Phoenix (3TV) reported yesterday on a deposition given by Sheriff Arpaio this past July in a lawsuit against him for malicious prosecution.
America’s toughest sheriff doesn’t seem to have a very good recollection of what goes on in his department, based on the number of times Arpaio couldn’t answer questions, but he is sure of one thing: the birth certificate “investigation is not yet done.”
Video:
Video snippet from Arpaio’s Flake deposition:
http://www.azfamily.com/clip/12672491/birther-investigation-comes-up-in-arpaio-deposition
I don’t think they want to have to return the monies to their donors so they keep repeating this old mantra. However, the BR bloggers are finally starting to wake up to reality. On a side note, BR is inaccessible once again. I think someone should get to Volin and tell him to pull that [redacted. Doc.] out of his arm long enough to correct it.
that lawyer was very unprofessional, but i’m glad they’re still working on it. this fire won’t die. Trump hasn’t forgotten about it either.
Criminal contempt for Arpaio (and others) ordered.
Excellent!
The delicious irony is that the Birther BS led Arapio to Montgomery and it was his failure to preserve evidence from the Montgomery BS investigation that largely led to the criminal contempt order. We should all give a big thank you to Mike Zullo and Montgomery for the role they played in getting Joe up on criminal charges.
Perjury charges may be in Joe’s future too.
More good stuff…
http://www.cbs5az.com/story/32801428/judge-recommends-criminal-prosecution-of-arpaio-in-racial-profiling-case
From the article above:
“I’d be hesitant to weigh in on what the U.S. Attorney would do here,” Charlton said. “But I have never seen a written court order in which a judge says that the head of a law enforcement agency repeatedly made misstatements — intentional misstatements — that he willfully ignored the court’s orders and he is now subject to prosecution by the U.S. Attorney’s Office. That doesn’t happen.”
“I suppose the only good news is that it rarely happens in this country,” he continued. “But that doesn’t excuse it’s happening here … very much like Third World countries when we hear this kind of conduct taking place by the head of law enforcement agencies.”
Federal Judge already assigned to Arpaio criminal contempt referral. Judge Susan Bolton.
http://arizonaspolitics.blogspot.com/2016/08/breaking-judge-susan-bolton-best-known.html?m=1
Yes, it all goes back to that glorious birth certificate investigation that will ultimately bring down Arpaio and Sheridan and hopefully, Zullo will be looked at with great interest for bringing in and backing the guy who, according to court transcripts, defrauded the MCSO. It’s starting to look like a grand slam home run.
Yes, the door remains open for perjury charges.
I imagine Arpaio saying this in a supervillain voice.
(Doc will probably want to cover this)
If you haven’t seen already, Tony Unplugged of BirtherReport and/or Phoenix Digital have posted Arpaio’s “Flake” deposition on YouTube. Four segments several hours long.
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoq0dDnBpBY
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFhcGAtL4IQ
3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ5gNgNrcS4
4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTJZJEC8PWg
“No, I’m just telling you what you’re doing is crazy and you should stop.”
http://www.azfamily.com/clip/12672491/birther-investigation-comes-up-in-arpaio-deposition
That kind of shocked me. . Because it opens up the “Fraudulent Claim of the long form Birther Certificate of Obama’s ” into the Court to dismiss the Case based on libel.
Certainly, Arpiao doesn’t have to be subjected to the label of “Crazy” by a lawyer who lacks “expert status” in the Court as a Psychological Expert, as well an expert in the investigation.
Yeah! Open up that can of crazy and swing away. Might be interesting to see the definition of “Crazy” in Court with Obama’s long form birth certificate as the definition subject to all kinds of Experts and Court subpoena powers Arapio now has for his Defense in a Public Criminal Trial.
Is that the rabbit hole you’re all excited to run down? I hope they Prosecute because that’s exactly what it needs.
Heck the WHITE HOUSE already has four versions going. That’s what I’d call a manufacturing plant😂
Earth to Judy: What an attorney says during a trial isn’t evidence. An attorney doesn’t have to be qualified as an expert in order to express an opinion.
There can be no defamation for something an attorney says during a court proceeding. It’s called Litigation Privilege. Look it up.
Also look up the difference between libel and slander.
You might learn something.
.
You better HOPE! I’m ready with popcorn!😂 love to see how long a Judge would put up with being called “Crazy”😃😂😀
Would you like to see OBAMA’S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE FRAUD GO TO CRIMINAL COURT YET!?
