
Other than those two, the closest you can find in the past 200 years is AP Morse’s 1904 article. He doesn’t say that children of aliens wouldn’t be citizens, just that it would be odd if they would be eligible for the Presidency while those born abroad to US citizen parents would not.
Other than Donofrio, Taitz and Apuzzo, (who aren’t real scholars) there are NO legal scholars other than the ones I’ve named above that even come close to what you’ve claimed.
Absolutely wrong. If she meant birth certificate, she would have said THE birth certificate. Also keep in mind, Hawaiian law says it’s illegal to provide any information contained on original vital records such as birth certificates. IOW, if the original birth certificate said Obama was born in Hawaii, Fukino would be breaking state law by making that statement. If she got permission to reveal that information, she could have also got permission to say that it came directly from the birth certificate. So again, there’s no reason to say anything about vital records unless she’s talking about something other than the birth certificate. Also, she makes it a point to separate her statement from the one that she DID make about the original birth certificate … so she is clearly NOT sourcing it to say Obama was born in Hawaii. Therefore, it has no legal or substantive value.
Wong Kim Ark established the Chinese Exclusion Act did not apply, because Ark was born in San Francisco.
Neither of Ark’s parents were citizens. In fact, they returned to China with their son; they did not intend to stay. When Ark returned, he ultimately was declared a NBC.
You really should familiarize yourself with the 14th Amendment.
Ever read B’rer Rabbit?
“Please, oh, please, don’t throw me in that briar patch!”
Why not release the long form?
Because you guys are the gang that cannot shoot straight!
By this time in Clinton’s presidency, the legal-eagles that were ginning up the Whitewater conspiracy had already driven Vince Foster to suicide. They were weeks away from an independent prosecutor.
You guys, by contrast, are focusing on nonsense, squandering every ounce of legal credibility that the Republicans could possibly have. Want to disqualify Hillary from SOS because of the emoluments clause? Sorry, the birthers have already sucked the air out of the room. Want to sue to challenge the ability of the President to force a bankruptcy through? Hmm. That sounds kinda birthery to me.
You birthers are a President’s wet-dream! Give me morons for enemies, who will focus on nonsense!
The index data is derived from the original birth certificate … and the only information that can legally be released from index data is name, gender and type of vital event. It doesn’t allow the release of the place of birth. Index data is not a vital record … but a listing of vital records.
If she checked the birth certificate AND the index record, wouldn’t that be vital records?
Couldn’t it be, possibly, the birth certificate PLUS something else?
The Wong Kim Ark decision was dependent on the parents being PERMANENT immigrants making their domicile and doing business in the United States. Obama’s father was clearly not a permanent immigrant and even Obama’s mother was not what you would a long-term resident of the United States.
Since the DOH validated the location to be Honolulu they must have verified the original data.
The Court clearly indicated that any child born on US soil would be a natural born citizen. As such the logic that the court followed in unescapable.
You know your talking points but lack any depth or understanding.
But we do appreciate your help in validating Obama’s COLB due to the missing space…
Remember your original argument about a missing space and other COLB’s not showing such a missing space. Since you obviously limited yourself to older COLB’s which mentioned date accepted, you missed the simple fact that for ‘date filed’ COLBs the space is indeed lacking.
As such this validates the Obama COLB even more.
For that I am incredibly grateful as this independent finding by a birther should lay to rest any doubts.
There may not be original data … and of course, that might explain why Obama didn’t release an original certificate. Maybe the place of birth was only declared through supplementary documentation. Notice how on the newspaper announcements, a place of birth is not listed, so we are left only to guess or rely on ambiguous statements.
Are you a troll, or merely clinically insane?
John Guendelsberger, “Access to Citizenship for Children born Within the State to Foreign Parents,” 40 Am. J. Comp. Law 379 (2002).
Henry Ide, “Citizenship by Birth, Another View,” 30 Am. L. Rev. 241 (1896).
Bernadette Meyler, “The Gestation of Birthright Citizenship,” 15 Geo. Immigr. L. J. 519 (2000)
James C. Ho, “Unnatural Born Citizens and Acting Presidents,” 17 Const. Comment. 575 (2000).
Randall Kennedy, “A Natural Aristocracy?” 12 Const. Comm. 175 (1995), “It is important that a formal proposition of American life is that every native-born American child could conceivably grow up to become president.”
George Collins, “Citizenship by Birth,” 29 Am. L. Rev. 385 (1896)
Johnathan Drummer, “The Nephews of Uncle Sam,” 9 Geo. Immigr. L. J. 667 (1995)
Charles Gordon, “Who can be President of the United States: The Unresolved Enigma,” 28 Md. L. Rev. 1 (1968) (“It is clear enough that native-born citizens are eligible and that naturalized citizens are not.” )
Warren Freedman, “Presidential Timber: Foreign born Children of American Parents,” 35 Cornell L.Q. 357 (1949-50).
Van Dyne, “Citizenship of the United States,” p. 32 (1904) (“it is almost universally conceded that citizenship by birth in the United States was governed by the principles of the English Common Law.”)
Hon. Pinckney McElwee, “Natural born citizen,” reproduced in 1967 Cong. Rec. 15875.
Those are just the ones in my google docs. I have a half-dozen or more left.
Can you cite me a single scholar who has published a real article stating your view?
The Wong Kim decision was not premised on his parents being permanent residents. That barely got mentioned in the case.
Whether Obama’s father was a permanent domiciliary, however, is not determined in retrospect. It’s determined at, in this case, at the instant of Obama’s birth. At that point, Obama Sr. had married a Hawaiian citizen, was being educated at a Hawaiian University and had a fixed address.
It’s not a cut and dried question whether Obama Sr. had developed a domicile in Hawaii.
You guys are so cute, pretending to know law and stuff. One of the first things they teach you when you get out of law school is to remember common sense. You’ll need it to relate complex information to the jury.
In common sense, if I’m checking the files to see if there’s an adoption record for Obama (because the birthers have claimed he was adopted either in Hawaii or Indonesia) and checking other files to run down other birther rumors, I might say I checked the “vital records.”
Of course, common sense says that “vital records” sounds better than “vital record,” so I might say that even though I’d only checked the birth certificate.
Of course, you and common sense have had a falling out, haven’t you? You want Fukino’s statement to have zero weight, except, of course, where she says she checked plural records.
Oh, and the division within the DOH that handles birth certificates? Vital Records. Plural.
Nonsense, the info was filed a few days after Obama was born.
There is no evidence to support your ignorance.
But I do thank you for certifying the authenticity of Obama’s COLB.
Don’t be desperate, you meant well.
Ouch, that must sting…
Shows you how ill prepared these birthers really are.
But accuracy is not their goal really…
Actually that’s exactly what it says in Vattel. I’m surprised you didn’t check.
When I read claptrap like this I have to wonder, have birthers even read Wong Kim Ark, do they assume we haven’t, or both? Please, quote exactly where the court stated that you are required to have permanent immigrant parents to be a natural born citizen (and I thought birthers claimed they had to be citizens, not just residents).
every time ksdb is shown his error he comes back with another birther talking point, he has a severe learning disabilty caused hating Obama. (common among birthers) He avoids showing proof because he has none, answering him is a waste of time, it’s time to ignore the troll. No more responses to an idiot please!
he said ” A good private detective would contact all those families whose children are listed in the newspaper clipping and see if that certificate number really belongs to one of them.” when he said he may do it, he lied, he won’t do it, birthers lie and are idiots!
Misha: “Are you a troll, or merely clinically insane?”
A perfect example, two examples in fact, of what I wrote before about pathological beliefs.
Belief is disconnected from truth, and contrary evidence actually reinforces the belief.
There is absolutely nothing anyone here could say or do that could change these people’s minds. Nothing.
Their pathological refusal to accept that Obama could legitimately be the President obviously has its source in some kind of deep-seated racism, but you’d need hours of treatment to ferret it out.
