Liberals cover Orly Taitz; Conservatives not so much

Here’s the latest story title on Orly’s blog:

Dan Amira, reporter for the far left NewYork magazine posted an interview with me and provided a link to my site for people to see for themselves Obama’s forged IDs and stolen SSN, however Breitbart.com who claim to be exposing Obama did not publish either the docs or the link. Demand they post Obama’s failed E-Verify or post a link to my site. Demand that Ari Rabin-Huff from Media Matters does not become complicit in the cover up of forgery and SSA fraud, demand he posts the interview and documents as well.

Orly Taitz has been the albatross around the neck of Conservatives who are attempting to recover from the pummeling they received in the last election. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham identified the problem when he said “We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term.” Taitz’s rejection by Breitbart News, et al. at a recent CPAC session, is an example of a shift in Conservative strategy to try to become respectable. Fox News hasn’t had a Taitz article I can find since 2011.

On the other hand, the liberal and progressive press is all to happy to rub Orly Taitz in the faces of conservatives and to keep her in the news. The example Taitz cites from New York Magazine is one; Huffington Post has extensive Orly Taitz coverage; and we’ve seen articles at Salon.com.

About Dr. Conspiracy

I'm not a real doctor, but I have a master's degree.
This entry was posted in Fox News, Orly Taitz and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

46 Responses to Liberals cover Orly Taitz; Conservatives not so much

  1. Thinker says:

    I find it hilarious that she thinks that people visiting her website and reading her pleadings or reviewing her zibits will make them *more* likely to support her. All of those documents scream “Crazy Birther Lady” louder than her unpleasant, high-pitched voice and clownish appearance do.

  2. Birther Weary says:

    Taitz’s rejection by Breitbart News, et al. at a recent CPAC session, is an example of a shift in Conservative strategy to try to become respectable.

    If a Breitbart panel with the hate monger Pamela Geller is part of a strategy to “become respectable”, I’m calling it a major FAIL.

  3. I think that in general that individual RWNJ’s think their own particular flavor of nuttery is respectable.

    Birther Weary: If a Breitbart panel with the hate monger Pamela Geller is part of a strategy to “become respectable”, I’m calling it a major FAIL.

  4. Kiwiwriter says:

    No matter how much conservatives hate President Obama, they can gain no ground by allying themselves with “birthers.” It only makes them look even more ridiculous.

    I’m not surprised the conservatives are ignoring her. I’m sure the left wing wants to give her maximum publicity, to make her an even bigger laughingstock than she is…if that’s possible.

    She thinks “New York” is “far left?” Maybe because of its “personals” ads, I guess….

  5. Daniel says:

    I don’t hate Obama

  6. Deborah says:

    Her website has a comment that she should receive a Congressional Medal of Honor. I wrote the the California Bar offering my thoughts that she should be disbarred. I am not sure how much value there is in online petitions, but here is one with only two signatures calling for her disbarment. One of the signatures is mine. Please sign and pass around if you care to.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/cecily/petition.html

  7. The Magic M says:

    Deborah: Her website has a comment that she should receive a Congressional Medal of Honor.

    Unless somebody translates to me what a “selflessness pursuit” is, I’d say this comment was written by Orly herself.

  8. Group hug!

    Daniel: don’t hate Obama

  9. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Kiwiwriter:
    She thinks “New York” is “far left?” Maybe because of its “personals” ads, I guess….

    The people like Taitz “far left” means anyone who isn’t a bigoted piece of human garbage.

  10. Rickey says:

    Kiwiwriter:

    She thinks “New York” is “far left?” Maybe because of its “personals” ads, I guess….

    Orly probably thinks that New York bagels are far left.

  11. Kiwiwriter says:

    Deborah: Her website has a comment that she should receive a Congressional Medal of Honor. I wrote the the California Bar offering my thoughts that she should be disbarred. I am not sure how much value there is in online petitions, but here is one with only two signatures calling for her disbarment. One of the signatures is mine. Please sign and pass around if you care to.http://www.petitiononline.com/cecily/petition.html

    Wasn’t aware that Orly served in any battlefields of any wars…

  12. Prove-IT! says:

    JUST PROVE THAT THE USURPER’S DOCUMENTS ARE ‘NOT’ FORGERIES… THAT’S ALL.

  13. I think any reasonable person would accept the two verification letters from the State of Hawaii to the Secretaries of State of Arizona and Kansas as more than sufficient proof of the validity of Obama’s long-form birth certificate.

    The corollary to this proof is that birthers are not reasonable persons.

    Prove-IT!: JUST PROVE THAT THE USURPER’S DOCUMENTS ARE ‘NOT’ FORGERIES… THAT’S ALL.

  14. Kiwiwriter says:

    Rickey: Orly probably thinks that New York bagels are far left.

    She’s obviously never tried one.

    “No soup for her!”

  15. Kiwiwriter says:

    Prove-IT!: JUST PROVE THAT THE USURPER’S DOCUMENTS ARE ‘NOT’ FORGERIES… THAT’S ALL.

    Sorry, “Prove-It,” you’re the one making the allegation. You’re the one that has to make your case and prove those allegations.