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1257795544255226&id=510896692278452
“No, I’m just telling you what you’re doing is crazy and you should stop.”
http://www.azfamily.com/clip/12672491/birther-investigation-comes-up-in-arpaio-deposition
That kind of shocked me. . Because it opens up the “Fraudulent Claim of the long form Birther Certificate of Obama’s ” into the Court to dismiss the Case based on libel.
Certainly, Arpiao doesn’t have to be subjected to the label of “Crazy” by a lawyer who lacks “expert status” in the Court as a Psychological Expert, as well an expert in the investigation.
Yeah! Open up that can of crazy and swing away. Might be interesting to see the definition of “Crazy” in Court with Obama’s long form birth certificate as the definition subject to all kinds of Experts and Court subpoena powers Arapio now has for his Defense in a Public Criminal Trial.
Is that the rabbit hole you’re all excited to run down? I hope they Prosecute because that’s exactly what it needs.
Heck the WHITE HOUSE already has four versions going. That’s what I’d call a manufacturing plant😂 Check out the 4 Versions.. that’s a Domestic manufacturing plant that hasn’t been exported yet! Lol
https://accidentalpatriot4.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/a-tale-of-four-fraudulent-obama-birth-certificates/
ABI
ABI Journal
Current IssueArchived IssuesJournal TopicsJournal ColumnsJournal AuthorsSubmission GuidelinesAdvertise
The Boundaries of Litigation Privilege
Jul/Aug 2003
Straight & Narrow
Journal Article:
Sources abound warning of the vices of gossip, and while most people’s experiences confirm those caveats, the lessons are perhaps nowhere more cemented than in the checks that pass hands following defamation actions. Professionals of all types have been unfortunate enough to find themselves in such a suit, either for having a loose tongue or from being subject to the repercussions of reputation-shattering lies. Lawyers must remember that they are not exempted from the rules of the game of law, and that in some situations they are held to higher standards than others. In particular, attorneys must exercise diligent restraint from making derogatory publications regarding other attorneys.
Despite these cautions, a recent case came to the Illinois Appellate Court involving defamation by one law firm of another firm’s reproachable behavior during bankruptcy actions. Edelman, Combs and Latturner v. Hinshaw and Culbertson, No. 1-01-3638, slip op. (Ill. App. Div. 2003). The defendant’s inability to justify its defamatory publication by relying on either litigation or qualified privilege serves to remind attorneys of their obligation to carefully discern and stay within the often vague ethical boundaries of professional responsibility. http://www.abi.org/abi-journal/the-boundaries-of-litigation-privilege
ABI
ABI Journal
Current IssueArchived IssuesJournal TopicsJournal ColumnsJournal AuthorsSubmission GuidelinesAdvertise
The Boundaries of Litigation Privilege
Jul/Aug 2003
Straight & Narrow
Journal Article:
Sources abound warning of the vices of gossip, and while most people’s experiences confirm those caveats, the lessons are perhaps nowhere more cemented than in the checks that pass hands following defamation actions. Professionals of all types have been unfortunate enough to find themselves in such a suit, either for having a loose tongue or from being subject to the repercussions of reputation-shattering lies.
Lawyers must remember that they are not exempted from the rules of the game of law, and that in some situations they are held to higher standards than others. In particular, attorneys must exercise diligent restraint from making derogatory publications regarding other attorneys.
Despite these cautions, a recent case came to the Illinois Appellate Court involving defamation by one law firm of another firm’s reproachable behavior during bankruptcy actions. Edelman, Combs and Latturner v. Hinshaw and Culbertson, No. 1-01-3638, slip op. (Ill. App. Div. 2003).
The defendant’s inability to justify its defamatory publication by relying on either litigation or qualified privilege serves to remind attorneys of their obligation to carefully discern and stay within the often vague ethical boundaries of professional responsibility.
http://www.abi.org/abi-journal/the-boundaries-of-litigation-privilege
Judy learn something, doubtful if not downright impossible.
Rickey, I have to say that you got more out of CRJ’s latest word salad than I did, even for him it was gibberish.
Perhaps if Judy tried reading, he would know that the “crazy” comment (which, as noted, is protected by both the First Amendment and litigation privilege) occurred in the Flake case. Which has nothing do with Montgomery, the criminal contempt referral, etc. The only commonality is Arpaio’s abuse of his position.
What Judy actually read something instead of just making it up to suit his current fantasy, next you’ll be expecting him to comprehend what little he does read. Not in this universe.
Let me guess: you’ve been getting legal tips from john.
Ah, the eternal hope of resurrecting the BC case around six corners in another trial. Typical of people with querulatory disorder.
Thanks to 250+ birther failures, the BC issue is now res iudicata.