As an aside, when President Obama visited France last year, much bally-ho was made by our local press of the fact that he had visited Provence during his student years and according all verifiable evidence, he identified himself and/or was identified as an American student.
And as ashamed as I am to admit it, he would have been treated very much differently by the authorities, to begin with, if he’d been from a so-called third-world country such as Indonesia, a Kenyan, or some kind of refugee with dubious documents. An American passport, especially back then, made you one of the Masters of the Universe. Women would show you their titties, etc. (I’m joking.)
There really is a preponderance of evidence to indicate that Obama was exactly what he claimed to be: an American tourist.
you nor I have seen a birth certificate for BOH anything spoken is only by DOH is hear say and not fact or proof
sir i feel sorry for your shallowness
I got sucked into his game at first. Then I realised he’s pathological.
They always start out asking a semi-plausible question, and then half way down the page…uh, oh.
That’s when I realised I was a fool for even looking into the rabbit hole, much less putting my foot into it.
I have to fix my radar.
We put up with 8 years of someone with a criminal record, and none of these people said a word. Look at their CV:
GWB: misdemeanor conviction
Agnew: felony conviction
Nixon: resigned in disgrace
Cheney: told Senator Leahy to ‘go f… yourself’
And of course making a case for war with Iraq, out of whole cloth. No wonder European progressives look at us, and wonder what went wrong. Bush said he does not believe in evolution.
True story: when President McKinley was told the US had won the Philippines, he was asked what he wanted to do. He actually had to look at a map, to find out where it was. He then said an angel appeared, and told him it was our duty to Christianize them. The fool didn’t even know that Catholic missionaries had baptized just about everyone there.
And don’t get me started on the home schoolers…
The truth does hurt, doesn’t it?
Obama’s birth certificate was available for inspection and scanned and photographed. What more do you want…
so make him do this or are you shallow?
he said ” A good private detective would contact all those families whose children are listed in the newspaper clipping and see if that certificate number really belongs to one of them.” when he said he may do it, he lied, he won’t do it, birthers lie and are idiots!
She’s not “the babe.” She runs the place. If you refer to the President by his step father’s name you are nothing but a birther in proofer disguise. Get a life. I personally know people who used the name of a step parent and were never legally adapted. He was in an Islamic country where name change is not accepted and birth family identity is extremely important. I know it is tempting to believe that western values and customs prevail everywhere when they do not. For some reason, his step father tried to pass the President off as his own son. Why? I do not know.
ksdp, my Transcript of Birth from the State of New York contains less information than the COLB. It does not even name the city I was born in. Yet, it is an official document with which I can get a Driver’s License, a passport and yes, ksdp, run for President of the United States. The information on it verifies the information on my origingal Birth Certificate which I lost. New York, like Hawaii does not hand those out. My grandson, born in Oregon in August, has a certificate much like the COLB. He will never need or see a certificate like the one you demand for the President. The hospital did prepare very pretty documents with footprints and signatures. These were carefully labeled so they could not be used for legal purposes. While I was at the hospial I checked, and the information from the delivery was taken and sent to the State of Oregon. They then processed it and sent our little guy’s parents an Oregon document. That’s the way it is done now. It is called reality. I’ll say it again. All the information on the COLB came from the original information given by the hospital. It was then sent to the State of Hawaii to keep. He was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. He is old enought to be President. He resided in the US for 14 years. My dad always told us there were needas, wantas and dreamas in life. You don’t need, you only want to fulfill a dream that this man is not your President. He is. Get a life.
Fukino is the Director of the Hawaii Dept of Health, which is the agency charged with maintaining vital records. She does not have to provide information about any underlying facts — the name of the hospital is irrelevant. All that is relevant is the official record, and whatever information is required by law to be maintained as the official record.
The “official” confirmation is Fukino herself — because she is the “official” whose job is to maintain the records.
There is no question Fukino would have consulted the Certificate of Live Birth. I think most likely Fukino was using the “bureaucratic records” sort of like the “royal we”. For example, someone had a background check; the police might say: “we have reviewed his records and found no serious offenses” when all that existed was a single parking ticket. In data systems everyone has “records” whether it be one or many: that’s just how folks talk.
ksdb: If she meant birth certificate, she would have said THE birth certificate.
You just made that up. You don’t have a clue what she would or would not have said. I on the other hand am on a first name basis with several state registrars and I work with vital records staff on a daily basis. What they hold in their databases are “vital records” and what the print and give to people are “birth certificates.” Now we all know that technically what the hospital provides the state is a birth certificate, but that’s not the way it’s described in normal conversation. That’s even more true today when hospitals report births electronically and there IS no Certificate of Live Birth beyond what states print out of their databases.
ksdb: Oh yeah, if you enhance it and squint, it looks almost real. Please.
Flatbed scanners tend to hide wrinkles and imprints. It’s the nature of the device.
I give you leave to keep posting your nonsense, but I recognize the futility of replying to someone with their fingers jammed in their ears and babbling so as not be able to hear what others say. The observation that you’re better informed that the average birther makes your willful misinterpretations all the more offensive.
Can you provide a link to a story about that trip to Provence?
The word is hearsay – one word. Why don’t you take a look at the rules that govern hearsay.
First, the statement by the DOH can’t be hearsay, because we’re not in court.
If you brought a case and then put Fukino on the stand, her testifying about what she had done to verify Obama’s birthplace would also not be hearsay – she would be the declarant. It would be testimony – fact and proof.
You might also look at the things that are exceptions to the hearsay rule:
So, when Obama’s sister says he was born in Hawaii, when his grandmother says he was born in Hawaii, that’s admissible evidence.
Also, any statement by Obama, such as the entire book he wrote, or his 2004 DNC Keynote Speech, are admissible evidence.
Speaking of dubious documents … if Barry visited France as a student, where’s the birth certificate he used to obtain a passport?? His alleged COLB is dated June 2007 so he had to have used something else to travel or obtain a passport prior to 2007. Where is that certificate and why not show it??
Here’s Okubo’s recant:
“Still, she acknowledges: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”
So she goes from the highly scientific document-authentification technique of ‘it looks like mine’ to ‘I don’t know.’
Have you ever had a passport? You don’t need to reshow your documents to renew it, you just send in the old passport and new photos. Obama hasn’t needed to show that BC to get a passport since his first over-age-16 one.
Did you miss that the election is over? These “issues” have irrelevant been for over a year. Try to keep up.
I’m not concerened about perceived credibility from people who justify the un necessary hiding of one of the most basic identification forms. When you focus on personality rather than the facts, it shows you lack a strong foundation and confidence in your own argument. There were no COLBs posted prior to my observation that contained that typo. Within a few days, Polarik suddenly had three that were not posted anywhere else.
We don’t have ‘known facts,’ just some jpgs from a guy trying to prove his own theories based on pixellation and halos, etc.
How about if we find an authentic COLB first that comes from an independent source and not from someone who overanalyzes pixels and halos. If you’re certain about the facts, tell me the names of the people these COLBs belong to.
Instead of snarky belittlement, how about using a little common sense and seeking truth?? Raise your game.
Young Obama had his first passport when he was about 6, since he needed one to leave Hawaii and move to Indonesia….Since he traveled he renewed his passport when it became due so he never had to reshow his documents…Nice try though…
KDSB addresses the President as Barry Soetero, which shows she is a birther. Because anyone that is not a birther would never address someone by a name where there has been no legally admissible evidence that the person ever went by that name. Besides when Leo and Miss Tickly contacted the state of HI, they verified that there was never a Barry Soetero but there was a Barack Obama II that was born in HI…
“I personally know people who used the name of a step parent and were never legally adapted.”
President Ford was born Leslie Lynch King Jr. Mitt Romney’s full name is Willard Mitt Romney. His father, who ran for president, was born in Mexico at a Mormon polygamist compound.
