Strunk something

Christopher Earl Strunk had a court appearance on the 24th of November. An email from him appears at Gerbil Report™ and it provides a narrative of what happened. The problem with this report (and others of its kind) is that it comes from someone who reads things differently than I do, and as a result what he thinks happened or what it means might be different from what I would have understood or reported.

It appears that Judge David Schmidt told Strunk to file default motion if defendants (and there are many) fail to respond in a time adequate for a March 26, 2015 hearing date. Nothing was reported as to what that date might be. The comments about someone admitting something seem to be some sort weird interpretation rather than anything actually said.

The convolutions of multiple cases and judges seems not worth the trouble to try to keep track of. What intrigued me was the statement:

The BHO falsified instrument was presented for the purpose of getting ballot access to the 2012 General Election here in New York as an act of treason against the Constitution for the United States.

What Strunk is saying here is that Obama released his birth certificate to the press in April of 2011 for the purpose of getting ballot access to the 2012 General Election in New York; however, I am not aware of any New York official watching TV or accessing the White House web site in order to make a determination of whether Obama should be on the ballot in 2012 or not.

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Lawsuits and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Strunk something

  1. Notorial Dissent says:

    Having read Stunk’s rambling, disjointed, and altogether incoherent email, at least the one I assume you mean, I can definitely see your point.He makes all sorts of wild assertions and claims, that I don’t see even coming close being justicable in a state court, or any court for that matter, and I thought he was supposed to have served whoever it is he is really suing by this point, and as near as I can tell they are still wrangling, and about what I’m not sure.

    I can’t help feeling that the whole steaming pile o’ poo should have been tossed a long time ago for nonsense value alone, let alone having no legal basis or standing.

  2. RanTalbott says:

    An email from him appears at Gerbil Report™ and it provides a narrative of what happened.

    Yeah, but it’s a narrative of what happened in his delusions, not in the real courtroom.

    Two things worthy of note are that he’s gotten in bed with Irey, whose looniness is increasing, and that he plans to take the approach Orly did in Georgia, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory by demanding a trial on the merits.

    I wonder if Obama will send the same crack defense team that so resoundingly defeated her 😉

  3. Notorial Dissent says:

    Has he ever managed to actually legally serve anyone even remotely involved in this farce?

  4. Color Me Skeptical says:

    The Gerbil Report™!!!

    ha ha good one!

  5. bovril says:

    The ‘thumbs down’ feature has been re-enabled over at Gerbil Report if one cares to rate posts and posters appropriately……..

  6. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    bovril:
    The ‘thumbs down’ feature has been re-enabled over at Gerbil Report if one cares to rate posts and posters appropriately……..

    Well, I got an hour to kill.
    I could play some Aliens: Colonial Marines, or thumb down as many birther posts as I can stand to…
    Hmmm…Gonna have to go with the option that involves Michael Biehn!

  7. Jim says:

    bovril: The ‘thumbs down’ feature has been re-enabled over at Gerbil Report if one cares to rate posts and posters appropriately……..

    But remember, when they start attacking each other give them a BIG thumbs up!!! 😀

  8. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Jim: But remember, when they start attacking each other give them a BIG thumbs up!!!

    And be sure to give thumbs ups to the ones who get under BSE and Falcon’s skin the most. They’ll take it as “proof” that said person is an Obot! 🙂

  9. Rickey says:

    It’s difficult to discern what is happening on Strunk’s lawsuit because very little of it is available online, and I certainly wouldn’t take Strunk’s word for any of it. For example, the next appearance date is 3/26/15 and the docket entry says nothing about an inquest. In fact, before there can be an inquest Struck has to be granted a default judgment, and there is nothing on the docket to suggest that he has even made a motion for a default judgment against any of the defendants.

  10. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    I’m convinced that the legal “battle” is taking place solely in Strunk’s mind. Complete with 1980s cartoon laser sounds.

  11. Notorial Dissent says:

    I’m still of the impression that he as to actually legally serve someone who is a real part to the suit, and as near as I can tell that hasn’t happened yet. I think, as you say, that most of the action is going on in his fetid imagination. Hint, he thinks he is winning.

  12. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    And therein lies the problem for all of birtherdom. What works in their self-created reality, has no effect in the real world.

  13. aarrgghh says:

    Andrew Vrba, PmG: And therein lies the problem for all of birtherdom. What works in their self-created reality, has no effect in the real world.

    most people don’t need a degree in birfer calculus to realize that, but every little bit helps …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.