Post press conference interview with Joe Arpaio

Las Vegas radio host Alan Stock is a big fan of Sheriff Joe.

The original video is no longer where I found it. Here’s another:

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Joe Arpaio, Videos and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Post press conference interview with Joe Arpaio

  1. John says:

    Sheriff’s Arpaio’s discussion of Andrew Breitbard is very troubling. Was Breitbard killed to keep him from talking?

  2. Talking about what? You’ve ‘been dead for years, and you’re still talking.

    John: Sheriff’s Arpaio’s discussion of Andrew Breitbard [sic] is very troubling. Was Breitbard [sic] killed to keep him from talking?

  3. Daniel says:

    I wonder when Sheriff Jerkoff will be releasing his investigation of the Round Earth fraud?

    I find the discussion of Copernicus to be very troubling.

  4. Arthur says:

    John: Was Breitbard killed to keep him from talking?

    Probably. And rumor has it, they’ve got their eyes on you, too, John, so better watch it. A “heart attack” can be such bummer–kinda’ ruins your whole day.

    Seriously John, do you think Breitbart would be killed to keep him from talking and Orly Taitz would be left alive?

  5. John says:

    Van Irion responds to Georgia about the lawsuits. Quite stunning and corrupt:

    he following is an email from Attorney Van Irion. He is now tasting the filthy corruption that you have been dealing with for years. He is stunned by the lack of honor in the courts, who should be the nation’s final defenders of justice.
    —-Attorney Van Irion’s experience in Georgia—
    “So much has happened recently demonstrating the lack of honor in our judicial system that I’m now forced to review these incidents in bullet point format:
    “The President’s attorney dishonors the Georgia Administrative Court by sending a letter directly to the Secretary of State requesting the executive branch of Georgia to take a lawsuit away from the judicial branch.
    “The President and his attorney dishonor the Georgia Administrative court again by violating that court’s order to appear.
    “The Georgia Administrative Court refuses to forward Liberty Legal Foundation’s motion for contempt to the Georgia Supreme Court, despite Georgia law leaving the Administrative court no discretion on this matter.
    “The Georgia Administrative court refuses to even respond to correspondence regarding our motion for contempt.
    “The Georgia Superior Court fails to comment on the motion for contempt or require the Administrative court to forward records, as required by law.
    “The Georgia Superior Court Clerk initially refuses to file LLF’s appeal document, then backs down after being instructed on the law.
    “The Georgia Superior Court Clerk refuses to file LLF’s emergency motion for preliminary injunction because $1 was not included with our filing. Then, when LLF hand delivers $1 to the clerk, the clerk sits on the motion for 10 days and mails it back to LLF claiming that the correct staffer didn’t get the $1. Our plaintiff gave the case number, name of the motion, and name of the staffer, who was literally pointed at in the room. Yet the clerk’s office still claims that that staffer didn’t get the $1. The motion had to be completely re-filed and was then delayed another two days before finally being filed.
    “The Chief Judge of the Superior Court was made aware of all of the incidents occurring in her Clerk’s office, yet she did nothing to correct the situation.
    “The President’s motion to dismiss was filed on his first attempt. After three days the Court notified LLF that the Court had shortened the time to file an opposition to that motion, giving us less than a day to file.
    “Late that same day the Chief Judge signs an order denying LLF’s motion to have Van Irion admitted as a visiting attorney in this case, preventing LLF from filing the opposition that the Court had ordered us to file 6 hours earlier. (Note that I’ve been admitted as a visiting attorney in 5 states and at every level of court, both state and federal. I’ve never been denied admission before. Further, my local attorney sponsor was a sitting member of the state’s legislature, making this denial even more shocking.) Even more outrageous is the timing of the denial, made just hours before a Court-set deadline, after the Court sat on our motion for more than two weeks.
    “The Georgia Secretary of State has, to date, refused to forward the record of the case to the Superior Court, despite Georgia law absolutely requiring this action and requiring that it be done as soon as possible.
    “The Superior Court does nothing to require the Secretary of State to forward the record of the case.
    “Only 90 minutes after our plaintiff files an opposition himself (because LLF was denied the ability to file it for him), the Chief Judge issues a three-page opinion granting Obama’s motion to dismiss our appeal. It seems obvious that the Court’s opinion was written before they asked us to file an opposition. Also, the dismissal was granted while the Court had not even received the record of the hearing held by the lower court. In other words, it ruled without even reviewing the record or reading our plaintiff’s opposition.
    “Our system of government is based upon an assumption that the people placed in high office are honorable. This is an absolute requirement for the survival of our nation. The Founding Fathers understood that when dishonorable people begin to take high office, the system of government they set into motion would begin to fail. Unfortunately America’s judicial system is proving this principle.
    “These are just the incidents associated with our Georgia case and we are not discussing the substance of the breathtakingly absurd rulings from any of these courts. Without needing to discuss judicial rulings, the incidents cited here demonstrate the harassment, bias, and lack of honor in the administrative operation of our courts. This bias effectively prevents those on one side of an issue to have basic access to the courts.In other words, the courts are now barring specific viewpoints from entering the front doors of the court. When we do get through we are harassed by means of the timing of orders and one-sided enforcement of procedural requirements.
    “Georgia is an example of what is happening across our country. Laws are being blatantly ignored by those in high office, while other laws are being used to punish their political opponents. This type of corruption reflects the practices historically found in third world nations, dictatorships, and communist tyrannies. Freedom cannot survive where such practices go unpunished.
    “Yet it is practically impossible to punish individuals holding high office. This is why such individuals must have honor, allowing them to resist their own selfish temptations. Unfortunately America’s high offices are now populated by corrupt people with no moral compass. Our leaders have no honor. Our Founding Fathers are being proven correct, once again.
    “Our opponents are trying to frustrate and exhaust us to the point that we will give up. They don’t want their bias and dishonor to be seen in the light of day. The corrupt individuals in high office are harassing us for our efforts. This tells us that we are having an effect. Even when we don’t win a legal battle, our efforts shine the light of truth on their corruption. That corruption is responding by lashing out at us.”

