Obot observers

Taitz Photo, WLBT NewsAny time there is conflict, it is important to get an objective account of the events. Today’s conflict is the first hearing in the lawsuit Taitz v Democrat Party of Mississippi. At first glance, “Obot observers” wouldn’t seem the most objective of choices, but in fact the Obots have an excellent track record of providing objective reports that match the official transcripts once they come available. I myself reported on Farrar v. Obama in Georgia. In this case, I’ve heard that there are several participants from the Fogbow forum attending today’s hearing.

This case is unique because it is the first and only judicial proceeding in which an original signed and sealed verification of Obama’s birth facts from the State of Hawaii has been submitted to the court. In the past, only copies of the long form birth certificate have been submitted, sometimes by plaintiffs and sometimes by the defense. It is also the first time that a credentialed anti-birther, Scott Tepper, is on the defense team.

At this point, I’m waiting for news, and when there is some, I’ll update the article. In the mean time, here are links to earlier articles on this case:

First report:

[Taitz] lost her motion to remand [return the case back to state court]. Her motion to stay was moot. She has to file oppositions to the motions for judgment on the pleadings AND a RICO statement within 3 weeks (her time frame). When she asked that defendants’ time to reply be shortened the judge declined since she was helping herself to 3 weeks. And at the end 28 USC sec. 1927 (the sanctions section of the federal law) was explained to her

So far there have been no reports of police breaking up fisticuffs in Mississippi, so I presume the Obots got away safely.

You can read the goodies from the folks who were there on The Fogbow and check out a special edition of Reality Check Radio tonight (9/24) for first-hand reports.  I read the report from Sugar Magnolia aloud to Ms. Conspiracy in my best Blanche DuBois voice, and we both totally cracked up.

I’m working on my own special report technically related to the Mississippi case, but focusing on what didn’t happen in Mississippi rather than what did. It promises to be a lot of work for very limited results, but at least it will be original. Now if I can just get past some technical problems 😉

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Ballot Challenges, Lawsuits, Orly Taitz and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

46 Responses to Obot observers

  1. Yoda says:

    Usually when a Judge reads a sanction provision to an attorney it is a message to withdraw the pleading or the action. Orly will not get this message. Her case was not dismissed so she will see this as a “victory” in much the same way that her denied motion in another action was labeled “her greatest victory to date” because she was granted leave to file an amended complaint.

  2. Rickey says:

    Sterngard Friegen has posted a second-hand account at The Fogbow:

    Taitz motion to remand denied.

    Taitz motion to stay moot.

    Taitz motion for sanctions premature. (Is that correct?)

    Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings will be promptly heard after Taitz files oppositions (in the next 3 weeks) and defendants file their replies. Taitz wanted 3 weeks but then wanted the court to require defendants to file their replies on shortened time. That didn’t go over well.

    Taitz has to file a RICO statement within 3 weeks, too.

    Taitz is going to try to serve other defendants (those she has named) but the judge also reminded her that she might be multiplying the litigation and could be sanctioned under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1927. I’m not sure Taitz heard or understood any of that.

    Taitz’s attempts to smear the President did not last long. While her attempts were objected to and overruled, when she started up with social security and selective service fraud the court shut her down.

    All in all a typical day at the office for Taitz.

    And I hear her hair was a mess at the end of the proceeding.

    Whipped again by an empty chair.

    First-hand reports should be getting posted this afternoon.

  3. RuhRoh says:

    From Great Grey at Fogbow:

    “Went from 9:30 to 11: 00. 20 min break, ended at noon.

    As Sterny indicated motion to remand back to state court was denied. Long lecture to Lena about proper service.

    After break addressed motion to expedite (moot), judicial notice (Ill tell you when I notice your crap).

    Got to asking Lena how long it would take to do proper service on the parties not present. She started at 2 weeks, then changed to 3 weeks. Wingate gave her 3 weeks to do that, PLUS properly finish the RICO Statement.

    So, 21 days, plus new defs get 60 to respond…December 14.

    Wingate indicated, and BB will correct me, he would hear Orval’s in 5 days.”

    *note: I think Orval’s is a typo for orals*

  4. Remind me again, when is the election?

    RuhRoh: So, 21 days, plus new defs get 60 to respond…December 14.

  5. RuhRoh says:

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    Remind me again, when is the election?

    😀

    Good thing the Birfers believe in that “magic reset” button! A belief in time-travel would be of more use.

    Apparently Orly spoke to some press following the hearing and was rather unhappy that Scott Tepper was allowed to appear telephonically.

  6. donna says:

    Dr. Conspiracy: Remind me again, when is the election?

    will the ditz include a constitutional amendment changing the date of us elections?

    is this another of the “retroactive” thingys?

  7. Rickey says:

    In addition to a full written report later today on The Fogbow, Reality Check Radio will be doing a show this evening.

  8. I think there will be a very special guest tonight.

    Rickey: In addition to a full written report later today on The Fogbow, Reality Check Radio will be doing a show this evening.

  9. Paul says:

    RuhRoh:

    *note: I think Orval’sis a typo for orals*

    Not a typo as such, just Fogbow Folks’ creative way of spelling it.

