How many times have you read on the Internet that all the hospitals in Hawaii had been called, and NONE of them would confirm that Barack Obama was born there? I’ve never seen a single name of someone who made such a call, until now: Peter Boyles, of radio station KHOW in Denver. Here’s the transcript from April 25, 2011:
HOSPITAL: Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children. Can I help you?
BOYLES: Hi, it’s Peter Boyles, a radio guy in Denver, Colorado, and you’re with us. I want to bring my family and go to where President Obama was born. Is this the right hospital?
HOSPITAL: That’s correct.
BOYLES: OK, so there’s, he was born here in Kapi’olani?
Well, I’m glad we have that cleared up.
well…the wheels are coming of the birtherworld band wagon…..guess they have to console themselves with junk science claiming it’s a forgery, and junk law claiming parent citizens….but I’m sure that’s enough for them to get buy.
Can anyone give me a hand? These goal posts are heavy!
From one of the Amazon blogs:
“Now I hear that David Sinclair’s wife is a DEMOCRAT social worker who has ALWAYS WORKED CLOSELY with the Hawaii Dept of Health. She’d be a great source for her dead husband’s signature…a real Kama’aina with lots of rabid Democratic friends starting with Fukino and right on down the line. Boy, it’s a small world, isn’t it? With Abercrombie and Adams saying that there essentially IS NO LONG FORM but “just a manual entry in some book,” what can you believe anymore when an official, findable doc surfaces. I’d bet my life savings that what we have is a conspiracy here…Hawaii’s governmental offices are populated by rabid DEMS who would do ANYTHING to keep Obama in office, even if it meant (no, especially if it meant) defecating on our Constitution.”
Hahaha I’m there Sean this guy is off his rocker. He’s just as bad as daniel king iv
wow, sean is really delusional, he needs mental healh advice. He must not be aware of how deluded he sounds, we should set up a fund for his Mental Hospital fees. The man is seriously ill.
But did they confirm that Obama sent them the letter that they put on their website that said he was born there? [/NC1]
I think Sean is making fun of the birthers.
I think Sean is making fun of the birthers.
yah, saw that
Sorry Sean, forgive me!
I was quoting one I found on one of the Amazon blogs.
speaking of which…not a peep out of our friend nc1….I wonder why? I would have expected her to come here and say, “well, with that out of the way, I can now vote for President Obama in 2012.”
NC1 has to read all the birther blogs first and get her fraud, forgery, counter-argument talking points together first. Give her time to prepare.
Peter Boyles called to get an expected answer of NO. He was surprized at the YES. If he anticipated a YES, he would not have called.
This has been a devastating day for the birthers.
Well it would be, if they were sane or honest.
No, Boyles probably expected to be told something along the lines of “we can’t release information about patients.”
As soon as the news hit, a reporter tried to hand Trump a copy of the birth certificate, and he didn’t want to look at it. He went and signed autographs instead. Trump wasn’t interested in the BC.
Peter Boyles’ web page has a poll asking if the birth certificate is real:
The stats from a minute ago:
I don’t know: 19.28%
> Boyles probably expected to be told something along the lines of “we can’t release information about patients.
Next expect nc1 to claim that this still is not a “confirmation” because the person Boyles called may have been the janitor.
I could use the help of anyone who cares to discuss documents and alleged forgeries to this:
I immediately scrutinized the release, only to find that it was a “more convincing” form of the same old COLB. But it still is dated 8 Aug, 4 days after the alleged birth time. It’s perhaps more convincing since it has two signatures. But I find four things fishy about this COLB version:
1- the check mark for the “attendant” MD slot was over-marked,
2- there are lightly penciled-in numbers 1, 2(twice), 9(twice), x – x as if someone had to be prompted to supply values for them. 3-
The right edge of the form is bent back out of sight as if to conceal the information specified and written. That bend-back is obviously longer – and contains attached real information – than the apparent slot remaining open; to the left is blank green bar blank paper; strange. A good copy of ANYTHING is both clear AND complete. There is no way the record could have been stored that way for almost 50 years and not be compressed to a fold. Yet the tiny green watermark bars align almost perfectly. What’s being hidden? Finally 4- What’s last Monday’s date (April 25, 2011) doing stamped on a document that is supposed to be 50 years old????? As Corsi says; “Let the Games Begin!”.
Angelo Campanella, Ph.D.(physics).
Over at this site:
Re: “What’s last Monday’s date (April 25, 2011) doing stamped on a document that is supposed to be 50 years old????? ”
That is so it could be a CERTIFIED DOCUMENT. A mere image of the original, not printed on security paper and without the seal, would not be certified. So, I believe that you are right, it is not a simple image of the original. It is a printed image of the digitized image of the original printed on security paper with the seal and signature added.
Are you saying that you would like to see an image of the paper copy? Why? Just for the folds?
Are you saying that you think that the facts on the paper copy would be different from those on the digital copy?
(Obviously, if the authorities wanted to forge a copy of the paper document without the seal and the security paper they could do just as easily as the digital image.)
Re the Aug 8 date. A guy gets born in the evening on a Friday too late for an entry on that day. Then there are Saturday and Sunday, and say that the clerks were busy on Monday and so some of their work slipped over into Tuesday.
