Georgia hearing video

Here’s the video from yesterday’s hearing via YouTube. I’m the fellow in the tan jacket lower left in all the shots. Some of the feed before the trial started is not included here including what I understand was an obscene remark from Orly Taitz to Dean Haskins.

The audio is crummy. The video is in 7 parts (the final two both labeled #6).

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Ballot Challenges, Videos and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

39 Responses to Georgia hearing video

  1. Wile says:

    Watching some of your and Loren’s reactions to the on-goings was pure comedic-gold pleasure….sort of like a silent birther version of MST3k.

  2. Arthur says:

    Can anyone recommend which of the six videos provides the most laughs?

  3. gorefan says:

    In Video Three @ 11:40, Hatfield intorduces into the record the letter from jablonski to the SoS. That letter refers to the Maskell Memorandum. Does that mean that Judge Mahili can take notice of that and look it up?

  4. By the way, in the video feed (not included here) before the hearing started I could be seen holding up a sign to the camera. I’m told that it was not readable. It said “Hi G!”

  5. G says:

    LOL! 🙂

    Dr. Conspiracy: By the way, in the video feed (not included here) before the hearing started I could be seen holding up a sign to the camera. I’m told that it was not readable. It said “Hi G!”

  6. Brilliant observation.

    Wile: sort of like a silent birther version of MST3k.

  7. richCares says:

    I popped in over at ObamaReleaseYourRecords and read the comments, can you imagine what they could accomplish if they put the energy of their hate into something that could help this country. Georgia is the fulfilment of their OMG moment, they are giddy with excitement. When this ballot thing fails they will go apepupu.

  8. JPotter says:

    richCares: apepupu.

    LOL! French apes!

  9. GeorgetownJD says:

    So many nutty nougats to choose from, but my favorite has to be Video Six at 11:00 where she asks John Sampson to speculate about the redactions in records obtain through FOIA. Yeah, right — like the judge is going to assign any weight to that!

  10. G says:

    Well, the best part seems to have been left out. Interesting that the person putting up the video chose to cut it Orly’s time on stage short with Sampson as Orly’s witness…and left out the BEST PART – Orly taking the stand herself and making the biggest stooge of herself…LMAO!

    I actually spent the time and watched the entire thing and also checked the source site to see if I could find the missing parts and the rest of it. Alas, no Part 7 to be found…

    Yeah, even a lot of the Birthers seem to realize what an embarassment Orly is.

    Arthur: Can anyone recommend which of the six videos provides the most laughs?

  11. LMK says:

    When I watched these on YT last night, there were 7 videos. The person posting the videos on YT labelled the last 2 videos as #6.

    Here is #7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpRqfKVOD2Q

    I noticed this because each #6 was a different length. The link I post as #7 does show Orly testifying as her own witness! It is 14:41 mins; the real #6 is 15:00 mins.

    So, #6 = 15 mins. #7 = 14.41 mins. Doc, you have the correct #6; my link will be video #7.

  12. Nathanael says:

    Arthur:
    Can anyone recommend which of the six videos provides the most laughs?

    Why not simply ask, “Which Three Stooges movies is the funniest?” You’ll be dead from laughter half way through any of them, so does it really matter?

    Though I understand the Fogbowzers have found Taitz’s attempt to swear herself in as a witness right up near the top of the list. Which part is that in?

  13. G says:

    Yep, that was it! Thanks for the link… You are right, that is a separate part 6 that is really Part 7!

    LMK: When I watched these on YT last night, there were 7 videos. The person posting the videos on YT labelled the last 2 videos as #6. Here is #7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpRqfKVOD2QI noticed this because each #6 was a different length. The link I post as #7 does show Orly testifying as her own witness! It is 14:41 mins; the real #6 is 15:00 mins.So, #6 = 15 mins. #7 = 14.41 mins. Doc, you have the correct #6; my link will be video #7.

  14. G says:

    PART 7. See LMK’s link above…

    Nathanael: Though I understand the Fogbowzers have found Taitz’s attempt to swear herself in as a witness right up near the top of the list. Which part is that in?

