Long time visitors may remember that I had an article here on Susan Herbert who brought suit against Barack Obama in Florida. Herbert claimed that she was “the only legal acting President not placed on the ballot and who never voluntarily withdrew [her] name.”
I had some email correspondence with Ms Herbert and decided to remove the article, which included some unkind remarks from the court. I’ve had another email just this week from her suggesting that she was not pleased that this site lacks coverage of her case. So let me include what she wrote me here (with some minimal typo correction):
This is Susan Herbert of Herbert V Obama, Roberts, Hull and the US. I’m on the case conference list and so I am now four for four with SCOTUS as on paper I have won each time I engaged them. Thus what is up with removing an article about my case as if you do that you have just removed the declaration and constitution as that is what a pro se case of authority and o.j. [original jurisdiction] is: our original government as the founders wrote it and as the founders lived it.
If you deny the truth of my lawsuit you then are denying the truth or the actual reality known as the Declaration and Constitution which is what the federal bench now does.
According to marbury [v. Madison] i had to win on paper first but then lose as marbury did – which is why roberts never filed those documents on 11/20/09 – and then i had to keep acting to then win in person as [Supreme Court Justice] roberts thus SCOTUS cannot refuse to hear a lawsuit in which they are defendants; they must hear it in person if I then exhaust federal appeals plus they already made a crucial error: SCOTUS? It is now actively in violation of marbury as they inadvertently overturned marbury upon first denying me that appearance in; person, lol. Thus, due to Marbury and USC 1331 they then placed the existence of their own Court and the Senate on the table!
all i’m doing now is proving their theory or their personal application of the law faulty and so cleaning up in person.
Conference is set for 11/06/09.
It’s a sovereignty suit and so Obama could be anyone at all. I can slowly walk you through all of the complex concepts. As it [is] a pack of physicists operating out of Rockford, IL immediately understood the legal principles involved and are now assisting me.
What’s lost on lawyers is not lost on scientists and philosophers as you will not understand my suit nor ever own the knowledge US law and case law if you are possessed of an overblown ego or if you do not unconditionally love your own person, a living constitution.
LOL! I wanted and needed a paper denial at first as that then is SCOTUS concurring as I legally claimed i am denied any and all protection of the law upon all levels, even in SCOTUS. To grant me at first would then be the Court granting me protection of the law thus I would have no case!
The real, actual reason paper is never proof in any Constitutional Republic is appearance of the paper is always deceptive…for one thing it is easy to forge and for another the words are meaningless unless you live them out as reality. Herbert V Obama, Roberts, Hull and the US? upon roberts 11/20/09 action it the became Susan and roberts versus Obama, Hull and the US no matter what the paper says; the paper is actually real – it reads exact words, Susan V Roberts – but the truth is legally real: It’s all pro se litigants against those who are not as the oath of office is I WILL not MY LAWYER WILL!
I happen to be the very first American citizen to successfully claim ownership of all of the knowledge found within the Declaration and the Constitution and then I became the first American to overcome all fear and so act upon that truth.
At the time of my original article, the district court had just dismissed the case. Ms. Herbert’s complaint and the order are still on the Obama Conspiracy Theories docket page. Ms. Herbert told me at the time that the case had been appealed but it wasn’t on the court docket, and I frankly forgot about it. It’s docketed now.
09-6777 HERBERT, SUSAN V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.