    That’s the way it works in classroom and courtroom. Let me know how the eighth grade is working out for you.

  16. Reverse says:

    [The following comment is by the same commenter as Prove-IT!, who it appears doesn’t actually read responses. Doc.]

    The American citizens didn’t provide the FORGED documents… the white house FRAUD provided the FOGED documents… so PROVE that the white house provided documents are NOT forgeries because it’s YOUR JOB to do so. PROVE the FORGED documents are NOT forgeries using whatever means that you have at your disposal to do so.

  17. Dear uninformed nut case (aka Reverse, aka Prove-IT!):

    Proof of the President’s birth certificate was provided by the State of Hawaii directly to the Secretaries of State of Kansas and Arizona, and another declaration from Hawaii was filed with the federal court in Jackson, Mississippi.

    The use of capital letters does not erase that fact, and repeating your assertions do not make them any less a lie than the first time you made them.

    See also:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/

    If you work really hard, you may improve enough to achieve “piss ant” status. We’ll be watching your progress.

    Reverse: The American citizens didn’t provide the FORGED documents… the white house FRAUD provided the FOGED documents… so PROVE that the white house provided documents are NOT forgeries because it’s YOUR JOB to do so. PROVE the FORGED documents are NOT forgeries using whatever means that you have at your disposal to do so.

  18. Daniel says:

    Dr. Conspiracy: how much conservatives hate President Obama

    I was actually replying to our friend Kiwiwriter, who erroneously (IMHO) stated “how much conservatives hate President Obama”, by pointing out that I don’t hate Obama.

  19. Kiwiwriter says:

    Reverse: [The following comment is by the same commenter as Prove-IT!, who it appears doesn’t actually read responses. Doc.]The American citizens didn’t provide the FORGED documents… the white house FRAUD provided the FOGED documents… so PROVE that the white house provided documents are NOT forgeries because it’s YOUR JOB to do so. PROVE the FORGED documents are NOT forgeries using whatever means that you have at your disposal to do so.

    Still a wrong answer, “Prove-It” and “Reverse.” You accuse someone of fraud and forgery, you have to prove the forger and fraudster did it. That’s the way it works, from the 8th grade to the Supreme Court.

    Using all-caps isn’t going to make your argument any better. You say they’re a forgery, you prove it. And what’s your batting average in our courts? 0-198? Well below the “Mendoza Line.”

    D-minus. Try again.

  20. Kiwiwriter says:

    Daniel: I don’t hate Obama

    I’m glad you don’t, and I respect you and your politics.

  21. Pee Contest says:

    [Pee Contest is formerly known as “Sef”. Doc]

    Why is it that Obots begin an attack on people who have major concerns about the validity of the liars facts that he presented to Americans as proof of his eligibility to be potus.

    1) Americans were concerned over the fact that the liar had many discrepancies concerning his bona fides.
    2) Americans… a democrat operative named Berg raised the issues of eligibility and was joined in the issue by many Americans who wanted to know for ‘certain’ that Americans had a legitimate Potus.
    3) the liar posted a summarized document that had discrepancies on the internet
    4) Many qualified persons stated that the document produced by the liar was a forgery… without any questions that could prove that the document was not a forgery.
    5) the story continues on with the liar producing more forged documents and false names.

    6) OBOTS who stink to high heaven with their analysis deny facts that stare them in the face… and are not able to provide any valid proofs that the forged documents are ‘not’ forged documents.

    How nuts are the Obots to believe that anyone in the lying entourage of faithless Obots would admit to pursuing a crime of ‘fraud’ to install a liar as a Potus?

    OH! Onaka said this and that! Fukino said this and that, too, and all of the latter is bs of the worst kind so that the Obots can continue being accessories to the White House liar’s fraud.

  22. Plantmaster says:

    Prove-IT!

    JUST PROVE THAT THE USURPER’S DOCUMENTS ARE ‘NOT’ FORGERIES… THAT’S ALL.

    Reverse

    [The following comment is by the same commenter as Prove-IT!, who it appears doesn’t actually read responses. Doc.]

    The American citizens didn’t provide the FORGED documents… the white house FRAUD provided the FOGED documents… so PROVE that the white house provided documents are NOT forgeries because it’s YOUR JOB to do so. PROVE the FORGED documents are NOT forgeries using whatever means that you have at your disposal to do so.

    Dear Prove-It aka Reverse:

    I’ve said this in another thread, but it clearly bears repeating:

    Did your parents have any children who graduated from kindergarten? Selective capitalization is so juvenile…

  23. Because they lie, misrepresent the facts, and spit on the sidewalk.

    Pee Contest: Why is it that Obots begin an attack on people who have major concerns about the validity of the liars facts that he presented to Americans as proof of his eligibility to be potus.

  24. Kiwiwriter says:

    Pee Contest: [Pee Contest is formerly known as “Sef”. Doc]Why is it that Obots begin an attack on people who have major concerns about the validity of the liars facts that he presented to Americans as proof of his eligibility to be potus>

    Because

    1. You folks are all a bunch of liars.

    2. You folks are all a bunch of nutters.

    3. You folks are all a bunch of seditious traitors, who want to overthrow the government.

    4. You folks are all a bunch of racists.

    5. You folks are all a bunch of mean-spirited whiners who can’t accept a defeat with good sportsmanship.

    6. You folks are all large, moving targets for people with intelligence and wit.

    If you act like fools in the public arena, you should not be surprised when you get called out. The First Amendment works both ways.