Ed, and you have some sort of proof that happened, right? You guys come up with the most ridiculous theories and think that anyone with any common sense would believe in that nonsense. Which is more plausible…That Obama was born in HI as his COLB states, which was filed 4 days after his birth (so it cannot be a delayed filing) and the newspaper report supports it. And the director of vital statistics states that her records show he was born in HI. Or that somehow Barack Obama’s mother was in Kenya near the time of his birth, even though there is no evidence to support that, had a baby, was able to somehow make it from Kenya to HI even though there were no direct flights no jet travel, snuck the baby past immigration, and was able to force the state of HI to file his birth as a birth in Honolulu….Really? And that makes sense to you?
“I personally know people who used the name of a step parent and were never legally adapted.”
When my mother re-married, I legally took my step-father’s last name, but he never adopted me.
The official white house transcript is here:
The relevant graph is:
Q What do you love about France, if I may ask?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, let’s see. We got the food. We’ve got the — we’ve got Paris. We’ve got the south of France — Provence — the wine.
Q The wine? Did you go to Provence?
THE PRESIDENT: You know, I have traveled through the south of France when I was in college. I haven’t been back for a long time. And so I need to — I need to get back there.
And right he is. He should come back for a second visit.
“He should come back for a second visit.”
Would he be admitted with a misdemeanor conviction?
You are not interested in the truth. You have shown you will do anything, including the torture of logic, to avoid addressing the facts.
You made an important observation of a missing space and now we have independent data that shows that instead of this being evidence of a forgery, it strengthens the authenticity of the document.
That you now desperately are moving the goalposts is fascinating but it’s too late.
As I have pointed out, the truth and facts show that President Obama was born on US soil.
Let the moving of goalposts begin…
I do appreciate your contribution to establishing the veracity of these facts, even when you were aiming for the opposite. That by itself makes the evidence so powerful.
remember you are writing to a birther, you have to write more slowly!
It doesn’t matter when he last needed his birth certificate to get a birth certificate … at some point he had one before June 2007, so why didn’t he show the earlier document??
Remember the argument of our friend ksdb? (2008/07/15)
I have shown that:
1. There is a reason for the missing space, when the template changed to printing date filed instead of date accepted.
2. There is in fact a known birth certificate which does show a missing space.
This of course not only totally undermines your argument but also establishes the authenticity of Obama’s COLB. Which combined with the statements from DOH, shows him indeed born on US soil.
You then observed
And indeed such photographs exist.
This is very misleading since Obama could have been traveling on his mother’s passport and not his own. Plus when traveled BACK to the United States, evidence shows he may have been an Indonesian citizen. To get his own U.S. passport … regardless of when he did and how old he was, he had to have one prior to June 2007 … plus he says in one of his own books that he had an older birth certificate. It’s time to stop making lazy excuses.
Show me a photograph that shows the full back of the birth certificate so that you can see if Obama’s name bleeds through on the same document that contains the seal and signature. I’ll wait … and wait … and wait.
view more photos here (high res)
but you won’t accept them, so why bothher!
Because he submitted it with his application? Again, your torture logic and reason.
And what is wrong with showing the latest COLB? Nothing….
I have addressed all alleged facts and explained when there are no facts. Most of what you consider to be ‘facts’ are just careless assumptions and wishful thinking.
You haven’t shown any independent data. I’ve directly challenged your Polarik COLBs as being unverifiable and you’ve FAILED to prove that they are.
I haven’t moved goalposts. Please focus.
There are no facts showing that Obama was born on U.S. soil. We have an alleged COLB, a few ignorant claims and a statement that was not based on an original birth certificate. Sorry, but even bigfoot is better documented than this.
As soon as we establish any facts, I’ll let you know. So far we have undocumented claims and a few photoshopped jpgs.
There is no such evidence, but there is evidence that when he returned to the US, he used his own passport.
You are still denying the simple fact that he provided his latest COLB which shows him born on US soil, that you thus are now torturing the meaning of natural born or moving to the ‘he was an indonesian citizen’ shows that you have no interest in the truth, just an interest in one outcome only.
And yet rather than showing evidence of Obama’s COLB being a forgery, we now have evidence to the contrary and it is up to you to show how Obama’s COLB with the ‘missing space’ is unique, as the evidence so far suggests that COLB’s from the same period, show the same missing space.
The single, most reliable record for proving a claim of birth is an original, doctor-signed birth certificate. Fukino says her state holds one for Obama. She has not cited that document as the source for her statement that Obama was born in Hawaii … and she has not in any capacity confirmed that the alleged COLB is authentic. Statements based on secondary documentation, that isn’t even identified, has diminished legal capacity. Why accept a second-best claim when it should be able to verified with an original, doctor-signed birth certificate??
And thus the denial continues…
In other words when these documents supported your argument, you accepted them without any problem but now that they undermine your claims, they are suddenly ‘unverifiable’.
You do a great job at further undermining your own argument and credibility.
As to the facts of Obama’s birth on US soil:
1. The COLB provided by Obama shows him born on US soil.
2. The DOH of Hawaii has verified his birth in Honolulu.
3. The COLB is a prima facie, legally admissible document with a signature and seal.
As to careless assumptions may I remind you that it is you who are the guilty party… Such as your claims about Natural Born, the Indonesian citizenship claims, and so on.
As I observed, you are not interested in the truth, you are interested in being right and up to now you did not even know of the existence of the 2007 COLB which shows a similar missing space.
There’s nothing in Hawaiian law that says a delayed certificate would prevent a birth announcement from being included on the list of births published in the paper. I don’t think Obama’s certificate fit the ‘delayed’ category, but it may have required supplementary information, thus a possibility for whatever ‘vital records’ were used by Fukino to make her Hawaiian birth claim … except that such records would be protected from public disclosure by law, just like the original birth certificate.
It’s as reliable as the its shortform version which is prima facie legally admissible evidence.
The Courts would accept the COLB, why won’t you.
Fukino is on the record as saying that based on her data Obama was born on US soil. That is far more credible than your tortured claims.
Maybe he lost it? I’ve had to write to the State of Kansas at least twice to replace lost birth certificates.
The COLB, if it is submitted to the court as it appears online, with seal and signature, would suffice to prove his birthplace.
You would then have to produce real evidence that called that birthplace into question. Not speculation, not supposition based on “vital records” versus “vital record.” You’ve got nothing.
Will you concede that the birth certificate is a vital record?
So, if Fukino checked the birth certificate and one other document, then she checked the vital records (plural), right?
You cannot claim, then, that she didn’t check the birth certificate.
Finally, someone with integrity … better be careful or you’ll be accused of being a birther too.
Yes, the COLB is the default certificate that is issued when requests come in. This is sensible and expedient … BUT, if you want copies of your original documents you are legally entitled to get copies and the state must comply with such requests, at reasonable expense to the requestor. Such documents are requested frequently by people doing genealogical and/or adoption research, in the latter case to help track down birth parents or other types of family information.
I’m not trying to make anything ‘go away.’ The so-called published birth certificate has not been confirmed as an authentic legal document by the very agency that would have been responsible for issuing it. There’s no compelling practical or even legal reason not to do so. Sorry, but I expect better proof than ‘it looks real’ or ‘the state says that other vital records say Obama was born there.’ If your kid wanted to play in the Little League, a jpg on a Web site isn’t going to do it. And the State Department doesn’t accept jpgs as proof for securing a passport.
Except we don’t know what original records these are and what legal weight said records carry. We do know she’s not talking about a birth certificate.
She didn’t show any documents to the public to backup her statements.
This isn’t true. Reporters had been asking for the birth certificate for several months and were never invited to inspect the birth certificate. Factcheck inexplicably posted photographs, but only AFTER the DOH made public statements indicating that the previously redacted certificate number was harmless and that they were prevent from disclosing any information about birth records. IOW, once it was clear the DOH wasn’t going to verify the COLB, they could release a false certificate number without fear of being exposed.
Was she lying? A Republican appointee?
Your posted is filled with inaccuracies. A) I am a male, B) I’m a proofer, not a birther, whatever the hell that is, C) Obama evidently went by the name Barry Soetoro and Obama has not disputed this fact, D) Leo and MT did not verify that Obama never went by the name Soetoro, only that the state denied having any vital records under that name, E) they also did not verify that Obama was born in Hawaii … nobody has … all requests for such specific information have been denied.
