Main Menu

Pulitzer Putz nominations

Inspired by the web that site won the 2010 Pulitzer Prize for investigative journalism, I’m accepting nomination for the most foolish web site related to Obama Conspiracies. I’m calling the competition the Pulitzer Putz (using the definition “fool or idiot”). Please attach your nominations as comments. I will collect the nominations and conduct a poll to select the winner, to be featured in a future article.

[The nominations are now closed.]

10 Responses to Pulitzer Putz nominations

  1. Kathryn N April 12, 2010 at 9:33 pm #

    Well, that malware and virus-infested site run by the Queen of Crazy, Orly Taitz, must surely be the odds-on favorite for the Pulitzer Putz award.

  2. richCares April 12, 2010 at 9:52 pm #

    it’s WND, no site is that bad!

  3. nbC April 12, 2010 at 10:29 pm #

    Have you ever visited Ed Hale’s website or Orly Taitz’s “Warning A virus has been detected” site?

    Friends should not let Friends use webtools they clearly do not understand.

  4. G April 12, 2010 at 11:49 pm #

    The Post & Fail should be up there too.

  5. nbC April 13, 2010 at 12:28 am #

    It reads like the Onion. You never know if it is tongue in cheek.

  6. Vince Treacy April 13, 2010 at 9:06 am #

    I nominate They printed an article by Lakin, and then censored my comments. When I challenged a birther on their censorship, he tried to post with them, and they censored HIM. The funny story is over at:

  7. Black Lion April 13, 2010 at 9:15 am #

    I go with the Post and Fail…Unlike WND, which you can tell is just fill of crap, the Post and Fail tries to actually look like it is a genuine website. And the article by Charlton and Rondeau are just horribly written. Secondly I would nominate our old buddy butterdezillion. She is still out there misinforming the public….

  8. J. Edward Tremlett April 13, 2010 at 1:23 pm #

    I’d have to go with WND. They at least imagine they’re journalists, which makes their inability to conduct themselves in a manner befitting journalism all the more sweet.

  9. G April 13, 2010 at 1:46 pm #

    I’d say their obvious intent to use this issue to get money & sell merchandise also puts them in the top for sleaziness.

    However, considering that just about all of these birther sites are heavy on the paypal / donate con job to fleece their flock as much as possible…

    …there might be very little way to distinguish that characteristic as standing out for one site over another.

  10. Bob Weber April 13, 2010 at 8:43 pm #

    it’s WND, no site is that bad!

    I agree.