    Now hurry and finish up the 8th grade. Only took you four years, did it?

  25. Plantmaster says:

    “Sef” in now “Pee Contest”?

    That is even more juvenile than UNNECESSARY CAPITALIZATION…:-)

  26. Kiwiwriter says:

    Daniel: I was actually replying to our friend Kiwiwriter, who erroneously (IMHO) stated “how much conservatives hate President Obama”, by pointing out that I don’t hate Obama.

    Yes, I know…however, when I read the angry e-mail reactions to my newspaper’s editorials, all of them are conservative, and all of them seem to loathe him with wolf-like ferocity. I have to forcibly remind myself that they are a small minority…the same people screeching back at the newspaper’s website over and over again, never happy, never satisfied, always furious, but not a large number.

  27. Sef says:

    Pee Contest: [Pee Contest is formerly known as “Sef”. Doc]

    Doc, I think you may have the sock puppets on the wrong hands.

  28. Majority Will says:

    Sef: Doc, I think you may have the sock puppets on the wrong hands.

    Yes, that didn’t make sense.

  29. justlw says:

    Sef: Doc, I think you may have the sock puppets on the wrong hands.

    Or… the troll call is coming from inside your IP address!

  30. justlw says:

    OT (so what else is new?): it saddens me that our children have no idea why “The phone call is coming from inside your house!” was once so implausible.

  31. Sef says:

    justlw: Or… the troll call is coming from inside your IP address!

    Impossible.

    Perhaps someone should refresh their memory about what the “D” in DHCP stands for.

  32. Majority Will says:

    Sef: Impossible.

    Perhaps someone should refresh their memory about what the “D” in DHCP stands for.

    If you enlarge the D, you’ll see a smiley face.

  33. justlw says:

    Majority Will: If you enlarge the D, you’ll see a smiley face.

    *applause*

  34. DISILLUSIONED says:

    [Please do not feed the troll. Doc]

    Obots are disillusioned over their false hopes of having a qualified White House office occupant. Tough luck little boys you all have limited abilities too understand the obligations too resolve who should be in jail now.
    Time will bring the facts out and one can bet that their will be a reckoning for the ‘satan’ in the White House.
    The bible stories on the History channel portrayed the White House ‘satan’ as he should be portrayed.

    “Father forgive for they know not what they do”… so long White House ‘satan’ your day is coming and it will come with all of your enablers sharing the punishment prize that you all have won.

  35. W. Kevin Vicklund says:

    A TOASTER!

  36. justlw says:

    We’ve had spaghetti at our house three times this month.

  37. Majority Will says:

    justlw:
    We’ve had spaghetti at our house three times this month.

    That’s using your noodles.

  38. The Magic M says:

    DISILLUSIONED: limited abilities too understand the obligations too resolve who should be in jail now.
    Time will bring the facts out and one can bet that their will be a reckoning

    You can’t be a real birther unless you are homophonically challenged. Maybe it’s because they don’t like “homos”. 😉

  39. The Magic M says:

    Majority Will: If you enlarge the D, you’ll see a smiley face.

    So birthers are the ones who buy all those enlargement pills that I keep getting spam about? *lol*

  40. Majority Will says:

    The Magic M: So birthers are the ones who buy all those enlargement pills that I keep getting spam about? *lol*

    😀

  41. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    The Magic M: So birthers are the ones who buy all those enlargement pills that I keep getting spam about? *lol*

    Well that would explain the collective raging boner that birthers have against this country, it’s constitution, and the democratic process!

  42. Thomas Brown says:

    DISILLUSIONED:
    [Please do not feed the troll. Doc]

    “…their [sic] will be a reckoning for the ‘satan’ in the White House… so long White House ‘satan’ your day is coming and it will come with all of your enablers sharing the punishment prize that you all have won.”

    Acts 23.5 ”You shall not speak evil of the ruler of your people.”

    (Sorry, Doc. Couldn’t stop myself.)

  43. Andrew Vrba, PmG says:

    Majority Will: That’s using your noodles.

    *puts on shades*
    YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

  44. Keith says:

    Andrew Vrba, PmG: *puts on shades*
    YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

    True Pastafarians would tell better jokes than that. You are all going straight to hell the garbage incinerator for your blasphemy*.

    (* This is a user pays excommunication. Please send $9.95USD in unmarked used bills to the FSM’s “Pope Keith the Infinite”)

  45. Majority Will says:

    Keith: True Pastafarians would tell better jokes than that. You are all going straight to hell the garbage incinerator for your blasphemy*.

    (* This is a user pays excommunication. Please send $9.95USD in unmarked used bills to the FSM’s “Pope Keith the Infinite”)

    Tough room!

  46. Thomas Brown says:

    Orly badly needs to be redeemed by the touch of His Noodly Appendage.

    Make it so, me Hearties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.