Proposed orders in Taitz v. Indiana Elections Commission

Approved rubber stampA series of proposed orders in Taitz  v. Elections Commission from the Indiana Attorney General’s office have been obtained. After the October 22 “trial” in which Taitz called three witnesses, the judge directed Orly Taitz, and the State defendants to provide her with proposed orders. I haven’t seen the ones from Taitz, but the AG proposed orders are linked below. One proposed order “vacates” the trial (meaning that the whole October 22 affair will be stricken from the record).


Orly Taitz reports [link to Taitz web site] that her Indiana attorney pro hac vice sponsor Greg Black sent the following email:

Mr. Kesler1 all orders of Atty Gen adopted, trial vacated, all evidence stricken, complaint dismissed…

Basic ruling of Judge: no proper appeal of Elections Commission decision in February.   Elections Commission decision in February is final, unappealed.

But the truth: birth certificate White House sent out April ’11 is admitted, Paul Irey allowed to testify the birth certificate is forged.  That was the state of the evidence at close of trial, no contrary evidence.


Judge Reid in Indiana is noted for her rubber stamp collection.

1Edward Kesler was one of the plaintiffs in the case.

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Ballot Challenges, Orly Taitz and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Proposed orders in Taitz v. Indiana Elections Commission

  1. JL from Sherman Oaks says:


  2. gorefan says:

    Have the signed orders been released? It would ne interesting to see if the judge struck out anything.

  3. bob says:

    Taitz (on her site) is reporting that the judge granted to motion to vacate the trial, and dismissed the case.

  4. Yoda says:

    Bob, you are being too kind. She, and I am paraphrasing here, said that the judge signed the garbage offered by the anti american AG and vacated the trial and then compared the US to Nazi Germany.

  5. Robert says:

    did she even offer a proposed order?

  6. Yoda says:

    Not that I know of

  7. JL from Sherman Oaks says:

    did she even offer a proposed order?

    Yes, but Lena didn’t share it with us on her brag-site, just said she’d forwarded it.

  8. donna says:

    [NBC corrected his article. These were Indiana, not California. Comment moved her to Indiana article. Doc.]
    CA – Orly v Obama – Signed orders!!!

    IN 2012-11-1 – POST-TRIAL ORDER




    The second document is corrupted and will be corrected

  9. bob says:

    The signed order. (The court dismissed the claim; it did not vacate the trial. Same result.)

  10. Daniel says:

    Once again Orly has a “trial on the merits” and found to be without merit. The nice thing about this particular set of orders is that it goes in to great and precise detail as to exactly why her “evidence” has no merits.

    I can’t help but wonder if this was the intent all along, since in this set of orders, Orly has hung herself well and truly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.