Guest editorial by Michael Jablonski

Empty director's chair labeled "Jablonski"

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Ballot Challenges, Lawsuits, Lounge and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Guest editorial by Michael Jablonski

  1. mimi says:

    Doc owes me a new monitor! LOL!

  2. Thomas Brown says:

    I like how it folds for easy transport to other states, if needed.

  3. Disclaimer

    As a condition for use of this web site, the reader holds Obama Conspiracy Theories harmless and free of liability for any personal injury or damage to computer equipment related to use of the site including, but limited to, damage to keyboards from spitting coffee on them, spraying beverages on computer monitors, blowing hot liquid from the nose, injury from banging heads against a wall or furniture, choking from the inability to stop laughing or falling out of a chair.

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/visitor-guide/

    mimi: Doc owes me a new monitor! LOL!

  4. donna says:

    HYSTERICAL, DOC

    new caption

    BIRTHER (?)

    V.

    EMPTY CHAIR (?)

  5. Thomas Brown says:

    Dr. Conspiracy

    “Disclaimer”

    Oh, sure Doc… NOW you tell us!

  6. Post hoc, ergo prompter hoc.

    Thomas Brown: Oh, sure Doc… NOW you tell us!

  7. Majority Will says:

    Thomas Brown:
    I like how it folds for easy transport to other states, if needed.

    And if you turn it upside down, it seats Oathkeeper Darren Huff and three friends.

    Remote control not included.

  8. PaulG says:

    When is Jablonski not a Jablonski?

    When you’re sitting in it.

  9. jtmunkus says:

    Got me, Doc. Love it!

  10. tes says:

    lolol … oh my … that was **GOOD** Doc C

  11. Daniel says:

    Every point Mr Jablonski made in the article was heads and tails above anything the birthers have come up with.

  12. Well, yes, I agree.

    I should add that should Mr. Jablonski every want to publish a guest editorial here, he is more than welcome.

    Differing reactions to the “empty chair” are interesting. Birthers see it as an arrogant assertion by Obama that he is above the law. Anti-Birthers see it as an effective marginalization of the Birthers and proof that their arguments fall under their own weight and require no refutation.

    Daniel: Every point Mr Jablonski made in the article was heads and tails above anything the birthers have come up with

  13. Plutodog says:

    Damn, I kept plunking on the ‘droid’ trying to get past the ‘illustration’ and into the actual editorial! You got me too, you brat! So why am I enjoying it? (And why would I still love to see an editorial from Jablonski?)

  14. Jamese777 says:

    On a serious note, does anyone know for certain whether Michael Jablonski submitted a brief for Judge Malihi in the time period between not showing up for the hearing and the date that the Judge set for receipt of additional filings?
    The reason I ask is that if he did submit something for the Judge, that might further explain the decision.
    Didn’t Orly say that Jablonski had submitted a certified birth certificate to the Judge? Or am I making that up?

  15. G says:

    😉 ROTFLMAO!!! Kudos.

    Dr. Conspiracy: DisclaimerAs a condition for use of this web site, the reader holds Obama Conspiracy Theories harmless and free of liability for any personal injury or damage to computer equipment related to use of the site including, but limited to, damage to keyboards from spitting coffee on them, spraying beverages on computer monitors, blowing hot liquid from the nose, injury from banging heads against a wall or furniture, choking from the inability to stop laughing or falling out of a chair.http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/visitor-guide/

  16. I am not aware of any filing by Jablonski following the hearing and I do recall a statement from one of the parties saying that Jablonski had sent a copy of the birth certificate (presumably a long form printed form the White House web site) to Secretary of State Kemp and “carbon copied” the court. I believe this was before the hearing.

    Jamese777: The reason I ask is that if he did submit something for the Judge, that might further explain the decision.
    Didn’t Orly say that Jablonski had submitted a certified birth certificate to the Judge? Or am I making that up?

  17. justlw says:

    Majority Will: And if you turn it upside down, it seats Oathkeeper Darren Huff and three friends.

    Cripes, just when I figured I already knew way too much about birferdom. Had not been acquainted with “Oathkeeper Huff’s Trunk o’ Junk” until now.

    (Dang, couldn’t find it. I was hoping to link to video of Frank Oz returning Jake Blues’ property to him when he was released from prison. “One unused prophylactic. One… soiled.”)

  18. This thing about equipment damage and injury reminds me of the Monty Python Killer Joke sketch.

    G: ROTFLMAO!!!

  19. G says:

    Ahhh yes! I know that sketch well! I have fond memories of invoking it in several multi-media presentations in the past to illustrate an analogy with humor. 🙂

    Dr. Conspiracy: This thing about equipment damage and injury reminds me of the Monty Python Killer Joke sketch.

  20. nycpeter says:

    Does Orly get equal time? Or was her Dental Chair time prophylactic? 😛

  21. JPotter says:

    Thomas Brown: I like how it folds for easy transport to other states, if needed.

    Thomas, that was AWESOME! 😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.