  15. Majority Will says:

    Mike: COPY AND PASTE SPAM!!!

    FIFY

  16. Nathanael says:

    Mike:
    DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!!! THANKS!! THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS POST THAT WOULD JUSTIFY CENSORING IT!!

    Or reading it. Again.

    And again.

    And again.

    Doc, we got a spammer here. Time to crack the whip.

  17. Obsolete says:

    Mike: 1) Keep Lying and hiding the facts, hoping that they will disappear by themselves!!

    Well, we know what path Spammer Mike has chosen…

  18. Joey says:

    I guess ol’ “Do Not CENSOR this” Mike just woke up from his stupidity induced coma and doesn’t realize that Barack Obama has been the duly elected 44th President of the United States for more than three years now and that in 90 original jurisdiction courts, 52 state and federal appeals courts and 16 attempts at the Supreme Court of the United States, no court and not one single judge or justice as ruled the President to be ineligible.
    Additionally, not one second of congressional hearings have been held on Barack Obama’s fictional ineligiblity.
    “The state of Hawaii says that he was born there, that’s good enough for me.'” Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH).

  19. Horus says:

    Mike: Obama’s long form birth certificate that Obama has provided through the White House web site HAS BEEN DECLARED BY MANY EXPERTS TO BE SIMPLY A FORGERY!!!

    Not one of your “Experts” has seen the actual document, all they have seen is the PDF scan file that was uploaded to the web by Obama’s team.
    You can claim the document is a forgery, but not reviewing the original makes your claim frivolous.

  20. richCares says:

    Mike: Obama’s long form birth certificate that Obama has provided through the White House web site HAS BEEN DECLARED BY MANY EXPERTS TO BE SIMPLY A FORGERY!!!
    .
    Is the State of Hawaii sending out forgeries, holy cow, call the FBI, call the UN, call Hannity, order a jacket with long sleeves for mike!

  21. y_p_w says:

    Horus: Not one of your “Experts” has seen the actual document, all they have seen is the PDF scan file that was uploaded to the web by Obama’s team.
    You can claim the document is a forgery, but not reviewing the original makes your claim frivolous.

    Then there’s the B&W handout that was issued to assembled press corps. Because of the nature of the security paper, the basketweave pattern doesn’t show up well, but the details are a lot sharper than the lower resolution PDF, which was meant for quick loading. If the PDF was their supposed “created” document that would be the “original”, then how come the WH was able to produce another version with considerably sharper details.

    And of course there was NBC’s reporter on the scene with the chutzpah to ask to see and handle one of the originals, as well as snapping a couple of pictures of it with her camera phone. When I bring it up with the “layers people”, I almost never hear any direct response back other than that I’m supposedly using “talking points”. They just keep on repeating that nobody has seen the original – sort of plugging up their ears and singing “la la la la la, I’m not hearing that, la la la la la”.

  22. Daniel says:

    Mike:
    DO NOT CENSOR THIS BULLSHIT!!!

    Birthers are a never ending source of entertainment….

  23. misha says:

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    By the way, in the video feed (not included here) before the hearing started I could be seen holding up a sign to the camera. I’m told that it was not readable. It said “Hi G!”

    Mine would have said, “Hi mom.”

  24. misha says:

    Nathanael: Though I understand the Fogbowzers have found Taitz’s attempt to swear herself in

    Wait until she starts swearing at herself.

  25. misha says:

    Mike: DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!!! THANKS!! THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS POST THAT WOULD JUSTIFY CENSORING IT!!

    Go play in heavy traffic.

  26. Northland10 says:

    Mike: DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!!!

    Wow, a minimum of 89 separate postings of this same text copy and paste spam.

  27. JPotter says:

    Daniel: Birthers are a never ending source of entertainment….

    Dang, Daniel, you had me thinking that dunce actually called his own bullsh|t “BULLSH|T”!
    Good one!

  28. I’ve added the missing 7th video above. What I don’t have is Orly Taitz swearing at Dean Haskins. This was before the hearing, but in the feed, so I was told by Dean.