Learn the facts. Accept them.
She’s talking about vital records. A birth certificate is a vital record. If she checked that and one other document, she’s checked vital records (plural). If she’s checked the birth certificate and confirmed there are no other documents (fetal death certificate, for example) then she’s checked the vital records (plural).
ksdb: Permit me to cut to the chase here. Obama is the President until January 2013, whether you like it or not and you shouldn’t delude yourself that any of your “questions” will change that. There are plenty of serious problems in the US and the world. Obama’s birth documents are not one. Grow up and try to use your time on earth wisely.
No, they made two CLAIMS: one claim is not contained in ANY vital record for which the DOH has official capacity and the other claim was not sourced from a verifiable document. This means whatever ‘accuracy’ you have faith in is legally infirm.
Yes, you’re real good at trying to argue by intimidation with namecalling and belittling, but I’ve challenged you on every point you’ve brought up. If logic was really on your side, you wouldn’t resort to such childishness.
All you’ve shown is some unverified jpgs and unverified claims … none of which could be admitted in a court or accepted by the state department or even the Little League.
I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen.
He was born in Hawaii. So sayeth Fukino. So sayeth the COLB.
You’re right that a jpeg isn’t admissible in court, but we’re not in court. The jpeg was considered acceptable to the majority of Americans – he was elected to the Presidency. You guys missed your opportunity to sue to disqualify Obama from the primary elections or from the state ballots. That was your only chance. Now you’ve missed your shot. You’re not going to get a personalized copy of OBama birth certificate.
If you don’t like it, convince like-minded Americans in 2012 that he’s not a loyal American.
Of course, never said it wasn’t.
The key word is ‘IF,’ because she refused to say what vital records she’s referring to. IF it was the birth certificate, that one vital record would be sufficient for the claim, so there’s no need talk about any other vital records, unless the original birth certificate does not contain that information. If not, the question is why not and what information is on it??
She obviously checked if the state has one, but we don’t know if she checked to see what information is on it. There should be no need to settle for an ambiguous statement.
Using anything but your legal name on official paperwork would constitute fraud. And if you aren’t ‘adapted’ then you would still need to legally change your name.
As I pointed out, there’s not a single legal authority out there, other than Taitz, Donofrio and Apuzzo, that thinks Obama’s citizenship is in doubt if he was born in Hawaii. If you think his father’s citizenship disqualifies Obama, the BC is irrelevant to that argument.
You’re not familiar with the law, are you? Her statement has legal significance and if she testified the same way in court, it would be admissible.
Why aren’t you offering this advice to the host of this Web site. I’m responding to its posts that are trying to support the veracity of Obama’s alleged birth documents. Why are you here?? Couldn’t your time be used more wisely??
Wrong and wrong the way you think.
1. It cannot be fraud unless it was done with the intent to defraud.
2. You don’t have to do anything other than use a name to legally change it.
Google “common law name change.”
Would the one vital record really be sufficient? Maybe she wanted to make sure there were no supplemental documents that dispute the birth certificate.
What’s her motive to lie?
No document maintained by the DOH contains any statements about persons being a ‘natural born American citizen.’ This statement on its face is an outright lie. Therefore I can’t place full value on the claim that Obama was born in Hawaii, especially when Fukino refuses to verify that the alleged COLB is authentic. Neither should you.
Right. Obama didn’t release his alleged COLB until after he’d won the primaries. We had no reason to sue because we thought Mr. Transparency would do the right thing. Lawsuits, as you’re probably well aware, did eventually get filed, but unsuccessfully. As of this week, at least one legislator (in Arizona) is pushing to add a requirement on their state ballots for presidential candidates to prove they are Constitutional eligible to hold the office of POTUS.
I don’t want a ‘personalized’ copy, just a copy that can be corroborated as authentic by an appropriate authority. Amateur factchecking Web sites are not an appropriate authority.
I don’t like to speak for others, but I suspect Dr C would be happy to shut his web site down if you guys would accept simple reality and move on. And what caused you to show up all of a sudden? You certainly aren’t bringing any new information.
Rather than talking about what you intend to investigate, you would be wiser to do the investigation first and then report the findings (if any).
My cat was born in Philadelphia, but I don’t have his original birth certificate.
I want to register him to vote. So do you think I could get an absentee ballot for him?
He’s waiting for your advice.
Any state document such as a COLB would suffice. The “Full faith and credit” clause requires any state to accept birth documents from any other state in whatever form they are furnished. Any attempt to oppose some “two citizen parent” standard or some other such nonsense would be overturned.
Baloney! He released the COLB in July 2008. You guys waited until the election was over to sue. You snoozed, you lose…
Really … ??
No document maintained by the DOH asserts that Obama was born on earth either. But, since it is universally accepted that Hawaii is on Earth, it’s not a lie that she can confirm he was born on Earth.
Your (Taitz/Donofrio/Apuzzo’s) legal theory is accepted by zero legal authorities. It is as accepted in the legal community as much as the theory that Hawaii is on the moon is accepted in the astronomical community.
If you seriously thought that Obama’s father’s citizenship could make Obama a non-citizen, you knew all the relevant facts as soon as Obama left the stage in 2004. Actually, you knew the relevant facts when his first book was published.
Your group was circulating rumors before the primaries were over. Why didn’t you file a lawsuit then?
The law doesn’t reward those who sit on their rights.
Except, not a jpg of an alleged COLB.
Not so much, especially not a jpg. If the state department requires an original certified copy of the birth document, then there’s no reason the same expectation would not apply to any state requesting same.
Or not. We won’t know until it actually goes to court.
He released the alleged COLB on June 12, 2008, AFTER Hillary had conceded. No one knew Obama was going to be so defiant about producing an original document or that it would necessitate legal action for something so basic. What a pathetic creep.
You’ve waited much too long already. Next Wednesday completes one year of Obama’s Presidency.
You can see nine high-resolution photographs of Obama’s Hawaiian certification of live birth at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html. If the particular view you want is not among them, cry hard.
Certainly as long as it doesn’t have any red flags on it, such as unnecessarily redacted information or inexplicable typos.
We shouldn’t have to guess what else she would have looked at. That’s what transparency is all about. Show it all. He’s a public figure. He does not have a legal expectation of privacy.
My guess is to protect Obama, but again, we shouldn’t have to guess because these documents should have been released outright.
You don’t actually link to the source. What you cite doesn’t contradict what I wrote:
Anyway, I’m sure you’ve gone to the Hawaii newspapers and found the publication of Obama’s name change to Soetoro, right?
In order for Hawaii to recognize a change, it must be published in a newspaper of general circulation. So, if Obama did, in fact, change his name to Soetoro, you should be able to find that publication.
So you’re thinking Obama submitted an original birth certificate and didn’t get it back?? Talk about tortured logic. There would be nothing wrong with the ‘latest’ COLB as long as it can be properly authenticated.
The State of Hawaii has its own laws. It has read those laws to forbid it to release more information than they have released so far. His lack of an expectation of privacy (he can still have sex in private, right? so your assertion that he has no expectation of privacy is obviously false) doesn’t override Hawaiian privacy laws.
Of course Obama and all other candidates would provide an original. But it will be whatever form of document their birth state currently issues. And just how would you like a candidate to make documents available to the voters? Order 150 million official copies?
Just out of curiosity can you provide me the original birth documents for all previous Presidents and major candidates for the Presidency? And please no b.s. None of them provided it so they are all usurpers. That’s what the term “equal under the law means”, my friend.
This post about the Nordyke twins birth announcement. It fortifies the suspicion that the certificate number on the Factcheck COLB is fraudulent.
I’ve simply been responding to old criticisms that are flawed. Blame the faithers who illogically justify the hiding of a basic birth document.
First, I don’t think you or any of the other faithers would accept my report. Most responses here have been various types of personal attacks. Second, I would like to see an independent third party do the research … someone who would be credible to proofers or to faithers.
