Ron Polland (the fake Internet document expert who used to call himself Dr. Ron Polarik) has produced the most outrageously fraudulent, lie filled, and total bullshit video on YouTube that I have ever seen. I was left speechless by the breadth and the audacity of it.
Given that his PhD is real, he must not be an idiot. What does that leave? You figure it out.
Here is the damned thing, but first I spit on it. I hope Dr. Fukino sues his sorry ass. This video is clearly malicious slander.
Update: One of the points Polland makes that I haven’t talked about on this blog before relates to his claim that the State of Hawaii changed the form of their birth certificate just to somehow (and it’s vague to me for what purpose) legitimize the Obama posted Birth Certificate (COLB) that Polland claims is a forgery.
Published comments from the Department of Health tell us that the Department went paperless in 2001 and the form revision date at the bottom of the Obama COLB (printed in 2007) shows a revision date of 11/01. Polarik makes a huge deal that the State changed the COLB in 2008, in the SAME MONTH that Dr. Fukino made a public statement saying the the State of Hawaii had Obama’s records according to regulation. However, if you had asked me whether or not Hawaii had changed the certificate in 2008 without any reference to Obama, I would had said that likely they did. Why? Because the National Standard Birth Certificate, published by the National Center for Health Statistics, changed in 2003 and states typically follow with the redesign of their systems in about 3-7 years. (Some take longer.) Therefore we would normally expect Hawaii to tweak the certificate around 2008.
Thanks for the comments left here by others who have followed more closely the every changing version of truth coming from Ron Polland.
I will download this then burn it to DVD then send it to aJames. He will be so excited, he’ll shake with joy for a week and add it to his proof collection.
Has BP posted the “We’re not responsible for hurricanes.” video yet?
This could get much uglier.
Well, outside of being completely libelous BS, I do have to say that the soundtrack was good.
Where on earth did he get that “Certificate of Live Birth”? I’ve never seen that one before.
The document STILL on both Factcheck.org & STILL on Obama’s campaign website AND every other site or TV show I’ve seen is always the exact same one and only “Certification of Live Birth” that we’ve always referred to. Yeah, the very same one that Polland claims all these websites “scrubbed” and no longer have there… well its still there.
How can anyone be that stupid to make such blatant lies that can be easily checked and caught within seconds of searching? Is Polland completely pathological?
So, where did this new “Certificate” come from? Did Polland just create his own forged document?
I think all 5 of the women in the video should be sent a copy. They all would have rights to pursue him for his slander & libel, in my opinion.
Polland created this document. His original post on FreeRepublic said,
There were some glaring holes in this. Apparently, in his first draft, he put “Hawaii” as “Island of Birth” and “Hawaii” as “County of Birth”. He put the father’s race as “Black”, and listed the father’s “country of birth” as being “Africa”.
When people saw these obvious mistakes, Polland “fixed” some of these issues. There have been at least 3 drafts around, before he finally pulled it off from his website. A second draft fixed the Island and County of Birth Issues, but not the “Africa” being listed as a country.
It’s amusing to see Polland be caught with this.
One wonders why the comments are disabled for his YouTube video.
omg … the stupid….. really… he really thinks that this will fool anyone that is sane? now he’s on par with Lucas smiths forgeries
the real test is to see how long it takes everyone’s favorite dentist-lawyer-realtor-secretary-of-state-also-ran to file it in court.
The funny/sad part is that, despite all the obvious mistakes and despite it being Polland, many Freepers still believed it. To which Pollard took great comfort, as it demonstrated his awesome digital-imagery skills.
(But to the credit of some, it took all of 15 minutes for someone to point out the first error.)
Yes, he’s off the deep end now. I believe Loren pushed him off by outing the nutcase, and he’s been sinking lower and lower ever since.
And yes, he forged his own, and apparently tried to pass them off as real at FR, got caught, quietly posted another one that was also fake, got caught again, and some Freepers turned against him.
Hilarious – Lucas banned from FR, and now Polarik exposes himself as the fraud we always knew he was.