  10. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Anyone got a pic of her with her hair looking all messed up? It could be a great photoshopping opportunity!

  11. RuhRoh says:

    Andrew Vrba, PmG:
    Anyone got a pic of her with her hair looking all messed up? It could be a great photoshopping opportunity!

    It seems as though one should surface eventually as she did speak with the press following the hearing.

  12. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Good, because I just perfected a new comic book effect in Photoshop, and a pic of Orly looking her craziest would make for a really funny faux-comic book cover!

  13. donna says:

    Mississippi Ballot Challenge–UPDATE 2

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23574

    Mississippi Ballot Challenge–UPDATE 3

    the taitz/court go-around is PRICELESS

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23576

  14. RuhRoh says:

    Butterfly Bilderberg has a summary of her notes posted here: http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=8315&p=421961#p421961

  15. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    This is making my day! It really is! XD

  16. RuhRoh says:

    Taitz says she was interviewed by the local NBC affiliate. Here’s the linky: http://www.wlbt.com/story/19625427/lawsuit-hopes-to-disqualify-obama-in-election

  17. RuhRoh says:

    Taitz’s hair in the WLBT pic looks pretty much the way it always does: over-processed, over-bleached, lopsided and living a life independent from the head upon which it suffers. Her eye makeup seems to have smudged a great deal on its misguided journey to her cheekbones, however.

  18. Paul Pieniezny says:

    28 USC sec. 1927

    It had to be explained to her? But Squeeky brought that up on her website. Does not Orly read Squeeky?

    Oops – I forgot that Orly is a great specialist at unlearning things. Especially where law is concerned. There are non-US non-lawyers here who are by now better at US law than Orly.

  19. RuhRoh says:

    Um, Orly can’t even figure out how to effect service, so…

  20. ASK Esq says:

    Paul Pieniezny: 28 USC sec. 1927
    It had to be explained to her?

    Knowing Orly, she probably thinks the judge was telling her he was going to sanction the defendants for daring to oppose her.

  21. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    That wouldn’t surprise me really, as she regularly screeches for the imprisonment of those who don’t agree with her.

  22. bgansel9 says:

    I get the feeling her husband is soon going to regret bringing her to the U.S.

  23. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    bgansel9:
    I get the feeling her husband is soon going to regret bringing her to the U.S.

    I think you mean that he will regret making her in a lab, in some horrible Dr. Moreau type experiment. Putting the brain of a screech owl, into the body of a crazy cat lady? What the hell was he THINKING?!
    But then again, Bat#$%@ crazy might be what does it for him!

  24. LW says:

    I read the report from Sugar Magnolia aloud to Ms. Conspiracy in my best Blanche DuBois voice, and we both totally cracked up.

    “I have always depended on the strangeness of birthers.”

    (Streetcar!)

  25. US Citizen says:

    So in Orly’s mind, she was prematurely ejaculated from court again?

  26. John Reilly says:

    Dr. Taitz reports that the case is still alive, that Mr. Tepper was turned down in his effort to get judicial notice of something, and she is off to another state.

    Dr. Taitz appears to be well qualified to be an NFL replacement ref.

  27. Daniel says:

    Isn’t it about time for John (not John Reilly) to show up and explain to us in great detail how wrong the judge was?

  28. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Ma

    Daniel:
    Isn’t it about time for John (not John Reilly) to show up and explain to us in great detail how wrong the judge was?

    Maybe we finally got lucky, and he was carried off in the night by tree lobsters. Or maybe John Reilly, went all Highlander on his ass.

  29. G says:

    Tree lobsters!!! LMAO!

    Andrew Vrba, PmG: Maybe we finally got lucky, and he was carried off in the night by tree lobsters

  30. John Reilly says:

    I have not gone Highlander on John’s rear. Perhaps his absence is a result of his Mother reminding him the chores have not been done or that his dinner is ready. One envisions John as being played by Kevin Smith, in, I believe, Die Hard 4. However, for those who miss John’s lack of connection to reality, we can guess that his position remains:

    ANY DAY NOW.

  31. G says:

    Minus Kevin Smith’s computer skills and brains in that movie, of course! 😉

    John Reilly:
    I have not gone Highlander on John’s rear.Perhaps his absence is a result of his Mother reminding him the chores have not been done or that his dinner is ready.One envisions John as being played by Kevin Smith, in, I believe, Die Hard 4.However, for those who miss John’s lack of connection to reality, we can guess that his position remains:

    ANY DAY NOW.

  32. misha says:

    bgansel9: I get the feeling her husband is soon going to regret bringing her to the U.S.

    I am waiting for the other shoe to drop. Having first hand experience with that crowd, I can assure you her antics have caused much marital misery. You don’t know drama until you’ve experienced Russian drama.