Notice the weasly way in which Boyles “disclosed” to the receptionist that they were on the air:
“Hi, it’s Peter Boyles, a radio guy in Denver, Colorado, and you’re with us.”
“You’re with us?” I have no doubt that he deliberately did not say “you’re on the air.”
The Composte and efail (post and email) has an article with headlines screaming “KAPIOLANI STILL REFUSES TO CONFIRM OBAMA BIRTH” or some such nonsense.
As long as the White House refuses to confirm whether it confirmed the released of Obama’s long-form BC, we still have doubts. Oh, and we need to confirm the confirmation of that confirmation just to be on the safe side.
So none of the birthers actually tried calling all of the hospitals like they said they did? Shocking.
Some of us work during the day – bills have to be paid.
Let me guess – you don’t mind any more that a state would require a certified copy of the original birth certificate as a prerequisite to include a candidate on the presidential elections ballot.
I hope that today’s events will encourage state legislators to pass such laws.
I also hope that at least one judge allows eligibility case to be heard on the merit. After all there is no reason for Obama to fight the lawsuit on a technicality – it is time to put the issue to rest so that he can start the re-election campaign with this issue behind him, right?
It’s time for racist birthers to admit President Obama is a natural born citizen and then STFU and let the adults talk about serious problems. Your 15 minutes of fame are done. There are no more reasonable questions about the President’s eligibility and if you don’t see that then you are a juvenile moron.
You don’t realize how bad this look for Obama and his character, do you?
If the long form certificate is a legitimate document – the circumstances leading to the disclosure of such a trivial document would illustrate the weakness of his character. A patriotic CiC would not have allowed the division of country on such a trivial issue.
When Berg filed his lawsuit in August 2008 (three months before elections) that was the proper time for Obama to release the long form. Another golden opportunity to look presidential was Lakin’s court martial.
If the long form is a legitimate document, Obama should have intervened and made sure that officers have no doubt whether they follow legitimate orders when asked to go to a war zone and risk their lives. Instead Obama stood and watched a court proceeding worthy of a third world banana republic: defendant (Lakin) was not allowed to present a defence, which he thought was best for him.
The “long form” is not a legally admissible document to prove eligibility, whereas the COLB was, and is. The long form was released today to shut up the morons, like you. Uselessly, as morons don’t know when to shut up. If they did, they wouldn’t be morons.
Any state legislature that would take the “long form” instead of the COLB, is being run by morons. or shysters that pander to morons.
Lakin was tried and sentenced for being a moron. He disobeyed a lawful command which had nothing to do with the President’s eligibility, nor would a president’s ineligibility have altered the lawfulness of that command.
Lakin was allowed to present any relevant defence. Lakin had no relevant defence. Lakin was not allowed to use his crime or the trial arising from it, to be a grandstand for morons like you.
We’ve been through all this before. If you’re too stupid to understand the basics of elementary justice, you should not be so stupid as to comment such that your ignorance is made plain to everyone watching.
“defence” As a naturalized citizen, you have chutzpah.
No other president in US history had to prove he is a citizen, much less NBC. I wonder why?
So only candidates who can get special dispensation from the officials running the health department can run? And all those candidates who were born in states that only provide short form certificates based on digital records are SOL, if they can’t get special favors done for them?
We know from the reporting today that Obama ordered up 2 certified copies. I guess he figured he’d have one to hang onto and one to let the press touch, feel and photograph if they insisted. What if 10 states pass laws, all of which want an a certified copy and not a photocopy? Does Obama need to get a special favor done for him again?
I have rarely (if ever) read a statement more vile, stupid and seditious on this site. You have outdone yourself in loathsomeness.
Because they’re racist schmucks.
I couldn’t agree more.
But can you confirm that the confirmation will confirm that the confirmation confirms what you say it will confirm, before the confirmation confirms what the confirmation should confirm so that we can all stop confirming the confirmations and forget about just what the heck we were supposed to be confirming in the first place?
I think you are giving them much, much to much credit here.
If the long form certificate is such a potent document to you birthers that it would have stopped your infamous larrikin Lakin from committing treason – well then, you have just declared the document that Obama provided to be irrefutable evidence that he was born in the United States.
But we all know that you do not mean it – you believe it is a forgery, not really a BC or even proof that he was no natural born citizen because his father was not a US citizen. And if your larrikin traitor had been shown the document (as if it is so easy to present 300,000,000 people a birth certificate in person, by the way) we all know that he would claimed it was a forgery, not really a BC or even proof that he was no natural born citizen because his father was not a US citizen.
And now go and check in a dictionary “to have your cake and eat it”.
151 61 10641
Had this document been released before Lakin’s video, in all likelihood, he would have wanted to know about the layers and the fonts. And after listening to Jensen and others, he would have decided it was a forgery. And continued to commit career suicide.
Well, Orly, did you enjoy your little smackdown from Mr. O’Donnell?
I must have missed it- Where exactly was nc1’s apology for being wrong all these years, wasting the nation’s time and money, and demanding papers from a minority for no other reason than his skin color?