BadFiction has the previous “flop” by Polarick on his site: http://badfiction.typepad.com/badfiction/2010/06/dispatches-from-birtherstan-for-23-25-june-2010.html#more
And looking at both copies in bigger size, HOLY you can see where he edited it the text (Photoshop and gimp picked it up)
This guy is nothing but a fraud.
The current reality we share isn’t a bed of roses right now, but it must be terrifying to live in their world, that’s all I can say.
Well, I doubt that Polland’s smart enough to figure this out… but that could be part of the strategy. “Truth” is an absolute defense to a claim for slander …. so someone could deliberately defame the Hawaii DOH, hoping to get sued, so that they could get…..
LOL! Good point!
Although I agree that requires far too much logical thought for birthers to pull off. 😉
Pollan is backpedaling so hard that he’s burning the chain on his bike:
To: cynwoody; rxsid
Finally, someone is asking me the right questions.
The new 2009 COLB is one of several, genuine paper COLBs I have. I wanted to show everyone what it looked like – up close and personal – but instead of redacting the private information on it, I replaced it with Obama’s information in the same, exact way that Obama’s forger created the fabricated COLB used in Factcheck’s phony photo shoot.
It is a layered composite, created totally in Photoshop, and everyone who has watched video 1-4 or video 2-1 would know that. In fact, if they watched video 2-2, they would know how to make it themselves.
So, while it’s a genuine 2009 form, the information on it originally came from Bambi’s “2007 COLB.” It is this information that I have posited as now being a part of his actual birth records (if “actual” can be used with Bambi).
Now, you see, FReepers are not going to understand how this fits with everything else that has transpired in the past two years to hide Obama’s birth records (and every other record of interest) without watching all four videos from Chapter One (followed or preceded by “It’s the conspiracy, stupid”).
This is the only way to really understand how Factcheck, Politifact, Hawaii Health Dept., and the Obama Campaign/Administration have corrodinated this fraud.
201 posted on June 25, 2010 1:12:27 PM PDT by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)
Anyway, I watched the video and it doesn’t make any sense. The only thing I draw from the whole thing is Polland has fallen victim to his own misogynism.
Article updated to say:
One of the points Polland makes that I haven’t talked about on this blog before relates to his claim that the State of Hawaii changed the form of their birth certificate just to somehow (and it’s vague to me for what purpose) legitimize the Obama posted Birth Certificate (COLB) that Polland claims is a forgery.
Published comments from the Department of Health tell us that the Department went paperless in 2001 and the form revision date at the bottom of the Obama COLB (printed in 2007) shows a revision date of 11/01. Polarik makes a huge deal that the State changed the COLB in 2008, in the SAME MONTH that Dr. Fukino made a public statement saying the the State of Hawaii had Obama’s records according to regulation. However, if you had asked me whether or not Hawaii had changed the certificate in 2008 without any reference to Obama, I would had said that likely they did. Why? Because the National Standard Birth Certificate, published by the National Center for Health Statistics, changed in 2003 and states typically follow with the redesign of their systems in about 3-5 years. (Some take longer.) Therefore we would normally expect Hawaii to tweak the certificate around 2008.
Thanks for the comments left here by others who have followed more closely the ever changing version of truth coming from Ron Polland.
That did cross my mind, but Polland has to know that his analysis is fraudulent and discovery would lead to his exposure.
So tell me, published defamation is libel and verbal defamation is slander. Where does blog and YouTube fit? Seems kind of in between to me.
And well they should since there a million nut cases running around saying that the “Certification” is no good. Also “Certificate of Live Birth” is in line with national standards. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf
libel. but the internet is not considered a periodical and therefor ( i believe ) does not have the option of posting a retraction.
When did “The One” legally change his name? Once adopted legally by lolo Soetoro, his name became barry Soetoro….Kenyan born wins Illinois Senate seat….suddenly American born? get your heads out of your butts.
there is no evidence that obama ever legally changed his name or was adopted.
as for the “kenyan born” ap story …..:
Margie quotes phony birther story: “adopted legally by lolo Soetoro, his name became barry Soetoro”. Can you substantiate this ludicrous claim. This lie shows up often, yet proof for it never shows up. And you heard this where?