As usual, you compare apples and oranges. If you had bothered to go beyond simply doing a Google search, you would see that in the case of Edelman, Combs and Latturner v. Hinshaw and Culbertson, a legal memorandum which allegedly defamed a law firm was intentionally distributed to parties who had no connection to the litigation. That was the basis for the Court of Appeals ruling that the litigation privilege did not apply.
That is entirely different from an off the cuff remark made by an attorney in a courtroom during a court proceeding.
Yeah, right. Kind of like the guy who falls off of a cliff because he’s such and idiot only to find that he’s fallen into a diamond mind. Mike ZulloMoore knew about the Escobar cartel and you will never convince me that forty years later he’s some sort of hero riding in on a white horse.
I know Mike’ll try and I know he himself actually believes it. ZulloMoore stayed in his office safe and sound because he knew what was going on after dark in Hendry County. That’s no hero. That’s a coward. Same thing goes for Arpaio. Save your money, folks.
Dyess, Escobar, the whole crew used to laugh at Mike ZulloMoore.
What it opens up is something I told a few people over two years ago. The end of the “posses.” Oops….look what just reportedly happened….the end of the “posses.”
And, I think this lawyer understands this as well. Hence, his frustration with Arpaio and his reason for telling Arpaio to stop.
I know who Obama is. I know what he’s been through (as much as a white person can). I know how he thinks. I know who his handlers are/were and what they’re after as well.
What’s next in the criminal-contempt case of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio?
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2016/08/22/sheriff-joe-arpaio-criminal-contempt-murray-snow/89127610/
The case has been referred to the U.S. Attorney. If the U.S. Attorney declines to proceed, then the court can appoint a special prosecutor.
I just laugh every time you bring up Mike Zullo just like Mike Volin. I asked you about them a year ago and you had never heard of them. Magically you worked them into your fiction.
As an aside Nancy is lucky she doesn’t reside in France. Forging documents (any kinds of documents really) can get you up to 5 years in jail and and a 75,000 euros fine.
Obviously, they’re not using their real names. That’s a con to begin with. And, I proved this beyond a shadow of doubt in this first LiveLink video:
http://www.liveleak.com/c/Nancy_Owens
Secondly, working with Pablo meant seeing a lot of blood and gore. That, I blocked out of my mind.
Third, [Removed defamatory item. Doc.] That, too, I blocked out of my mind.
You have heard of repressed memories, right?
Again, save your money suckers. It’s a con job.
IANAL so I’m speaking out of my backside here, but my impression is that forging documents and sticking them on a web site is not a crime in the US in and of itself. It only becomes a crime if you file them or use them to defraud people out of money.
But anyone relying on this as legal advice deserves what they get.
We do distinguish between “faux” (forging false docs) and “usage de faux” (actually using them for whatever purposes), but both are at least “délits” (misdemeanors), possibly worse depending on circumstances.
Since she has publicly confessed, repeatedly, were she here, it would be routine for a local prosecutor to drag her in front of a “tribunal correctionnel,” a first instance/lower criminal court for misdemeanors and the likes. Her best defense would be to plead that she made it all up. That would be amusing.
I forged it. Make your move.
I call your bluff. We have a saying in my state “Show me!” Forge another of equal quality, or kindly shut your stupid hag face.
*laughing*
How is that calling my bluff? It’s no bluff.
I’ve told Mike Volin. I’ve called Arpaio’s office and told them. I’ve posted it everywhere imaginable.
I’ve written posts on “Before It’s News.”
I have, most recently, told it to several deputies from the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s office who practically ran off of my porch in the other direction while I was still talking to them about the birth certificate and how it came to be.
I’ve told Osceola County who took the three PC chips I gave them.
I’ve called Hendry County (Mike ZulloMoore’s REAL office).
I’ve posted on FaceBook, Twitter, and every social media/blog possible.
I’ve called Congress.
I’ve called representatives (FL).
I posted on America’s Most Wanted site and several others of its kind.
I’ve talked to this Mark McDaniel character for over two years now (who didn’t make a move until I said to him, “Maybe it’s YOU who’s under investigation.”) McDaniels then made a fake call to Hillsborough County hence the five plus deputies who showed up at my door a few weeks ago as well as a threatening YouTube video for me and Doc, deleted after one day).
I’ve sent an affidavit to the FBI (they’re not investigating).
I’ve called and confessed to the FBI and that one’s on YouTube here:
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/shock-woman-calls-fbi-claiming-to-be-obama-birth-certificate-forger-fbi-directs-her-to-the-news-media
I’ve contacted a few media outlets via email who have not responded.
I’ve talked on a few radio shows (Thank you Doug and Joe Hagmann of ‘Hagmann and Hagmann’ and Joe McNeil of ‘The MicroEffect’).