    Read all about it. NSFW:
    http://blog.friendseat.com/paradou-owner-vadim-ponorovsky-curses-out-employees

  33. Dave B. says:

    My girlfriend has a bachelor’s degree in Russian language and a Master’s in Russian literature, and she’s spent extended periods in St. Petersburg and Moscow. Loves the language, literature and culture. She doesn’t want anything to do with any kind of employment using her Russian smarts and schooling, though; she got overloaded on Russian personal dramas helping refugees get settled in.

    misha: You don’t know drama until you’ve experienced Russian drama.

  34. donna says:

    speaking of the ditz

    from her website September 25, 2012

    Mike Pence was updated on upcoming hearing in IN

    I was able to talk to IN Congressman Mike Pence, leading candidate for the IN Governor for 2012 election. I updated him on the hearing in the Superior Court of Indiana before Judge Reid to be held tomorrow at 1:30 in the Marion county Superior Court.

    any day now ……

  35. Paul Pieniezny says:

    Paul: Not a typo as such, just Fogbow Folks’ creative way of spelling it.

    Perhaps Orval is one of Obama’s favorites?

    There is a legend (probably baloney) that the name was coined by Mathilda of Tuscany. When her golden ring fell into a spring and was returned by a trout, she proclaimed the abbey grounds a valley of gold.

    And like most abbeys and villages in Belgium, they not only have their own beer, but their own cheese as well.

    http://www.orval.be/en/8/Brewery

    Perhaps Orly was told “Orval” before that picture was taken. It is all part of the conspiracy to make her look bad.

  36. donna says:

    Indiana Ballot Challenge: Land Of Ankeny

    We move on today to Indiana, a state with an elections commission Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. says is more corrupt than Egypt!

    This afternoon at 1:30, she appears pro hac vice before Judge S.K. Reid in the Superior Court of Indiana, Marion County, on a Second Amended Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed on September 7, to which she has added defendants, including a radio station and its talk show host, as well as the deputy attorneys-general assigned to the case. Indiana’s anti-SLAPP statute could easily come into play here, something that could prove expensive for Taitz.

    MORE: http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23614#more-23614

  37. donna says:

    update from indiana

    Indiana Ballot Challenge: Preliminary Injunction–DENIED

    The preliminary injunction was denied the judges reasoning was that Orly had not presented any evidence had not met burden of proof.

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23666#more-23666

  38. Rickey says:

    donna:
    Indiana Ballot Challenge: Land Of Ankeny

    We move on today to Indiana, a state with an elections commission Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. says is more corrupt than Egypt!

    This afternoon at 1:30, she appears pro hac vice before Judge S.K. Reid in the Superior Court of Indiana, Marion County, on a Second Amended Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed on September 7, to which she has added defendants, including a radio station and its talk show host, as well as the deputy attorneys-general assigned to the case. Indiana’s anti-SLAPP statute could easily come into play here, something that could prove expensive for Taitz.

    MORE: http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23614#more-23614

    Fogbow observers report that Orly was granted pro hac vice with the admonishment (apparently a five minute lecture) that she must follow the rules of the court and she is subject to disciplinary action. Her motion for a preliminary injunction was denied. Black was warned that he will be held responsible for Orly’s actions.

  39. donna says:

    Rickey: “the rules of the court”???

    there are rules?

    who knew?

    lol me thinks another corrupt, paid off, coerced judge

  40. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Rules? Is that a kind of breakfast cereal?

  41. donna says:

    more on indiana

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23680

    priceless/reid “That includes disciplinary actions against you, perhaps for events from today.”

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=23685#more-23685

  42. donna says:

    RC Radio – Special Edition on Orly in Indiana

    Be sure to listen to Reality Check Radio tonight at 9 p.m. Eastern for a full report on Orly’s hearing in Indiana today!

  43. brygenon says:

    I’m a blue-blooded Orly-hating obot, but I feel I should stand up in a way that might be taken as defending her. She does so much that’s so awful, so deserving of scorn, but…

    Dress, hair, makeup, husband? We should be above that crap. I have dear friends, wonderful people, who make bigger mistakes than Dr. Taitz on those matters.

    Call her evil. She is. Don’t call her ugly. Doesn’t matter whether she is.

  44. misha says:

    brygenon: Dress, hair, makeup, husband? We should be above that crap…Call her evil. She is. Don’t call her ugly.

    OK, I’ll call her a streetwalker and harpie. Also, a character assassin, third rate dentist and fifth rate mail order lawyer.

    Her actual name is Svetlana Auerbach, and she changed it to Orly in Israel. “Or” is Hebrew for ‘light.’ Like other refuseniks, she developed a taste for fascism. She’s a shonde who spent Yom Kippur trying to file a lawsuit against President Obama.

    There. I did not once say she was beaten with an ugly stick.

  45. Daniel says:

    brygenon:
    I’m a blue-blooded Orly-hating obot, but I feel I should stand up in a way that might be taken as defending her. She does so much that’s so awful, so deserving of scorn, but…

    Dress, hair, makeup, husband? We should be above that crap. I have dear friends, wonderful people, who make bigger mistakes than Dr. Taitz on those matters.

    Call her evil. She is. Don’t call her ugly. Doesn’t matter whether she is.

    I’ll stand with you on this.

    She’s responsible for what she says and does, not for the face she was born with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.