Why do we keep seeing the same old debunked rumors, Is it true that hating Obama causes mental illness?
Everybody in Illinois knew Obama was born in Hawaii when they voted him in as Senator. I live in Illinois and it was touted all over the place that he was born in Hawaii. Everybody in his Hyde PArk district knew he was born in Hawaii when he ran for State Senator.
Methinks thou protest too much about cranial rectal syndrome.
One wonders why Polland/Polarik got back in the birther game. After his outing, he seemed to shrivel away into oblivion with the vow that he’d never be back. But like all his other bullshit, of course he’s back. Said he was working on a big piece for the The Post and Email, but of course, that never happened. He’s nuts, sloppy, inconsistent, and entertaining as hell.
Who opened your cell, Margie?
Theres no proof that he was ever adopted. Do you have the adoption papers? He wasn’t born in Kenya you might want to pull your head out of your butt
Margie must be a right winger, they are the only ones that use the terms “The One” or “Messiah”. I wonder why they believe Obama is the Messiah, do they worship him or just admire him. We all know he is not the Messiah, really weird huh? Maybe it’s the food they eat. Maybe that’s why they fall for the Soetoro BS. They seem to never need proof that he is “Soetoro” or the “Messiah”, they just believe it. Really Margie, you don’t have to worship Obama, he is not “The One”. It may help to ask the guards to loosen your straight jacket.
Polland / Polarik posted version 1 of it on Free Republic. When a couple people (14 minutes later) started pointing out errors, he posted a second version with the errors corrected without noting it was a corrected version. Many of the freepers couldn’t even buy THAT one though, and he pulled both and made a “disclaimer” that he created it to show “how such things could be done” and to “prove his skills in digital images”.
Since it took 14 minutes to catch his errors, I’d say he showed his digital image skills alright. He showed they sucked as badly as his “document forensic” skills.
He’s now attacking those freepers who dare voice their disappointment in being fooled by him. And notice the video has no such disclaimer, he’s presenting that as “fact”.
Polland / Polarik is, in fact, a proven forger and liar.
Because Polland / Polarik can’t handle criticism.
Haven’t seen you post outside of “Citizen” Larry Wells’ place usually.
You do know there’s no credible proof that Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama. Not that it would have made any difference, since under both US and Indonesian law, Obama couldn’t have lost his US citizen OR gained Indonesian citizenship even if he had been adopted.
There’s also no credible proof that Obama was born outside of Hawaii either.
And it’s only the right wingers that call Obama “The One” or a “messiah.”
Absolutely false. My friend’s mother married another man 7 years after his father died. The step-father never formally adopted my friend, and my friend’s name continued to have the last name of his deceased father. Only his mother gained the last name of her new husband.
Stop posting lies and BS that anyone can easily call you out on.
Hey Doc, just to be sure, I ordered a copy of my COLB to see if Hawaii has changed the lalyout/format of the COLB (including the name) – I’ll let you know if the change has been made to the one that Polland posted.
That is the gray area I was thinking of too – which is why I felt it important to mention both, as I believe there is justification to pursue both libel & slander charges.
1 – I too believe there is a case for libel and slander. I doubt they will, because that would just give more publicity to someone who is unbalanced. Just because someone has an advanced degree, does not mean they are immune to mental illness.
2 – Obama somehow lost citizenship as a child. I’ll repeat my experience: when in Israel, I was asked to serve in the IDF. I went to the US Embassy in Tel Aviv, and spoke with a legal affairs representative. Since there is a proviso that serving in a foreign military can cause loss of citizenship, I told him of my concern. I was told the only way I could lose my US citizenship, was by renouncing it in writing. A ten-year old child cannot do so.
I returned to the US with my US passport. Sorry, Denialists.
The point would be that, as a defendant in a lawsuit, he would have a legal opportunity to depose the plaintiffs on the issue of the truth or falsity of the matters they are suing over. If the goal is to force production of documents related to Obama’s birth, then a lawsuit over a claim that the documents are fraudulent would be one way (in theory) to do that. It would eliminate the standing issue — Polland doesn’t have standing to sue the DOH in Hawaii, but he does have “standing” to defend himself against a lawsuit brought by Hawaii officials for defamation.