We’re not in court. He wasn’t submitting the document to a court. The appropriate authority was the voting public. They took a look at the document and found it sufficient to confirm Obama’s citizenship.
Nordyke has said that her labor was very long.
Occam’s razor still says that we take the simple explanation – she got her certificate when she checked in – over the much more complicated explanation. (Someone forged Obama’s birth certificate, Obama forged his COLB, the DOH conspired to cover up this forgery, and no one noticed this in a billion dollar Presidential campaign.)
Make him a jpg. It worked for Obama.
He told that his father was a foreign student in his book which was published in 1995. He reiterated this in his DNC Keynote Address in 2004.
If his father’s citizenship could call his citizenship into question, nothing in the birth certificate could change that, and you’ve known about it for 22 years!
The reality is nobody other than the birthers cares. There is nothing one could do with the information.
And really, suppose you came up with some discrepancy in the numbers, so what would that prove? There is no one alive who could testify as to the specifics of how birth records in Hawaii were handled in 1961 and what possible errors could have been made.
Besides, I am a scientist and I require a control in any study to be believeable. In this case, the control would be to examine the birth records of a sampling of other Presidents and see if they stood up any better than Obama’s. Now stop wasting time here and get busy-you have a lot of work to do!
What an idiotic person ksdb is, his tortured posts prove that. He appears to be severely mentally challanged. He should just go back to WND ____ off Chuck Norris.
This Alice in Wonderland speak is tiresome. The fact that these certificate numbers are so close would be seen by any reasonable person as confirming evidence.
But not someone who is invested in not finding the truth…
There is no such thing as an original birth certificate. All are copies. The long form typically is a xerox-like copy while the short form is computer generated.
Stop sounding so foolish.
The latest COLB was properly authenticated through the seal and the signature.
But you already know this.
plus he says in one of his own books that he had an older birth certificate.
Ah, one of the more enduring birther attempts at misdirection.
The operative word is he had an older birth certificate – when he was in high school, more than thirty years ago. It’s on page 26 (paperback edition) of DREAMS FROM MY FATHER. He mentions that he found a newpaper article about his father among his vaccination records and his birth certificate. These obviously were things which were being kept by Obama’s mother.
Like Obama, I saw my birth certificate when I was in high school. I used it to apply for a Social Security Number, and later I used it when I enlisted in the Navy. Then I gave it back to my parents. Years later, when I decided to apply for a passport, my mother had moved and she couldn’t find my birth certificate, so I applied for and received another. When my mother died 13 years ago, my sister found my birth certificate while going through my mother’s papers. However, it is torn and the signature of the registrar has been obliterated by a water stain, so it probably would not be accepted in its current condition.
The fact that Obama saw his birth certificate more than thirty years ago in no way establishes (or even suggests) that he still has that copy. The greater likelihood is that since he has held a U.S. passport continuously since he was a child, over the ensuing years he had no need to produce his birth certificate until his political opponents started circulating rumors that he was not born in the United States. His older birth certificate likely was lost or damaged, just as mine was. So he applied for a new copy from the State of Hawaii, which in turn issued the COLB which he posted on his website.
For the record, I am not a “faither”. I am firmly in the “I don’t care because the election is over” camp.
You can see the seal bleed through to the front on the documents.
I am surprised you are unfamiliar with these facts.
By all accounts it would appear that Obama has held a U.S. passport continuously since he was a child. His “older” birth certificate would have been submitted with his very first passport application. That certificate likely is the same one which he refers to in his book, which he observed among some other papers when he was in high school. He likely had no occasion to need his birth certificate in the ensuing 30+ years, since it isn’t required to produce one again when renewing a passport.
What happened to that particular birth certificate is anyone’s guess, but I know that my original one was missing for three decades until it was found among my mother’s papers after she died. I probably wouldn’t have been able to use it anyway, because it is tattered and water-stained.
That’s somewhat ironic… However, the veracity of Obama’s documentation is beyond a reasonable doubt. All that remains is rebutting some persistent rumors and myths.
64 lawsuits, 18 appeals and 10 Supreme Court cases later and all were decided in favor of the Constitution.
How do you link to an adoption that was contested by the birth father and voided by a State of Hawai’i Family Court?
For that matter, when Dr. Fukino views Obama’s Vital Records (plural) and then refuses to provided index data for an amendment, wouldn’t that be indicative of a record ordered sealed by the Court.
We shouldn’t be left to wonder if it’s lost or not. When Tommy Vietor sent out the jpg of the allgeged June 2007 COLB he offered no explanations that the original certificate was lost or why a recent COLB was being used in place of a copy of the 1961 doctor-signed certificate. The Fight the Smears site even called this ‘original,’ which would suggest Obama didn’t have a birth certificate prior to June 2007.
By showing the documents of the adoption or the case where Obama’s father contested the adoptions.
Again fully speculative and lacking any reasonable foundation. The suggestion that Fukino refused to provide index data for an amendment that may or may not exist ignores the privacy laws involved.
Even if Obama had been adopted, this does not make him lose his natural born citizenship status.
I appreciate you admitting that you have no evidence.
So, stop wondering. Is someone else’s birth certificate really your greatest worry in life? If so, rejoice in your good fortune.
The only foolishness is for people like yourself to carry water for someone who chooses to hide the truth despite his hypocritical claim to demand transparency from everyone else. Plus you seriously ducked the question. Do you believe an original copy of the long-form was submitted for a passport application and not returned??
This is an outright false and you already know this. The alleged seal and signature have not been authenticated by the issuing agency.
Oh boy, darn me for expecting proof of Constitutional eligibility for the highest office in our government.
See if you can answer this question-what proof have previous Presidents provided? Focus now. Come on…
Wrong. State law says the public’s right to know outweighs privacy interests. See the Uniform Information Practices Act. Second, who exactly is going to file a complaint if the state releases the original birth certificate, especially when they could do so by obtaining Obama’s permission??
Obama is a public figure by legal definition. In the eyes of the law, he has no right to privacy. And let’s keep focused, we’re talking about basic birth documentation, not his sex life (although that hasn’t stopped any Democrats from going after Republicans before).
You obviously don’t understand what a birth certificate is.
Births are registered with the public agency in the jurisdiction where the birth occured, which is charged with maintaining those records. In some jurisdictions it is simply an entry in a log or registration book.
For purposes of documentation of the time and place of birth, the agency will issue a certificate — or certification — attesting to its own records. This is what is commonly referred to as a “birth certificate” and it is written statement that attests to what is in the records of the public agency.
In Obama’s case, you have a statement issued directly to the press and posted on the web site of the public agency, made by its director. You do not need more “documentation” — the director’s statement IS the documentation. All a birth certificate would do is provide written evidence of what the Director of Public Health would be able to testify to, if called to testify in a court of law.
How many presidents claimed to be the sons of foreign nationals whose citizenships at birth were subsequently governed by another country?? The context makes a difference. Besides, have you forgotten that Obama with other Democrats created a resolution blessing John McCain to run for president? Are you forgetting that John McCain was also taken to court over his eligibility??
The Fight the Smears site even called this original,’ which would suggest Obama didn’t have a birth certificate prior to June 2007.
Wrong. The Fight the Smears site calls it “official,” not “original.”
Sorry. That doesn’t wash. Equality under the law means equality. If Rodriguez has to show papers, then Smith does too.
And for all I know half the Presidents were sons of foreign nationals and didn’t bother to mention it. Now there’s a wide-open field for your inquiries. But you would rather waste time here.
And yes, the fact that you are expending that much effort over the birth records of someone who has already been in office for a year IS strange, no matter how you slice it. Surely, when 2012 rolls around voters will be able to judge Obama on his record in office rather than events 50 years in the past?
I embedded a link but it doesn’t look like the code worked.
You said a person doesn’t have to do anything. What I quoted says you have to get consent from the parents involved. We’re talking about Obama/Soetoro when he was a minor.
