Main Menu

You can tell a lot about a blog…

…by who they link to. Take Larry Sinclair, would be author of yet another anti-Obama book: BARACK OBAMA & LARRY SINCLAIR: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder. So who does Larry Sinclair link to in his blog?

Not one mention of Obama Conspiracy Theories!

, , , , , , ,

39 Responses to You can tell a lot about a blog…

  1. avatar
    bogus info January 10, 2009 at 8:31 pm #

    And you would want to be mentioned in that crowd?

  2. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 10, 2009 at 8:45 pm #

    The way I ended up on Sinclair’s blog was doing a Google search asking for links to Dr. Orly, “link:drorly.blogspot.com”. It’s a good way to pick up nObama web sites to look at and comment on.

  3. avatar
    bogus info January 10, 2009 at 10:28 pm #

    Dr. C.,

    That was meant to be funny.

  4. avatar
    mimi January 11, 2009 at 4:39 am #

    I’ve been to RosettaSister’s blog. (((shivers)))

  5. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 7:06 am #

    mimi,

    What do you mean?

  6. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 9:03 am #

    Dr. C.,

    Anything to this? Came from Texasdarlin:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/9997554/Strunk-v-US-Dept-of-State-and-Homeland-Security-Amended-Verified-Complaint-and-Petition-in-Re-Foia-Usdc

    Read the entire Strunk v. US Dept of State & US Dept of Homeland Security lawsuit papers …

    …” and you may be amazed. It’s wonderful. Even facts I didn’t know about and I thought I pretty much knew all about the Indonesian years and laws re Barry and his citizenship. The laws and facts stated in this document, if correct, PROVE that Obama is still an Indonesian citizen.

    I hope this one makes it to the Supreme Court and that they get all the way to oral arguments, thus forcing Barry to produce documents that disprove this lawsuit’s allegations.
    I don’t think he can.

    This is excellent. It also says that if any info is denied, then we have standing under the Freedom of Information Act to sue!

    It also says that because we were denied information prior to voting, that we were hurt/injured. Very very true. I like this one. I wonder how far it will get?”

  7. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 9:20 am #

    Here is one sane poster on Texasdarlin:

    The Supreme Court has rejected various cases questioning Obama’s eligibility. They did not list Berg’s case on the list of accepted cases on Friday, so I am pretty sure they will be rejecting that one as well on Monday, although we’ll see if they do in a few days.

    Barack Obama will be sworn in as president by John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, on January 20th. Anyway, it does not seem that the highest law in the land thinks Obama’s eligibility is in question.

    If Obama’s birth certificate was not legitimate would they ignore it? I don’t at all think they would. I am not one to believe in conspiracy theories. It does not seem at all probable that EVERYONE at the Supreme Court, the FBI, the CIA, Homeland Security, the Pentagon etc, would allow someone that’s not eligible to even get this far in the process. They have far more resources for investigative work than bloggers do. They can look at any document they want, regardless of privacy laws to verify any information. There is no doubt for me that they have checked Obama out.

    I guess something could happen in the next 10 days, but it does not seem like his citizenship is an issue to anyone at the Supreme Court or anyone else.

    If John Roberts swears Obama in on January 20th, I will disregard all questions of his citizenship.

  8. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 9:52 am #

    I’ll give them that at least this one is more professionally written. That said, I still doubt it has much of a chance because FOIA doesn’t grant them access to private info. They seem to be unable or unwilling to grasp this fact. Here, I do not believe the “public interest” outweighs the privacy concerns unless they were able to show some measure of sufficient proof that Obama were born elsewhere (or even enough to raise a reasonable doubt in light of the COLB, etc.).

    Strunk is also quite the character here in NYC! He believes the Jesuits are in control of EVERYTHING in some New World Order conspiracy. Pretty crazy stuff– completely loony (big surprise). I am not too familiar with his background (trying to find some stuff) but either he was an atty or definitely knows one who is helping him. Check out Strunk’s website here:
    http://www.strunk.ws/index.html

    and more here:
    http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/8-Feb-2008.html

    He files lots of lawsuits on all sorts of Jesuit conspiracy theory stuff. Not suprising to see him jump into the ring with this merry band of morons.