  6. Good interview. He is repeating that mantra I wrote about last night, “I’m just a poor Sheriff doing my job. Also interesting that Mara Zebest was there. I picked up on her as one of the prime movers, too.

    I will go post a link on the Open Thread.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

  7. donna says:

    “John: Was Breitbard killed to keep him from talking?”

    YUP, birthers killed him

    This is what Breitbart said about wing nutzz daily and the birth certificate issue:

    “It’s self-indulgent, it’s narcissistic, it’s a losing issue,” Breitbart told Schilling. “It’s a losing situation. If you don’t have the frigging evidence — raising the question? You can do that to Republicans all day long. You have to disprove that you’re a racist! Forcing them to disprove something is a nightmare.”

    “Wouldn’t you say,” asked Schilling, “in this case, that Farah is asking Obama to prove something rather than his disprove it?”

    Breitbart rejected the premise. “When has a president ever been asked to prove his citizenship?”

    “I was talking to you. And I was saying that I disagreed on the birther stuff.”

    http://washingtonindependent.com/75949/b

  8. Steve says:

    John:
    Sheriff’s Arpaio’s discussion of Andrew Breitbard is very troubling. Was Breitbard killed to keep him from talking?

    John, it was natural causes. It happens. I worked for a guy who died in his sleep at 39.
    There has never been a case of a President putting out a mafia-style hit on an individual. It doesn’t happen. Ever.

  9. CarlOrcas says:

    Dr. Conspiracy: Talking about what?

    You may need to sit down for this one, Doc. It’s a real shocker: WorldNetDaily is toying with the notion that Breitbart was assasinated. Stand by for the e-book.