No, actually I don’t have an expectation that name changes per adoptions would be listed. Do you??
Wait, you said you don’t have to do anything … now you’re saying a name change has to be published to be legal?? You’ve just undermined your own argument.
Unless there was an intent to defraud … and we can’t rule that out with the information that is currently available.
Hard to tell. As far as the ‘copy’, not the original birth certificate is concerned, an important distinction you seem to gloss over, which Obama described having found 30 years ago, I have no idea what happened to it. It may very well have been lost. Furthermore, for a passport the copy cannot be older than 1 year so Obama’s parents, when applying for the passport on which he traveled to and from Indonesia must have submitted the required evidence which is most likely a short or long form copy.
Once Obama had obtained his first passport, renewals are more straightforward.
It does not really matter, Obama submitted his COLB for inspection and with the raised seal and signature it is indeed prima facie and legally admissible evidence.
When putting side by side your case and Obama’s case, it is clear that there exists no support for your side other than a continued appeal to moving the goal posts, when in fact from Obama’s side we have the following corroborating evidence
1. Obama’s COLB, with seal and signature shows him born in Honolulu
2. Obama’s birth city was verified by the Department of State of Hawaii
3. Obama’s birth was reported in two newspapers
4. The missing space, once seen by you as evidence of doctoring now agrees with other 2007 COLB’s
There is just not really much out there now is there that supports your claim.
Which explains why you are now moving to “let an independent source verify the data”. I doubt that your definition of independent source would be reasonable.
Wong Kim Ark lays to rest any concerns about dual nationality and natural born status.
As to McCain, now there is some reasonable doubt which was patched by a non binding resolution of Congress. No such need exists for a child born on US soil.
I stand corrected, although calling it ‘official’ is pretty sketchy since the HI DOH won’t authenticate this alleged document.
this is not true
sounds like a consession
Of course it is true. But perhaps you can present an actual coherent argument as to why you disagree.
You do realize that the COLB as Hawaii’s official BC is the prima facie evidence, admissible in court and sufficient to obtain a passport?
“Make him a jpg.”
Thanks. I’ll start working on it. I have another dilemma: I’m in my car, traveling at the speed of light. If I turn on my headlights, do they glow?
To someone in a desperate position like yours, anything may sound like a concession.
The DOH cannot comment on this by law but in spite of this the DOH has verified the date and location of birth, the name of the child. Since the DOH applied the raised seal and signature to the COLB, it has in fact been authenticated by the DOH.
The only problem is that we don’t know whether the information submitted by Obama for his first passport matches the information contained on his alleged COLB. He doesn’t have to have been born in the United States to obtain a U.S. passport.
Posting a jpg is not the same as submitting a physical document for inspection. No legal authority has declared the document represented in the jpg as being legally admissable evidence … in fact, just the opposite … that they don’t know what it represents.
My so-called case is that Obama has failed to provide proof that can be recognized or corroborated by the official agency. They’ve said a few things, but nothing to support that the COLB is authentic or legal.
You mean alleged COLB. Still not authenticated more than 570 days later.
Haven’t seen this verified period and especially not with corroborating evidence.
Except that neither the child’s name was included nor the location of birth.
Said COLBs have not been corroborated as being authentic and were presented by a self-described photoshop expert.
Wrong, you’re actually proving that there is by absence of physical evidence.
Your doubt is misplaced and your comment is simply being dismissive because you can’t disprove my points.
hog wash, obama is hiding something, your denial is easily seen as a sign of ignorance
or why would obama have a BC czar. This all can be put to rest if you would see that the release of the records BHO sits on would answer all our questions. What he hides from me he also hides from you. you blindly follow.
No, they’ve made a claim but have not provided an official verification of any of these alleged facts, and especially not with any documentation to support the claim. Also, explain why they can apparently break their law to claim a location of birth but can’t straight out declare the COLB to be authentic. Weird.
We have no proof the DOH applied a seal or a signature to the alleged COLB. I’m still waiting for the photograph that shows the entire back side of Obama’s alleged COLB. It’s time to expose Obama’s backside to the world!!
As long as the parents are permanent immigrants. Barak Sr. was not. However, I’ll concede that Obama qualifies as an NBC if his marriage to SAD was voided by the previous marriage to Kezia, which it would be under British and U.S. law without formally dissolving the first marriage. This means Obama was illegitimate at birth and would be a citizen at birth no matter where he was born. So, yes, the little bastard might be a natural born citizen under those circumstances.
Except when that child might be a dual citizen with divided loyalties. The founders of the United States generally believed a child’s citizenship followed his father’s allegiance, despite being born on U.S. soil. Barak had no allegiance to the United States, thus his son, if legitimate, would be a natural born subject and not a natural born citizen. But as I said, if Barak was a bigamist, then his little bastard could indeed be a natural born citizen.
Since he however was born in the US, the question is somewhat moot.
Still ignoring the facts with moving the goalpost ‘objections’.
As I said before, you are not interested in the truth.
I have no interest in disproving your points as they have no foundation in fact or reason. What I present is the existing evidence which all show that President Obama was born in the US. You can be dismissive of all this but the facts are on my side, even if not presented under oath they are an infinite level more relevant than your musings which are based on a lack of evidence or contradicted by evidence.
Your ‘arguments’ are unraveling quickly and even your ‘best argument’ the ‘missing space’ has turned against your position.
I don’t disagree, however, I didn’t create the system. As a voter, I’m within my rights to point out flaws and to raise questions. If you believe Obama is legit, then you should have no objection that he present verifiable proof.
It’s a free country, no??
It’s only strange because Obama continues to hide a basic birth document.
Surely, when 2012 rolls around voters will be able to judge Obama on his record in office rather than events 50 years in the past?
I respect the Constitution and am doing my part to uphold it. Ignoring this part can only lead to further abuses. No thanks.
“As long as the parents are permanent immigrants.”
Wong Kim Ark limited its holding to the facts, which dealt with permanent resident parents. However, it based its decision on the fact that both “natural born citizen” and the 14th amendmnet sere based on the english common law rules which had no such limitation. Thus, there is no basis to read such a disctinction into th ruling.
“The founders of the United States generally believed a child’s citizenship followed his father’s allegiance, despite being born on U.S. soil.”
You simply have not done the research as there is simply no early authority to support such claim. I suggest you go to Doc’s or NBC’s quotation page to see the multitude of early authority contrary to such assertion.
Again, you are placing the burden of proof on the President who has in fact managed to convince the only Constitutionally relevant bodies of his eligibility, the voters, the electoral college, and Congress (most importantly per 12/20th Amendments).
I can point you to the evidence which you are rejecting out of hand as insufficient while claiming that there are inconsistencies where there are none.
You are of course free to make yourself look foolish and there is nothing I personally can do about it but as far as the facts are concerned, you have no case.
Hence the moving of the goalposts to now require us to prove President Obama’s eligibility to your liking.
That of course would be a foolish venture as you have shown yourself to be impervious to fact and reason.
Well, then we agree, and since it was properly authenticated through a seal and signature, what do you now intend to argue?
You are of course familiar with the concept of self authentication?
You fool… It’s not a lie, it’s a fact that the seal and signature are the official authentication of the data on the COLB.
This claim has yet to be proven. I choose not to go on blind faith over unsupported and undocumented statements.
Not in the least.
All you’ve presented are unsubstantiated jpgs and undocumented statements. Bernie Madoff would be proud.
Your level of evidence is nothing more than hearsay. I’m asking for very basic documentation and you act like I kicked your puppy. And let’s not talk about dismissiveness unless you’re prepared to do some apologizing.
Not at all. I questioned Polarik when he posted those jpgs last year and he promptly ignored the questions and has since disappeared from Algore’s Internets. Nobody is around to vouch for those alleged COLBs. Nobody even knows who they belong to.
Or that they just requested a recent one to avoid the ‘well this is an old one’. However original merely means that this was a real copy of the document not a scan…
Logic my friend, pure logic.