  9. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 10:07 am #

    The below may give you an idea of Strunk’s past success rate with the courts:

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

    At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, at Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 23rd day of June, two thousand and three, PRESENT:

    Hon. Jon O. Newman, Hon. Ralph K. Winter, Hon. Barrington D. Parker, Jr., Circuit Judges.

    Christopher Earl Strunk, Plaintiff-Appellant, -v.- No. 02-6159

    [this is an exerpt]…

    The District Court properly dismissed Strunk’s third amended complaint and properly denied his motion to file a fourth amended complaint, as his complaint was unintelligible and his claims indiscernible. In each of his complaints, Strunk asserted violations of several federal statutes and eleven constitutional amendments, without explaining what conduct constituted the violations, which defendants violated which statutes or amendments, or how the alleged violations harmed him. Thus, the complaint did not put the defendants on notice of the allegations against them. See Salahuddin, 861 F.2d at 42. As previously noted, the District Court allowed Strunk to amend his complaint three times and instructed Strunk how to cure the pleading defects each time. Thus, the District Court acted well within its discretion when it denied Strunk’s motion to amend his complaint a fourth time.

    We have considered the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

  10. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 10:23 am #

    How do you guys know all this stuff? I had never heard of this guy. Not too shiny is he? LOL So, this is another “BS” put out by the “birthers”, as you refer to them.?

    Where did all these “nutcase” lawyers come from? What about that guy in Washington State–Pidgeon I think his name is. Is it that easy to get a law degree? Dumb question–guess so, Doc Orly got hers online. LOL.

    And here all this time, I thought you had to be smart to be a lawyer.

  11. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 10:35 am #

    SOME lawyers are pretty smart. I “know” all this stuff, or, can find information rather quickly with a little bit of effort, because I have had great training in the field and I do this stuff every day. Reputable lawyers have decent research skills and great legal training both at law school and by some wonderful, brilliant mentors over the years, not to mention daily experience.

    I have to wonder if Orly had ever filed a case before this fiasco came along?

  12. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 10:41 am #

    Within the legal field there are reputable schools and crappy ones. Lots of lawyers go to crappy ones, some go to those in what is called the “top tier”. Check US News and World Reports for the law school rankings to get an idea of how bad some of these guys are. Decent lawyers gernerally tend to come out of top tier schools and then go on to practice with top law firms where they really learn the craft. That said, I must add that there are some VERY GOOD lawyers that come from lower tier schools, but, on average, those people stand out as exceptions.

  13. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 11:32 am #

    LH,

    “I have to wonder if Orly had ever filed a case before this fiasco came along?”

    Would that information be available? It amazes me how quickly you guys find information. My background is medical. But, we have to research too.

    I had never even heard of Berg–and didn’t realize he had sued Bush 9/11. Guess it didn’t make the evening news? LOL

    Seems something I see as a “concern”, all of quickly know/realize it is “trivial.” Sorry for being a pain in the you know what. But, I guess this is how you learn.

  14. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 11:45 am #

    Who is this Larry Sinclair? He has some horrible things on his website.

  15. avatar
    Patrick McKinnion January 11, 2009 at 12:18 pm #

    He’s a known felon and con artist who got in tight with the PUMA crowd because of his claims that he sold drugs to and had sex with Obama, and that Obama is behind the murder of a member of his former church.

    Only conspiracy fans and gullible fools believe his claims, which is why he’s popular with the Birther crowd as well.

  16. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 12:23 pm #

    Seems to me like several of these “conspiracy kooks” are in it for the $$$$$$$$. Martin and this Sinclair fellow have “books” for sale and many of these blogs want you to “donate”.

  17. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 12:42 pm #

    BINGO! That would be their ultimate motivation, IMHO.

  18. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 12:44 pm #

    I’ve done some quick research and not found her as counsel on any case that I could locate so far until this one.

  19. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 12:46 pm #

    Bogus:
    I am also pretty familiar with most of these legal loons, as they hold a certain “reputation” in the legal community. Essentially, they are laughing stocks and an embarrassment to the profession. If you practice law for any amount of time you’ve heard of these maniacs either as a cautionary tale or, more likely, the butt of a joke.

  20. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 11, 2009 at 3:22 pm #

    If you want information on tabloid quality accusations, read the tabloids! Just hit GlobeMagazine.com and search for “larry sinclair”.