I’m pretty sure it’s libel. Legally, electronic media is deemed a “writing”.
Analytically, the difference is really one of proof and exposure. With slander — a verbal communication — you’ve got a he said, she said situation in terms of what was said, and the “publication” is limited to the person or audience that hears the spoken words. Anything that is recorded — whether in print, a tape recording, film or blog — is easily determinable — the paper, web site, video, etc. is itself evidence of the defamation. If it the writing / recording was created by the defendant for dissemination, then you clearly also have a “publication”.
I’d note that the first step really is to flag the video in YouTube as violating its TOS. They’ll take it down fairly quickly.
Thank you very much. I would not be surprised to see that some aspects of the certificate have changed over the past 9 years.
How about a subtle watermark that reads, “Screw you, birther idiots.”?
States do not disclose to the public all the security features built into their birth certificates. 👿
True. The seal on every authentic state certificate has extensive binary data on Area 51 and the final resting spot of Jimmy Hoffa.
So that’s what happened to him.
You – you mean he’s NOT living in sin with Judge Crater?
Showing how silly the birthers are over at the Post and Fail they use this forged analysis, that even the Freepers realized was phony, to support a call to Adm. Mullen to “rise up and overthrow the democratically elected President of the United States”….You really can’t make this stuff up….
“History has placed you in a position where you appear to be faced with assuming the role of a modern-day Solomon. However, the decision you face is even more critical than can be resolved by suggesting the baby be cut in half. Only a skilled executive with years of administrative and military experience, together with the special qualities of balance, described above, can possibly make an accurate determination as to whether the current civil administrator with a questionable level of authority, an authority to which you report through the established chain of command, has exceeded the limits of appropriate legal, ethical and moral conduct by a government based on the Constitution as empowered by the people of the United States.
In my view, Admiral Mullen, the Obama regime and Congress have consistently rejected and ignored the will of the people on many occasions. I base this conclusion on the execution of a constant unrelenting stream of events, oppressive legislation and abusive executive orders, where the will of the people has been repeatedly expressed, in good faith, and flatly ignored by those who have seized power. Many of the disenfranchised people of this country, me included, have classified the current administration and the Congress as our “domestic enemy, a term in the Constitution of the United States which describes this specific state of affairs.
Certainly many factors must be taken into consideration when weighing the gravity of this situation which has been developing over the last 18 months, a situation which has exhibited a pattern of repeated administrative abuse headed in a direction where even you must have some questions and concerns about the legitimacy of those in charge.”
This dangerous and treasonous set of circumstances demonstrates the very reason the Commander-in-Chief of the United States military must be a natural born Citizen, a special kind of citizen who cannot be placed in a position of divided loyalties such as in the case of Mr. Obama, who had a foreign parent and might even be foreign-born himself.
I am not sure if it occurred to you, but it did to me: when Obama is in a position to determine military options, is he thinking of the American people or his benefactors in the Middle East?
Admiral Mullen, will you honor your oath and, along with Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, take the necessary steps to insure that any and all orders from your “Commander-in-Chief” are, in fact, lawful orders from a Constitutionally-qualified and eligible person for that position, and, if not, also take the necessary steps to remove him from the chain of command? I and a desperately-awaiting nation are awaiting your response to this burning question: Can any orders, Executive or Commands, from an illegitimate Commander-in-Chief, be considered “Lawful Orders”?”
And the usual commentary from the peanut gallery….I guess they don’t like that Mullen believes in adhering to the US Constitution….
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM
Adm. Mike Mullen stated on June 28th:
 military leaders must always be mindful that they serve elected leaders;
 they must ensure that they are adhering to that in every way — publicly, privately, formally, informally;
 they must do so to the degree that they tolerate it even in private discussions because it’s corrosive.
Conclusion drawn: the U.S. Military has made it “Crystal-clear” to ALL the purpose of the U.S. Military is to “SERVE THE ELECTED LEADERS…ADHERING TO SUCH SERVICE NO MATTER WHAT”. Here again, we see again, the ENTIRE U.S. Government, specifically including its Military, has established and empowered the Obama regime’.