Constitutional Eligibility is guided by the Constitutional amendments which require Congress to find the President to be qualified.
The Constitution does not state that KSDB shall be convinced beyond an unreasonable doubt before a president shall be elected and sworn in…
That is an incorrect reading of the Wong Kim Ark case which does not focus on the status of the parents and in fact reject that the status of the parents makes any impact.
Your claim about what the founders believed has no foundation in evidence.
Barack by virtue of being born on US soil, had allegiance to the United States, and in fact a stronger one than to the country of his parent’s citizenship which was by statute only.
Your dislike of Obama shines through marvelously (his little bastard) and let’s spell his name correctly.
You’re quite a fool my friend and your own words betray you.
There is evidence that Obama was claimed to be an Indonesian citizen. I’m sure you know what I’m talking about … and where praytell is your evidence he returned to the U.S. on his own passport??
Wrong. Wrong. And Wrong. I don’t deny that Obama show an alleged COLB. I only deny that anyone has authenticated it. I’ve said nothing about Obama’s Indonesia citizenship having an impact on being a natural born citizen. Maybe you have a guilty conscience. Like everything else in Obama’s life, there is a dearth of documentation, in this case to show what passport he traveled on and what birth certificate he used to obtain one … or if he even used a birth certificate to obtain a passport.
The state of Hawaii has not admitted they have made any format errors on their COLBs. No COLBs have been presented that can be vouched for in authenticity to show that the error is definitely a mistake by the vital records office.
It is supported by his COLB which was authenticated by the DOH through the seal and signature and it is supported by the DOH which has stated that Obama was born on US soil.
In his own words. After all you believe him when he stated that he saw his birth certificate 30 years or so ago. The same book outlines his description of when he returned.
And thus you are wrong since it was authenticated through seal and signature, making it by law a self authenticating document. Which is why courts and the Department of State accept such forms as prima facie evidence.
It’s also fascinating how you accept the unconfirmed form where his name is mentioned with nationality Indonesian when you reject officially certified documents.
Furthermore, per Indonesian law, Obama could not have become a citizen of its country until reaching the age of 18. And per US law and legal precedent a child cannot denounce his citizenship.
Raising questions about one but not another is hypocrisy. But you do have a right to be a hypocrite.
No more than every other President and candidate. Once again you are a hypocrite.
The entire document or 3 words? Can you show me other Constitutional issues where you’ve been active? Once again you are a hypocrite.
Can you please cite the law that says public figures have no right to privacy? Please???
Read the decision. There’s no reason to mention that the parents were permanent immigrants except if it has relevance and it obviously does.
As you can see, permanence was a key factor in the decision.
It absolutely does. Read Shanks v. Dupont.
Vattel says that a child’s natural allegiance follows that of his father and the place of his birth does not change that. To be a natural born American citizen, Obama’s parents (plural) would both need to be citizens.
Bastard is the correct term for an illegitimate child and his father’s name was spelled as ‘Barak’ in his 1965 article, “Problems facing our society.”
Nonsense. All you have is insults and derision. Facts?? Not so much.
Total nonsense. The right of privacy may be reduced to a public figure but the same laws that protect you and me, protect such public figures.
That’s just plain wrong. Guess we will never see any further backing of this claim…
The success of a lie does not improve its truthfulness. The current system puts a burden of proof on candidates when filing to have their names placed on ballots … it just happens to be limited proof … a signature and self-declaration. As a voter, I, and others whom are dismissively labeled as birthers, simply ask for a slightly stronger burden of proof, but one which is within the same reasonable bounds as having your child play Little League baseball, so spare me the whining.
Knock yourself out.
So your M.O. so far is to try to intimidate me instead of back up your claims??
Little league, man, Little League. This shouldn’t be like pulling teeth out of crocodile.
Not at all. I’ve backed up my points every step of the way and am met with very little logic, but instead a great deal of baseless derision.
Then lobby your state legislature or the federal legislature for stricter laws.
Obama provided his COLB which is also sufficient for playing in the little league.
You have done nothing of the kind you fool. Do you really believe that the reader cannot see through this baseless claim?
You merely summarily dismiss any fact, reason or logic.
Like that public figures have no right to privacy?
Of course he cannot
It’s not self-authenticating at all. The Obama jpg barely shows one and not the other. The Fact Check photos do not show enough of the back of the alleged COLB to conclusively prove the seal and signature are on the same document as photographed from the front. Obama, expose your back side to America!
And again, the state of Hawaii REFUSES to authenticate any alleged COLBs … period. IOW, you got nothing.
Again, a COLB is self authenticating and the raised seal is clearly visible from the front, however the signature is not but can be seen from the back. If you imply some falsification of evidence then it would be helpful to provide some coherent argument. In this case, nothing but a miracle would convince you of the truth.
DOH has in fact authenticated the document and validated his birth in the US.
Nothing you say has disproven this.
The DOH is prohibited by law. However, in spite of this they have validated all the information but the hour of birth.
It was photographed and written about by legitimate members of the press. This has not happened with Obama’s alleged COLB. One is obviously much more compelling than the other.
Wrong. If adopted under age 5, Obama would have automatically become an Indonesian citizen. According to a story written about Obama when he was at Harvard, his mother remarried sometime when he was between the ages of 2 and 4 years old. I realize the more recent version of the story is age 6 … but, like everything else in Obama’s childhood … the stories are not consistent … so it is easily within the realm of possiblity that Obama was adopted and became an Indonesian citizen.
Answers.com and ye shall receive:
“Public figures, such as politicians lose most of their rights to privacy. In the United States, their finances are usually public. When they are away from private time with their families, their lives are closely examined. The difference concerns their family members. Their non campaigning family members have a right to privacy. Other than that, politicians, and other celebrities, have lost their right to privacy. If they are going to use the press and be presented by the press, the press has the right to present them in situations other than their own choosing.”
Sorry, but the same statement making this claim and so-called validation included a claim that falls outside the authority of Fukino’s office. That statement qualifies as hearsay only.
The COLB was fotographed and written about, however unlike your ‘evidence’ the COLB is self authenticating and there is no way to authenticate the photo of the page.
Indeed, you are right, reason would dictate that one is more compelling than the other. But I am not convinced that you are guided by reason.
If you can’t tell whether your own headlights are on or not, I’ll take a cab.
Nope, even under age 5 he would not have become an Indonesian citizen automatically, but there is just no evidence that Obama ever was adopted or naturalized in Indonesia.
Of course, in your world devoid of reason, anything is possible, just not plausible.
You guessed wrong:
[Note to readers: the preceding citation out of context is misleading. Read further comments for a more complete context. Dr. C.]
As Dr C explained
ksdb is a complete idiot, do not respond to him please, that allows him to take over this thread (his real goal)
Responding to him makes no sense at all, his brain is locked on “stupid”, being stuck with an idiotic troll is not fun, don’t respond(especially you nbc, no response is the best response)!
You make it so easy to prove you wrong:
You claimed ‘automatically’ when in fact the code shows that it requires approval.
I told you to read and use reason before making your claims. Now you have to make up your usual excuses,
I refuse to let his nonsense remain unrebutted. It serves as a good example for those who believe his nonsense.
You have dishonestly quoted out of context. Here is the entire paragraph:
“It is clear that the Constitution protects newspapers that publish truthful information, however “private,” about “public figures”—including candidates for office. Whether or not such figures entirely surrender any “right to privacy” they might otherwise have, as a practical matter newspapers and other media need not worry that they will face legal sanctions if they reveal indelicate truths. No Supreme Court decision supports privacy claims of public figures seeking political office who object to the disclosure of information that some voter might find relevant to their fitness to serve in office. Recognition of any such privacy rights would disserve the democratic process itself by depriving the public of salient information. “[T]he candidate who vaunts his spotless record and sterling integrity,” Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist has reiterated, “cannot convincingly cry Foul’ when an opponent or an industrious reporter attempts to demonstrate the contrary,” even if the demonstration involves scrutiny of what might be regarded as one’s “private” life (Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 1988, pp. 46, 51, quoting from Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 1971).”