Seriously, I have saturated the market, I think. Who’s bluffing?
A second forgery proves nothing.
Again, make your move. Reagan’s presidency created a huge vacuum. That vacuum still exists today. It’s not Obama/Allen’s fault that it does.
This situation IS most definitely critical. As someone who is very familiar with guerilla warfare, acid baths, mosh pits, abdicated airspace, space shuttle bombing, train bombings, plane bombings, murder, subversive techniques, submarines in America waters, political assassinations, political cover-ups, foreign invasions (Castro, Chavez, Gorbechev) etc., etc., I don’t take this lightly.
Who’s bluffing?
It’s not me.
Yes it does. It proves you have the talent you profess.
Make us another to proove you can do what you said you did.
Make one for ronald reagan of as good a quality as ‘you did’ for Obama.
Put up or shut up. That IS what is called ‘calling your bluff’.
I said I forged Obama’s birth certificates.
I never said I was a professional/talented forger.
You’re trying to make an illogical leap here.
NRO can’t sting a coherent sentence together, how is she going to forge anything? Besides her etch a sketch hasn’t been updated in years.
If you can’t reproduce something you brag so effortlessly about, it means you’re a lying sack of crap. I don’t waste my time on lying sacks of crap. I asked for results, you gave me a lot of empty words.
Let’s not stoop to insulting useful bags of fertilizer. 🙂
I don’t know if forging a birth certificate is a felony or not in the US, but clearly no real forger (of anything really) go bragging about it to the four corners. Assuming NRO is not a troll (still a possibility) she is so obviously and transparently lying that it’s clear why no law enforcement agency would ever take her seriously.
I don’t know about the US but an weird thing here has been, with the onset of alzheimer hitting the WWII generation, we’ve had a spat of old folks showing up at police stations confessing (mostly imaginary) crimes or (that’s a doozie) wanting to snitch on Jews to the Nazi occupier.
You have heard of making stuff up right? You do that all the time. Seek help. You’re the one who uses multiple aliases and was arrested for assault
Yeah people often walk in the other direction when a crazy person shouts nonsense at them
Oh no, there was fear in this deputy’s face along with a lot of sweat. I’ve spent decades in blood and gore. I know how to read people quite well. They know. Plus, my name is, or should be, in the records of Humberto Delgado as a witness(Hillsborough County Prison System) in regards to a cop getting killed here in Tampa. Like I told this deputy, and I’ll repeat it here, I gave false evidence on Humberto Delgado (Medellin Cartel member).
I’ve lost track of how many law enforcement officers have been killed this year. I’m sure they know. *tongue in cheek* Killing cops is Ok as long as it’s done, or ordered, by another cop as it was in this case.
Do we have an investigator yet?
You know, one that’s not potentially going off to prison for contempt of court or one that has been rendered obsolete by the new “posse no more” executive order that has reportedly just been signed.
For the record once again, I saw that one coming well over two years ago.
You forget. It passed CIA, FBI inspection for what that’s worth. And, it was co-signed by a Hendry County (FL) deputy. How are they going to explain that?
“Kaleidoscope”
One of your numerous delusions is that you seem to think we believe (or care for) what you say.
Stop. Please, just stop.
Wouldn’t you be happier spending all of your time at Birther Report, in mortal combat with fellow space-time traveler James Smith? Y’know, kind of like the end of that Star Trek episode when “Lazarus” and “Anti-Lazarus” from parallel universes were zapped by Captain Kirk into the corridor between their universes (in order to save both universes), to spend all of eternity at each other’s throats?
Surely, this arrangement sucked for Lazarus and Anti-Lazarus, but for the rest of humanity it was some much-needed peace and quiet.
The con job BirtherReport has shut down. Nobody can get into it.
“This website is temporarily (always) unavailable, please try again later.”
It is a ghost of its former self, but is still accessible. Doc can explain how to resolve the (in)accessibility issues.
I seem to recall that Nancy didn’t feel comfortable making changes to a system file. Murder is, I guess, less traumatic.
I made my first “ripper” kill when I was 8 or 9. I modified my first file when I was age 50 or so. Some things just come easier when you’ve been doing it for so long.
:0)
—
Good grief, I hadn’t heard about that.
For example lying and making up fictional stories
It’s no fiction.The last time Nancy did a killer rip was after an extended visit to a Korean restaurant. When she let one rip, dogs howled, babies cried, and her husband exclaimed, “For God’s sake, Nancy, next time go easy on the kim chee!”
If I ever get to the point of only being able to relive my childhood I know they will be mostly happy memories. So very sorry for these folks of whom you speak.