  21. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 4:34 pm #

    Dr. C.,

    No thanks, I’ve seen quite enough of Larry Sinclair.

  22. avatar
    bogus info January 11, 2009 at 4:43 pm #

    Doc Orly must be having problems with her website. She hasn’t cranked out a billion articles today.

  23. avatar
    Patrick McKinnion January 11, 2009 at 5:06 pm #

    Yeah, and “Citizen Wells” hasn’t updated since thursday and the certifcation of the electoral vote

  24. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 5:32 pm #

    For a laugh, check this out the link to the newsvine article over at Orly’s blog in the comments under the “test” post. I think the link is in the first comment.

    They actually have a few posters that believe Justice Roberts is commenting over there. HYSTERICAL. BTW- we could use a few more Justices to join in the conversation!!

  25. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 5:40 pm #

    here is the link to the article, please do come join the conversation…they need the opinion of a few more Justices!!

    http://bdimainman.newsvine.com/_news/2009/01/10/2295937-us-supreme-court-fires-warning-shot

  26. avatar
    Patrick McKinnion January 11, 2009 at 5:43 pm #

    *Laugh*

    I think that their belief that the Supreme Court is somehow plotting a “trap” to spring on Obama to be hysterical. I wonder how many more cases have to be dismissed before they realize that people aren’t buying their snake oil?

  27. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 11, 2009 at 5:58 pm #

    They will likely never realize it. They are simply either too deluded or too stupid or both.

  28. avatar
    bogus info January 12, 2009 at 9:32 am #

    http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=738

    The above article has everything but the kitchen sink.

  29. avatar
    bogus info January 12, 2009 at 10:14 am #

    LH,

    ROTFL. That is hysterical. Thanks for posting it. Chuckle into big laugh in howling, made my day.

  30. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 12, 2009 at 2:56 pm #

    Former Chief Justice Warren did enjoy himself immensely! 😉

  31. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 12, 2009 at 3:13 pm #

    I should go over as justice John Rutledge of South Carolina (the chairman of the Constitutional Committee of Detail that wrote the first draft of the Constitution). He served briefly on the Supreme Court in a recess appointment. I don’t remember if he got to vote on any cases.

  32. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 12, 2009 at 3:23 pm #

    Oh, please, please do so!!!! Too funny!

  33. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 12, 2009 at 3:25 pm #

    Not sure what’s up with me the last few days, but, they have tried my patience beyond it’s threshhold now. UGH. This stupidity really has to end. The country has HUGE problems to deal with and this is all just dispicable.

  34. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 12, 2009 at 4:38 pm #

    The fringe will always be with us.

  35. avatar
    laughinghysterically January 12, 2009 at 5:02 pm #

    Too true, but, one can hope that members of the bar who stir the pot with false info and intentionally invade other’s privacy all while making money off their dispicable actions will be disiplined harshly.

  36. avatar
    TRUTH January 21, 2009 at 1:22 pm #

    I’m not the fastest reader, so before I ordered, waited to get the book, then read it, I wanted to make sure you guys got a chance to get your copy as soon as possible. Looks like a #1 bestseller to me.

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1596980907?ie=UTF8&tag=regnerypublishin&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1596980907

  37. avatar
    Dr. Conspiracy January 21, 2009 at 2:10 pm #

    If you search for Obama on Amazon you get 3,448 hits. I don’t want to enrich the authors of questionable value (the title has a tinge of bias), so I only books like this USED. My like-new hardback copy of Obama Nation arrived yesterday. It cost me less to buy the book than the shipping.

    Once it ships, we can look at the Amazon ranking and see how A Slobbering Love Affair: The True (And Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance Between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media is doing. Personally, I like Al Franken’s book: Truth which predicted in October 2005 his own election to the Senate and hints at Obama’s election.

  38. avatar
    TRUTH January 21, 2009 at 4:08 pm #

    Well, Al may be a nut, but he isn’t necessarily stupid thats for sure. A lot like Obi-1. AL knows how the media steers Americans decisions, and if he knew Obi-1’s plan of monopolizing the internet in addition, it was a safe bet for him to predict the outcome. The Old-School GOP failed to catch that train, now have to play a LOT of Catch up.

  39. avatar
    milspec June 20, 2009 at 9:07 am #

    That is the it has, Esp the ashes not looking right.