    My best recollection of the second-hand report was something like:

    Orly: You’re Dean Haskins. I think an apology is due.
    Dean: I’ll accept your apology
    Orly: You’re not worth shit.

    Did anybody else hear this on the live feed?

    misha: Wait until she starts swearing at herself.

  29. G says:

    Hey, I was personally honored and touched to get a shout out! I only wish I could have made it out when I was watching the video feed….

    If I ever get to meet Dr. C or any of you in person, the first drink is on me! 🙂

    misha: Mine would have said, “Hi mom.”

  30. G says:

    No, didn’t hear that. The audio was pretty bad and a lot of people were milling about, so no…wish I did hear that exchange, but I don’t recall it.

    Dr. Conspiracy: I’ve added the missing 7th video above. What I don’t have is Orly Taitz swearing at Dean Haskins. This was before the hearing, but in the feed, so I was told by Dean.My best recollection of the second-hand report was something like:Orly: You’re Dean Haskins. I think an apology is due.Dean: I’ll accept your apologyOrly: You’re not worth shit.Did anybody else hear this on the live feed?

  31. JPotter says:

    Dr. Conspiracy: Orly: I think an apology is due.

    While Orly is busy making sure it’s all about Orly, Farah says the hearing in GA was really a commercial for WTBC? !

    Yeah, I was stunned too.

  32. J. Potter says:

    Tancredo is still a’birthin’ …. or at least his blog is on his behalf. Posted a recap of events in Georgia on the 26th ….. misspelled poor Vogt’s name in every instance as ‘Gogt’. Quite a slanted writeup.

    http://congressmantomtancredo.com/update-judge-malihi-has-stated-that-he-will-enter-a-default-judgement-against-obama/

  33. I wanted to add that I have confirmed that Orly Taitz did submit into evidence the FOIA document from 1967, an internal Department of State memorandum confirming that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. It appears on page 122 of her exhibits, accessible here:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/79963546/2012-1-26-Farrar-v-Obama-Exhibits-1-7

  34. Northland10 says:

    So to support her claim that the BC is fake and Obama is not eligible, she submits evidence that supports the BC. Brilliant.

    Dr. Conspiracy:
    I wanted to add that I have confirmed that Orly Taitz did submit into evidence the FOIA document from 1967, an internal Department of State memorandum confirming that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. It appears on page 122 of her exhibits, accessible here:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/79963546/2012-1-26-Farrar-v-Obama-Exhibits-1-7

  35. y_p_w says:

    Northland10: So to support her claim that the BC is fake and Obama is not eligible, she submits evidence that supports the BC. Brilliant.

    I know in the world of internet crackpots and cranks, using a shotgun approach and seeing what sticks to the wall may be appropriate. However, when it comes to arguing a case before a judge, I would think it would help to have a consistent narrative. I don’t think she has that in her.

  36. JoZeppy says:

    y_p_w: I know in the world of internet crackpots and cranks, using a shotgun approach and seeing what sticks to the wall may be appropriate. However, when it comes to arguing a case before a judge, I would think it would help to have a consistent narrative. I don’t think she has that in her.

    I suppose in Orly-land, a consistent narrative consists of everything negative about President Obama is true, even if they are mutually exclusive.

  37. G says:

    Yeah, that seems to pretty much sum up the Birther mentality in general…

    JoZeppy: I suppose in Orly-land, a consistent narrative consists of everything negative about President Obama is true, even if they are mutually exclusive.

  38. J. Potter says:

    Dr. Conspiracy: It appears on page 122 of her exhibits,

    Wow, having taken a minute to flip through her exhibits, all i can say is “There goes Orly!” She may as well have backed up the dump truck and taken a dump ( 😉 ) on Malihi’s desk. Give the guy a roadmap for Pete’s sake! Nary a caption or citation in sight. He isn’t going to piece this together for her, nor should he. I don’t recall many references on her part appearing in the hearing transcript, either!

    At least Corsi puts this kinda thing in a nice book form and spins a story around it. This is just throwing spew at the at the wall … just like always!

  39. G says:

    Yep, that’s typical Mad Orly’s style all the way…

    J. Potter: This is just throwing spew at the at the wall … just like always!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.