What that means is that if you do your famous “investigation” and publish the truthful results, Obama can’t sue you for libel. It doesn’t require him to help you in your digging though, nor does it require him to release anything beyond what the law requires (Financial disclosure forms for example).
Quoting out of context shows your dishonesty.
The citizenship part IS automatic. The child has no requirement to do anything. The authorities only check to see if the adoption is legal. If it weren’t automatic, it would require taking an oath which might also be accompanied by naturalization classes.
See HRS 338-18
Everything you’ve posted has been shot down like balloons at a carnival. And Obama’s birth certificate is still being held hostage … Day 582.
You are now misinterpreting or misrepresenting the actual law. Automatic means without any further action. In fact, the father has to apply for approval from the “Pengadilan Negeri at the residence of the person adopting the child”
As I pointed out before, you have no interest in the truth. Let alone the application of logic or reason.
Denial, the first step towards recovery, however you already show some signs of anger so you are making good progress and even some bargaining…
Good job my dear friend, there is hope
All ‘automatic’ citizenship is accompanied by further action … that’s what the filing of a birth certificate does, for example. No action is required on the part of the recipient. Sorry, but you’ve been shot down again. Don’t make it so easy.
What part of acquires Indonesian citizenship if… do you fail to comprehend?
Furthermore, Indonesian Constitution prohibits the acquisition of Indonesian nationality when the child retains his original birth right citizenship and since the child is unable to denounce his citizenship or have it denounced for him, Indonesia could never have naturalized Obama.
How do I hail a cab in outer space?
People like ksdb are not driven by facts (obvious!), they are driven by hate (hate for Obama), him and all the other birthers will not change course. They are actually unaware that Obama is president and has been for a year. They are pushing this birther nonsense in hopes of getting Obama out of office, though the chances of that are less than 0, poor birthers are nothing more than hateful, racist dipsh_s! They want the Ni__er out, but birthers are on a losing battle, the wrong side of history.
How can it be automatic when it involves the parent having to petition and the Pengadilan Negeri has to declare it legal…
That’s just plain illogical.
I do notice you have still got a tendency that prevents you from admitting to your errors. Which combined with your propensity to make errors is quite unfortunate.
Again, that applies to information someone digs up about a public figure. Nothing compels them to disclose information, other than legally required financial disclosures. Presidential candidates are not legally required to release medical records, school records or anything else. Some release a few selected bits of information and some don’t. None that I know of have released even 10% of what you birthers have “demanded” from Obama. And once in office previous sitting Presidents have released their tax returns and that’s it. Obama already released his 2008 return and I’m sure he will do the same with future ones.
It’s no different than filing a birth certificate. Once the adoption is declared legal (or a birth certificate is accepted as valid), citizenship is automatic. What action is required by the recipient for his or her citizenship??
I admitted that the Fight the Smears site says ‘official’ birth certificate, not “original.” Now are you going to admit to being wrong??
Feel free to cite the statute. I have a feeling your misunderstanding it.
So Obama was adopted in Indonesia? That would place him older than 5 years by most any credible account. So no go there. So perhaps you meant, adopted in Hawaii, but such an adoption would not lead to automatic citizenship.
If adopted and found that the adoption was legal by the local Pengadilan Negeri…
And citizenship could not be automatic if it would create a dual citizenship conflict.
So adoption can happen without automatic acquisition. You were wrong
Candidates release tax returns and medical records all the time. Obama posted an alleged COLB … why do you think he would he have a different right to privacy over the long-form certificate??
Now that is ironic given your misinterpretation of automatic citizenship after adoption… When in fact, a child can be adopted and the “declaration of legality by the Pengadilan Negeri shall be requested by the person adopting the child within 1 year after such an adoption or within 1 year after enforcement of this law.”
Within one year after such adoption… So adoption precedes the request for declaration of legality.
What??? Are you trying to say a child should be able to be declared as a citizen before it’s adopted?? Please … try again … and make sense this time.
h.have no nationality, or have lost his nationality if the petitioner acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia or states at the time to have released another nationality according to the legal provisions of the country of origin or according to the legal provisions of the Agreement on the settlement of the bi-nationality between the Republic of Indonesia and the country concerned.
(1)Aliens born and domiciled in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia whose father or mother, in case they have no legal family relationship with the father, is also born in the territory of the Republic in Indonesia and is a resident of the Republic of Indonesia, may present a petition to the Minister of Justice in order to acquire the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia if they, after having acquired the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, have no other nationality or at the time that they present a petition they also make a statement as to having released another nationality which they may possibly possess, in accordance with the legal provisions prevailing in the country of their origin or according to the provisions of the Agreement on the settlement of the bi-nationality between the Republic of Indonesia and the country in question.
The statute cited by Dr.C applies when the mother is Indonesian and the father is a foreigner … SAD was not Indonesian and Lolo was not a foreigner.
NBC stop wasting your time!
OK. Let me summarize the conclusion of the discussion:
THE ELECTION IS OVER AND OBAMA WON
Articles four and five do not apply to adoptions of children under age 5.
Article 5: (2)In order to present a petition for naturalization, the petitioner shall: a.have reached the age of 21;
Article 4 refers to Aliens born and domiciled in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia …
Are you trying to say Obama was born in Indonesia to foreign parents??
US Department of State
No I am saying that Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, only in 2006 was a law passed that allowed minors to hold a dual citizenship status. Since Obama could not renounce his citizenship, he could not become an Indonesian citizen.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that Obama was less than 5.
If Indonesia does not allow for a dual citizenship and if Obama as a minor could not reject his US citizenship then there is but one conclusion.
Right … under Indonesian law, Obama, if adopted under age 5, would have been considered an Indonesian citizen exclusively. IOW, if Lolo wanted to fight for Barry Soetoro’s custody, it would have been a very ugly international battle to see whose laws superceded the others. At the time Obama would have been adopted, U.S. nationality laws wouldn’t have protected Obama’s U.S. citizenship … certainly the SCOTUS would have then overturned those laws, but as written, the laws did not prevent the loss of citizenship through adoption.
A delayed birth certificate has a very defined meaning. It means a birth certificate that is filed over a year after the birth of the person.
Barack Obama’s birth certificate was filed 4 days after he was born, on August 8, 1961. By definition, this cannot be a delayed birth certificate.
Yes, there is evidence, thanks to the Honolulu Advertiser:
Obama, if born in 1961, would have been three or four years old in 1965 when Lolo married Stanley. I understand the ‘official’ story NOW is that they didn’t marry until 1967 … which would have made Obama 6 and ineligible for citizenship by adoption … weird. Admittedly we don’t have proof of adoption or if Lolo got the adoption approved, but we do see that Barry Soetoro was listed as an Indonesian citizen at school in Indonesia. It’s hard to explain that one away.
If Obama was adopted after 2006, this might mean something.
Most sites place the marriage at 66 or 67 so you need something better here to ‘prove’ your point.
So you rely on one discrepancy in reporting and consider that the fact.
As I stated before, you have no interest in the truth.
Not at all
1. The parents lied to get Obama into school
2. The school assumed
If you like the source however, you should also accept that it shows Obama born in Honolulu.
But I doubt you appreciate the logic of that
birthers on the “adoption” rumor!
no proof that Obama was adopted, but the rumor goes on.
Muslim’s require an adopted child to retain name of birth father(so no Barry Soetoro would exist)
Birhers are losers, the election concluded a year ago, an idiotic birther myth can’t change that!
go away Troll!
Yes, it means that before 2006 Obama could not have been adopted since Indonesia did not allow a minor to keep dual citizenship status and thus since Obama as a juvenile could not renounce his citizenship, Indonesia could not have granted him one.
That has no foundation in law as SCOTUS has accepted that a minor cannot renounce his US citizenship and thus Obama, in the eyes of US law, remained a US natural born citizen.
you miss out on a a key word: ADOPTED … please provide documentation that Obama was adopted Soetoro.