  10. richCares says:

    “Van Irion responds to Georgia about the lawsuits. Quite stunning and corrupt:”
    yes, insulting the court is a good plan!
    .
    Sheriff Joe’s earth shattering news didn’t shatter the earth, in fact it was considered a joke Sheriff Joe’s pressar was produced and directed by WND and starred only birthers (birther cast and crew), maybe that’s why it’s going nowhere Hey but john is happy.
    .
    it did not cause frog marching but did generate laughs, I am hoping someone tries to place this poo into evidence maybe Orly, what comedy that will be.

  11. John says:

    I agree with Miki Booth. Birthers were ambushed and setup regarding the Georgia Election challenge. It appears that Georgia had no intention of ruling in favor of the birthers and there appears to be collusion between Kemp, Mahili [sic] , Jabonski [sic], and the appeals court to squash this issue. All have apparently worked together to ambush and setup the birthers by allowing a ballot election hearing when is reality it was just a setup.

  12. roadburner says:

    CarlOrcas: You may need to sit down for this one, Doc. It’s a real shocker: WorldNetDaily is toying with the notion that Breitbart was assasinated.Stand by for the e-book.

    here we go again, the clinton death list version 2.0 – bho edition

  13. justlw says:

    John: Was Breitbard killed to keep him from talking?

    There’s a very simple explanation. This is an everyday occurance and nothing to get all het up about:

    His replacement pod wasn’t ready, and the go-team wasn’t notified in time.

    I had the same thing happen when we were getting a window replaced once. No big deal.

  14. Bob says:

    Breitbart died of embarrassment when he realized he would be forever labelled a Birther.

  15. nbc says:

    richCares: “Van Irion responds to Georgia about the lawsuits. Quite stunning and corrupt:”
    yes, insulting the court is a good plan!

    Indeed, good thing for Hatfield is that the Judge just denied the motion for Pro Hac Vice for van Irion, otherwise, as the sponsoring attorney, he may have had some explaining to do.

  16. aarrgghh says:

    birfers have taken a page from the book of mormon and baptised breitbart posthumously.

    freeper quote of the week:

    1_Rain_Drop: “Mr Breitbart now has the power to guide Sheriff Joe to the evidence he now needs.”

  17. justlw says:

    aarrgghh [quoting 1_Rain_Drop]: “Mr Breitbart now has the power to guide Sheriff Joe…”

    Local PBS station is playing the Moyers/Campbell interview as I type.

    “Turn off your targeting computer, Sheriff Joe. Use The Farce…”

  18. aarrgghh says:

    John: Was Breitbard killed to keep him from talking?

    my vote for “least surprising conspiracy theory of the year.”

    but keep it up. the year is young.

  19. Suranis says:

    Is john a robot that just parrots the same stuff no matter what people say. I havent seen hom actually respond to anything anyone has said.

  20. Majority Will says:

    Bob:
    Breitbart died of embarrassment when he realized he would be forever labelled a Birther.

    Nicely done.

  21. Thomas Brown says:

    John is utterly beyond help. BHO’s eligibility could be affirmed by the SCOTUS 9-0 and he’d say they 1) don’t know the Constitution, 2) are part of the Conspiracy, or 3) have been paid off or threatened.

    Sad and hilarious at the same time.

  22. Majority Will says:

    Thomas Brown:
    John is utterly beyond help.BHO’s eligibility could be affirmed by the SCOTUS 9-0 and he’d say they 1) don’t know the Constitution, 2) are part of the Conspiracy, or 3) have been paid off or threatened.

    Sad and hilarious at the same time.

    I recall a birther recently telling me that Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was mistaken over the meaning of natural born citizen.

  23. G says:

    Yes John, there is an overwhelming conspiracy out there to ambush Birthers. It is commonly called Reality.

    Gets them Birthers every time!

    John: All have apparently worked together to ambush and setup the birthers by allowing a ballot election hearing when is reality it was just a setup.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.